AzTrials
AzTrials

Low Back PainLombalgIPNCT05200533

Task-sharing and Shifting Model for Acute Low Back Pain

A study testing Task-sharing and shifting model between family physicians and physiotherapists in people with Low Back Pain, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 6 sites in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: The aging population and the rising prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders increase resort to primary care services. Models of care integrating task sharing and shifting (TS/S) can help face challenge of access to care by strengthening the role of healthcare professionals. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Low Back Pain
What is being tested?
Task-sharing and shifting model between family physicians and physiotherapists
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
195 participants
Where
6 sitesFrance
Study dates
1 Mar 2022to 31 Jan 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients from 20 to 55 years old
  • Suffering from acute low back pain since less than 4 weeks
  • Able to understand and speak French
  • Whose family physician is included in the task-sharing and shifting model (only in the intervention group)

Who cannot join

  • Protected patient according to the public health regulation,
  • Patient unable to fill the survey,
  • Non-availability of the physiotherapist to receive the patient (only in the intervention group)

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

Amelie Kechichian, PhD student contact

+33 (0)698304997

akechichian@chu-grenoble.fr

6 sites in 1 country

France6 sites, 6 recruiting
  • Maison de santé pluriprofessionnelle de Cran Gévrier

    Annecy, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 74960

    Céline Tuttino, medicran74@gmail.com

    Bruno Mas

    Recruiting
  • Maison de santé pluriprofessionnelle des Hauts de Chambéry

    Chambéry, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 73000

    Emilie Fuentes, emilie.f@recoords.fr

    Guillaume Bouchet, Dr

    Recruiting
  • Maison de santé pluriprofessionnelle de Voiron-Sud

    Coublevie, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 38500

    Sabine Pages, sabine.pages@free.fr

    Patrick Lambert, Dr

    Recruiting
  • Maison de santé pluriprofessionnelle de Lans-en-Vercors - Pôle Santé en Vercors

    Lans-en-Vercors, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 38250

    Laetitia Wrona, assistanteencoordination@gmail.com

    Alban Thoret

    Recruiting
  • Maison de santé pluriprofessionnelle de Moirans

    Moirans, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 38430

    Sabine Pages, sabine.pages@free.fr

    Muriel Carlotti, Dr

    Recruiting
  • Pôle de santé interprofessionnel de Saint-Martin d'Hères

    Saint-Martin-d'Hères, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 38400

    Maxime Bertolini, maxime.bertolini@psip-smh.fr

    Laura Vasselier

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Task-sharing and Shifting Model Between Family Physicians and Physiotherapists for Acute Low Back Pain Patients: a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: The aging population and the rising prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders increase resort to primary care services. Models of care integrating task sharing and shifting (TS/S) can help face challenge of access to care by strengthening the role of healthcare professionals. In France, a new TS/S model is being implemented between family physicians (FPs) and physiotherapists (PTs) for acute low back pain (LBP) patients' care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of this new model of care on patient clinical outcomes, healthcare resources use and patient satisfaction.

Design: Pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial

Conditions
Low Back Pain
Being tested
Task-sharing and shifting model between family physicians and physiotherapists, Usual care
Keywords
Task-sharing, Task-shifting, Family physician, Physiotherapist
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Task-sharing and shifting model between family physicians and physiotherapistsOther

    Medical consultations for acute low back pain patients are shifted from family physicians to physiotherapists.

  • Usual careOther

    Medical consultations for acute low back pain patients are performed by family physicians

Study groups in NCT05200533
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Task-sharing and shiftingExperimentalIn the task-sharing and shifting group, family physicians shifted acute low back pain consultations to physiotherapists. Patients with acute low back pain are seen by the physiotherapist instead of family physician. Physiotherapist diagnose acute low back pain, identify red and yellow flags, prescribe sick leave and medications and can refer the patient to additional physical therapy treatment.
Receives: Other: Task-sharing and shifting model between family physicians and physiotherapists
Usual careActive comparatorIn the usual care group, patients with acute low back pain are seen by their family physician.
Receives: Other: Usual care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Effect of the TS/S model on acute low back pain (LBP) patients' disability at 6 weeks

    Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire It is a 24 points scale. The lower score is 0, the higher score is 24. Higher scores mean worse outcomes as the disability level is higher.

