Root Canal TreatmentNCT05374434
A First in Human Study to Compare Feasibility of Inertial Cavitation Irrigation to SNI in Root Canal Treatment.
A study testing Conventional irrigation and Inertial cavitation in people with Root Canal Treatment and Post Operative Pain, run by Lumendo AG at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The study design is a single-center 2-arm randomized controlled clinical trial. 10 subjects (teeth) requiring a root canal treatment will be enrolled in 2 groups (5 in each group). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Root Canal Treatment, Post Operative Pain
- What is being tested?
- Conventional irrigation and Inertial cavitation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 10 May 2022to 31 May 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Physical status classification system described was used for patients' recruitment. Healthy patients, who were classified by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) as ASA I and II
- Patients with the age of 18 and over
- Patients who were diagnosed as in need of non-surgical orthograde root canal treatment of an asymptomatic tooth
- Tooth without signs of previously initiated Root Canal Therapy
Who cannot join
- Pregnant and lactating females
- Patients with chronic periodontal diseases
- Patients with sensitivity or adverse reactions to any medication or materials that were used throughout the treatment procedure
- Patients with acute periapical periodontitis
- Patients with acute periodontal abscess
- Patients who could not abide by the follow-up time
Show all 17Show fewer
- Patients who used analgesics 1-week prior or antibiotics 1-month prior to treatment
- Uncooperative patients
- Teeth that cannot be made functional nor restored or difficult to access teeth with no importance (wisdom teeth)
- Teeth with poor prognosis, for example, due to deep root caries or big root resorption
- Teeth with more than/or equal 4 mm periodontal pocket depth
- Teeth with an inaccessible root end
- Teeth with apical resorption or a radiologically not clearly defined apex
- Fractured teeth
- Teeth with immature or open apices
- Teeth with root apices extending into the maxillary sinus
- Teeth with external resorption communicating with the pulp
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
İstanbul Medipol Universitesi, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics
Istanbul, Unkapanı, Fatih, 34083
About this study
Official title: Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Root Canal Preparation After Irrigation Using Endodontic Needle and Inertial Cavitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The study design is a single-center 2-arm randomized controlled clinical trial. 10 subjects (teeth) requiring a root canal treatment will be enrolled in 2 groups (5 in each group). The aim of the study is to compare the postoperative pain intensity levels in patients with asymptomatic teeth diagnosed for non-surgical orthograde root canal treatment that are disinfected during the root canal treatment procedure by manual irrigation with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution using an endodontic needle or by a inertial cavitation-generating device.
Read the detailed description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Physical status classification system described was used for patients' recruitment. Healthy patients, who were classified by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) as ASA I and II
- Patients with the age of 18 and over
- Patients who were diagnosed as in need of non-surgical orthograde root canal treatment of an asymptomatic tooth
- Tooth without signs of previously initiated Root Canal Therapy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant and lactating females
- Patients with chronic periodontal diseases
- Patients with sensitivity or adverse reactions to any medication or materials that were used throughout the treatment procedure
- Patients with acute periapical periodontitis
- Patients with acute periodontal abscess
- Patients who could not abide by the follow-up time
- Patients who used analgesics 1-week prior or antibiotics 1-month prior to treatment
- Uncooperative patients
- Teeth that cannot be made functional nor restored or difficult to access teeth with no importance (wisdom teeth)
- Teeth with poor prognosis, for example, due to deep root caries or big root resorption
- Teeth with 4 mm periodontal pocket depth
- Teeth with an inaccessible root end
- Teeth with apical resorption or a radiologically not clearly defined apex
- Fractured teeth
- Teeth with immature or open apices Confidential
- Teeth with root apices extending into the maxillary sinus
All treatment procedures will be performed in a single visit by a single treatment provider. It will be assured that the operation room is quiet and isolated throughout the whole process to avoid any outside interference. Patients will be made comfortable and informed about the steps of the procedure a second time right before commencing the treatment protocol. Patients will be also reminded that they will get the necessary treatment even if they decline from the study and should not feel compelled to participate the study for a proper treatment. All root canal treatments will be performed using a dental loupe with a magnification of 4.50X (EyeMag Pro F; Carl Zeiss).
