Chronic Pain SyndromeNCT05491499
Assessing the Impact of Exercise Based Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment (IIPT) on Endogenous Pain Modulation in Youth With Chronic Pain Syndromes
An observational study of Chronic Pain Syndrome and Fibromyalgia, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This work will answer two critical questions: 1) Does intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) involving aerobic exercise help normalize pain processing in youth with chronic pain syndromes and 2) Are aerobic fitness levels and the ability to modulate pain inter-related? Currently, medications are ineffective… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain Syndrome, Fibromyalgia, Chronic Headache Disorder
- How many people
- 43 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Oct 2022to 30 Nov 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: Youth with all types of chronic pain syndromes (including but not limited to: headaches, abdominal pain, complex regional pain syndrome, amplified pain syndrome) admitted to the Mayo Family Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Center for intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment.
Who may be able to join
- age 10-17 years
- first test completed within 5 days of admission
- established diagnosis of primary or secondary chronic pain
- report of constant moderate pain (≥ 5/10 on a numeric rating scale of 0-10 points) for at least 3 months duration
- stable use of medications for at least one week prior to the study visit.
Who cannot join
- presence of allodynia in either upper extremity
- a history of central nervous system, heart, kidney, liver and respiratory system diseases, and psychiatric disorders (e.g., bipolar, conversion, psychosis)
- reported consumption of alcohol, cannabis or tobacco products
- unable to read English or follow testing instructions
- intolerant to the thermal test stimulus, or vi) no pain reported at maximum stimulus (48ºC).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Boston Children's Hospital at Waltham
Waltham, Massachusetts, 02453
About this study
This work will answer two critical questions: 1) Does intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) involving aerobic exercise help normalize pain processing in youth with chronic pain syndromes and 2) Are aerobic fitness levels and the ability to modulate pain inter-related?
Currently, medications are ineffective for improving pain and disability in youth with chronic pain syndromes and identifying non-pharmacologic treatments, such as IIPT, that help strengthen the nervous system's ability to modulate or turn pain signals down will improve outcomes and quality of life for youth suffering from chronic pain. This study will help determine whether exercise based IIPT leads to physiologic improvements in how pain is processed, specifically if youth with chronic pain can better turn pain down during the offset analgesia test after an exercise based IIPT treatment, and also help elucidate the link between a child's aerobic fitness and their ability to modulate pain.
Read the detailed description
- Study Design: We will recruit 38 youth with primary and secondary chronic pain syndromes[29; 31] ages 10-17 years who are admitted to the Mayo Family Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Center (PPRC) at Boston Children's Hospital. This longitudinal cohort study will examine responses to the OA and Fitkids Treadmill tests at 2 timepoints: 1) within 5 days of IIPT admission and 2) within 1 week of IIPT discharge. Twelve participants will complete a 3rd visit within 5 days of the first study visit to examine OA test-retest reliability.
- Description of Study Treatments or Exposures/Predictors:
Thermal testing: A computer-controlled temperature paradigm is programmed to deliver each stimulus using the Medoc Thermosensory Analyzer (TSA)-II device (Medoc Ltd. Advanced Medical Systems, Ramat Yishai, Israel). The device operates by a microcomputer-driven 3 cm x 3 cm (9 cm2) Peltier contact thermode secured to the skin by a Velcro band without stretch. Testing is conducted on the non-dominant forearm using 4 locations to minimize skin sensitivity. Participants are blinded to the type of test being performed and expected response patterns.
Assessment of Pain Intensity: During all tests participants rate heat pain intensity continuously in real time using a linear electronic visual analogue scale (eVAS). Participants use their dominant hand to operate a knob on a horizontal sliding eVAS scale (0-100 mm) with the following two anchors: the left defined as "no heat pain sensation" (0 mm) and the right as "most intense heat pain sensation imaginable" (100 mm). Participants are instructed to move the knob on the scale in proportion to perceived heat pain intensity and not temperature intensity during testing.
