Liver Transplant FailureMAASTR3BOLOMICNCT05361044
Liver Graft Viability Assessment During Normothermic Regional Perfusion
A study testing Blood samples Donnor in people with Liver Transplant Failure, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 4 sites in France.
Trial summary
With the increasing shortage of available donor organs, liver transplantation from donation after circulatory death (DCD) has been established in many countries to offer a therapeutic strategy for patients with end-stage liver disease beyond standard donation after brain death (DBD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 66 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Liver Transplant Failure
- What is being tested?
- Blood samples Donnor
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 22 Aug 2022to 26 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 66 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All cDCD liver grafts allocated to one of the study centers undergoing NRP and where procurement of any abdominal organ is initiated
- Procurement performed by one of the four transplant teams
- non opposition by the donor or his family to organ donation
- non opposition by the recipient to participate in the study
- All Adult recipients on the waiting list for liver transplantation elligible for a liver procured after circulatory death according to the Agence de la Biomedecine.
- Recipient, aged at least 18 years and less than 66 years,
Show all 11Show fewer
- Awaiting a first transplantation,
- Recipients considered not too sick to cope with post-reperfusion syndrome not ventilated, no inotropic agents ...)
- No major surgical history and no portal vein thrombosis; To minimize cold and recipient ischemic time (anastomotic time), patients where the recipient hepatectomy was predicted to be difficult were excluded
- With a MELD score ≤ 25
- Patient has been duly informed and has consented. Although the results of transplantations after DCD have very clearly improved over the years, clear information for the recipient and the provision of informed consent both remain essential. This means making clear to the patient the risk of primary nonfunction as well as of ischemic cholangiopathy and early arterial thrombosis.
Who cannot join
- -- cDCD procurement where NRP fails or is not initiated due to technical reasons
- Graft reallocation after procurement to a transplant team not included in the study
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
France4 sites
Department of HPB surgery and liver transplantation
Clichy, 92210
Department of general surgery and liver transplantation, Croix-Rousse University Hospital 103 Boulevard de la Croix Rousse
Lyon, 69004
Department of HPB surgery and liver transplantation
Paris, 75013
Department of HPB and Digestive Surgery
Rennes, 35000
About this study
Official title: Metabolomics Based Prediction Model for Liver Graft Viability During Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Donation After Circulatory Death
With the increasing shortage of available donor organs, liver transplantation from donation after circulatory death (DCD) has been established in many countries to offer a therapeutic strategy for patients with end-stage liver disease beyond standard donation after brain death (DBD). In France, a controlled DCD (cDCD) program based on the use of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) during organ procurement has been successfully implemented since 2015. This program has since shown excellent post-transplant outcomes with one-year patient and graft survival rates >90%. However, owing to very strict donor and graft selection criteria nearly one third of all potential liver grafts were not transplanted because of presumed poor quality. Furthermore, survival in cDCD liver transplantation which did not adhere to the current selection criteria was significantly lower (68% vs 94%) compared to the highly selected population. Thus, to further expand selection criteria and reduce discard rates without compromising outcomes, there is an urgent need for novel objective methods to assess graft quality prior to transplantation.
Graft quality assessment prior to transplantation has been a key challenge in liver transplantation for decades and still today the decision to accept or decline a graft before transplantation relies for the most part on ''gut feeling" of the procurement or transplant team. Currently, selection criteria for cDCD in France are based on donor data, liver biopsy results and hepatocyte injury markers AST and ALT. While donor data are only indirect indicators of graft quality, liver graft biopsy are highly pathologist dependant and do not provide a dynamic assessment. Hepatocyte injury markers during normothermic perfusion have been shown to only have limited value in predicting post-transplant graft function. In addition, several recent studies have suggested a superior predictive value of specific biomarkers in the liver through metabolomics. There is growing evidence that dynamic graft preservation such as NRP may even allow a direct analysis of key injury metabolites within solid organ grafts.
Read more
During cDCD procurement, liver grafts are exposed to donor warm ischemia which in combination with static cold storage causes ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) of the graft during implantation in the recipient. IRI is directly correlated to detrimental post-transplant complications such as primary non function and ischemic cholangiopathy or even recipient death.
Studies in animal models have revealed that mitochondria play a major role in IR injury and several mitochondrial signature metabolites for example succinate have been identified in various solid organ grafts such as livers, hearts and kidneys. Based on these results, our team and others have recently identified the release of a small auto fluorescent molecular compound of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, Flavin Mononucleotide (FMN), during the early phase of hepatic I/R injury. Furthermore, FMN has been shown to serve as a surrogate marker for impaired cellular energy production of the liver graft prior to transplantation and enable accurate prediction of post-transplant liver graft viability. Given the natural fluorescence of FMN, a real time quantification method has been established allowing to rapidly assess viability of human liver grafts during the procurement process. Of note, a team from the United Kingdom has validated this real-time FMN quantification during NRP of cDCD liver grafts. Interestingly, since mitochondrial injury is a universal signature of graft injury during the transplant process, FMN has the potential to serve as viability marker in other solid organs such as hearts, lungs and kidneys.
