AzTrials
AzTrials

Non Specific Low Back PainNCT05340894

Mckenzie Versus William Exercise for Non Specific Low Back Pain in Adolescents

A study testing MCKENZIE exercises and WILLIAM'S exercises in people with Non Specific Low Back Pain, run by Cairo University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

MCKENZIE EXERCISE VERSUS WILLIAMS EXERCISE ON DECREASING PAIN IN ADOLESCENT WITH NON SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN Low back pain is uncommon in the first decade of life,but prevalence increases steeply during the teenage years; around 40% of 9-18-year olds in high-income, medium-income, and low-income countries report having… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 14 to 18 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Non Specific Low Back Pain
What is being tested?
MCKENZIE exercises and WILLIAM'S exercises
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
10 Oct 2022to 10 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 14 to 18 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age range from 14 to 18 years.
  • Diagnosed as non-specific low back pain.
  • Medically and clinically stable.
  • All participants are within normal range weight and height.

Who cannot join

  • Adolescents have one or more of the followings will be excluded:
  • Any spinal deformities.
  • History of spinal or pelvic surgery.
  • Specific spinal pathologies as cauda equina syndrome, cord compression, infection, fracture, neoplasm, inflammatory disease, whiplash associated disorders and vertebro-basilar insufficiency.
  • Any visual or auditory problems that interfere with the rehabilitation program.
  • Children with significant mental or psychological problems that interfere with understanding instructions.

About this study

Official title: A Randomaized ,Double Study ,Aims to Compare Between Mckenzie and William's Exercises in Order to Find Which Method Has Better Effect on Adolescents With Non Specific Low Back Pain

MCKENZIE EXERCISE VERSUS WILLIAMS EXERCISE ON DECREASING PAIN IN ADOLESCENT WITH NON SPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN

Low back pain is uncommon in the first decade of life,but prevalence increases steeply during the teenage years; around 40% of 9-18-year olds in high-income, medium-income, and low-income countries report having had low back pain. NSLBP represents about 85% of LBP patients seen in primary care. Non-specific low back pain is one of the most common health problems and is the leading cause of disability in young adults. During school age, the overall risk of low back pain is similar to adults, with prevalence rates as high as 70% to 80% by the age of 20 years old Non-specific low back pain is defined as low back pain not attributable to a recognisable, known specific pathology.

Read more

Understanding back pain in adolescents is crucial to obtain timely diagnosis and determine appropriate treatment. Proper treatment and management of LBP in the adolescent years can minimize back pain lasting into adulthood Non pharmacological treatments are emphasised over pharmacological interventions in the management of persistent non-specific low back pain.

natinal institute for health and care excellence(NICE) 2016 draft guideline endorses self-management, exercise, manual therapy, psychological therapies, combined physical and psychological programmes, return-to-work programmes, and radiofrequency denervation.

Back exercises can be an inexpensive and easy option of treatment for NSLBP and proven to be effective. McKenzie extension exercise and William flexion exercise are the most common types of back exercises.

Selection the appropriate treatment method is important. So this study will be aimed to compare between Mckenzie and William's exercises in order to find which method has better effect on adolescents with NSLBP.

Being tested
MCKENZIE exercises, WILLIAM'S exercises
Keywords
Adolescents, Balance, Low Back Pain, McKenzie Exercises, and William's Exercises.
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MCKENZIE exercisesProcedure or surgery

    McKenzie method is popular amongst physiotherapists as a management approach for spinal pain and McKenzie exercises for LBP are beneficial treatment for increasing flexibility of spine and improving the pain with better results in pain relief

  • WILLIAM'S exercisesProcedure or surgery

    William flexion exercise is to reduce pain or soreness and provide lower trunk stability by actively developing the abdominal muscles,gluteus maximus and hamstring, passively stretching the hip flexors and lower back muscles(sacro spinalis) and to restore or improve the work balance between the postural flexor and extensor muscle groups

Study groups in NCT05340894
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mckenzie groupActive comparator* adolescents will receive 4 weeks Mckenzie exercise program * Follow-up:pre-test (Baseline), 2 weeks post-test and 4 weeks post-test.
Receives: Procedure: MCKENZIE exercises
William's groupActive comparator* adolescents will receive 4 weeks William's exercise program * Follow-up:pre-test (Baseline), 2 weeks post-test and 4 weeks post-test.
Receives: Procedure: WILLIAM'S exercises

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    This will be used to determine the intensity of pain.The VAS is a valid and reliable measure of chronic pain intensity . It is the amount of pain that a patient feels ranges across a continuum from none to an extreme amount of pain. Operationally, a VAS is usually a horizontal line, 100 mm in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end The patient will mark on the line at the point that he feels which represents his perception of the current state.The VAS score is determined by measuring in millimeters from the left hand end of the line to the point that the child marks .

    Measured: changes in pain at 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. ModifiedSchober's Test(MSchober test)

    The mSchober test is frequently used method for assessing lumbar flexion range of motion (ROM).

    Test will be done as follows:

    • The participant will stand in neutral erect position without shoes.
    • The assessor will marks 1 point 5 cm below and 1 point 10 cm above the lumbosacral junction(dimples of Venus), that is, 15 cm in upright position.
    • The participant will be asked to make 2 attempts to bend forward as far as possible, the first will be a trial attempt, and the assessor measured the distance between the marks on the second attempt
    • The increase in distance between the marks was then calculated as the measure of lumbar flexion ROM.
    • In general, the measure should increase by at least 6 cm to 21 cm. An increase of less than 6 cm suggests decreased lumbar spinal mobility.

    Measured: changes in back flexibility in 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Apr 2022
  2. Study start10 Oct 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion10 Dec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05340894
Sponsor's protocol ID
P.T.REC/012/003327
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
15 Mar 2022
Last updated
17 Oct 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing MCKENZIE exercises and WILLIAM'S exercises in people with Non Specific Low Back Pain, run by Cairo University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (time frame: changes in pain at 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Oct 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in