Determination of the Individualized Test Temperature (ITT): To determine ITT the first temperature stimulus will ramp from baseline (32°C) to 46°C (the 75th percentile heat pain detection threshold for children ages 7-17 years) and held for 5 seconds.[22] The temperature will return to baseline (32°C) for 30 seconds and be repeated three times. If an eVAS of 75/100mm is not consistently reported on all three trials, this paradigm will be repeated at 48ºC. The lowest temperature that consistently evokes an eVAS 75/100mm will be used as the first temperature in all tests.
Offset Analgesia (OA) Test: We will use the same paradigm as our previous study, except for increasing the ITT threshold to 75/100mm.[37] The first temperature (T1) is set to the ITT and held for 5 seconds, followed by a second temperature (T2) 1°Celsius (C) higher for 5 seconds, and then returns to a third temperature (T3) that is equal to T1 for 20 seconds before returning to baseline (32ºC). OA responses are calculated as a percentage of perceived pain reduction following the 1ºC noxious thermal stimulus offset. A larger OA response (i.e., greater pain reduction) reflects a greater ability to actuate pain inhibition.
Control Test: For control tests, T1 and T2 temperatures are identical to those used in the OA paradigm, but T3 is set at the non-noxious baseline temperature (32°C). The control test serves as a physiological discriminative stimulus to examine participants' pain perception in the presence versus absence of a noxious heat stimulus.
Constant Test: For constant tests, the ITT (T1) is applied and held for 30 seconds before returning to baseline (32ºC). The constant test compares the magnitude of habituation and summation occurring during constant and OA tests.
Cardiovascular Endurance Assessment: The Fitkids Treadmill Test (FTT) is a reliable and valid measure of pediatric submaximal cardiovascular endurance.[16; 17] Time to exhaustion (TTE) on the FTT provides an objective, norm-referenced marker of cardiovascular endurance in youth ages 6-18 years and is defined as the total time completed on the test, excluding the warm-up and cool-down phases. Our recent study demonstrated that youth with chronic pain demonstrate impaired cardiovascular endurance compared to age and sex matched peers at baseline and improves significantly after IIPT.[36] The FTT is completed at PPRC admission and discharge as per standard of care for participants who can safely ambulate on a treadmill.
Biopsychosocial Characteristics: A battery of psychosocial and clinical questionnaires are administered as part of routine clinical care at the Mayo Family PPRC and stored in an IRB approved data registry for which Dr. Shulman and Dr. Sethna are co-investigators (P-0015943). Data for responses to these questionnaires will be shared for the current protocol to reduce participant burden. These measures include reliable and valid pediatric questionnaires of physical and emotional functioning including: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Anxiety short form 8a ,[42] PROMIS Depressive Symptoms short form 8a,[42] PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference short form 8a,[42] Central Sensitization Inventory,[27; 28] Functional Disability Inventory.[21; 43] Participant characteristics at IIPT admission including, age, sex, diagnosis, pain intensity ratings, time since symptom onset, and medications will also be included to evaluate similarities and differences among OA responders and non-responders for Aim 3 based on prior research.[23; 25; 33; 39]
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain Syndrome, Fibromyalgia, Chronic Headache Disorder, Functional Abdominal Pain Syndrome, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes
- Medical subject headings
- Fibromyalgia, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Youth with Chronic pain | We will recruit 38 youth with primary and secondary chronic pain syndromes[29; 31] ages 10-17 years who are admitted to the Mayo Family Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Center at Boston Children's Hospital. This longitudinal cohort study will examine responses to the OA and Fitkids Treadmill tests at 2 timepoints: 1) within 5 days of IIPT admission and 2) within 1 week of IIPT discharge. Twelve participants will complete a 3rd visit within 5 days of the first study visit to examine OA test-retest reliability. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Offset Analgesia
Percent reduction in pain following the small, 1º C stimulus offset.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4-6 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change in Control Test Response
Percent reduction in pain following a large stimulus offset to a non-noxious temperature.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4-6 weeks
Change in Constant Test Response
Pain response (area under the curve) during a 30 second constant, moderate heat pain stimulus.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4-6 weeks
Change in Cardiovascular Endurance
Total time to exhaustion (minutes) on the Fitkids Treadmill Test.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 4-6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Aug 2022
- Study start17 Oct 2022
- Primary completion30 Nov 2023
- Study completion30 Nov 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Pain SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boston Children's HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Children's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- APTA Pediatrics
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Julie Shulman, Boston Children's Hospital
- Investigators
- Julie M Shulman, PT, PhD, Principal investigator, Boston Children's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05491499
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P00043035
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 4 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Shulman J, Zurakowski D, Keysor J, Jervis K, Sethna NF. Offset analgesia identifies impaired endogenous pain modulation in pediatric chronic pain disorders. Pain. 2020 Dec;161(12):2852-2859. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001984.