In addition, metabolomics approach allow the identification and quantification of many metabolites in a biological system through the use of high-throughput analytical technologies. It can give valuable information about what has, is and will occured in a specific tissu. In Liver transplantation, efforts have focused on studying early event of IR which are known to influence long term outcomes. It is however a complex pathway involving numerous metabolites. Metabolomic is therefore gaining interst in field of LT because it can enlight underlying metabolic process occurring during organ preservation and can lead the way toward a better evaluation of graft quality.
Thus, this study aims at developing a robust bio-clinical prediction model of liver graft viability during NRP using in depth metabolomics of perfusate and tissue in combination with available donor and graft characteristics
- Conditions
- Liver Transplant Failure
- Being tested
- Blood samples Donnor
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood samples DonnorBiological
Additional samples will be preleved in the Normothermic Regional Reperfusion at 30 min, and blood sample will be collected at the end of the Normothermic Regional Reperfusion (4 samples of 5ml).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Donnor of liver grafts | Other | Blood samples And liver biopsy taken from the donnor Receives: Biological: Blood samples Donnor |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Composit endpoint: Number of major liver graft-related adverse events (LGRAE) containing - Graft dysfunction or primary non-function - Non-anastomotic biliary structure - Arterial complications
Measured: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Identification and Semi Quantification of FMN during normothermic regional perfusion
Metabolomic evaluation of the graft including various markers of interest (FMN, hypoxanthine, succinate, xanthine, NADH) measured by sepctroscopy and mass spectrometry (LC-MS), during CRN.
Measured: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Identification and Semi Quantification of Hypoxanthine during normothermic regional perfusion
measured by spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (LC-MS), during CRN.
Measured: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Identification and Semi Quantification of succinate during normothermic regional perfusion
measured by spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (LC-MS), during CRN.
Measured: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Identification and Quantification of xanthine during normothermic regional perfusion
measured by spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (LC-MS), during CRN.
Measured: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Identification and Semi Quantification of NADH during normothermic regional perfusionn
measured by spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (LC-MS), during CRN.
Measured: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Sensitivity and Specificity analysis of the FMN regarding the composit endpoint of outcome 1
Measured: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Sensitivity and Specificity analysis of the hypoxanthine regarding the composit endpoint of outcome 1
Measured: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Sensitivity and Specificity analysis of the succinate regarding the composit endpoint of outcome 1
Measured: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Sensitivity and Specificity analysis of the xanthine regarding the composit endpoint of outcome 1
Measured: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Sensitivity and Specificity analysis of the NADH regarding the composit endpoint of outcome 1
Measured: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 May 2022
- Study start22 Aug 2022
- Primary completion26 Jun 2025
- Study completion26 Jun 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Liver Transplant FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospices Civils de LyonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05361044
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 69HCL21_1179
- Acronym
- MAASTR3BOLOMIC
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 22 Apr 2022
- Last updated
- 25 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Metabolomics Based Prediction Model for Liver Graft Viability During Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Donation After Circulatory Death
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05361044
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MAASTR3BOLOMIC / 69HCL21_1179
- Conditions
- Liver Transplant Failure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de LyonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Jun 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 May 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
With the increasing shortage of available donor organs, liver transplantation from donation after circulatory death (DCD) has been established in many countries to offer a therapeutic strategy for patients with end-stage liver disease beyond standard donation after brain death (DBD). In France, a controlled DCD (cDCD) program based on the use of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) during organ procurement has been successfully implemented since 2015. This program has since shown excellent post-transplant outcomes with one-year patient and graft survival rates >90%. However, owing to very strict donor and graft selection criteria nearly one third of all potential liver grafts were not transplanted because of presumed poor quality. Furthermore, survival in cDCD liver transplantation which did not adhere to the current selection criteria was significantly lower (68% vs 94%) compared to the highly selected population. Thus, to further expand selection criteria and reduce discard rates without compromising outcomes, there is an urgent need for novel objective methods to assess graft quality prior to transplantation.
Graft quality assessment prior to transplantation has been a key challenge in liver transplantation for decades and still today the decision to accept or decline a graft before transplantation relies for the most part on ''gut feeling" of the procurement or transplant team. Currently, selection criteria for cDCD in France are based on donor data, liver biopsy results and hepatocyte injury markers AST and ALT. While donor data are only indirect indicators of graft quality, liver graft biopsy are highly pathologist dependant and do not provide a dynamic assessment. Hepatocyte injury markers during normothermic perfusion have been shown to only have limited value in predicting post-transplant graft function. In addition, several recent studies have suggested a superior predictive value of specific biomarkers in the liver through metabolomics. There is growing evidence that dynamic graft preservation such as NRP may even allow a direct analysis of key injury metabolites within solid organ grafts.
During cDCD procurement, liver grafts are exposed to donor warm ischemia which in combination with static cold storage causes ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) of the graft during implantation in the recipient. IRI is directly correlated to detrimental post-transplant complications such as primary non function and ischemic cholangiopathy or even recipient death.
