Knee OsteoarthritisNCT05730829
Pain Informed Movement for People With Knee Osteoarthritis
A study testing pain informed movement, standard neuromuscular exercise and Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare a pain informed movement program to standard neuromuscular exercise in people with knee osteoarthritis. The main question it aims to answer are: 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- pain informed movement, standard neuromuscular exercise and Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 69 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 3 Apr 2023to 3 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- - ≥40 years of age with diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (OA) by a physician OR;
- ≥45 years of age and having activity-related knee joint pain with or without morning stiffness lasting 30 minutes (NICE criteria)
- Having an average pain intensity of 3/10 on a numeric pain scale on most days of the past month
Who cannot join
- Cannot communicate in English;
- Has inflammatory arthritis or other systemic conditions;
- Have had lower limb trauma or surgery within the past 6 months;
- Have participated in a knee OA exercise program in the prior 3 months;
- Have had any injection in the index knee within 3-months prior to baseline assessment
- Does not have regular access to the internet
Show all 12Show fewer
- Inability to get up and down from the floor independently
- Use of mobility aids
- Currently participating in any other drug/device/exercise clinical trial related to OA
- Planned absences (e.g., trips away) of >1 week
- Currently receiving other forms of care for knee OA pain (e.g., from a physiotherapist, chiropractor, athletic therapist, kinesiologist)
- Does not meet screening for safe participation in exercise according to the Get Active questionnaire from the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Pain Informed Movement for People With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot and Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare a pain informed movement program to standard neuromuscular exercise in people with knee osteoarthritis. The main question it aims to answer are:
- Are the two interventions a) pain informed movement program plus pain neuroscience education and b) neuromuscular exercise plus standard osteoarthritis education feasible in terms of recruitment, treatment adherence, timelines, data collection procedures, patient follow-up, and resources required?
- Is there a difference in patient's satisfaction and acceptability of the two programs?
- Are there any differences in the potential effects of the two programs on subjective pain measures, self-reported function, quality of life, functional leg strength, nervous system pain modulation, brain derived neurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor levels, and psychological factors?
Read the detailed description
It is critical to understand the underlying mechanism of knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain in order to effectively manage knee OA. It has become clear that alterations in central and peripheral nervous system functioning occurs in people with knee OA and pain sensitization is a common feature. Descending modulation from the central nervous system can facilitate or inhibit nociception. Endogenous pain modulation through the descending system is an important factor as its dysregulation has significant ramifications in pain facilitation and promotion of chronic pain development and maintenance at all levels of the nervous system. The current guidelines lack focus on how to effectively manage it, which is a potential reason for why the current methods in conservative management of knee OA pain are only moderately effective. Mind-body approaches are uniquely positioned to potentially reverse the sensitization, induce positive neuroplastic changes, and improve descending pain modulation resulting in decreased pain intensity in many chronic pain populations. This study involves an exercise program which the investigators call 'Pain Informed Movement' that includes evidence-based exercises combined with mind-body techniques and pain neuroscience education. The data from this phase will be used to inform a multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the program's effectiveness with the primary outcome of change in pain severity mediated by change in descending pain modulation.
Exercise is regularly used as a first-line management option for knee OA, and its use is supported by high quality evidence to improve pain and function. Clinical practice guidelines for people with knee OA recommend the use of aerobic and strength training for the reduction of pain and improved physical function. Currently, one of the key components of conservative management of knee OA often implemented by clinicians is a type of exercise called neuromuscular exercise, which aims at improving sensorimotor control and the functionality of the knee joint by addressing movement in all three movement planes. Previous research has showed that the neuromuscular exercise programs designed specifically for knee OA can reduce pain, improve function, alter knee biomechanics, and improve the muscle-activation patterns of the surrounding knee musculature. While exercise is the first line treatment for knee OA and can lead to improvements in physical function and pain, it is important to highlight that it has a moderate effect, which may be short term.
