Education, MedicalNCT05201950
Study of Virtual Simulated Resuscitation in Junior Clinicians
A study testing Virtual simulation and Team based in situ simulation in people with Education, Medical, run by National University Hospital, Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.
Trial summary
The investigators seek to examine the impact of virtual patient simulation on junior clinicians' resuscitation skills in an academic emergency department. Exposure to real life resuscitation cases is opportunistic, with variation in case mix across different junior clinicians. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Education, Medical
- What is being tested?
- Virtual simulation and Team based in situ simulation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSingapore
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2022to 10 Feb 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 99 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Junior doctors scheduled to rotate through NUH emergency department for at least 3 months
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women will be excluded from the study as the study procedures do involve additional exposure to fellow healthcare workers, with the associated risk of COVID transmission, while there is no direct benefit in terms of generalisable knowledge about pregnancy or the fetus.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of Virtual Patient Simulation Versus In-situ Simulation for Improving Performance in Trauma and Sepsis Resuscitation in Junior Clinicians in the Emergency Department
The investigators seek to examine the impact of virtual patient simulation on junior clinicians' resuscitation skills in an academic emergency department.
Exposure to real life resuscitation cases is opportunistic, with variation in case mix across different junior clinicians. Junior clinicians are closely supervised during resuscitations, with limited independence to make decisions, for patient safety.
Read more
High fidelity simulation, such as in-situ mock codes with a high fidelity manikin, is resource intensive. Constraints in facilitator and learner time and manpower reduce the feasibility of holding large numbers of simulations for large numbers of learners, leading to limited breadth of case mix exposure in simulation cases.
Virtual patient simulation may allow greater and more uniform breadth of exposure and allow automated feedback and rapid cycle deliberate practiceacross a wide range of cases, with reduced resource intensiveness, and prepare them to better utilise limited opportunities for resuscitation during real life or high fidelity simulation.
Virtual simulators have been found to be useful for improving skills rather than knowledge or attitudes in health professions education. Such skills include communication, radiograph interpretation, dermatological diagnosis, and cardiac arrest procedures.
What is not known is:
- Whether going directly to in-situ simulation with a high fidelity manikin is the best learning approach for resuscitation, given its potentially detrimental high cognitive load, compared to going first to virtual patient simulation.
- Whether the benefits of virtual simulation extend beyond cardiac arrest and to other resuscitation scenarios, such as trauma, sepsis, and others.
The investigators' hypothesis is that in junior clinicians in the emergency department who have received didactic materials in trauma and sepsis resuscitation, proceeding next to learning by virtual patient resuscitation simulation is associated with improved scores in resuscitation performance for trauma and sepsis, as measured by checklists of required actions during observed in-situ simulation with a high-fidelity manikin, compared to proceeding next to learning by team-based in-situ simulation with a high fidelity manikin. This pilot study aims to determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial to test the above hypothesis.
Read the detailed description
Sample size: For a pilot study, a sample size of at 24-50 participants is advisable to be informative regarding population characteristics such as expected means and standard deviation, to facilitate future study, where sample size calculation will target a small standardised effect size of 0.2, where standardised effect size would be the difference in means divided by standard deviation. About 50 junior clinicians are anticipated to rotate through NUH emergency department for at least 3 months in 2022.
Randomisation:
- After informed consent and recruitment, participants will be randomised to virtual simulation versus in-situ simulation groups, through the use of opaque sealed envelopes. The randomisation sequence will be generated by one investigator (A), with block randomisation in varying block sizes, while another investigator (B) will open envelopes to allocate learners to their groups, to maintain allocation concealment.
Interventions:
- Two investigators (C and D) will schedule participants for assigned interventions, namely virtual simulation or team-based in-situ simulation. As team-based in-situ simulation sessions are dispersed across each month, virtual simulation sessions will be matched to in-situ simulation days, to prevent confounding by time from outcome assessment. All interventions will be scheduled after didactic materials for resuscitation have been delivered to learners as part of standard departmental curriculum.
- Virtual simulation group: Participants will log in to the virtual simulation software from home and play 2 cases (1 case of sepsis, 1 case of trauma). Participants are instructed to play each case as many times as personally desired within 70 minutes, to reach the highest score possible in that time. This process is proctored, with participants sharing their screen over video conferencing with two investigators (C and D) to ensure adherence to time limit and cases played.
- Team based in situ simulation group: Faculty observing and debriefing learners at the mock code will be variable and consist of a wide range of NUH emergency department faculty outside of this study, due to logistical constraints in having the same faculty being present consistently in the entire year. The in situ simulation will cover 1 case of sepsis, and 1 case of trauma, with case content matched to the cases in the virtual simulation group, and time matched at 70 minutes.
