AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory Distress SyndromeINRECLISANCT05711966

Comparison of INRECSURE and LISA in Preterm Neonates With RDS

A study testing Ventilator for High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (HFOV) and Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS at 1 site in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary hypothesis of this study is that surfactant administration by INtubate-RECruit-SURfactant-Extubate (IN-REC-SUR-E), via a high frequency oscillatory ventilation recruitment maneuver increases survival without BPD at 36 weeks' gestational age in spontaneously breathing infants born at 24+0-27+6 weeks'… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 24 to 27 weeks
What is being tested?
Ventilator for High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (HFOV) and Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
381 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
9 Jan 2023to 15 Apr 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 24 to 27 weeks
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Infants satisfying the following inclusion criteria will be eligible to participate:
  • Born at 24+0-27+6 in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit participating in the trial (and)
  • Breathing independently and sufficiently with only nasal CPAP or NIPPV for respiratory support (and)
  • Written parental consent has been obtained (and)
  • Failing nasal CPAP or NIPPV during the first 24 hours of life

Who cannot join

  • Severe birth asphyxia or a 5-minute Apgar score less than 3
  • Prior endotracheal intubation for resuscitation or insufficient respiratory drive
  • Prolonged (>21 days) premature rupture of membranes
  • Presence of major congenital abnormalities
  • Hydrops fetalis
  • Inherited disorders of metabolism

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

    Roma, 00168

    Giovanni Vento, Professor, 00390630153237, giovanni.vento@unicatt.it

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Comparison of "IN-REC-SUR-E" and LISA in Preterm Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Randomized Controlled Trial (IN-REC-LISA Trial)

The primary hypothesis of this study is that surfactant administration by INtubate-RECruit-SURfactant-Extubate (IN-REC-SUR-E), via a high frequency oscillatory ventilation recruitment maneuver increases survival without BPD at 36 weeks' gestational age in spontaneously breathing infants born at 24+0-27+6 weeks' gestation affected by Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) and failing nasal CPAP or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) during the first 24 hours of life compared to less invasive surfactant administration (LISA).

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND: RDS represents the main cause of respiratory failure in preterm infants and one of the major causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Surfactant is a well-established therapy in neonatology, but its optimal administration method remains unresolved, especially with the focus on avoiding MV in preterm infants born before 28 weeks' gestational age (i.e. extremely low gestational age newborns - ELGAN). Duration of MV is a key determinant of the se-verity of bronchopulmo-nary dysplasia (BPD). Although attractive and beneficial in clinical practice, the INtubate, SURfac-tant, Extubate (IN-SUR-E) method cannot be universally applied to all pre-term neonates due to non-homogeneous surfactant distribution and lung derecruitment during intu-bation, resulting in failure rate in preterm infants ranging from 19 % to 69 %. A recent randomized clinical trial showed that the application of a recruitment manoeuvre just before surfactant admin-istration, followed by rapid extubation (INtubate-RECruit-SURfactant-Extubate [IN-REC-SUR-E]), decreased the need for MV during the first 72 h of life compared with IN-SUR-E technique in ELGAN, without in-creasing the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. Recent-ly, a less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) method was developed with surfactant intro-duced into the trachea of infants breathing spontaneously using a small catheter instead of an endo-tracheal tube. The LISA technique poten-tially combines the benefits of early surfactant treatment CPAP avoiding MV. The last network me-ta-analyses on the comparative efficacy of methods for surfactant administration found that among preterm infants, LISA technique was associated with lower likelihood of mortality, need for MV and BPD compared with IN-SUR-E, but these findings did not include comparison to IN-REC-SUR-E method. More importantly, data for ELGAN are not as robust as for the higher gestation age groups. The same Authors of meta-analysis agree that data for ELGAN are not as ro-bust as for higher gestation age group and that lung recruitment before sur-factant administration (IN-REC-SUR-E) represents a promising novel alternative. The investigators therefore de-signed this study to compare the IN-REC-SUR-E technique with LISA for evaluating the compara-tive effectiveness of these techniques in increasing the survival without BPD of ELGANs.