PubMed 32658151Kotte EM, de Groot JF, Bongers BC, Winkler AM, Takken T. Fitkids Treadmill Test: Age- and Sex-Related Normative Values in Dutch Children and Adolescents. Phys Ther. 2016 Nov;96(11):1764-1772. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150399. Epub 2016 May 19.
PubMed 27197825Grill JD, Coghill RC. Transient analgesia evoked by noxious stimulus offset. J Neurophysiol. 2002 Apr;87(4):2205-8. doi: 10.1152/jn.00730.2001.
PubMed 11929939King S, Chambers CT, Huguet A, MacNevin RC, McGrath PJ, Parker L, MacDonald AJ. The epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents revisited: a systematic review. Pain. 2011 Dec;152(12):2729-2738. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.016.
PubMed 22078064Hermans L, Calders P, Van Oosterwijck J, Verschelde E, Bertel E, Meeus M. An Overview of Offset Analgesia and the Comparison with Conditioned Pain Modulation: A Systematic Literature Review. Pain Physician. 2016 Jul;19(6):307-26.
PubMed 27454261
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessing the Impact of Exercise Based Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment (IIPT) on Endogenous Pain Modulation in Youth With Chronic Pain Syndromes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05491499
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P00043035
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain Syndrome, Fibromyalgia, Chronic Headache Disorder, Functional Abdominal Pain Syndrome, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Children's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- APTA Pediatrics
- Study start
- 17 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This work will answer two critical questions: 1) Does intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) involving aerobic exercise help normalize pain processing in youth with chronic pain syndromes and 2) Are aerobic fitness levels and the ability to modulate pain inter-related?
Currently, medications are ineffective for improving pain and disability in youth with chronic pain syndromes and identifying non-pharmacologic treatments, such as IIPT, that help strengthen the nervous system's ability to modulate or turn pain signals down will improve outcomes and quality of life for youth suffering from chronic pain. This study will help determine whether exercise based IIPT leads to physiologic improvements in how pain is processed, specifically if youth with chronic pain can better turn pain down during the offset analgesia test after an exercise based IIPT treatment, and also help elucidate the link between a child's aerobic fitness and their ability to modulate pain.
Detailed description
- Study Design: We will recruit 38 youth with primary and secondary chronic pain syndromes[29; 31] ages 10-17 years who are admitted to the Mayo Family Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Center (PPRC) at Boston Children's Hospital. This longitudinal cohort study will examine responses to the OA and Fitkids Treadmill tests at 2 timepoints: 1) within 5 days of IIPT admission and 2) within 1 week of IIPT discharge. Twelve participants will complete a 3rd visit within 5 days of the first study visit to examine OA test-retest reliability.