Outcome assessment:
- Scores obtained based on number of correct actions completed in a timely manner, during simulated resuscitation with a high fidelity manikin around the end of the 3rd month of their posting, as compared to a checklist of required actions derived from expert consensus among NUH emergency department clinicians, and aligned to established international guidelines for resuscitation in sepsis or trauma (e.g. Advanced Trauma Life Support 10th edition).
- Two trained and standardised assistants, playing the roles of one nurse and one doctor, will be present to assist the medical officer, who will take the role of resuscitation team leader.
- Each study participant will be observed and marked on two scenarios: one scenario on major trauma resuscitation, and one scenario on resuscitation of a patient with sepsis. Marking will be performed independently by two investigators (E and F) who will calibrate and standardise their ratings by watching one investigator (A) perform simulated resuscitation at different levels of competence, and using that as a stimulus to calibrate their ratings.
- All assistants and assessors doing marking will be blinded to participant allocation, and will not be involved in team based in situ simulated resuscitation during the study period.
Other data collection:
- Learner demographic data, level of post graduate experience generally and in emergency medicine, and views regarding assigned intervention (i.e. Kirkpatrick level of reaction), will be collected via an online questionnaire.
- The following virtual simulation metrics will be automatically captured: Number of attempts for each unique case, time spent on each attempt, scores obtained during each attempt as marked by a virtual patient simulator
Data analysis:
- Descriptive statistics of the following will be tabulated:
- Baseline characteristics of learners in each group, to determine effectiveness of randomisation
- Learner reaction data, to determine extent of acceptability of virtual patient simulation based on learner perception
- Mean, median, and measures of spread (either standard deviationor interquartile range, depending on whether data is normally distributed) of scores obtained
Analysis for associations:
- Primary outcome: Association between exposure to virtual patient simulation (categorical variable) and marks obtained during observed in-situ resuscitation using a high fidelity manikin (likely to be a continuous variable with normal distribution, and this pilot study would help to determine if that is true), as measured by number of correct actions completed on a checklist derived from local expert consensus, rated by two independent observers (Investigators E and F) with statistical testing using a 2-tailed student t-test. --> Interobserver agreement will be measured using intra class correlation
- The investigators acknowledge that as a pilot, the analyses are unlikely to be adequately powered. Nonetheless, understanding the distribution of marks in each group, including mean/median/measures of variance, would be useful for planning further study.
- Conditions
- Education, Medical
- Being tested
- Virtual simulation, Team based in situ simulation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Virtual simulationOther
Virtual simulation using Full-Code, a virtual simulation software with a bank of emergency medicine cases
Team based in situ simulationOther
In situ simulation, using a high fidelity manikin in the critical care area of the emergency department, with team members consisting of multiple junior doctors and nurses, facilitated by senior emergency medicine doctors and nurses.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual simulation | Experimental | - Virtual simulation group: Participants will log in to the virtual simulation software from home and play 2 cases (1 case of sepsis, 1 case of trauma). Learners are instructed to play each case as many times as they like within 70 minutes, to reach the highest score possible in that time. This process is proctored, with participants sharing their screen over video conferencing with study team members (JCL or LZY) to ensure adherence to time limit and cases played. Receives: Other: Virtual simulation |
| Team based in situ simulation | Active comparator | - Team based in situ simulation group: Faculty observing and debriefing learners at the mock code will be variable and consist of a wide range of NUH emergency department faculty outside of this study, due to logistical constraints in having the same faculty being present consistently in the entire year. The in situ simulation will cover 1 case of sepsis, and 1 case of trauma, with case content matched to the cases in the virtual simulation group, and time matched at 70 minutes. Receives: Other: Team based in situ simulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Score obtained in outcome assessment simulation
Participants will be assessed by 2 independent assessors using a standardised checklist during simulation with a high fidelity manikin and standardised assistants in two scenarios: trauma, and sepsis
Measured: At end of 3rd month of junior clinicians' emergency medicine rotation
Secondary outcomes (1)
Learner satisfaction
Participants report their level of satisfaction with the intervention through an online questionnaire.
Measured: Within one week after completion of assigned intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jan 2022
- Study start1 Jan 2022
- Primary completion2 Dec 2022
- Study completion10 Feb 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Education, MedicalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National University Hospital, SingaporeThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants are assigned to learning through either virtual simulation, or team based in situ simulation, and are not planned to cross over during the study period.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National University Hospital, Singapore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Matthew JW Low, MBBS, Principal investigator, National University Hospital, Singapore
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05201950
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DSRB 2021/00542
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2021
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Low MJW, Chan GWH, Li Z, Koh Y, Jen CL, Lee ZY, Cheng LTW. Comparison of virtual and in-person simulations for sepsis and trauma resuscitation training in Singapore: a randomized controlled trial. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024;21:33. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.33. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
PubMed 39552082
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of Virtual Patient Simulation Versus In-situ Simulation for Improving Performance in Trauma and Sepsis Resuscitation in Junior Clinicians in the Emergency Department
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05201950
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DSRB 2021/00542
- Conditions
- Education, Medical
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National University Hospital, SingaporeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Feb 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators seek to examine the impact of virtual patient simulation on junior clinicians' resuscitation skills in an academic emergency department.