METHODS: The primary hypothesis of this study is that IN-REC-SUR-E via a HFOV recruitment maneuver increases survival without BPD at 36 weeks' gestational age in spontaneously breathing ELGAN and failing nCPAP or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) during the first 24 hours of life compared to LISA treatment.

Study design: this study is an unblinded multi-center randomized trial of IN-REC-SUR-E vs. LISA in ELGANs.

Randomisation and Masking: infants will be allocated to one of the two treatment groups (1:1) ac-cording to a restricted randomization procedure. Stratification factors will include centre and gesta-tional age (24+0 to 25+6 weeks or 26+0 to 27+6 weeks). The table of allocation will not be disclosed to ensure concealment and the randomization will be provided through Research Electron-ic Data Capture (RedCap) web application. The assignment to intervention will be unmasked to all trial par-ticipants: parents, research staff, and medical team will be only aware of study group as-signment af-ter randomization procedures.

Management in the Delivery Room: Neonates will be stabilized after birth with positive pressure us-ing a neonatal mask and a T-piece system (i.e. Neopuff Infant Resuscitator ®, Fisher and Paykel, Auckland, New Zealand). All neonates will be started on nCPAP of at least 6 cm H2O via mask or nasal prongs. Newborns who do not breathe or who are persistently bradycardic within the first 60 seconds after birth will receive positive-pressure ventilation with initial FiO2 of 0.30. Infants that will be transitioned successfully to spontaneous breathing will be transferred to NICU on nCPAP (6-7 cm H2O) or NIPPV. The decision to intubate and start MV in the delivery room will be in ac-cordance with the American Heart Association Guidelines. Method and timing of umbilical cord clamping will be as per standard practice at each site.

Surfactant treatment Nasal CPAP or NIPPV in the NICU will perform by nasal prongs or nasal mask, with a pressure of 7-8 cm H2O or with a setting of peak inspiratory pressure of 12-15 cmH2O, positive end-expiratory pressure of 7-8 cmH2O and rate of 30-40 breaths/min, respectively. Infants will receive surfactant with IN-REC-SUR-E or LISA if they need a FiO2 ≥ 0.30 maintain a SpO2 between 90% to 94% for at least 30 min. Infants will also be given surfactant if their clinical status will deteriorate rapidly or will develop respiratory acidosis defined as a pCO2 more than 65 mmHg (8.5 kPa) and a pH less than 7.20, or with lung ultrasound scoring >8. A loading dose of intravenous caffeine citrate (20 mg/kg) will be given in the delivery room or immediately after admission to the NICU (within 2 hours of life) or in any case prior to surfactant administration, followed by a daily morning in-trave-nous dose of 5-10 mg/kg as required.

All neonates of both groups will receive preprocedural medications using intravenous atropine (10 µg/kg) in one minute followed by intravenous fentanyl: 0.5 µg/kg by pump infusion in no less than 5 minutes (possibly repeatable dose if satisfactory analgosedation is not obtained) or followed by in-travenous ketamine: 0.5 mg/kg in no less than one minute (possibly repeatable dose if satisfactory analgosedation is not obtained). Method of premedication will be documented in each participating centre.

IN-REC-SUR-E group infants after intubation, will receive HFOV starting at MAP 8 cmH2O; fre-quency 15 Hz, with volum guarantee (1.5-1.7 mL/kg). The I:E will be 1:1. An oxygenation guided lung recruitment procedure will be performed using stepwise increments then decrements in MAP. The starting MAP will be increased stepwise as long as SpO2 improves reducing the FiO2 keeping SpO2 within the target range (90-94 %) until the oxygenation no longer improves or the FiO2 is equal to or less than 0.25 (opening MAP). Next, the MAP will be reduced stepwise until the SpO2 deteriorates (closing MAP). After a second recruitment maneuver at the opening pressure, the opti-mal MAP will be set 2 cmH2O above the closing MAP. Then 200 mg/kg of poractant alfa (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy) via a closed administration system will administrate. In-fants with sufficient respiratory drive will be extubated within 30 minutes after surfactant admin-istration start-ing nCPAP (7-9 cm H2O) or NIPPV.

