Virtual RealityNCT05493774
Preliminary Exploration of Applying Multi-person Simulation Training to Improve Nurse-led Burn and Scald Nursing Care
A study testing Multi-person virtual reality simulation scenario training and Multi-person high-fidelity simulation scenario training in people with Virtual Reality and High Fidelity Simulation Training, run by Chimei Medical Center at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the learning performance of trainees before and after learning burns and scald nursing care by applying the burns and scald virtual reality (VR) training module multi-person interactive training in different places and the traditional training model with a high-fidelity patient. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Virtual Reality, High Fidelity Simulation Training
- What is being tested?
- Multi-person virtual reality simulation scenario training and Multi-person high-fidelity simulation scenario training
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 22 May 2023to 20 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- people who are above 20 years old, with a nurse practitioner certificate and an ACLS or AHA certificate within the validity period.
- people who are interested in learning the role of a team leader in burn and scald care.
- people who have never used an interactive virtual reality (VR) environment device.
Who cannot join
- people who are prone to vertigo or poor balance and are prone to motion sickness.
- people with a history of epilepsy.
- eye surgery or injury within the past 6 months.
- people with facial wounds that prevent them from wearing VR glasses.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The purpose of this study was to compare the learning performance of trainees before and after learning burns and scald nursing care by applying the burns and scald virtual reality (VR) training module multi-person interactive training in different places and the traditional training model with a high-fidelity patient.
Read the detailed description
The clinical instructors, standard practice nurses, training content, and assessment process were the same for the experimental and control groups, except for the training methods of the interventions. A pre-recorded instructional video on burn care was provided to each participant one week prior to the experiment for self-study. The experiment procedure includes research description, pre-test and pre-test questionnaire (about 10 minutes), VR hands-on teaching or environment familiarization phase (about 10 minutes), multi-person simulation training (about 15 minutes) and post-test debrief (about 5 minutes), post-test and questionnaire (about 10 minutes). After completing all experiments, the collected data will be analyzed by the researcher using SPSS version 22.0 for descriptive, t-test, and other statistical analyses.
- Conditions
- Virtual Reality, High Fidelity Simulation Training
- Being tested
- Multi-person virtual reality simulation scenario training, Multi-person high-fidelity simulation scenario training
- Keywords
- Virtual Reality, High Fidelity Simulation Training, Burns
- Medical subject headings
- Burns
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Multi-person virtual reality simulation scenario trainingOther
Using multi-person virtual reality simulation scenario training to evaluate the learning effectiveness of nursing care for emergency burn and scald patients.
Multi-person high-fidelity simulation scenario trainingOther
Using multi-person high-fidelity simulation scenario training to evaluate the learning effectiveness of nursing care for emergency burn and scald patients.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | Virtual reality Receives: Other: Multi-person virtual reality simulation scenario training |
| Control group | Active comparator | High Fidelity Simulation Training Receives: Other: Multi-person high-fidelity simulation scenario training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in knowledge of burn and scald nursing care scale
There were 10 items to evaluate the participants' knowledge of the burn and scald nursing care scale. Each item had four response options. The total score ranged from 0 to 10 and a higher score indicates a higher level of knowledge of burn and scalds nursing care.
Measured: Pre- and post-instructional design (immediately before conducting and after completing simulation scenario training)
Change in motivation and attitude toward learning and personal self-efficacy scale
The motivation and attitude toward learning and personal self-efficacy scale included 21 items. Each item was scored on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranged from 21 to 105 and a higher score indicated a positive motivation and attitude toward learning and a higher level of personal self-efficacy in burn and scald nursing care.
Measured: Pre- and post-instructional design (before conducting and immediately after completing simulation scenario training)
Self-reported measure of satisfaction of learning
The satisfaction of learning scale included 9 items. Each item was scored on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranged from 9 to 45 and a higher score indicated a higher level of satisfaction with the learning intervention in burns and scald nursing care.
Measured: Post-instruction (immediately after completing simulation scenario training)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Aug 2022
- Study start22 May 2023
- Primary completion20 Oct 2023
- Study completion20 Oct 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Virtual RealityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized control trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chimei Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ying-Li Lee, Chimei Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05493774
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 11105-012
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 1 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 29 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Preliminary Exploration of Applying Multi-person Simulation Training to Improve Nurse-led Burn and Scald Nursing Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05493774
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 11105-012
- Conditions
- Virtual Reality, High Fidelity Simulation Training
- Keywords
- Virtual Reality, High Fidelity Simulation Training, Burns
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chimei Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 May 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Oct 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to compare the learning performance of trainees before and after learning burns and scald nursing care by applying the burns and scald virtual reality (VR) training module multi-person interactive training in different places and the traditional training model with a high-fidelity patient.