Each tooth will be anaesthetized with 2 mL local anaesthetic solution containing 40 mg/mL articaine hydrochloride and 12 mg/mL epinephrine hydrochloride (Ultracaine DS Forte; Aventis Pharma). After isolating the tooth with a rubber dam (Hygenic Dental Dam Kit; Coltene/Whaledent Gmbh \& Co.kg, Langenau, Germany) the operation field will be disinfected using 5.25% NaOCl solution (Wizard; Rehber Chemistry) soaked cotton rolls. After the access cavity preparation, a #10 C-File (MMC file, Coltene-Micro-Méga, Besançon, France) will be introduced into the root canal for scouting. Coronal flaring of root canals will be performed using a nickel-titanium flaring file (One Flare; Coltene-Micro-Méga) with an electric endodontic motor (Dual Move, Coltene-Micromega). Working length determination will be performed with a #10 C-file (MMC file, Coltene-Micro-Méga) and glidepath preparation will be completed with a One G (Coltene-Micro-Méga). The shaping of the root canals will be performed using One Curve (#25/0.06, Coltene-Micro-Méga). If further shaping of the canal will be needed 2 Shape F35 (#35/0.06) (ColteneMicro-Méga) files will be used according to apical canal lumen. All rotary files will be used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The filing protocols and files used will be recorded in the patient file.
In Group 1, 2 mL of NaOCl solution will be used after each file as an irrigation solution. After the shaping of the root canal is completed final irrigation with a 31G double side vented tip is performed in each canal using 2.5 mL of 5% EDTA (Wizard; Rehber Chemistry) for 1 minute, 2.5 mL of 5.25% NaOCl for 30 seconds and 5 mL of saline solution for 30 seconds respectively.
In Group 2, 2 mL of NaOCl solution will be used after each file as an irrigation solution. After the shaping of the root canal is completed, the NaOCl solution is removed from the root canal with 2.5 mL saline solution using a syringe with a 31G needle. EndoClean tip is introduced into the root canal, always maintaining a distance of at least 3mm from the apex. The EndoClean device is used for 60 seconds for each root canal.
In both groups, following root canal preparation, a matching gutta-percha cone (#25/0.06 or #35/0.06) (MM GP Points, Coltene-Micro-Méga) is introduced into the root canal coated with a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer (BioRoot RCS; Lancester PA, USA). Single-cone technique is used to fill the root canals.
Total-etch technique is used to restore the coronal part of each tooth. The cavities are etched with 35% H3PO4 for 15 seconds before a single layer application of an adhesive material (Adper Single Bond 2; 3M ESPE). After photopolymerization (Elipar S10, 3M ESPE) of the adhesive material for 20 seconds, a flowable bulk-fill composite material (Estelite, BulkFill Flow, Tokuyama Dental, Tokyo, Japan) is used to restore the coronal cavity incrementally with a thickness of 4 mm for every layer. Each layer is photopolymerized for 20 seconds.
Post-endodontic pain assessment :
After the treatment, all participants will be provided with analgesics (75 mg diclofenac sodium) (Voltaren SR 75 mg, Novartis, Kurtköy, İstanbul) and will be advised to use them if needs be and record the time of use. A pain intensity evaluation diary including VAS diagrams with their respective follow-up evaluation times will be provided to each participant to mark their pain. All participants will be contacted on their follow-up time to remind them to mark their pain intensity scores. Pain intensity of patients will be evaluated at 6h, 24h, 48h, 72h and 1 week after the completion of root canal treatment as previously described. Any complication such as paraesthesia, acute exacerbations, flare-ups, swellings will be also recorded on patients' charts. Patients who fail to abide by the followup time will be traced via phone, e-mail or SMS to determine the possible reasons for dropout.
- Conditions
- Root Canal Treatment, Post Operative Pain
- Being tested
- Conventional irrigation, Inertial cavitation
- Keywords
- Root Canal Irrigation, Root Canal Cleaning, Root Canal Treatment, Post Operative Pain, Root Canal Disinfection, Inertial cavitation, NaOCl Irrigation, Debridement
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conventional irrigationOther
The participant will be treated by manual irrigation with sodium hypochlorite NaOCl.
Inertial cavitationDevice
The participant will be treated by inertial cavitation-generating device, that generates hydraulic cavitation to clean root canals deeper and more effectively than other existing systems.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional irrigation | Active comparator | Root canal cleaning will be performed by manual irrigation with sodium hypochlorite NaOCl solution. Receives: Other: Conventional irrigation |
| Inertial cavitation | Experimental | Root canal cleaning will be performed by inertial cavitation-generating device. Receives: Device: Inertial cavitation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical Postoperative Pain
Pain intensity levels were graded using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is a horizontal 100 mm bar, marked in every 10mm with two ends. One end (0) indicated "no pain" and the other end (100) indicated "worst pain possible". Categorization of pain scores is as follows: 0-4 mm = No Pain, 5-44 mm = Mild Pain, 45-74 mm = Moderate Pain, 75-100 mm = severe pain.