LISA Group infants allocated will receive 200 mg/kg of poractant alfa (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy) during nCPAP of 7-8 cmH2O. Surfactant will be administered over 0.5-3 min using the SurfCath™ tracheal instillation catheter (VYGON S.A. - Ecouen, France), or a 4- 6 F end-hole catheter. The infant's mouth will be closed. In cases of apnoea or bradycardia, positive pressure ven-tilation will be performed until recovery. After surfactant administration, CPAP (7-9 cm H2O) or NIPPV will be continued.

Transcutaneous PaCO2 will be recorded during surfactant administration in both the procedures (IN-REC-SUR-E and LISA), if available.

In nCPAP infants, the decision as to whether to begin bilevel positive airway pressure or NIPPV to prevent the need for re-intubation in infants of both groups will be up to the neonatologist on duty and will be considered in the final analysis. Infants in both groups who meet the CPAP/NIPPV fail-ure criteria again during the following 24 h will receive a second dose of surfactant (100 mg/kg of poractant alfa) according to the randomized group (IN-REC-SUR-E or LISA).

The indications for MV after IN-REC-SUR-E or LISA will be: Poor oxygenation with FiO2 of greater than 0.40 to maintain a SpO2 between 90% to 94% despite CPAP (7-9 cm H2O) or NIPPV; respiratory; apnoea, despite optimal noninvasive respiratory sup-port.

Primary outcome is a composite outcome of death or BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age.

DATA COLLECTION AND MANAGMENT. A customized eCRF (eletronic Case Report Form) will be created for the study. Pseudo-anonimyzed study data will be collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemellli, IRCCS (https://redcap-irccs.policlinicogemelli.it/). All collected data will be obtained from the clini-cal records. All data above listed in "Primary out-come measure", "secondary outcome measure", and "Other collected data" sections. Adverse events, device deficiency and incidents will be rec-orded and reported to Manufacturer and the National Competent Authority as per applicable law.

Statistical analysis The investigators hypothesized that IN-REC-SUR-E technique for surfactant administration might increase the survival without BPD at 36 weeks of postmenstrual age in extremely preterm infants, respect to LISA approach, from 65 % to 80 %. The investigators based the 15 % difference estimate from the data of the German Neonatal Network (GNN) on the LISA approach, from the results of the OPTIMIST trial recently published and from updated data on the IN-REC-SUR-E technique of some Italian Centers that continued to use this strategy even after that the INRECSURE study had ended. The investigators calculated that 181 newborns must be enrolled in each group to detect this difference as statistically significant with 90 % power at 0.05 level. 381 patients will be randomly assigned to accommodate the risk of enrolling a 5% of patients judged not meeting inclusion criteria after randomization. Twins will be separately randomized. Analyses will be done according to the intention-to-treat and per-protocol principles, as suggested by CONSORT guidelines, with the primary outcome assessed in the in-ten-tion-to-treat population. The intention-to-treat population will include all participants assigned to study intervention, and the per-protocol population will include all participants who receive and complete the study intervention, and who met study criteria. For the primary outcome, a log-binomial regression model correcting for the stratification factors of gestational age and study centre will be used to estimate the adjusted relative risk (RR). Moreover, the absolute risk reduction and the number-needed-to-treat will be calculated. Statistical analyses will be done using Stata software, version 16. An interim-analysis for safety to evaluate the prespecified stopping rules will be done at 30 % of recruitment by an independent statistician, masked to the treatment allocation. The prespecified clinical and safety outcomes will be: in-hospital mortality, intraventricular haemor-rhage worse than grade 2 and pneumothorax. The data and safety monitoring board will have un-masked access to all data and will discuss the results of the interim analysis with the steer-ing com-mittee in a joint meeting. The steering committee will decide on the continuation of the trial and will report to the central ethics committee.