Exposure to real life resuscitation cases is opportunistic, with variation in case mix across different junior clinicians. Junior clinicians are closely supervised during resuscitations, with limited independence to make decisions, for patient safety.
High fidelity simulation, such as in-situ mock codes with a high fidelity manikin, is resource intensive. Constraints in facilitator and learner time and manpower reduce the feasibility of holding large numbers of simulations for large numbers of learners, leading to limited breadth of case mix exposure in simulation cases.
Virtual patient simulation may allow greater and more uniform breadth of exposure and allow automated feedback and rapid cycle deliberate practiceacross a wide range of cases, with reduced resource intensiveness, and prepare them to better utilise limited opportunities for resuscitation during real life or high fidelity simulation.
Virtual simulators have been found to be useful for improving skills rather than knowledge or attitudes in health professions education. Such skills include communication, radiograph interpretation, dermatological diagnosis, and cardiac arrest procedures.
What is not known is:
- Whether going directly to in-situ simulation with a high fidelity manikin is the best learning approach for resuscitation, given its potentially detrimental high cognitive load, compared to going first to virtual patient simulation.
- Whether the benefits of virtual simulation extend beyond cardiac arrest and to other resuscitation scenarios, such as trauma, sepsis, and others.
The investigators' hypothesis is that in junior clinicians in the emergency department who have received didactic materials in trauma and sepsis resuscitation, proceeding next to learning by virtual patient resuscitation simulation is associated with improved scores in resuscitation performance for trauma and sepsis, as measured by checklists of required actions during observed in-situ simulation with a high-fidelity manikin, compared to proceeding next to learning by team-based in-situ simulation with a high fidelity manikin. This pilot study aims to determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial to test the above hypothesis.
Detailed description
Sample size: For a pilot study, a sample size of at 24-50 participants is advisable to be informative regarding population characteristics such as expected means and standard deviation, to facilitate future study, where sample size calculation will target a small standardised effect size of 0.2, where standardised effect size would be the difference in means divided by standard deviation. About 50 junior clinicians are anticipated to rotate through NUH emergency department for at least 3 months in 2022.
Randomisation:
- After informed consent and recruitment, participants will be randomised to virtual simulation versus in-situ simulation groups, through the use of opaque sealed envelopes. The randomisation sequence will be generated by one investigator (A), with block randomisation in varying block sizes, while another investigator (B) will open envelopes to allocate learners to their groups, to maintain allocation concealment.
Interventions:
- Two investigators (C and D) will schedule participants for assigned interventions, namely virtual simulation or team-based in-situ simulation. As team-based in-situ simulation sessions are dispersed across each month, virtual simulation sessions will be matched to in-situ simulation days, to prevent confounding by time from outcome assessment. All interventions will be scheduled after didactic materials for resuscitation have been delivered to learners as part of standard departmental curriculum.
- Virtual simulation group: Participants will log in to the virtual simulation software from home and play 2 cases (1 case of sepsis, 1 case of trauma). Participants are instructed to play each case as many times as personally desired within 70 minutes, to reach the highest score possible in that time. This process is proctored, with participants sharing their screen over video conferencing with two investigators (C and D) to ensure adherence to time limit and cases played.
- Team based in situ simulation group: Faculty observing and debriefing learners at the mock code will be variable and consist of a wide range of NUH emergency department faculty outside of this study, due to logistical constraints in having the same faculty being present consistently in the entire year. The in situ simulation will cover 1 case of sepsis, and 1 case of trauma, with case content matched to the cases in the virtual simulation group, and time matched at 70 minutes.
Outcome assessment:
- Scores obtained based on number of correct actions completed in a timely manner, during simulated resuscitation with a high fidelity manikin around the end of the 3rd month of their posting, as compared to a checklist of required actions derived from expert consensus among NUH emergency department clinicians, and aligned to established international guidelines for resuscitation in sepsis or trauma (e.g. Advanced Trauma Life Support 10th edition).
- Two trained and standardised assistants, playing the roles of one nurse and one doctor, will be present to assist the medical officer, who will take the role of resuscitation team leader.
- Each study participant will be observed and marked on two scenarios: one scenario on major trauma resuscitation, and one scenario on resuscitation of a patient with sepsis. Marking will be performed independently by two investigators (E and F) who will calibrate and standardise their ratings by watching one investigator (A) perform simulated resuscitation at different levels of competence, and using that as a stimulus to calibrate their ratings.
- All assistants and assessors doing marking will be blinded to participant allocation, and will not be involved in team based in situ simulated resuscitation during the study period.
