Post Intensive Care Unit SyndromeIMPROVENCT05182086
Improving Recovery After Critical Illness
A study testing Group physical therapy and dietary improvements in people with Post Intensive Care Unit Syndrome and Critical Illness, run by Frisius Medisch Centrum at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Rationale: Survival rates of patients with critical illness have increased due to improved facilities and treatment methods in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, surviving critical illness does not mean these patients are cured. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Post Intensive Care Unit Syndrome, Critical Illness, Malnutrition
- What is being tested?
- Group physical therapy and dietary improvements
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2021to Mar 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Allergy to components of ProSource® (Allergy information: gluten-free, lactose-free, NOT cow's milk free (wey-protein), produced in a factory in which soy, wheat and nuts are processed.
- Inability to understand the Dutch language
- Actively participating in a professional physical rehabilitation program during the study period.
- Note: previous participation in a concluded rehabilitation program is NOT an exclusion criterion.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Netherlands1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Medical Centre Leeuwarden
Leeuwarden, 8934AD
Lise Beumeler, lise.beumeler@mcl.nl
About this study
Official title: IMPROVE: Evaluation of a Combined Lifestyle Intervention Program to Improve Quality of Life in Long-term ICU-survivors
Rationale: Survival rates of patients with critical illness have increased due to improved facilities and treatment methods in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, surviving critical illness does not mean these patients are cured. In general, ICU-admission is associated with decreased physical performance and perceived physical health, impaired mental health and quality of life (QoL), reflecting in an impaired long-term recovery. Long-term health problems can partly be contributed to prolonged muscle weakness and malnutrition. Improving physical performance and perceived physical health may play a key role in boosting recovery after ICU-admission. Mono-interventions focusing on improving physical performance or nutritional intake have limited effect on long term functioning and QoL. A lifestyle intervention encompassing physical therapy and optimisation of caloric and protein intake may improve wellbeing and QoL in these patients. Previous studies found that interventions focused on mobilization and physical rehabilitation are feasible within the ICU and outpatient programs. Additionally, promising results were found in personalized healthcare and lifestyle programs for other patient groups with long-term health problems, such as cancer survivors and patients with diabetes or mental health problems. Based on this, the investigators hypothesized that a lifestyle intervention program may improve wellbeing and quality of life in long-term ICU-survivors.
Objective: Evaluation of the effects of a integrative lifestyle intervention program on physical performance and perceived physical health, mental health and health related quality of life after ICU-admission.
Read more
Study design: Randomised controlled trial Study population: Long-term ICU patients (length of stay ICU ≥48h) Intervention: The intervention group will be part of a 12-week combined lifestyle intervention encompassing group physical therapy twice a week and improvement of dietary caloric and protein intake by means of nutritional advice and, if applicable, caloric and/or protein supplementation. The control group will be subject to follow up meetings with research staff to assess physical and mental health and quality of life.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Physical functioning (RAND-36 subscale-score) at the end of the 12 week intervention period.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: All participants have two additional appointments where they participate in an interview and perform physical tests (bioimpedance measurements, ultrasound of the upper thigh muscles, hand grip strength test, Morton mobility index test, and the six-minute walking test with pulse oximetry). At baseline and week 12 of the program, all participants complete a combination of questionnaires on mental health and quality of life. The intervention group will additionally be subject to supervised group training sessions twice a week for the duration of the intervention (12 weeks). Further, two meetings with a professional about their diet will be organised. If a patient has a deficit in caloric and/or protein intake, dietary supplements with daily intake instructions will be provided. The risks and disadvantages of this intervention are minimal. However, this study requires considerable time investment and physical and mental effort. The extent of this study is crucial to clarify the effect of a combined intervention program on recovery after critical illness.
