SuicideNCT05021224
Engaging Suicidal Patients in Mental Health Treatment
A study testing Caring Contacts, Reminders and Informational Poster in people with Suicide and Depression, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators will identify characteristics of suicidal patients who do or do not attend a first mental health visit following referral using administrative data. Then, the investigators will apply established approaches to contextual inquiry to identify barriers and facilitators to mental health treatment… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Suicide, Depression, Mental Health Impairment
- What is being tested?
- Caring Contacts, Reminders and Informational Poster
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Mar 2022to 12 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years and older
- Elevated suicidal ideation per item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ item score ≥ 1) completed during a primary care visit
- Able to read and understand English
Who cannot join
- Current psychotic episode requiring emergency services and/or precluding ability to provide informed consent
- Documented diagnosis of dementia in the past 2 years. The rationale for this criteria is that these individuals may have difficulty understanding the study information provided to them, including how to opt out of the study
- No patients will be excluded on the basis of sex, race, or ethnicity
- Primary care provider notes that participation is not indicated
- Already received a study engagement strategy following a different primary care visit.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
About this study
Official title: Leveraging Behavioral Economics and Implementation Science to Engage Suicidal Patients in Mental Health Treatment
The investigators will identify characteristics of suicidal patients who do or do not attend a first mental health visit following referral using administrative data. Then, the investigators will apply established approaches to contextual inquiry to identify barriers and facilitators to mental health treatment attendance for individuals at risk of suicide. Using established procedures from implementation science and behavioral economics, the investigators will then leverage the insights gleaned from Aims 1 and 2, relevant theories and frameworks, and the extant literature to develop preliminary strategies to support attendance at first mental health visit. Strategies will be developed in collaboration with a team of experts in suicide, implementation science, and behavioral economics. These preliminary strategies will then be iteratively tested and refined. The investigators also will assess putative mechanism using behavioral tasks and self-report tools.
Read the detailed description
In 2017, there were more than 800,000 deaths by suicide worldwide. Patients at high risk for suicide are less likely to die by suicide if they engage in psychotherapy. However, despite the development of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for suicide prevention, rates of suicide in the U.S. have increased by approximately 30% over the past two decades. One way to lower these rates would be to increase treatment initiation among those at risk. Suicidal individuals have difficulty engaging in mental health services, yet no studies have systematically developed and tested strategies to increase treatment initiation for suicidal patients.
Nearly two-thirds of people who die by suicide interact with a primary care clinician in the year prior to death, making primary care an optimal setting in which to identify individuals at risk for suicide and connect them to mental health care. Yet only half of those referred by primary care providers attend an initial mental health visit, even when referred to care within the same practice. Various strategies to increase attendance at first appointment, including reminder calls and texts, motivational and informational interventions, and case management, have demonstrated small to moderate effects. Even when these strategies are implemented, approximately 40% of patients do not initiate treatment, suggesting that additional work is needed.
The primary objective of this study is to develop acceptable, feasible, low-cost, and effective strategies that increase patients' treatment initiation (i.e., attendance at a first mental health visit) following identification of suicide risk in primary care. The investigators will partner with a large, diverse health system to rapidly prototype and test promising strategies to achieve this objective. Rapid prototyping involves a series of rigorous tests to optimize operations in the early-study stages. Industries outside of health care commonly use this approach to learn quickly and "de-risk" decision-making on a short timeline prior to a large roll-out. To maximize generalizability, the investigators will use rapid prototyping to develop strategies for increasing attendance in both collaborative care and outpatient specialty mental health. The strategies the investigators develop and test will be informed by behavioral economics and implementation science methods, leveraging the University of Pennsylvania's P50 ALACRITY center. In accordance with an experimental medicine approach to behavior change, the investigators will also identify and target mechanisms of action that impede treatment attendance. The specific aims are to:
Aim 1. Identify characteristics of suicidal patients who do or do not attend a first mental health visit following referral. The sample will include adults 18 years and older, including Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial insurance enrollees, who are referred for mental health services after an initial screening in primary care identified suicidal ideation. Using medical records, the investigators will compare characteristics of patients who initiate treatment to those patients who do not. When possible, the investigators will utilize insurance claims data to identify any mental health services utilization that occurred outside the health system. The investigators also will explore data from patients who report suicidal ideation in primary care and are not referred to mental health services.