Measured: 6 hours
Clinical Postoperative Pain
Pain intensity levels were graded using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is a horizontal 100 mm bar, marked in every 10mm with two ends. One end (0) indicated "no pain" and the other end (100) indicated "worst pain possible". Categorization of pain scores is as follows: 0-4 mm = No Pain, 5-44 mm = Mild Pain, 45-74 mm = Moderate Pain, 75-100 mm = severe pain.
Measured: 24 hours
Clinical Postoperative Pain
Pain intensity levels were graded using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is a horizontal 100 mm bar, marked in every 10mm with two ends. One end (0) indicated "no pain" and the other end (100) indicated "worst pain possible". Categorization of pain scores is as follows: 0-4 mm = No Pain, 5-44 mm = Mild Pain, 45-74 mm = Moderate Pain, 75-100 mm = severe pain.
Measured: 48 hours
Clinical Postoperative Pain
Pain intensity levels were graded using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is a horizontal 100 mm bar, marked in every 10mm with two ends. One end (0) indicated "no pain" and the other end (100) indicated "worst pain possible". Categorization of pain scores is as follows: 0-4 mm = No Pain, 5-44 mm = Mild Pain, 45-74 mm = Moderate Pain, 75-100 mm = severe pain.
Measured: 72 hours
Clinical Postoperative Pain
Pain intensity levels were graded using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is a horizontal 100 mm bar, marked in every 10mm with two ends. One end (0) indicated "no pain" and the other end (100) indicated "worst pain possible". Categorization of pain scores is as follows: 0-4 mm = No Pain, 5-44 mm = Mild Pain, 45-74 mm = Moderate Pain, 75-100 mm = severe pain.
Measured: 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 May 2022
- Study start10 May 2022
- Primary completion31 May 2022
- Study completion31 May 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Root Canal TreatmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Lumendo AG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tan Firat EYÜBOĞLU, DDS, MDS, Principal investigator, İstanbul Medipol University, Department of Endodontics, İstanbul/TürkiyeMutlu ÖZCAN, DDS, MDS, Study director, İstanbul Medipol University, Istanbul Turkey
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05374434
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LUM-EC-001-060522
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 10 May 2022
- Last updated
- 25 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Root Canal Preparation After Irrigation Using Endodontic Needle and Inertial Cavitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05374434
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LUM-EC-001-060522
- Conditions
- Root Canal Treatment, Post Operative Pain
- Keywords
- Root Canal Irrigation, Root Canal Cleaning, Root Canal Treatment, Post Operative Pain, Root Canal Disinfection, Inertial cavitation, NaOCl Irrigation, Debridement
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Lumendo AGIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 10 May 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 May 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 25 Jul 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study design is a single-center 2-arm randomized controlled clinical trial. 10 subjects (teeth) requiring a root canal treatment will be enrolled in 2 groups (5 in each group). The aim of the study is to compare the postoperative pain intensity levels in patients with asymptomatic teeth diagnosed for non-surgical orthograde root canal treatment that are disinfected during the root canal treatment procedure by manual irrigation with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution using an endodontic needle or by a inertial cavitation-generating device.
Detailed description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Physical status classification system described was used for patients' recruitment. Healthy patients, who were classified by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) as ASA I and II
- Patients with the age of 18 and over
- Patients who were diagnosed as in need of non-surgical orthograde root canal treatment of an asymptomatic tooth
- Tooth without signs of previously initiated Root Canal Therapy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant and lactating females
- Patients with chronic periodontal diseases
- Patients with sensitivity or adverse reactions to any medication or materials that were used throughout the treatment procedure
- Patients with acute periapical periodontitis
- Patients with acute periodontal abscess
- Patients who could not abide by the follow-up time
- Patients who used analgesics 1-week prior or antibiotics 1-month prior to treatment
- Uncooperative patients
- Teeth that cannot be made functional nor restored or difficult to access teeth with no importance (wisdom teeth)
- Teeth with poor prognosis, for example, due to deep root caries or big root resorption
- Teeth with 4 mm periodontal pocket depth
- Teeth with an inaccessible root end
- Teeth with apical resorption or a radiologically not clearly defined apex
- Fractured teeth
- Teeth with immature or open apices Confidential
- Teeth with root apices extending into the maxillary sinus
All treatment procedures will be performed in a single visit by a single treatment provider. It will be assured that the operation room is quiet and isolated throughout the whole process to avoid any outside interference. Patients will be made comfortable and informed about the steps of the procedure a second time right before commencing the treatment protocol. Patients will be also reminded that they will get the necessary treatment even if they decline from the study and should not feel compelled to participate the study for a proper treatment. All root canal treatments will be performed using a dental loupe with a magnification of 4.50X (EyeMag Pro F; Carl Zeiss).