Read the detailed description
Survival rates of critical illness have increased due to improved facilities and treatment methods in intensive care units. However, surviving critical illness does not automatically mean these patients are cured. In the past, the patients' survival was the measure of success in the treatment of critical illness. Over the past decades, the focus has been shifting towards the quality of life and care needs of these patients after critical illness. Survivors of critical illness frequently suffer from reduced quality of life. Health problems in the recovery period of survivors may predominantly be provoked by the physical consequences of longterm ICU-admission. The physical consequences of critical illness are mostly associated with skeletal muscle wasting during critical illness. This results in a decrease of muscle density up to two percent per day. Some long term physical health problems associated with this phenomenon are fatigue, neuropathy, neuromuscular dysfunction, and changes in bone mineral density. With regards to the long term psychosocial problems in survivors of critical illness there have been reports of short and long-term anxiety, depression and/or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Further, during and after critical illness, patients may experience delirium and cognitive impairments. In conclusion, survivors of critical illness suffer from long term physical and mental health problems, reflecting in a reduced HRQoL.
Critical illness survivorship is a relatively new and unknown area in research and medical health care. The term post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) has been used to describe the complex aetiology of health deficits following critical illness. A recent Dutch study (the MONITOR-IC-study) with a population of 1729 ICU-patients found that an overwhelming 70 percent of ICU-patients suffer from some form of PICS one year after discharge. Data collected from the specialized post-ICU clinic of the Medical Centre Leeuwarden (MCL) illustrated that 44% of 250 patients that visited this clinic between 2012 and 2018 were unable to sufficiently recover in physical functioning one year after ICU-discharge. Unfortunately, adequate and efficient aftercare programs for ICU survivors are still lacking and patients regularly feel abandoned and insecure after discharge. Personalised healthcare and lifestyle interventions may fulfil this discontinuity in care and improve physical performance and perceived physical health in ICU-patients, followed by improvements in mental wellbeing and HRQoL. Little is known on the effects of optimizing lifestyle on longterm recovery of these patients. Promising results were found in personalised healthcare and lifestyle programs for other patient groups with long-term health problems, such as cancer survivors and patients with diabetes or mental health problems. A Cochrane review showed several exercise rehabilitation programs after ICU-discharge to be feasible, but lacking in overall effect on functional exercise capacity, or on health-related quality of life. This paucity of effect on patient-centred outcomes may be due to inconsistencies in study protocol. However, a lack of adequate nutritional support might be an equally important pitfall. ICU-survivors may experience a number of problems that can hinder their nutritional intake, including lack of appetite, problems with taste and smell perception, and swallowing issues. Recent data from a study on post-ICU nutritional intake showed that of 12 included patients, the majority did not meet their daily caloric and protein intake. Data on nutritional intake after hospital discharge is lacking, but it is likely that patients are unable to achieve these goals without professional support.
Based on this, the investigators hypothesized that, complementary to the standard post-ICU care, a combined lifestyle intervention focussed on exercise and nutritional therapy may improve physical performance and perceived physical health alongside with an improved mental wellbeing and quality of life in long-term ICU-survivors.