- Description of Study Treatments or Exposures/Predictors:
Thermal testing: A computer-controlled temperature paradigm is programmed to deliver each stimulus using the Medoc Thermosensory Analyzer (TSA)-II device (Medoc Ltd. Advanced Medical Systems, Ramat Yishai, Israel). The device operates by a microcomputer-driven 3 cm x 3 cm (9 cm2) Peltier contact thermode secured to the skin by a Velcro band without stretch. Testing is conducted on the non-dominant forearm using 4 locations to minimize skin sensitivity. Participants are blinded to the type of test being performed and expected response patterns.
Assessment of Pain Intensity: During all tests participants rate heat pain intensity continuously in real time using a linear electronic visual analogue scale (eVAS). Participants use their dominant hand to operate a knob on a horizontal sliding eVAS scale (0-100 mm) with the following two anchors: the left defined as "no heat pain sensation" (0 mm) and the right as "most intense heat pain sensation imaginable" (100 mm). Participants are instructed to move the knob on the scale in proportion to perceived heat pain intensity and not temperature intensity during testing.
Determination of the Individualized Test Temperature (ITT): To determine ITT the first temperature stimulus will ramp from baseline (32°C) to 46°C (the 75th percentile heat pain detection threshold for children ages 7-17 years) and held for 5 seconds.[22] The temperature will return to baseline (32°C) for 30 seconds and be repeated three times. If an eVAS of 75/100mm is not consistently reported on all three trials, this paradigm will be repeated at 48ºC. The lowest temperature that consistently evokes an eVAS 75/100mm will be used as the first temperature in all tests.
Offset Analgesia (OA) Test: We will use the same paradigm as our previous study, except for increasing the ITT threshold to 75/100mm.[37] The first temperature (T1) is set to the ITT and held for 5 seconds, followed by a second temperature (T2) 1°Celsius (C) higher for 5 seconds, and then returns to a third temperature (T3) that is equal to T1 for 20 seconds before returning to baseline (32ºC). OA responses are calculated as a percentage of perceived pain reduction following the 1ºC noxious thermal stimulus offset. A larger OA response (i.e., greater pain reduction) reflects a greater ability to actuate pain inhibition.
Control Test: For control tests, T1 and T2 temperatures are identical to those used in the OA paradigm, but T3 is set at the non-noxious baseline temperature (32°C). The control test serves as a physiological discriminative stimulus to examine participants' pain perception in the presence versus absence of a noxious heat stimulus.
Constant Test: For constant tests, the ITT (T1) is applied and held for 30 seconds before returning to baseline (32ºC). The constant test compares the magnitude of habituation and summation occurring during constant and OA tests.
Cardiovascular Endurance Assessment: The Fitkids Treadmill Test (FTT) is a reliable and valid measure of pediatric submaximal cardiovascular endurance.[16; 17] Time to exhaustion (TTE) on the FTT provides an objective, norm-referenced marker of cardiovascular endurance in youth ages 6-18 years and is defined as the total time completed on the test, excluding the warm-up and cool-down phases. Our recent study demonstrated that youth with chronic pain demonstrate impaired cardiovascular endurance compared to age and sex matched peers at baseline and improves significantly after IIPT.[36] The FTT is completed at PPRC admission and discharge as per standard of care for participants who can safely ambulate on a treadmill.