Each tooth will be anaesthetized with 2 mL local anaesthetic solution containing 40 mg/mL articaine hydrochloride and 12 mg/mL epinephrine hydrochloride (Ultracaine DS Forte; Aventis Pharma). After isolating the tooth with a rubber dam (Hygenic Dental Dam Kit; Coltene/Whaledent Gmbh \& Co.kg, Langenau, Germany) the operation field will be disinfected using 5.25% NaOCl solution (Wizard; Rehber Chemistry) soaked cotton rolls. After the access cavity preparation, a #10 C-File (MMC file, Coltene-Micro-Méga, Besançon, France) will be introduced into the root canal for scouting. Coronal flaring of root canals will be performed using a nickel-titanium flaring file (One Flare; Coltene-Micro-Méga) with an electric endodontic motor (Dual Move, Coltene-Micromega). Working length determination will be performed with a #10 C-file (MMC file, Coltene-Micro-Méga) and glidepath preparation will be completed with a One G (Coltene-Micro-Méga). The shaping of the root canals will be performed using One Curve (#25/0.06, Coltene-Micro-Méga). If further shaping of the canal will be needed 2 Shape F35 (#35/0.06) (ColteneMicro-Méga) files will be used according to apical canal lumen. All rotary files will be used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The filing protocols and files used will be recorded in the patient file.
In Group 1, 2 mL of NaOCl solution will be used after each file as an irrigation solution. After the shaping of the root canal is completed final irrigation with a 31G double side vented tip is performed in each canal using 2.5 mL of 5% EDTA (Wizard; Rehber Chemistry) for 1 minute, 2.5 mL of 5.25% NaOCl for 30 seconds and 5 mL of saline solution for 30 seconds respectively.
In Group 2, 2 mL of NaOCl solution will be used after each file as an irrigation solution. After the shaping of the root canal is completed, the NaOCl solution is removed from the root canal with 2.5 mL saline solution using a syringe with a 31G needle. EndoClean tip is introduced into the root canal, always maintaining a distance of at least 3mm from the apex. The EndoClean device is used for 60 seconds for each root canal.
In both groups, following root canal preparation, a matching gutta-percha cone (#25/0.06 or #35/0.06) (MM GP Points, Coltene-Micro-Méga) is introduced into the root canal coated with a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer (BioRoot RCS; Lancester PA, USA). Single-cone technique is used to fill the root canals.
Total-etch technique is used to restore the coronal part of each tooth. The cavities are etched with 35% H3PO4 for 15 seconds before a single layer application of an adhesive material (Adper Single Bond 2; 3M ESPE). After photopolymerization (Elipar S10, 3M ESPE) of the adhesive material for 20 seconds, a flowable bulk-fill composite material (Estelite, BulkFill Flow, Tokuyama Dental, Tokyo, Japan) is used to restore the coronal cavity incrementally with a thickness of 4 mm for every layer. Each layer is photopolymerized for 20 seconds.