Duration of study: 3 years QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES Compliance to protocol Compliance will be defined as full adherence to protocol. Compliance with the protocol will be ensured by a number of procedures as: site set-up local principal investigators are required to participate in preparatory meetings in which details of study protocol, data collection, "IN-REC-SUR-E" and "LISA" procedures will be accurately discussed. All centers will receive de-tailed written instruction on web based data recording, and, to solve possible difficulties, it will be possible to contact the Clinical Trials Coordinating Center. Moreover, it has been ascertained that "IN-REC-SUR-E" and "LISA" procedures are followed similarly in all participating centers.

Being tested
Ventilator for High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (HFOV), Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA)
Keywords
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Surfactant, INRECSURE, LISA
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ventilator for High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (HFOV)Device

    This device will be used to perform an HFOV recruitment maneuver before surfactant administration

  • Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA)Device

    SurfCath™ tracheal instillation catheter, or a 4- 6 F end-hole catheter, according to local protocols will be used for surfactant administration

Study groups in NCT05711966
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IN-REC-SUR-EExperimentalINRECSURE infants will receive preintubation medications and HFOV starting at MAP 8 cmH2O; frequency 15 Hz, with volume-guarantee (1.5-1.7 mL/kg). The I:E will be 1:1. An oxygenation guid-ed lung recruitment procedure will be performed using stepwise increments then decrements in MAP. The starting MAP will be increased stepwise as long as SpO2 improves reducing the FiO2 keeping SpO2 within the target range (90-94 %) until the oxygenation no longer improves or the FiO2 is equal to or less than 0.25 (opening MAP). Next, the MAP will be reduced stepwise until the SpO2 deterio-rates (closing MAP). After a second recruitment maneuver at the opening pressure, the optimal MAP will be set 2 cmH2O above the closing MAP. Then 200 mg/kg of poractant alfa (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy) via a closed administration system will administrate. Infants with sufficient res-piratory drive will be extubated within 30 minutes after surfactant administration starting nCPAP (7-9 cm H2O) or NIPPV.
Receives: Device: Ventilator for High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (HFOV)
Less Invasive Surfactant AdministrationActive comparatorBy contrast, infants allocated to the LISA group will receive 200 mg/kg of poractant alfa (Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Parma, Italy) according to the following protocol: during nasal CPAP with a pressure of 7-8 cm H2O, surfactant will be administered over 0.5-3 min using the SurfCath™ tracheal instillation catheter (VYGON S.A. - Ecouen, France), or a 4- 6 F end-hole catheter, according to local protocols. After the same pre-procedural medications, the catheters will be positioned during laryngoscopy with or without Magill forceps. The catheter will be connected to a syringe pre-filled with the surfactant, and the surfactant is instilled slowly. The infant's mouth will be closed. In cases of apnoea or bradycardia, positive pressure ventilation will be performed until recovery. After surfactant administration, CPAP (7-9 cm H2O) therapy (16) or NIPPV will be continued.
Receives: Device: Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. A composite outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age

    A composite outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age is the primary outcome because BPD represents the most severe respiratory morbidity of preterm infants and death is a competing risk. The diagnosis of BPD will be ascertained by a standardized test. Infants remaining on mechanical ventilation or CPAP at 36 weeks postmenstrual age, or those with a supplemental oxygen concentration ≥0.30 to obtain SpO2 between 90% to 94% will receive a BPD diagnosis without additional testing. Infants with a supplemental oxygen concentration < 0.30 to obtain SpO2 between 90% to 94% or those receiving high-flow nasal cannula therapy will undergo a timed stepwise reduction to room air without any flow. Those in whom the reduction will not be tolerated will receive a BPD diagnosis.

    Measured: 36 weeks' postmenstrual age or death

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. BPD at 36 weeks' s postmenstrual age

    BPD at 36 weeks' s postmenstrual age

    Measured: 36 weeks' s postmenstrual age

  2. Death at 36 weeks' s postmenstrual age or before discharge

    Death at 36 weeks' s postmenstrual age or before discharge

    Measured: 36 weeks' s postmenstrual age or hospital stay

  3. SpO2/FiO2 at 3 days, 7 days, and thereafter every 7 days until 36 weeks postmenstrual age

    SpO2/FiO2 at 3 days, 7 days, and thereafter every 7 days until 36 weeks postmenstrual age