Aim 2. Apply established approaches to contextual inquiry to identify barriers and facilitators to mental health treatment attendance for individuals at risk of suicide. The investigators will use direct observation and brief interviews with key stakeholders, including leaders (n = 12), primary care providers (n = 12), behavioral health providers (n = 12), mental health intake coordinators (n = 5), and patients who do (n = 12) and do not (n = 12) attend a first mental health visit following referral from primary care to understand key structural and behavioral barriers, facilitators, and mechanisms to engaging patients at risk for suicide in mental health services. The investigators also will use behavioral tasks and self-report measures to assess putative mechanisms of action in patient stakeholders.
Aim 3. Rapidly prototype and test strategies to optimize engagement. Using established procedures from implementation science and behavioral economics, the investigators will leverage the insights gleaned from Aims 1 and 2, relevant theories and frameworks (e.g., EAST, Science of Behavior Change), and the extant literature to develop preliminary strategies to support attendance at first mental health visit. Based on the literature and their previous work, the investigators anticipate that strategies that target temporal discounting (e.g., incentives) and foster perceived social support (e.g., Caring Contacts) will be needed. Strategies will be developed in collaboration with a team of experts in suicide, implementation science, and behavioral economics. The investigators will then iteratively test and refine these preliminary strategies. Throughout this process, the investigators expect to uncover additional barriers and facilitators that will allow us to further refine and optimize implementation strategies. The investigators will assess putative mechanism using behavioral tasks and self-report tools.
The primary output will be a menu of promising and feasible implementation strategies that directly address barriers to the initiation of mental health services for patients at risk of suicide. These strategies will be tested in a subsequent multisite R01. The long-term goal is to reduce deaths by suicide by increasing engagement in evidence-based mental health services for individuals at risk of suicide.
- Conditions
- Suicide, Depression, Mental Health Impairment, Suicidal Ideation, Suicidal
- Being tested
- Caring Contacts, Reminders, Informational Poster, Motivational Interviewing
- Medical subject headings
- Suicide, Depression, Suicidal Ideation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Caring ContactsBehavioural
Non-demanding message sent from the care team
RemindersBehavioural
Appointment reminders sent electronically
Informational PosterBehavioural
An informational poster linking to an infographic
Motivational InterviewingBehavioural
Motivational interviewing training for intake coordinators
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Caring Contacts | Active comparator | Non-demanding message sent from the care team Receives: Behavioral: Caring Contacts |
| Reminders | Active comparator | Appointment reminders sent electronically Receives: Behavioral: Reminders |
| Informational Poster | Active comparator | An informational poster linking to an infographic Receives: Behavioral: Informational Poster |
| Motivational Interviewing | Active comparator | Motivational interviewing training for intake coordinators Receives: Behavioral: Motivational Interviewing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
A reliable and valid 4-item tool to assess perceptions of the acceptability of engagement strategies. Each item is rated using a 5-point ordinal response options, ranging from 1= "completely disagree" to 5="completely agree" and scores are averaged across the four items to yield a mean scale score. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
Measured: 6 months
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
A reliable and valid 4-item tool to assess perceptions of the appropriateness of engagement strategies to the context. Each item is rated using a 5-point ordinal response options, ranging from 1= "completely disagree" to 5="completely agree" and scores are averaged across the four items to yield a mean scale score. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Measured: 6 months
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
A reliable and valid 4-item tool to assess perceptions of the feasibility of engagement strategies. Each item is rated using a 5-point ordinal response options, ranging from 1= "completely disagree" to 5="completely agree" and scores are averaged across the four items to yield a mean scale score. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Measured: 6 months
Attendance at First Mental Health Visit
Derived from the electronic health record, defined as patient did or did not attend first mental health visit following referral.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Aug 2021
- Study start7 Mar 2022
- Primary completion12 Jan 2024
- Study completion12 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SuicideStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PennsylvaniaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pennsylvania
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Courtney Benjamin Wolk, PhD, Principal investigator, University of PennsylvaniaShari Jager-Hyman, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Pennsylvania
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05021224
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 829538
- Other IDs
- 5R21MH123851
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 8 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: All study personnel will have Patient Oriented Research certification from the University of Pennsylvania. Interview personnel meeting with primary care providers, behavioral health providers, leaders, and patients will hold a Bachelor's, Master's or doctorate degree. The PI will oversee the additional training and ongoing review of interviewers. Interviewers must display research reliability in collecting data and will work under the close supervision of the PI.