Other data collection:
- Learner demographic data, level of post graduate experience generally and in emergency medicine, and views regarding assigned intervention (i.e. Kirkpatrick level of reaction), will be collected via an online questionnaire.
- The following virtual simulation metrics will be automatically captured: Number of attempts for each unique case, time spent on each attempt, scores obtained during each attempt as marked by a virtual patient simulator
Data analysis:
- Descriptive statistics of the following will be tabulated:
- Baseline characteristics of learners in each group, to determine effectiveness of randomisation
- Learner reaction data, to determine extent of acceptability of virtual patient simulation based on learner perception
- Mean, median, and measures of spread (either standard deviationor interquartile range, depending on whether data is normally distributed) of scores obtained
Analysis for associations:
- Primary outcome: Association between exposure to virtual patient simulation (categorical variable) and marks obtained during observed in-situ resuscitation using a high fidelity manikin (likely to be a continuous variable with normal distribution, and this pilot study would help to determine if that is true), as measured by number of correct actions completed on a checklist derived from local expert consensus, rated by two independent observers (Investigators E and F) with statistical testing using a 2-tailed student t-test. --> Interobserver agreement will be measured using intra class correlation
- The investigators acknowledge that as a pilot, the analyses are unlikely to be adequately powered. Nonetheless, understanding the distribution of marks in each group, including mean/median/measures of variance, would be useful for planning further study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants are assigned to learning through either virtual simulation, or team based in situ simulation, and are not planned to cross over during the study period.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual simulation | Experimental | Other: Virtual simulation- Virtual simulation group: Participants will log in to the virtual simulation software from home and play 2 cases (1 case of sepsis, 1 case of trauma). Learners are instructed to play each case as many times as they like within 70 minutes, to reach the highest score possible in that time. This process is proctored, with participants sharing their screen over video conferencing with study team members (JCL or LZY) to ensure adherence to time limit and cases played. |
| Team based in situ simulation | Active comparator | Other: Team based in situ simulation- Team based in situ simulation group: Faculty observing and debriefing learners at the mock code will be variable and consist of a wide range of NUH emergency department faculty outside of this study, due to logistical constraints in having the same faculty being present consistently in the entire year. The in situ simulation will cover 1 case of sepsis, and 1 case of trauma, with case content matched to the cases in the virtual simulation group, and time matched at 70 minutes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Junior doctors scheduled to rotate through NUH emergency department for at least 3 months
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pregnant women will be excluded from the study as the study procedures do involve additional exposure to fellow healthcare workers, with the associated risk of COVID transmission, while there is no direct benefit in terms of generalisable knowledge about pregnancy or the fetus.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual simulationVirtual simulation using Full-Code, a virtual simulation software with a bank of emergency medicine cases | Other | Virtual simulation |
| Team based in situ simulationIn situ simulation, using a high fidelity manikin in the critical care area of the emergency department, with team members consisting of multiple junior doctors and nurses, facilitated by senior emergency medicine doctors and nurses. | Other | Team based in situ simulation |
Primary outcome
Score obtained in outcome assessment simulation
Time frame: At end of 3rd month of junior clinicians' emergency medicine rotation
Participants will be assessed by 2 independent assessors using a standardised checklist during simulation with a high fidelity manikin and standardised assistants in two scenarios: trauma, and sepsis
1 secondary outcome
Learner satisfaction
Time frame: Within one week after completion of assigned intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Mar 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39552082Low MJW, Chan GWH, Li Z, Koh Y, Jen CL, Lee ZY, Cheng LTW. Comparison of virtual and in-person simulations for sepsis and trauma resuscitation training in Singapore: a randomized controlled trial. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024;21:33. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.33. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Education, Medical
Not yet recruiting
AI Smart Glasses Feedback for Intubation Training in Medical Students
Intubation, Intratracheal, Medical Education
Recruiting
Linking Education, Produce Provision, and Community Referrals to Improve Diabetes Care (LINK)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Nutrition Poor
Not yet recruiting
Title of Study: Anesthesiologists' Learning Curves for Ultrasound Assessment of Difficult Airway
Airway Ultrasound, Difficult Airway Management
Not yet recruiting
Comparing the Efficacy of a Conversational Agent (QuitBot) Versus Standard Health Education on Smoking Cessation Among Medical Students in Cairo University
Conversational Agent, Smoking Cessation
Not yet recruiting
Generative AI-Assisted Personalized Feedback for Laparoscopic Skill Learning in Medical Undergraduates
Medical Education
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Matthew JW Low, MBBS principal investigator
National University Hospital, Singapore
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Virtual simulation and Team based in situ simulation in people with Education, Medical, run by National University Hospital, Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Score obtained in outcome assessment simulation (time frame: At end of 3rd month of junior clinicians' emergency medicine rotation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05201950, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2023.