- Being tested
- Group physical therapy and dietary improvements
- Medical subject headings
- Critical Illness, Malnutrition, Muscle Weakness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Group physical therapy and dietary improvementsOther
20 patients allocated to intervention group. During 12 weeks, patients will participate in a combined lifestyle intervention, including a one-hour physical therapist guided exercise group twice a week and consultation by a nutritional scientist. In case of inadequate intake, dietary supplements will be provided.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Patients that are allocated to the intervention group will participate in a 12 week lifestyle intervention program consisting of group exercise therapy and dietary advice combined with dietary supplementation. The group exercise therapy will be guided by trained physical therapists. Patients will participate in this part of the intervention twice a week for one hour. The exercise therapy will combine cardiorespiratory with strength training. At the start of the intervention, patients will have an appointment with a nutritional scientist or doctor in which they will receive dietary advise and dietary supplements (ProSource®) to reach the advised caloric and protein intake as composed by the Dutch Centre for Nutrition (Voedingscentrum). Dietary supplements like ProSource® are extensively tested and often used as part of general practice to patients after ICU- or hospital-discharge following critical illness. Receives: Other: Group physical therapy and dietary improvements |
| Standard care | No intervention | Standard care outpatient post-ICU clinic |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Physical functioning
Physical functioning (subscale score) measured with the Dutch 36-Item Short Form health Survey/Research and Development-36 (RAND-36) questionnaire (0-100; higher is better)
Measured: After the 12-week intervention program
Secondary outcomes (11)
Change in hand grip strength
Hand grip strength with hand-held dynamometer (kg; higher is better)
Measured: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in walking distance
Walking distance with the six-minute walking test (m, higher is better)
Measured: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in quadriceps muscle layer thickness
Ultrasound measures of the quadriceps (mm, higher is better)
Measured: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in mobility
Mobility using the morton mobility index (0-100, higher is better)
Measured: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in dietary intake
Dietary intake using food diary
Measured: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in health-related quality of life
Dutch 36-Item Short Form health Survey/Research and Development-36 (RAND-36) questionnaire (0-100; higher is better)
Measured: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in fatigue
Short Fatigue Questionnaire (Verkorte VermoeidheidsVragenlijst) (4-28, higher is worse)
Measured: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in anxiety and depression symptoms
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (0-21; higher is worse)
Measured: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in cognitive functioning
Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ) (0-100; higher is worse)
Measured: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in subjective happiness
Happiness Index (HI) VAS-scale (0-10; higher is better)
Measured: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Phase angle
Bioimpedence measurements
Measured: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jan 2022
- Study start1 Sep 2021
- Primary completionDec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Post Intensive Care Unit SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Frisius Medisch Centrum
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, E.C. Boerma, Frisius Medisch Centrum
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05182086
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RTPO 1103
- Acronym
- IMPROVE
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2021
- Last updated
- 18 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Christiaanse PMR, van Zutphen T, Bolding HA, van der Werf RAM, Stellingwerf F, de Jager CM, Buter H, Boerma EC, Beumeler LFE. Effects of a Combined Lifestyle Intervention on Recovery of ICU Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Crit Care Med. 2026 Jun 1;54(6):1377-1386. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000007095. Epub 2026 Mar 16.
PubMed 41870216
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- IMPROVE: Evaluation of a Combined Lifestyle Intervention Program to Improve Quality of Life in Long-term ICU-survivors
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05182086
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IMPROVE / RTPO 1103
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Frisius Medisch CentrumUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rationale: Survival rates of patients with critical illness have increased due to improved facilities and treatment methods in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, surviving critical illness does not mean these patients are cured. In general, ICU-admission is associated with decreased physical performance and perceived physical health, impaired mental health and quality of life (QoL), reflecting in an impaired long-term recovery. Long-term health problems can partly be contributed to prolonged muscle weakness and malnutrition. Improving physical performance and perceived physical health may play a key role in boosting recovery after ICU-admission. Mono-interventions focusing on improving physical performance or nutritional intake have limited effect on long term functioning and QoL. A lifestyle intervention encompassing physical therapy and optimisation of caloric and protein intake may improve wellbeing and QoL in these patients. Previous studies found that interventions focused on mobilization and physical rehabilitation are feasible within the ICU and outpatient programs. Additionally, promising results were found in personalized healthcare and lifestyle programs for other patient groups with long-term health problems, such as cancer survivors and patients with diabetes or mental health problems. Based on this, the investigators hypothesized that a lifestyle intervention program may improve wellbeing and quality of life in long-term ICU-survivors.
Objective: Evaluation of the effects of a integrative lifestyle intervention program on physical performance and perceived physical health, mental health and health related quality of life after ICU-admission.