Publications
Wolk CB, Duresso B, Weiss SE, Khazanov GK, Candon M, Oslin DW, Patel E, Press MJ, Buttenheim A, Anderson E, Pieri M, Jager-Hyman S. Evaluating the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of treatment engagement strategies for primary care patients at risk for suicide: a pilot study. Front Psychiatry. 2026 Aug 5;17:1897475. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1897475. eCollection 2026.
PubMed 42621426Wolk CB, Pieri M, Weiss SE, Harrison J, Khazanov GK, Candon M, Oslin DW, Press MJ, Anderson E, Famiglio E, Buttenheim A, Jager-Hyman S. Engaging primary care patients at risk for suicide in mental health treatment: user insights to inform implementation strategy design. BMC Prim Care. 2024 Oct 16;25(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02616-w.
PubMed 39415093Khazanov GK, Jager-Hyman S, Harrison J, Candon M, Buttenheim A, Pieri MF, Oslin DW, Wolk CB. Leveraging behavioral economics and implementation science to engage patients at risk for suicide in mental health treatment: a pilot study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Aug 13;8(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01131-y.
PubMed 35964151
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Leveraging Behavioral Economics and Implementation Science to Engage Suicidal Patients in Mental Health Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05021224
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 829538
- Conditions
- Suicide, Depression, Mental Health Impairment, Suicidal Ideation, Suicidal
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PennsylvaniaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
- Study start
- 7 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 8 Jun 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators will identify characteristics of suicidal patients who do or do not attend a first mental health visit following referral using administrative data. Then, the investigators will apply established approaches to contextual inquiry to identify barriers and facilitators to mental health treatment attendance for individuals at risk of suicide. Using established procedures from implementation science and behavioral economics, the investigators will then leverage the insights gleaned from Aims 1 and 2, relevant theories and frameworks, and the extant literature to develop preliminary strategies to support attendance at first mental health visit. Strategies will be developed in collaboration with a team of experts in suicide, implementation science, and behavioral economics. These preliminary strategies will then be iteratively tested and refined. The investigators also will assess putative mechanism using behavioral tasks and self-report tools.
Detailed description
In 2017, there were more than 800,000 deaths by suicide worldwide. Patients at high risk for suicide are less likely to die by suicide if they engage in psychotherapy. However, despite the development of evidence-based practices (EBPs) for suicide prevention, rates of suicide in the U.S. have increased by approximately 30% over the past two decades. One way to lower these rates would be to increase treatment initiation among those at risk. Suicidal individuals have difficulty engaging in mental health services, yet no studies have systematically developed and tested strategies to increase treatment initiation for suicidal patients.
Nearly two-thirds of people who die by suicide interact with a primary care clinician in the year prior to death, making primary care an optimal setting in which to identify individuals at risk for suicide and connect them to mental health care. Yet only half of those referred by primary care providers attend an initial mental health visit, even when referred to care within the same practice. Various strategies to increase attendance at first appointment, including reminder calls and texts, motivational and informational interventions, and case management, have demonstrated small to moderate effects. Even when these strategies are implemented, approximately 40% of patients do not initiate treatment, suggesting that additional work is needed.