In recent years multiple guidelines for non-surgical management of knee OA have begun to include mind-body therapies, such as yoga or tai-chi, as conditional or core treatment recommendations. Mind-body therapies can lead to pain reductions and improvement of function through various techniques. For instance, breathing exercises including breath awareness and regulation can activate the parasympathetic nervous system and decrease the danger signals of pain, leading to improvement of pain levels. Meditative breathing can lead to reductions in pain levels by modulating the somatosensory cortex. Relaxation techniques focused on relaxing the muscles that become tense as a result of pain and by association can re-enforce or aggravate pain, can influence the pain experience by reversing that association. Mindfulness meditation and mindful movement which can lead to a switch from sensory pain to the interoceptive awareness of the movements of the different body parts, resulting in reduced muscle tension, improvements in postural stability and proprioception, and reductions in pain levels. Mind-body therapies also lead to improvement of psychological factors such as depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, increasing pain acceptance, changing patients' relationships to their pain, which in turn lead to reductions in pain levels. The positive effects of mindfulness practices have been reported to last in longer-term follow ups such as 15 months, and 3 years.
Education is another core component recommended by clinical guidelines and known to be effective particularly when combined with exercise. Pain Neuroscience education (PNE) is an alternative technique of teaching patients about pain and how to rethink and re-evaluate the way pain is viewed. The use of PNE in physical therapy interventions has been steadily increasing due to its positive effects on pain and function in many chronic pain patient populations. PNE includes an explanation of the neurophysiology of pain and its process by the nervous system. This includes how pain can be modulated through upregulation or downregulation of signals to increase or decrease the pain experience and that these changes are not necessarily related to tissue damage, particularly when pain becomes chronic. PNE also provides information regarding the influence of various psychosocial aspects. By offering avenues to reconceptualize pain as a threat to the body and movement as imminent danger, patients may become more willing to participate in physical activity and tolerate slight increases in pain and discomfort.
In contrast standard OA education is the traditional and most widely used educational model in people with knee OA, focuses heavily on a pathoanatomical perspective of pain referring mainly to anatomy, biomechanics, and patho-anatomy of OA and the knee joint.
Given the importance of finding effective management strategies for pain modulation in people with knee OA, there is a need to further our understanding of the impact of evidence-based exercise combined with mind-body techniques (e.g., breathing exercises and mindfulness) with PNE on pain mechanisms.
The study is a pilot RCT with a nested qualitative component. The study will be guided by the Conceptual Framework for Defining Feasibility and Pilot studies and the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Intervention Trials.
Study Population
A sample of 66 adults will be sought. The sample size is based on the primary outcome of complete follow-up using the confidence interval method for calculating sample size in pilot trials. 90% follow-up rate is the aim but the trial will be considered successful if 81% is achieved. To achieve a margin of error of 9%, with 10% added for attrition, 66 participants is required.
Recruitment Participants will be recruited through the email lists of the McMaster Physical Activity Centre of Excellence (PACE) community and the McMaster Institute for Research on Aging (MIRA) newsletter. Postings will be placed on both PACE and MIRA social media pages. In addition, the study poster will be placed on other social media channels (i.e., Twitter, Facebook advertisements). In addition, flyers will be placed in local orthopaedic surgeon, Rheumatologist and Physiatrists offices. Physicians will provide potential participants with a one-page study information sheet in lay language. If interested, potential participants can then contact the research team through the contact information provided in the flyer.
Setting The in-person 8-week exercise program will be held twice weekly at McMaster University's Physical Activity Centre of Excellence (PACE) located in the Ivor-Wynne Centre or in one of two local community churches. Participants will complete the pain assessment, and have blood drawn at PACE by PACE staff who are certified phlebotomists.
Assessment As part of participation in the study, participants will be asked to attend an assessment at the beginning of the study, and once again upon completing the 8-week exercise program. Participants will conditioned undergo pain modulation (CPM) and mechanical temporal summation testing, and the 30 Second Sit to Stand Test to determine leg strength and endurance. Lastly, participants will have their blood drawn (fasting) at the beginning and end of the study. Participants will then be asked to complete a series of questionnaires about their pain and mood.
Interventions Twice weekly group exercise sessions will be 75 minutes for the intervention group and 60 minutes in duration for the control group. The intervention arm class is slightly longer due to the detailed delivery of instructions for the techniques during the class. Participants will be given instructions to complete these exercises at home at least one other time during the week for the same duration. Participants will receive education videos that are ~15-20 minutes each week, for up to 4 weeks.
Pain Informed Movement and PNE - During the neuromuscular exercise sessions, the PNE components and concepts such as mindfulness, muscle tension regulation, and breathing techniques will be applied by the instructor.
Neuromuscular exercise and standard OA education - The exercise component (i.e., the specific movements) of this group will be similar to those of the intervention group without the added mind-body techniques.
