AzTrials
AzTrials

Cesarean Section ComplicationsNCT05395585

The Effect of Placental Spontaneous Delivery Versus Manual Removal on Blood Loss During Cesarean Section. A Comparative Study

A study testing Manual placental separation in people with Cesarean Section Complications, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The mode of placental delivery may contribute to an increase or decrease in the morbidity associated with CS, and many studies have shown it to be a key role in determining the blood loss during CS. Manual removal of the placenta has been implicated in increased blood loss during CS. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 35 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cesarean Section Complications
What is being tested?
Manual placental separation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Jun 2022to 8 Jan 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 35 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age (18 - 35) years.
  • Primigravida.
  • Unscarred uterus.
  • Singleton pregnancy.
  • Living baby.
  • Body mass index (18 - 30) 37-40 weeks

Who cannot join

  • Emergency cesarean section due to possibility of maternal distress and blood loss.
  • Cesarean hysterectomy as the placenta will be removed with the uterus.
  • Abnormally adherent placenta: Placenta accrete, percreta or placenta previa due to failure of placental separation.
  • Previous cesarean section as the previous scar may affect placental separation.
  • Body mass index less than 18 and more than 30 as extremes of body weight may be associated with increased risks of anemia, bleeding and/or infection.
  • Suspected chorioamnionitis to decrease the risk of disseminated infection.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Bleeding disorders to decrease blood loss.
  • Multiple pregnancy due to larger placental volume and blood loss compared with singleton.
  • Any pelvic surgery (Appendix - Ovarian cyst. - Ectopic Pregnancy - pelvic abscess)
  • Women with medical illness e.g. pre-eclampsia, anemia (Hb less than 11 gm/dl), DM, Cardiac, Renal …etc. to decrease the risk of maternal morbidity.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital

    Cairo, Cairo/القاهرة, 71350

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

The mode of placental delivery may contribute to an increase or decrease in the morbidity associated with CS, and many studies have shown it to be a key role in determining the blood loss during CS. Manual removal of the placenta has been implicated in increased blood loss during CS. However, other researchers concluded that it had no detrimental effect on blood loss

Being tested
Manual placental separation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Manual placental separationProcedure or surgery

    Manual separation of the placenta from uterus

Study groups in NCT05395585
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Spontaneous separationNo interventionNot described
Manual separationExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Manual placental separation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Blood loss

    The blood loss during cesarean section and in the first 24 hours postoperatively will be assessed in a standard manner. Blood will be measured after suction of the mount of amniotic fluid in a separate suction bottle. Amount of blood which collected from towels will be measured according to gravimetric method which reported by Liu et al. (2020).

    • EBV x (Hi-Hf)/Hi: Where the Hi is the preoperative blood hematocrit, Hf is the postoperative one and EBV is the estimated blood volume. The estimated blood volume could be calculated by multiplying weight times average blood volume which is around 65 ml/kg in females (Miller et al., 2000).

    Measured: 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 May 2022
  2. Study start1 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2023
  4. Study completion8 Jan 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05395585
Sponsor's protocol ID
MS 290/2022
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
25 May 2022
Last updated
20 Jan 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Manual placental separation in people with Cesarean Section Complications, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Blood loss (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jan 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in