The primary objective of this study is to develop acceptable, feasible, low-cost, and effective strategies that increase patients' treatment initiation (i.e., attendance at a first mental health visit) following identification of suicide risk in primary care. The investigators will partner with a large, diverse health system to rapidly prototype and test promising strategies to achieve this objective. Rapid prototyping involves a series of rigorous tests to optimize operations in the early-study stages. Industries outside of health care commonly use this approach to learn quickly and "de-risk" decision-making on a short timeline prior to a large roll-out. To maximize generalizability, the investigators will use rapid prototyping to develop strategies for increasing attendance in both collaborative care and outpatient specialty mental health. The strategies the investigators develop and test will be informed by behavioral economics and implementation science methods, leveraging the University of Pennsylvania's P50 ALACRITY center. In accordance with an experimental medicine approach to behavior change, the investigators will also identify and target mechanisms of action that impede treatment attendance. The specific aims are to:
Aim 1. Identify characteristics of suicidal patients who do or do not attend a first mental health visit following referral. The sample will include adults 18 years and older, including Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial insurance enrollees, who are referred for mental health services after an initial screening in primary care identified suicidal ideation. Using medical records, the investigators will compare characteristics of patients who initiate treatment to those patients who do not. When possible, the investigators will utilize insurance claims data to identify any mental health services utilization that occurred outside the health system. The investigators also will explore data from patients who report suicidal ideation in primary care and are not referred to mental health services.
Aim 2. Apply established approaches to contextual inquiry to identify barriers and facilitators to mental health treatment attendance for individuals at risk of suicide. The investigators will use direct observation and brief interviews with key stakeholders, including leaders (n = 12), primary care providers (n = 12), behavioral health providers (n = 12), mental health intake coordinators (n = 5), and patients who do (n = 12) and do not (n = 12) attend a first mental health visit following referral from primary care to understand key structural and behavioral barriers, facilitators, and mechanisms to engaging patients at risk for suicide in mental health services. The investigators also will use behavioral tasks and self-report measures to assess putative mechanisms of action in patient stakeholders.
Aim 3. Rapidly prototype and test strategies to optimize engagement. Using established procedures from implementation science and behavioral economics, the investigators will leverage the insights gleaned from Aims 1 and 2, relevant theories and frameworks (e.g., EAST, Science of Behavior Change), and the extant literature to develop preliminary strategies to support attendance at first mental health visit. Based on the literature and their previous work, the investigators anticipate that strategies that target temporal discounting (e.g., incentives) and foster perceived social support (e.g., Caring Contacts) will be needed. Strategies will be developed in collaboration with a team of experts in suicide, implementation science, and behavioral economics. The investigators will then iteratively test and refine these preliminary strategies. Throughout this process, the investigators expect to uncover additional barriers and facilitators that will allow us to further refine and optimize implementation strategies. The investigators will assess putative mechanism using behavioral tasks and self-report tools.