    Measured: 36 weeks postmenstrual age

  4. Severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grade 3 or 4 based on the Papile criteria)

    Severe intraventricular hemorrhage (grade 3 or 4 based on the Papile criteria) minimum: grade 3 maximum: grade 4 Grade 4 means a worse outcome

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 12 weeks

  5. Occurrence of air leaks including pneumothorax or pulmonary interstitial emphysema before discharge

    Occurrence of air leaks including pneumothorax or pulmonary interstitial emphysema before discharge

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 12 weeks

  6. Duration of invasive respiratory support

    Duration of invasive respiratory support

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 12 weeks

  7. Duration of non-invasive respiratory support

    Duration of non-invasive respiratory support

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 12 weeks

  8. Duration of oxygen therapy

    Duration of oxygen therapy

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 12 weeks

  9. Rate of pulmonary Hemorrhage

    Pulmonary hemorrhage

    Measured: First 72 hours of life

  10. Rate of patent ductus arteriosus; haemodynamically significant (PDAhs) (i.e.requiring pharmacological treatment with ibuprofen/indomethacin/acetaminophen).

    Patent ductus arteriosus; haemodynamically significant (PDAhs) (i.e.requiring pharmacological treatment with ibuprofen/indomethacin/acetaminophen).

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 12 weeks

  11. Percentage of infants receiving two or more doses of surfactant

    Percentage of infants receiving two or more doses of surfactant

    Measured: First 72 hours of life

  12. Incidence of periventricular leukomalacia (PVL)

    Incidence of periventricular leukomalacia (PVL)

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 12 weeks

  13. Incidence of a grade 3 or above retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)

    Incidence of a grade 3 or above retinopathy of prematurity (ROP)

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 12 weeks

  14. Incidence of any necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)

    Incidence of any necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 12 weeks

  15. Incidence of sepsis defined as a positive blood culture or suggestive clinical and laboratory findings leading to treatment with antibiotics for at least 7 days despite absence of a positive blood culture

    Incidence of sepsis defined as a positive blood culture or suggestive clinical and laboratory findings leading to treatment with antibiotics for at least 7 days despite absence of a positive blood culture

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 12 weeks

  16. Total in-hospital stay

    Total in-hospital stay

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 12 weeks

  17. Rate of use of systemic postnatal steroids

    Use of systemic postnatal steroids

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 12 weeks

  18. Neurodevelopmental outcomes via Bayley scales of infant development-III and respiratory function testing at 24 months of age.

    Bayley III - Nancy Bayley (scales of infantand toddler development third edition) 45 minimum value and155 maximum value (higher scores mean a better outcome)

    Measured: 24 months of age

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Feb 2023
  2. Study start9 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion15 Apr 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Apr 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
381 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05711966
Sponsor's protocol ID
4933
Acronym
INRECLISA
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
16 Jan 2023
Last updated
17 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Brix N, Sellmer A, Jensen MS, Pedersen LV, Henriksen TB. Predictors for an unsuccessful INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation procedure: a cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2014 Jun 19;14:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-155.

    PubMed 24947477
  • Svedenkrans J, Stoecklin B, Jones JG, Doherty DA, Pillow JJ. Physiology and Predictors of Impaired Gas Exchange in Infants with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug 15;200(4):471-480. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201810-2037OC.

    PubMed 30789787
  • Lakkundi A, Wright I, de Waal K. Transitional hemodynamics in preterm infants with a respiratory management strategy directed at avoidance of mechanical ventilation. Early Hum Dev. 2014 Aug;90(8):409-12. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.04.017. Epub 2014 Jun 5.

    PubMed 24951077
  • Dani C, Corsini I, Bertini G, Fontanelli G, Pratesi S, Rubaltelli FF. The INSURE method in preterm infants of less than 30 weeks' gestation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Sep;23(9):1024-9. doi: 10.3109/14767050903572174.

    PubMed 20180736
  • Cherif A, Hachani C, Khrouf N. Risk factors of the failure of surfactant treatment by transient intubation during nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Am J Perinatol. 2008 Nov;25(10):647-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1090590. Epub 2008 Oct 7.

