AzTrials
AzTrials

Memory ReactivationSleepDanceNCT05452733

Toward a Real-time Access to Sleepers' Mental Content

A study testing differences of behavior between sleepwalking and non sleepwalking patient in people with Memory Reactivation and Memory Consolidation, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Sleep is crucial for global cognitive functioning, but its exact functions and mechanisms are still poorly understood. Cognitive studies of sleep typically rely on linking electrophysiological changes measured during sleep with behavioral and neural changes collected in tasks performed during wakefulness. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
differences of behavior between sleepwalking and non sleepwalking patient
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
31 Mar 2023to 29 Aug 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 35 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18-35 y.o
  • Written consent
  • Affiliated to social security
  • Sleepwalking (group patients only)

Who cannot join

  • Psychiatric or neurologic disorder
  • Sleep disorder except sleepwalking for the patient group
  • Surdity
  • Pain or physical disability affecting the upper limbs
  • Consumption of drugs altering sleep structure
  • Subjects under legal protection

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Service des Pathologies du Sommeil, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière

    Paris, Paris, 75013

Other trials in France

About this study

Sleep is crucial for global cognitive functioning, but its exact functions and mechanisms are still poorly understood. Cognitive studies of sleep typically rely on linking electrophysiological changes measured during sleep with behavioral and neural changes collected in tasks performed during wakefulness. What concomitantly happens in the mind of sleeping subjects is often ignored, certainly because it is virtually inaccessible. Yet, major advances in the understanding of human behaviors have resulted from an integrated approach that combines both neural and cognitive measures of their ongoing mental processes. The goal of this study is to provide real-time measures of the cognitive processes occurring within sleep.

To prompt real-time access to the sleeping mind, investigators will use auditory stimulation in people with unique sleep peculiarities: sleepwalkers whose overt behaviours may enable to objectively visualize ongoing cognitive processes during non-REM (NREM) sleep.

Read the detailed description

Investigators aim to offer a quantifiable, real-time measure of memory processing during NREM sleep by using memory-related cues to influence which behaviours sleepwalkers will exhibit. Because sleepwalking is characterized by complex behaviors emerging from NREM sleep, it could provide an observable window into mental activity in NREM sleep. While neuronal memory reactivations have largely been demonstrated in sleeping rodents, evidence for the existence of such reactivations in humans is at best indirect. Here, investigators will use targeted memory reactivation (TMR), a tool that allows to control which individual memories are reactivated on a trial by trial basis. TMR consists in associating sensory cues with a specific learning, then re-applying these cues during subsequent sleep to trigger the reactivation of the corresponding learning. Sleepwalkers will be trained on a modified version of the serial reaction time task: sleepwalkers will perform as fast and accurately as possible a sequence of gestures in response to auditory cues. Investigators goals are to: i) show that playing the auditory cues during NREM sleep triggers a behavioral replay of the learned 'choreography' in sleepwalkers, ii) quantify, with a gesture recognition algorithm, how the sleep gestures differ from the wake ones (speed, accuracy, sequence fidelity), and iii) test whether this evoked replay is accompanied by a congruent dream.

Being tested
differences of behavior between sleepwalking and non sleepwalking patient
Keywords
sleepwalking, sleep, memory consolidation, reactivation, dream, targeted memory reactivation
Medical subject headings
Somnambulism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • differences of behavior between sleepwalking and non sleepwalking patientBehavioural

    movement registry done by camera when low intensity sound are send to patient during sleep.

Study groups in NCT05452733
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sleepwalking patientExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: differences of behavior between sleepwalking and non sleepwalking patient
Non sleepwalking patientActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Behavioral: differences of behavior between sleepwalking and non sleepwalking patient

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Behavioral reaction

    number of behavioral reactivations of the motor sequence following the auditory cues during sleep

    Measured: 2 days

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Evaluation of targeted memory reactivation (TMR) success in sleepwalkers by movements test

    test whether performance is better for movements that have been cued during sleep (vs. uncued ones) in sleepwalkers

    Measured: 2 days

  2. Quantification of movements exhibited during sleep

    The quantification of movement will be evaluated by combinaison of the reaction time, speed and precision of movements exhibited by sleepwalkers during sleep vs. wakefulness

    Measured: 2 days

  3. Determination of the link between dream and sensory cues

    Comparison between the number of dreams related to the motor sequence on the 2nd night (after TMR) vs. during the 1st one.

    Measured: 2 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2022
  2. Study start31 Mar 2023
  3. Primary completion29 Aug 2025
  4. Study completion29 Aug 2025

Why it stopped: lack of personnel to perform the tests

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05452733
Sponsor's protocol ID
APHP220764
Acronym
SleepDance
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
17 Jun 2022
Last updated
12 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing differences of behavior between sleepwalking and non sleepwalking patient in people with Memory Reactivation and Memory Consolidation, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: lack of personnel to perform the tests). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Behavioral reaction (time frame: 2 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in