Studies in animal models have revealed that mitochondria play a major role in IR injury and several mitochondrial signature metabolites for example succinate have been identified in various solid organ grafts such as livers, hearts and kidneys. Based on these results, our team and others have recently identified the release of a small auto fluorescent molecular compound of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, Flavin Mononucleotide (FMN), during the early phase of hepatic I/R injury. Furthermore, FMN has been shown to serve as a surrogate marker for impaired cellular energy production of the liver graft prior to transplantation and enable accurate prediction of post-transplant liver graft viability. Given the natural fluorescence of FMN, a real time quantification method has been established allowing to rapidly assess viability of human liver grafts during the procurement process. Of note, a team from the United Kingdom has validated this real-time FMN quantification during NRP of cDCD liver grafts. Interestingly, since mitochondrial injury is a universal signature of graft injury during the transplant process, FMN has the potential to serve as viability marker in other solid organs such as hearts, lungs and kidneys.
In addition, metabolomics approach allow the identification and quantification of many metabolites in a biological system through the use of high-throughput analytical technologies. It can give valuable information about what has, is and will occured in a specific tissu. In Liver transplantation, efforts have focused on studying early event of IR which are known to influence long term outcomes. It is however a complex pathway involving numerous metabolites. Metabolomic is therefore gaining interst in field of LT because it can enlight underlying metabolic process occurring during organ preservation and can lead the way toward a better evaluation of graft quality.
Thus, this study aims at developing a robust bio-clinical prediction model of liver graft viability during NRP using in depth metabolomics of perfusate and tissue in combination with available donor and graft characteristics
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Donnor of liver grafts | Other | Biological: Blood samples DonnorBlood samples And liver biopsy taken from the donnor |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 66 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- All cDCD liver grafts allocated to one of the study centers undergoing NRP and where procurement of any abdominal organ is initiated
- Procurement performed by one of the four transplant teams
- non opposition by the donor or his family to organ donation
- non opposition by the recipient to participate in the study
- All Adult recipients on the waiting list for liver transplantation elligible for a liver procured after circulatory death according to the Agence de la Biomedecine.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- -- cDCD procurement where NRP fails or is not initiated due to technical reasons
- Graft reallocation after procurement to a transplant team not included in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood samples DonnorAdditional samples will be preleved in the Normothermic Regional Reperfusion at 30 min, and blood sample will be collected at the end of the Normothermic Regional Reperfusion (4 samples of 5ml). | Biological | Donnor of liver grafts |
Primary outcome
Composit endpoint: Number of major liver graft-related adverse events (LGRAE) containing - Graft dysfunction or primary non-function - Non-anastomotic biliary structure - Arterial complications
Time frame: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Identification and Semi Quantification of FMN during normothermic regional perfusion
Time frame: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Metabolomic evaluation of the graft including various markers of interest (FMN, hypoxanthine, succinate, xanthine, NADH) measured by sepctroscopy and mass spectrometry (LC-MS), during CRN.
Identification and Semi Quantification of Hypoxanthine during normothermic regional perfusion
Time frame: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
measured by spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (LC-MS), during CRN.
Identification and Semi Quantification of succinate during normothermic regional perfusion
Time frame: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
measured by spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (LC-MS), during CRN.
Identification and Quantification of xanthine during normothermic regional perfusion
Time frame: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
measured by spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (LC-MS), during CRN.
Identification and Semi Quantification of NADH during normothermic regional perfusionn
Time frame: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
measured by spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (LC-MS), during CRN.
Sensitivity and Specificity analysis of the FMN regarding the composit endpoint of outcome 1
Time frame: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Sensitivity and Specificity analysis of the hypoxanthine regarding the composit endpoint of outcome 1
Time frame: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Sensitivity and Specificity analysis of the succinate regarding the composit endpoint of outcome 1
Time frame: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Sensitivity and Specificity analysis of the xanthine regarding the composit endpoint of outcome 1
Time frame: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Sensitivity and Specificity analysis of the NADH regarding the composit endpoint of outcome 1
Time frame: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jul 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Liver Transplant Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Establishing a Reference Framework for Outcomes After Machine-Preserved Liver Transplantation in Europe
End-stage Liver Disease (ESLD), Acute Liver Failure
Active, not recruiting
Leveraging Technology to Improve Medication Adherence in Youth With Kidney or Liver Transplant
Transplant;Failure,Kidney, Transplant; Failure, Liver
RecruitingObservational study
Magnetic Resonance Elastography as a Method to Estimate Stiffness of Soft Tissues
Heart Failure, Liver Fibrosis
RecruitingObservational study
CytOSorb TreatMent Of Critically Ill PatientS Registry
Septic Shock, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study of Tabelecleucel for Participants With Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease After Failure With Rituximab or Rituximab and Chemotherapy
Epstein-Barr Virus+ Associated Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease (EBV+ PTLD), Solid Organ Transplant Complications
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Blood samples Donnor in people with Liver Transplant Failure, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 4 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Composit endpoint: Number of major liver graft-related adverse events (LGRAE) containing - Graft dysfunction or primary non-function - Non-anastomotic biliary structure - Arterial complications (time frame: Unitl the end of study, an average of 3 years). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2025.