EmergenciesCTPC15NCT05642117
Pediatric Telephone Center Board 15
An observational study of Emergencies and Pediatric ALL, run by University Hospital, Brest at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the follow-up of advices given in a Urgent Medical Aid Service (SAMU 29) for every pediatric's emergency call under 15yo and try to evaluate the adhesion's factors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 15 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Emergencies, Pediatric ALL, Response, Acute Phase
- How many people
- 785 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 1 May 2021to 15 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 15 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: all pediatric's emergency call for a child Under 15yo with a medical advice given by the physician.
Who may be able to join
- all emergency calls at SAMU 29 for under 15yo childs
- medical advices were given by the physician (medication at home OR consult in an emergency department OR consult the general praticionner the same day or later.
Who cannot join
- all emergency calls at SAMU 29 for upper 15yo childs
- participation opposition.
- need for an ambulance or an emergency medical team at home
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Pediatric Telephone Center Board 15 and Adhesion Factors
This study evaluates the follow-up of advices given in a Urgent Medical Aid Service (SAMU 29) for every pediatric's emergency call under 15yo and try to evaluate the adhesion's factors.
Read the detailed description
Many of pediatric's medical emergency are followed by a medical advice in a Urgent Medical aid Service (SAMU).
This advices could be medications advices, to see a general praticionner the same day or later, or to consult in an emergency department.
But the rate of advices really followed by callers is unknown. This study evaluate by who, when and why this advices are followed or not.
- Conditions
- Emergencies, Pediatric ALL, Response, Acute Phase
- Keywords
- Urgent Medical Aid Service (SAMU), Pediatric
- Medical subject headings
- Emergencies, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, Acute-Phase Reaction
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
rate of medical advices with follow-up completed in epidemic condition
number of medical advices followed after calling SAMU in epidemic condition
Measured: 10 days
rate of medical advices with follow-up completed in summer
number of medical advices followed after calling SAMU in summer
Measured: 10 days
Secondary outcomes (4)
epidemiology of pediatric's emergency calls in Urgent Medical Aid Service (SAMU 29)
Who, when and why population calls for an pediatric's emergency probleme
Measured: 10 days in epidemic condition
epidemiology of pediatric's emergency calls in Urgent Medical Aid Service (SAMU 29)
Who, when and why population calls for an pediatric's emergency probleme
Measured: 10 days in summer
adhesion factors to follow medical advice
By who, when and why medical advices were not followed by callers
Measured: 10 days in epidemic condition
adhesion factors to follow medical advice
By who, when and why medical advices were not followed by callers
Measured: 10 days in summer
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Dec 2022
- Study start1 May 2021
- Primary completion15 Sep 2021
- Study completion15 Sep 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for EmergenciesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, BrestThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 785 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Brest
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05642117
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CTPC15 - 29BRC21.0124
- Acronym
- CTPC15
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 10 May 2021
- Last updated
- 8 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pediatric Telephone Center Board 15 and Adhesion Factors
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05642117
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CTPC15 / CTPC15 - 29BRC21.0124
- Conditions
- Emergencies, Pediatric ALL, Response, Acute Phase
- Keywords
- Urgent Medical Aid Service (SAMU), Pediatric
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 785 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, BrestUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Sep 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the follow-up of advices given in a Urgent Medical Aid Service (SAMU 29) for every pediatric's emergency call under 15yo and try to evaluate the adhesion's factors.
Detailed description
Many of pediatric's medical emergency are followed by a medical advice in a Urgent Medical aid Service (SAMU).
This advices could be medications advices, to see a general praticionner the same day or later, or to consult in an emergency department.
But the rate of advices really followed by callers is unknown. This study evaluate by who, when and why this advices are followed or not.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 15 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- all pediatric's emergency call for a child Under 15yo with a medical advice given by the physician.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- all emergency calls at SAMU 29 for under 15yo childs
- medical advices were given by the physician (medication at home OR consult in an emergency department OR consult the general praticionner the same day or later.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- all emergency calls at SAMU 29 for upper 15yo childs
- participation opposition.
- need for an ambulance or an emergency medical team at home
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
rate of medical advices with follow-up completed in epidemic condition
Time frame: 10 days
number of medical advices followed after calling SAMU in epidemic condition
rate of medical advices with follow-up completed in summer
Time frame: 10 days
number of medical advices followed after calling SAMU in summer
4 secondary outcomes
epidemiology of pediatric's emergency calls in Urgent Medical Aid Service (SAMU 29)
Time frame: 10 days in epidemic condition
epidemiology of pediatric's emergency calls in Urgent Medical Aid Service (SAMU 29)
Time frame: 10 days in summer
adhesion factors to follow medical advice
Time frame: 10 days in epidemic condition
adhesion factors to follow medical advice
Time frame: 10 days in summer
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Dec 2022.
Related trials for Emergencies
Recruiting
Effectiveness of the RAUC Pathway in Reducing Unscheduled Hospitalizations After Emergency Digestive Surgery
Digestive Emergency, New Pathway
Not yet recruiting
Development, Validation, and Clinical Trial of a Prediction Tool for High-Risk Emergency Department Revisits
Emergency Department, Revisit
Enrolling by invitation
Improving In-hospital and Post-discharge Patient Education for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Concussion, Mild, Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical Management and Outcomes After Lung Scintigraphy for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department
Pulmonary Embolism (Diagnosis)
Recruiting
Aspiration Risk Assessment by Gastric Ultrasound in eMErgency Surgery and ANesThetic Decision-making: The ARGUMENT Study
Pulmonary Aspiration, Emergency Surgery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Emergencies and Pediatric ALL, run by University Hospital, Brest at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
rate of medical advices with follow-up completed in epidemic condition (time frame: 10 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Dec 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 3 Nov 2026.