    PubMed 18841536
  • Vento G, Ventura ML, Pastorino R, van Kaam AH, Carnielli V, Cools F, Dani C, Mosca F, Polglase G, Tagliabue P, Boni L, Cota F, Tana M, Tirone C, Aurilia C, Lio A, Costa S, D'Andrea V, Lucente M, Nigro G, Giordano L, Roma V, Villani PE, Fusco FP, Fasolato V, Colnaghi MR, Matassa PG, Vendettuoli V, Poggi C, Del Vecchio A, Petrillo F, Betta P, Mattia C, Garani G, Solinas A, Gitto E, Salvo V, Gargano G, Balestri E, Sandri F, Mescoli G, Martinelli S, Ilardi L, Ciarmoli E, Di Fabio S, Maranella E, Grassia C, Ausanio G, Rossi V, Motta A, Tina LG, Maiolo K, Nobile S, Messner H, Staffler A, Ferrero F, Stasi I, Pieragostini L, Mondello I, Haass C, Consigli C, Vedovato S, Grison A, Maffei G, Presta G, Perniola R, Vitaliti M, Re MP, De Curtis M, Cardilli V, Lago P, Tormena F, Orfeo L, Gizzi C, Massenzi L, Gazzolo D, Strozzi MCM, Bottino R, Pontiggia F, Berardi A, Guidotti I, Cacace C, Meli V, Quartulli L, Scorrano A, Casati A, Grappone L, Pillow JJ. Lung recruitment before surfactant administration in extremely preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (IN-REC-SUR-E): a randomised, unblinded, controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Feb;9(2):159-166. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30179-X. Epub 2020 Jul 17.

    PubMed 32687801
  • Kribs A. Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy and Noninvasive Respiratory Support. Clin Perinatol. 2016 Dec;43(4):755-771. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

    PubMed 27837757
  • Bellos I, Fitrou G, Panza R, Pandita A. Comparative efficacy of methods for surfactant administration: a network meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 Sep;106(5):474-487. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319763. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

    PubMed 33452218
  • Nobile S, Bottoni A, Giordano L, Paladini A, Vento G. Critical appraisal of the evidence underpinning the efficacy of less invasive surfactant administration. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023 Jan;108(1):90-91. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-323100. Epub 2021 Oct 16. No abstract available.

    PubMed 34656993
  • Janssen LC, Van Der Spil J, van Kaam AH, Dieleman JP, Andriessen P, Onland W, Niemarkt HJ. Minimally invasive surfactant therapy failure: risk factors and outcome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Nov;104(6):F636-F642. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316258. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

    PubMed 31036700
  • Bellos I, Pandita A. SurE for surfactant: response to letter. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2023 Jan;108(1):91-92. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-323394. Epub 2021 Nov 29. No abstract available.

    PubMed 34844986
  • Finer NN, Katheria A. Recruitment: the best way to IN-SUR-E surfactant delivery? Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Feb;9(2):119-120. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30242-3. Epub 2020 Jul 17. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32687802
  • Broglio K. Randomization in Clinical Trials: Permuted Blocks and Stratification. JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2223-2224. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6360. No abstract available.

    PubMed 29872845
  • Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, Hallman M, Ozek E, Te Pas A, Plavka R, Roehr CC, Saugstad OD, Simeoni U, Speer CP, Vento M, Visser GHA, Halliday HL. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome - 2019 Update. Neonatology. 2019;115(4):432-450. doi: 10.1159/000499361. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

    PubMed 30974433
  • Aziz K, Lee HC, Escobedo MB, Hoover AV, Kamath-Rayne BD, Kapadia VS, Magid DJ, Niermeyer S, Schmolzer GM, Szyld E, Weiner GM, Wyckoff MH, Yamada NK, Zaichkin J. Part 5: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S524-S550. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000902. Epub 2020 Oct 21. No abstract available.

    PubMed 33081528

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ventilator for High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation (HFOV) and Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in people with Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Giovanni Vento, MD (+39 0630153237, giovanni.vento@unicatt.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

A composite outcome of death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (time frame: 36 weeks' postmenstrual age or death). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05711966, which also lists 29 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in