The primary output will be a menu of promising and feasible implementation strategies that directly address barriers to the initiation of mental health services for patients at risk of suicide. These strategies will be tested in a subsequent multisite R01. The long-term goal is to reduce deaths by suicide by increasing engagement in evidence-based mental health services for individuals at risk of suicide.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Caring Contacts | Active comparator | Behavioral: Caring ContactsNon-demanding message sent from the care team |
| Reminders | Active comparator | Behavioral: RemindersAppointment reminders sent electronically |
| Informational Poster | Active comparator | Behavioral: Informational PosterAn informational poster linking to an infographic |
| Motivational Interviewing | Active comparator | Behavioral: Motivational InterviewingMotivational interviewing training for intake coordinators |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 18 years and older
- Elevated suicidal ideation per item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ item score ≥ 1) completed during a primary care visit
- Able to read and understand English
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Current psychotic episode requiring emergency services and/or precluding ability to provide informed consent
- Documented diagnosis of dementia in the past 2 years. The rationale for this criteria is that these individuals may have difficulty understanding the study information provided to them, including how to opt out of the study
- No patients will be excluded on the basis of sex, race, or ethnicity
- Primary care provider notes that participation is not indicated
- Already received a study engagement strategy following a different primary care visit.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Caring ContactsNon-demanding message sent from the care team | Behavioural | Caring Contacts |
| RemindersAppointment reminders sent electronically | Behavioural | Reminders |
| Informational PosterAn informational poster linking to an infographic | Behavioural | Informational Poster |
| Motivational InterviewingMotivational interviewing training for intake coordinators | Behavioural | Motivational Interviewing |
Primary outcome
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Time frame: 6 months
A reliable and valid 4-item tool to assess perceptions of the acceptability of engagement strategies. Each item is rated using a 5-point ordinal response options, ranging from 1= "completely disagree" to 5="completely agree" and scores are averaged across the four items to yield a mean scale score. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Time frame: 6 months
A reliable and valid 4-item tool to assess perceptions of the appropriateness of engagement strategies to the context. Each item is rated using a 5-point ordinal response options, ranging from 1= "completely disagree" to 5="completely agree" and scores are averaged across the four items to yield a mean scale score. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Time frame: 6 months
A reliable and valid 4-item tool to assess perceptions of the feasibility of engagement strategies. Each item is rated using a 5-point ordinal response options, ranging from 1= "completely disagree" to 5="completely agree" and scores are averaged across the four items to yield a mean scale score. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Attendance at First Mental Health Visit
Time frame: 6 months
Derived from the electronic health record, defined as patient did or did not attend first mental health visit following referral.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jun 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42621426Wolk CB, Duresso B, Weiss SE, Khazanov GK, Candon M, Oslin DW, Patel E, Press MJ, Buttenheim A, Anderson E, Pieri M, Jager-Hyman S. Evaluating the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of treatment engagement strategies for primary care patients at risk for suicide: a pilot study. Front Psychiatry. 2026 Aug 5;17:1897475. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1897475. eCollection 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39415093Wolk CB, Pieri M, Weiss SE, Harrison J, Khazanov GK, Candon M, Oslin DW, Press MJ, Anderson E, Famiglio E, Buttenheim A, Jager-Hyman S. Engaging primary care patients at risk for suicide in mental health treatment: user insights to inform implementation strategy design. BMC Prim Care. 2024 Oct 16;25(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02616-w.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35964151Khazanov GK, Jager-Hyman S, Harrison J, Candon M, Buttenheim A, Pieri MF, Oslin DW, Wolk CB. Leveraging behavioral economics and implementation science to engage patients at risk for suicide in mental health treatment: a pilot study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Aug 13;8(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01131-y.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. All study personnel will have Patient Oriented Research certification from the University of Pennsylvania. Interview personnel meeting with primary care providers, behavioral health providers, leaders, and patients will hold a Bachelor's, Master's or doctorate degree. The PI will oversee the additional training and ongoing review of interviewers. Interviewers must display research reliability in collecting data and will work under the close supervision of the PI.
Related trials for Suicide
Not yet recruiting
A Pre-post Study of a Lethal Means Safety Planning Intervention for Youth at Elevated Suicide Risk in the Emergency Department
Suicidal Ideas, Suicidal Ideation
RecruitingObservational study
Student Precarity and Psychiatry
Depressive Disorder, Major, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Not yet recruiting
SERENE Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Cognitive Control
Suicidal Ideation, Cognitive Control
Not yet recruiting
A MRT to Optimize a JITAI for Alcohol Craving and Suicide Ideation
Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), Suicide Ideation
Enrolling by invitation
Pilot Study of a Modified Safety Planning Intervention for Elementary School-Aged Children - Main Study
Suicidal Ideation, Suicidal Behaviors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Courtney Benjamin Wolk, PhD principal investigator
University of Pennsylvania
Shari Jager-Hyman, PhD principal investigator
University of Pennsylvania
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Caring Contacts, Reminders and Informational Poster in people with Suicide and Depression, run by University of Pennsylvania at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05021224, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2025.