Biopsychosocial Characteristics: A battery of psychosocial and clinical questionnaires are administered as part of routine clinical care at the Mayo Family PPRC and stored in an IRB approved data registry for which Dr. Shulman and Dr. Sethna are co-investigators (P-0015943). Data for responses to these questionnaires will be shared for the current protocol to reduce participant burden. These measures include reliable and valid pediatric questionnaires of physical and emotional functioning including: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Anxiety short form 8a ,[42] PROMIS Depressive Symptoms short form 8a,[42] PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference short form 8a,[42] Central Sensitization Inventory,[27; 28] Functional Disability Inventory.[21; 43] Participant characteristics at IIPT admission including, age, sex, diagnosis, pain intensity ratings, time since symptom onset, and medications will also be included to evaluate similarities and differences among OA responders and non-responders for Aim 3 based on prior research.[23; 25; 33; 39]
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Youth with Chronic pain | – | –We will recruit 38 youth with primary and secondary chronic pain syndromes[29; 31] ages 10-17 years who are admitted to the Mayo Family Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Center at Boston Children's Hospital. This longitudinal cohort study will examine responses to the OA and Fitkids Treadmill tests at 2 timepoints: 1) within 5 days of IIPT admission and 2) within 1 week of IIPT discharge. Twelve participants will complete a 3rd visit within 5 days of the first study visit to examine OA test-retest reliability. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Youth with all types of chronic pain syndromes (including but not limited to: headaches, abdominal pain, complex regional pain syndrome, amplified pain syndrome) admitted to the Mayo Family Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Center for intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- age 10-17 years
- first test completed within 5 days of admission
- established diagnosis of primary or secondary chronic pain
- report of constant moderate pain (≥ 5/10 on a numeric rating scale of 0-10 points) for at least 3 months duration
- stable use of medications for at least one week prior to the study visit.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- presence of allodynia in either upper extremity
- a history of central nervous system, heart, kidney, liver and respiratory system diseases, and psychiatric disorders (e.g., bipolar, conversion, psychosis)
- reported consumption of alcohol, cannabis or tobacco products
- unable to read English or follow testing instructions
- intolerant to the thermal test stimulus, or vi) no pain reported at maximum stimulus (48ºC).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Change in Offset Analgesia
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4-6 weeks
Percent reduction in pain following the small, 1º C stimulus offset.
3 secondary outcomes
Change in Control Test Response
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4-6 weeks
Change in Constant Test Response
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4-6 weeks
Change in Cardiovascular Endurance
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4-6 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2024.
- Background: PubMed 32658151Shulman J, Zurakowski D, Keysor J, Jervis K, Sethna NF. Offset analgesia identifies impaired endogenous pain modulation in pediatric chronic pain disorders. Pain. 2020 Dec;161(12):2852-2859. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001984.
- Background: PubMed 27197825Kotte EM, de Groot JF, Bongers BC, Winkler AM, Takken T. Fitkids Treadmill Test: Age- and Sex-Related Normative Values in Dutch Children and Adolescents. Phys Ther. 2016 Nov;96(11):1764-1772. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150399. Epub 2016 May 19.
- Background: PubMed 11929939Grill JD, Coghill RC. Transient analgesia evoked by noxious stimulus offset. J Neurophysiol. 2002 Apr;87(4):2205-8. doi: 10.1152/jn.00730.2001.
- Background: PubMed 22078064King S, Chambers CT, Huguet A, MacNevin RC, McGrath PJ, Parker L, MacDonald AJ. The epidemiology of chronic pain in children and adolescents revisited: a systematic review. Pain. 2011 Dec;152(12):2729-2738. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.016.
- Background: PubMed 27454261Hermans L, Calders P, Van Oosterwijck J, Verschelde E, Bertel E, Meeus M. An Overview of Offset Analgesia and the Comparison with Conditioned Pain Modulation: A Systematic Literature Review. Pain Physician. 2016 Jul;19(6):307-26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Pain Syndrome
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Low Dose Naltrexone Therapy for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Simultaneous Engagement of Networks for Alleviating Pain (SENAP)
Neuropathic Pain, Postherpetic Neuralgia
Active, not recruiting
Multimodal Manual Therapy vs. Maitland Mobilization for Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain
Chronic Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation for Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain, Sickle Cell Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Lemborexant vs Clonidine vs Sedatives to Treat Insomnia in Chronic Pain Patients
Chronic Insomnia, Chronic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Julie M Shulman, PT, PhD principal investigator
Boston Children's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Chronic Pain Syndrome and Fibromyalgia, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Offset Analgesia (time frame: through study completion, an average of 4-6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05491499, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2024.