Detailed description
The clinical instructors, standard practice nurses, training content, and assessment process were the same for the experimental and control groups, except for the training methods of the interventions. A pre-recorded instructional video on burn care was provided to each participant one week prior to the experiment for self-study. The experiment procedure includes research description, pre-test and pre-test questionnaire (about 10 minutes), VR hands-on teaching or environment familiarization phase (about 10 minutes), multi-person simulation training (about 15 minutes) and post-test debrief (about 5 minutes), post-test and questionnaire (about 10 minutes). After completing all experiments, the collected data will be analyzed by the researcher using SPSS version 22.0 for descriptive, t-test, and other statistical analyses.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized control trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | Other: Multi-person virtual reality simulation scenario trainingVirtual reality |
| Control group | Active comparator | Other: Multi-person high-fidelity simulation scenario trainingHigh Fidelity Simulation Training |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- people who are above 20 years old, with a nurse practitioner certificate and an ACLS or AHA certificate within the validity period.
- people who are interested in learning the role of a team leader in burn and scald care.
- people who have never used an interactive virtual reality (VR) environment device.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- people who are prone to vertigo or poor balance and are prone to motion sickness.
- people with a history of epilepsy.
- eye surgery or injury within the past 6 months.
- people with facial wounds that prevent them from wearing VR glasses.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-person virtual reality simulation scenario trainingUsing multi-person virtual reality simulation scenario training to evaluate the learning effectiveness of nursing care for emergency burn and scald patients. | Other | Experimental group |
| Multi-person high-fidelity simulation scenario trainingUsing multi-person high-fidelity simulation scenario training to evaluate the learning effectiveness of nursing care for emergency burn and scald patients. | Other | Control group |
Primary outcome
Change in knowledge of burn and scald nursing care scale
Time frame: Pre- and post-instructional design (immediately before conducting and after completing simulation scenario training)
There were 10 items to evaluate the participants' knowledge of the burn and scald nursing care scale. Each item had four response options. The total score ranged from 0 to 10 and a higher score indicates a higher level of knowledge of burn and scalds nursing care.
Change in motivation and attitude toward learning and personal self-efficacy scale
Time frame: Pre- and post-instructional design (before conducting and immediately after completing simulation scenario training)
The motivation and attitude toward learning and personal self-efficacy scale included 21 items. Each item was scored on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranged from 21 to 105 and a higher score indicated a positive motivation and attitude toward learning and a higher level of personal self-efficacy in burn and scald nursing care.
Self-reported measure of satisfaction of learning
Time frame: Post-instruction (immediately after completing simulation scenario training)
The satisfaction of learning scale included 9 items. Each item was scored on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranged from 9 to 45 and a higher score indicated a higher level of satisfaction with the learning intervention in burns and scald nursing care.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Aug 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Virtual Reality
Recruiting
Breathing Meditation and VR Nature Videos in Angiography Patients: Effects on Anxiety, Comfort, and Physiology
Coronary Angiography, Virtual Reality
Not yet recruiting
Testing the Timing and Application of Virtual Reality Distraction During Knee Injections in a VA Pain Clinic
Pain Management, Injection Pain Prevention
Enrolling by invitation
Virtual Reality-Based Simulation Training for Retrograde Anterior Column Acetabular Screw Placement in Orthopedic Residents
Virtual Reality Simulation
Not yet recruiting
HMD-Based Virtual Reality Simulation in Nursing Skills Education
Nursing Education Research, Nursing Education
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality-Augmented Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Versus Conventional Constraint-Induced Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy.
Cerebral Palsy Spastic Hemiplegic, Functionnal Neurological Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Multi-person virtual reality simulation scenario training and Multi-person high-fidelity simulation scenario training in people with Virtual Reality and High Fidelity Simulation Training, run by Chimei Medical Center at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in knowledge of burn and scald nursing care scale (time frame: Pre- and post-instructional design (immediately before conducting and after completing simulation scenario training)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.