    Measured: 6 weeks after the initial consultation

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Effect of the TS/S model on acute LBP patients' disability at 3 months

    Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire It is a 24 points scale. Scores rank form 0 to 24. Higher scores mean worse outcomes as the disability level is higher.

    Measured: 3 months after the initial consultation

  2. Effect of the TS/S model on acute LBP patient's pain at 6 weeks and 3 months

    Brief Pain Inventory It is a 10 points scale. Scores rank from 0 to 10. Higher scores mean worse outcomes, as the pain level is higher.

    Measured: 6 weeks and 3 months after the initial consultation

  3. Effect of the TS/S model on acute LBP patient's psychosocial risk factors at 6 weeks and 3 months

    Start-Back screening tool It is a 9 points scale. Scores rank from 0 to 9. Higher scores mean worse outcomes.

    Measured: 6 weeks and 3 months after the initial consultation

  4. Effect of the TS/S model on acute LBP patient's satisfaction

    Medrisk questionnaire It is a 5 points scale. Scores rank from 0 to 5. Higher scores mean better outcomes;

    Measured: Few minutes after the initial consultation (less than one hour)

  5. Effect of the TS/S model on acute LBP patient's wait time before the initial consultation

    Time (number of days and hours)

    Measured: Initial consultation

  6. Effect of the TS/S model on healthcare resources use

    Initial prescription of sick leave and medications, number of family physician visits, number of physical therapy appointments, number of emergency department visits at 6 weeks and 3 months

    Measured: Initial consultation, 6 weeks and 3 months after the initial consultation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jan 2022
  2. Study start1 Mar 2022
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Cluster randomized controlled trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
195 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05200533
Sponsor's protocol ID
38RC21.0259
Acronym
LombalgIP
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
6 Jan 2022
Last updated
27 Jun 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Babatunde OO, Bishop A, Cottrell E, Jordan JL, Corp N, Humphries K, Hadley-Barrows T, Huntley AL, van der Windt DA. A systematic review and evidence synthesis of non-medical triage, self-referral and direct access services for patients with musculoskeletal pain. PLoS One. 2020 Jul 6;15(7):e0235364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235364. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32628696
  • Demont A, Bourmaud A, Kechichian A, Desmeules F. The impact of direct access physiotherapy compared to primary care physician led usual care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Jun;43(12):1637-1648. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1674388. Epub 2019 Oct 11.

    PubMed 31603709
  • Chiarotto A, Maxwell LJ, Terwee CB, Wells GA, Tugwell P, Ostelo RW. Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index: Which Has Better Measurement Properties for Measuring Physical Functioning in Nonspecific Low Back Pain? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2016 Oct;96(10):1620-1637. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150420. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

    PubMed 27081203
  • Desmeules F, Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Champagne F, Hinse O, Woodhouse LJ. Advanced practice physiotherapy in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jun 21;13:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-107.

    PubMed 22716771
  • Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, Konstantinou K, Main CJ, Mason E, Somerville S, Sowden G, Vohora K, Hay EM. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Oct 29;378(9802):1560-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9. Epub 2011 Sep 28.

    PubMed 21963002
  • Kechichian A, Lafrance S, Matifat E, Dube F, Lussier D, Benhaim P, Perreault K, Filiatrault J, Rainville P, Higgins J, Rousseau J, Masse J, Desmeules F. Multimodal Interventions Including Rehabilitation Exercise for Older Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2022 Jan-Mar 01;45(1):34-49. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000279.

    PubMed 34928239
  • Kechichian A, Desmeules F, Girard P, Terrisse H, Vermorel C, Pinsault N. Physiotherapists as first-contact practitioners for patients with low back pain in French primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):1427. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11814-2.

    PubMed 39558330

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Task-sharing and shifting model between family physicians and physiotherapists in people with Low Back Pain, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 6 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Amelie Kechichian, PhD student (+33 (0)698304997, akechichian@chu-grenoble.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Effect of the TS/S model on acute low back pain (LBP) patients' disability at 6 weeks (time frame: 6 weeks after the initial consultation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05200533, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in