Study design: Randomised controlled trial Study population: Long-term ICU patients (length of stay ICU ≥48h) Intervention: The intervention group will be part of a 12-week combined lifestyle intervention encompassing group physical therapy twice a week and improvement of dietary caloric and protein intake by means of nutritional advice and, if applicable, caloric and/or protein supplementation. The control group will be subject to follow up meetings with research staff to assess physical and mental health and quality of life.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Physical functioning (RAND-36 subscale-score) at the end of the 12 week intervention period.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: All participants have two additional appointments where they participate in an interview and perform physical tests (bioimpedance measurements, ultrasound of the upper thigh muscles, hand grip strength test, Morton mobility index test, and the six-minute walking test with pulse oximetry). At baseline and week 12 of the program, all participants complete a combination of questionnaires on mental health and quality of life. The intervention group will additionally be subject to supervised group training sessions twice a week for the duration of the intervention (12 weeks). Further, two meetings with a professional about their diet will be organised. If a patient has a deficit in caloric and/or protein intake, dietary supplements with daily intake instructions will be provided. The risks and disadvantages of this intervention are minimal. However, this study requires considerable time investment and physical and mental effort. The extent of this study is crucial to clarify the effect of a combined intervention program on recovery after critical illness.
Detailed description
Survival rates of critical illness have increased due to improved facilities and treatment methods in intensive care units. However, surviving critical illness does not automatically mean these patients are cured. In the past, the patients' survival was the measure of success in the treatment of critical illness. Over the past decades, the focus has been shifting towards the quality of life and care needs of these patients after critical illness. Survivors of critical illness frequently suffer from reduced quality of life. Health problems in the recovery period of survivors may predominantly be provoked by the physical consequences of longterm ICU-admission. The physical consequences of critical illness are mostly associated with skeletal muscle wasting during critical illness. This results in a decrease of muscle density up to two percent per day. Some long term physical health problems associated with this phenomenon are fatigue, neuropathy, neuromuscular dysfunction, and changes in bone mineral density. With regards to the long term psychosocial problems in survivors of critical illness there have been reports of short and long-term anxiety, depression and/or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Further, during and after critical illness, patients may experience delirium and cognitive impairments. In conclusion, survivors of critical illness suffer from long term physical and mental health problems, reflecting in a reduced HRQoL.
Critical illness survivorship is a relatively new and unknown area in research and medical health care. The term post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) has been used to describe the complex aetiology of health deficits following critical illness. A recent Dutch study (the MONITOR-IC-study) with a population of 1729 ICU-patients found that an overwhelming 70 percent of ICU-patients suffer from some form of PICS one year after discharge. Data collected from the specialized post-ICU clinic of the Medical Centre Leeuwarden (MCL) illustrated that 44% of 250 patients that visited this clinic between 2012 and 2018 were unable to sufficiently recover in physical functioning one year after ICU-discharge. Unfortunately, adequate and efficient aftercare programs for ICU survivors are still lacking and patients regularly feel abandoned and insecure after discharge. Personalised healthcare and lifestyle interventions may fulfil this discontinuity in care and improve physical performance and perceived physical health in ICU-patients, followed by improvements in mental wellbeing and HRQoL. Little is known on the effects of optimizing lifestyle on longterm recovery of these patients. Promising results were found in personalised healthcare and lifestyle programs for other patient groups with long-term health problems, such as cancer survivors and patients with diabetes or mental health problems. A Cochrane review showed several exercise rehabilitation programs after ICU-discharge to be feasible, but lacking in overall effect on functional exercise capacity, or on health-related quality of life. This paucity of effect on patient-centred outcomes may be due to inconsistencies in study protocol. However, a lack of adequate nutritional support might be an equally important pitfall. ICU-survivors may experience a number of problems that can hinder their nutritional intake, including lack of appetite, problems with taste and smell perception, and swallowing issues. Recent data from a study on post-ICU nutritional intake showed that of 12 included patients, the majority did not meet their daily caloric and protein intake. Data on nutritional intake after hospital discharge is lacking, but it is likely that patients are unable to achieve these goals without professional support.