Post-endodontic pain assessment :
After the treatment, all participants will be provided with analgesics (75 mg diclofenac sodium) (Voltaren SR 75 mg, Novartis, Kurtköy, İstanbul) and will be advised to use them if needs be and record the time of use. A pain intensity evaluation diary including VAS diagrams with their respective follow-up evaluation times will be provided to each participant to mark their pain. All participants will be contacted on their follow-up time to remind them to mark their pain intensity scores. Pain intensity of patients will be evaluated at 6h, 24h, 48h, 72h and 1 week after the completion of root canal treatment as previously described. Any complication such as paraesthesia, acute exacerbations, flare-ups, swellings will be also recorded on patients' charts. Patients who fail to abide by the followup time will be traced via phone, e-mail or SMS to determine the possible reasons for dropout.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional irrigation | Active comparator | Other: Conventional irrigationRoot canal cleaning will be performed by manual irrigation with sodium hypochlorite NaOCl solution. |
| Inertial cavitation | Experimental | Device: Inertial cavitationRoot canal cleaning will be performed by inertial cavitation-generating device. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Physical status classification system described was used for patients' recruitment. Healthy patients, who were classified by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) as ASA I and II
- Patients with the age of 18 and over
- Patients who were diagnosed as in need of non-surgical orthograde root canal treatment of an asymptomatic tooth
- Tooth without signs of previously initiated Root Canal Therapy
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Pregnant and lactating females
- Patients with chronic periodontal diseases
- Patients with sensitivity or adverse reactions to any medication or materials that were used throughout the treatment procedure
- Patients with acute periapical periodontitis
- Patients with acute periodontal abscess
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional irrigationThe participant will be treated by manual irrigation with sodium hypochlorite NaOCl. | Other | Conventional irrigation |
| Inertial cavitationThe participant will be treated by inertial cavitation-generating device, that generates hydraulic cavitation to clean root canals deeper and more effectively than other existing systems. | Device | Inertial cavitation |
Primary outcome
Clinical Postoperative Pain
Time frame: 6 hours
Pain intensity levels were graded using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is a horizontal 100 mm bar, marked in every 10mm with two ends. One end (0) indicated "no pain" and the other end (100) indicated "worst pain possible". Categorization of pain scores is as follows: 0-4 mm = No Pain, 5-44 mm = Mild Pain, 45-74 mm = Moderate Pain, 75-100 mm = severe pain.
Clinical Postoperative Pain
Time frame: 24 hours
Pain intensity levels were graded using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is a horizontal 100 mm bar, marked in every 10mm with two ends. One end (0) indicated "no pain" and the other end (100) indicated "worst pain possible". Categorization of pain scores is as follows: 0-4 mm = No Pain, 5-44 mm = Mild Pain, 45-74 mm = Moderate Pain, 75-100 mm = severe pain.
Clinical Postoperative Pain
Time frame: 48 hours
Pain intensity levels were graded using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is a horizontal 100 mm bar, marked in every 10mm with two ends. One end (0) indicated "no pain" and the other end (100) indicated "worst pain possible". Categorization of pain scores is as follows: 0-4 mm = No Pain, 5-44 mm = Mild Pain, 45-74 mm = Moderate Pain, 75-100 mm = severe pain.
Clinical Postoperative Pain
Time frame: 72 hours
Pain intensity levels were graded using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is a horizontal 100 mm bar, marked in every 10mm with two ends. One end (0) indicated "no pain" and the other end (100) indicated "worst pain possible". Categorization of pain scores is as follows: 0-4 mm = No Pain, 5-44 mm = Mild Pain, 45-74 mm = Moderate Pain, 75-100 mm = severe pain.
Clinical Postoperative Pain
Time frame: 1 week
Pain intensity levels were graded using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This scale is a horizontal 100 mm bar, marked in every 10mm with two ends. One end (0) indicated "no pain" and the other end (100) indicated "worst pain possible". Categorization of pain scores is as follows: 0-4 mm = No Pain, 5-44 mm = Mild Pain, 45-74 mm = Moderate Pain, 75-100 mm = severe pain.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jul 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Root Canal Treatment
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Nivolumab After Combined Modality Therapy in Treating Patients With High Risk Stage II-IIIB Anal Cancer
Anal Basaloid Carcinoma, Anal Canal Cloacogenic Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
EA2176: Phase 3 Clinical Trial of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel +/- Nivolumab in Metastatic Anal Cancer Patients
Anal Basaloid Carcinoma, Anal Canal Cloacogenic Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Intratreatment FDG-PET During Radiation Therapy for Gynecologic and Gastrointestinal Cancers
Cancer of the Cervix, Vulvar Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Intracanal Cryotherapy on Pain, Anxiety, and Salivary Irisin After Root Canal Treatment
Postoperative Pain After Endodontic Treatment, Dental Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Photobiomodulation After Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment
Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tan Firat EYÜBOĞLU, DDS, MDS principal investigator
İstanbul Medipol University, Department of Endodontics, İstanbul/Türkiye
Mutlu ÖZCAN, DDS, MDS study director
İstanbul Medipol University, Istanbul Turkey
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Conventional irrigation and Inertial cavitation in people with Root Canal Treatment and Post Operative Pain, run by Lumendo AG at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Jul 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical Postoperative Pain (time frame: 6 hours). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2024.