Randomization and allocation concealment Participants will be randomized with an allocation ratio of 1:1 into one of two treatment groups (Pain informed movement and PNE versus neuromuscular exercise and standard OA education) using a REDCap randomization module. Following consent and completion of baseline assessment, the assessor (different person than the recruiter) will log in to the website, open the participants' identification record and click on the randomize button. Randomization will be blocked and this process will ensure allocation concealment. As allocation concealment occurs following the baseline assessment, the assessors will be blinded at baseline and follow up assessment. Blinding of instructors is generally not possible in studies of physical interventions (i.e., exercise). Participants will be blinded to study hypotheses and the two treatment groups. As both arms of the study are providing exercise based interventions and education, participants will be provided limited details of each intervention arm so as to blind them from knowing which is the intervention and which is the control. This will help minimize any bias that occurs by knowledge of group assignment and perception of treatment effects.
Exit Survey and Focus Group In addition to the primary and secondary outcomes, a satisfaction survey will be conducted at the end of the program to evaluate the a priori feasibility criteria. Participants who indicated upon initially consenting to the study that would like to participate in a focus group, will be contacted. Qualitative data collection will be used to explore participants experience and perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of the program. A focus group will be conducted using audio or video recording (using Zoom), lasting between 45-60 minutes.
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- pain informed movement, standard neuromuscular exercise, Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE), Standard osteoarthritis (OA) education
- Keywords
- pain modulation, mind-body exercise
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
pain informed movementOther
group classes twice weekly for 8 weeks of neuromuscular exercise in combination with mind-body techniques such as breath regulation, muscle tension regulation, relaxation, mindfulness, awareness of pain related thoughts and emotions.
standard neuromuscular exerciseOther
group classes twice weekly for 8 weeks of neuromuscular exercise.
Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE)Other
The pain neuroscience education (PNE) will be delivered in videos addressing concepts such as the purpose of pain, neurophysiological changes of pain, movement guidelines when pain persists, and self-care techniques to impact neurophysiology and support moving with ease that include breath awareness and regulation, muscle tension regulation, awareness of pain related thoughts and emotions, relaxation, and body awareness.
Standard osteoarthritis (OA) educationOther
The standard osteoarthritis (OA) education will address the following topics, OA prevalence, risk factors, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, role of exercise, surgery, self-management
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Informed Movement and pain neuroscience education | Experimental | Participants will receive a twice weekly, 8 week in-person group exercise program, consisting of exercise instruction (75 minutes) and pain neuroscience education (PNE) videos (20 to 30 minutes/week for the first 4 weeks). During the exercise sessions, the educational components and concepts such as mindfulness, muscle tension regulation, and breathing techniques will be applied by the instructor. A third home session (weekly) will be facilitated by exercise handout sheets. The exercise component will be delivered by an experienced yoga teacher that has been extensively trained. The PNE video component will cover the following topics: The purpose of pain, neurophysiological changes of pain, movement guidelines when pain persists, and self-care techniques to impact neurophysiology and support moving with ease that include breath awareness and regulation, muscle tension regulation, awareness of pain related thoughts and emotions, relaxation, and body awareness. Receives: Other: pain informed movement; Other: Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) |
| Standard neuromuscular exercise and OA education | Active comparator | Participants in this group will receive an 8-week in-person group exercise program held twice weekly, in which they will receive exercise instructions (60 minutes) and standard osteoarthritis (OA) education (15 to 20 minutes/week for the first 4 weeks). A third home session (weekly) will be facilitated by exercise handout sheets. The exercise component (i.e., the specific movements) of this group will be similar to those of the other group without the added techniques of breath awareness and regulation, muscle tension regulation, awareness of pain related thoughts and emotions, relaxation, and body awareness. The standard OA education videos will cover the following topics: common OA symptoms, risk factors associated with knee OA, and the effects of exercise and self-management tips. The exercise and education components will be delivered by a physiotherapist in the research team. Receives: Other: standard neuromuscular exercise; Other: Standard osteoarthritis (OA) education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Follow up
The follow-up rate is calculated as the number (percentage) of participants who completed the study out of those who completed the baseline assessment.
Measured: 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
Number of Participants Who Considered the Program Useful and Very Useful
the number of participants who found the program useful or very useful. Participants rated the program's usefulness on a Likert scale, ranging from "Not useful at all" to "Very useful." The final count reflects those who selected either of the top two response categories, indicating a positive perception of the program's value.