Based on this, the investigators hypothesized that, complementary to the standard post-ICU care, a combined lifestyle intervention focussed on exercise and nutritional therapy may improve physical performance and perceived physical health alongside with an improved mental wellbeing and quality of life in long-term ICU-survivors.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Other: Group physical therapy and dietary improvementsPatients that are allocated to the intervention group will participate in a 12 week lifestyle intervention program consisting of group exercise therapy and dietary advice combined with dietary supplementation. The group exercise therapy will be guided by trained physical therapists. Patients will participate in this part of the intervention twice a week for one hour. The exercise therapy will combine cardiorespiratory with strength training. At the start of the intervention, patients will have an appointment with a nutritional scientist or doctor in which they will receive dietary advise and dietary supplements (ProSource®) to reach the advised caloric and protein intake as composed by the Dutch Centre for Nutrition (Voedingscentrum). Dietary supplements like ProSource® are extensively tested and often used as part of general practice to patients after ICU- or hospital-discharge following critical illness. |
| Standard care | No intervention | –Standard care outpatient post-ICU clinic |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Allergy to components of ProSource® (Allergy information: gluten-free, lactose-free, NOT cow's milk free (wey-protein), produced in a factory in which soy, wheat and nuts are processed.
- Inability to understand the Dutch language
- Actively participating in a professional physical rehabilitation program during the study period.
- Note: previous participation in a concluded rehabilitation program is NOT an exclusion criterion.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Group physical therapy and dietary improvements20 patients allocated to intervention group. During 12 weeks, patients will participate in a combined lifestyle intervention, including a one-hour physical therapist guided exercise group twice a week and consultation by a nutritional scientist. In case of inadequate intake, dietary supplements will be provided. | Other | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Physical functioning
Time frame: After the 12-week intervention program
Physical functioning (subscale score) measured with the Dutch 36-Item Short Form health Survey/Research and Development-36 (RAND-36) questionnaire (0-100; higher is better)
11 secondary outcomes
Change in hand grip strength
Time frame: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in walking distance
Time frame: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in quadriceps muscle layer thickness
Time frame: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in mobility
Time frame: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in dietary intake
Time frame: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in health-related quality of life
Time frame: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in fatigue
Time frame: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in anxiety and depression symptoms
Time frame: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in cognitive functioning
Time frame: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Change in subjective happiness
Time frame: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Phase angle
Time frame: Before and after the 12-week intervention program
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jan 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41870216Christiaanse PMR, van Zutphen T, Bolding HA, van der Werf RAM, Stellingwerf F, de Jager CM, Buter H, Boerma EC, Beumeler LFE. Effects of a Combined Lifestyle Intervention on Recovery of ICU Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Crit Care Med. 2026 Jun 1;54(6):1377-1386. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000007095. Epub 2026 Mar 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Post Intensive Care Unit Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Family-partnered Delirium Prevention, Detection, and Management in the ICU
Delirium, Intensive Care Unit Delirium
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Cumulative Intra-Abdominal Pressure Burden and Acute Kidney Injury After Emergency Abdominal Surgery
Acute Kidney Injury, Intra-Abdominal Hypertension
Not yet recruitingObservational study
PICS-p Longitudinal Cohort Study
Physical Functional Impairment, Cognitive Impairment
Not yet recruiting
Protocol for a Hybrid Implementation-effectiveness Feasibility Study of a Transdisciplinary ICU-to-home Recovery Model
Post ICU Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Post-ICU Syndrome and Social Determinants of Healths
Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Group physical therapy and dietary improvements in people with Post Intensive Care Unit Syndrome and Critical Illness, run by Frisius Medisch Centrum at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Lise Beumeler (058 286 6738, lise.beumeler@mcl.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Physical functioning (time frame: After the 12-week intervention program). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05182086, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2024.