Measured: 8 weeks
Number of Participants Who Considered the Program Frequent Enough
This outcome measure represents the number of participants who rated the program's frequency as "Frequent enough" on a 5-point Likert scale. The scale ranged from "Not frequent enough" to "Frequent enough," capturing participants' satisfaction with the program's scheduling.
Measured: 8 weeks
Number of Participants Who Considered the Educational Session Frequency Enough
This outcome measure represents the number of participants who rated the frequency of the educational sessions as "Frequent enough" on a 5-point Likert scale. The scale ranged from "Not frequent enough" to "Frequent enough," assessing participants' satisfaction with the scheduling of the sessions.
Measured: 8 weeks
Rate of Recruitment Measured by Number of People Recruited in a Year
recruitment rate is a minimum of 40 people in a year
Measured: 1 year
Percentage of Participants Who Did Not Find the Study Procedures Burdensome (Questionnaires, Tests, Blood Draws) Measured on 0-10 Scale
This outcome measure represents the percentage of participants who rated the program's burdensomeness as zero, using a scale from 0 ("No burden at all") to 10 ("Very much a burden"). Participants who provided a low burden rating (≤3/10) are included in this percentage, indicating that they did not perceive the program as burdensome.
Measured: 8 weeks
Rate of Adherence Measured by Number of Sessions Attended and Home Sessions Completed
This outcome measure evaluates adherence to the program by calculating the number of sessions attended in-person and the number of home sessions completed by participants. The rate of adherence is determined by the proportion of sessions attended and completed relative to the total number of scheduled sessions.
Measured: 8 weeks
Rate of Adverse Events Measured by Question Regarding Symptom Flare and Seeking Treatment
measured as any problem that lasts for >2 days and/or causes the participant to seek other treatment
Measured: 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Feb 2023
- Study start3 Apr 2023
- Primary completion3 Dec 2024
- Study completion3 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (25)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Knee OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by McMaster UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 69 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boston University, University of Melbourne, University of British Columbia
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lisa Carlesso, PhD, Principal investigator, McMaster University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05730829
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HiREB 15700
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2023
- Last updated
- 28 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Fingleton C, Smart K, Moloney N, Fullen BM, Doody C. Pain sensitization in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Jul;23(7):1043-56. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.163. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
PubMed 25749012Carlesso LC, Segal NA, Frey-Law L, Zhang Y, Na L, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Neogi T. Pain Susceptibility Phenotypes in Those Free of Knee Pain With or at Risk of Knee Osteoarthritis: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Apr;71(4):542-549. doi: 10.1002/art.40752. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
PubMed 30307131Neogi T, Frey-Law L, Scholz J, Niu J, Arendt-Nielsen L, Woolf C, Nevitt M, Bradley L, Felson DT; Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) Study. Sensitivity and sensitisation in relation to pain severity in knee osteoarthritis: trait or state? Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Apr;74(4):682-8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204191. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
PubMed 24351516Petersen KK, Graven-Nielsen T, Simonsen O, Laursen MB, Arendt-Nielsen L. Preoperative pain mechanisms assessed by cuff algometry are associated with chronic postoperative pain relief after total knee replacement. Pain. 2016 Jul;157(7):1400-1406. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000531.
PubMed 27331347Fransen M, McConnell S, Harmer AR, Van der Esch M, Simic M, Bennell KL. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee: a Cochrane systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;49(24):1554-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095424. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
PubMed 26405113Anwer S, Alghadir A, Brismee JM. Effect of Home Exercise Program in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2016 Jan-Mar;39(1):38-48. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000045.
PubMed 25695471Rice D, McNair P, Huysmans E, Letzen J, Finan P. Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 5: Osteoarthritis. J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 24;8(11):1769. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111769.
PubMed 31652929Yarnitsky D. Role of endogenous pain modulation in chronic pain mechanisms and treatment. Pain. 2015 Apr;156 Suppl 1:S24-S31. doi: 10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460343.46847.58.
PubMed 25789433Damien J, Colloca L, Bellei-Rodriguez CE, Marchand S. Pain Modulation: From Conditioned Pain Modulation to Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Experimental and Clinical Pain. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;139:255-296. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.07.024. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
PubMed 30146050Hassed C. Mind-body therapies--use in chronic pain management. Aust Fam Physician. 2013 Mar;42(3):112-7.
PubMed 23529519Kolasinski SL, Neogi T, Hochberg MC, Oatis C, Guyatt G, Block J, Callahan L, Copenhaver C, Dodge C, Felson D, Gellar K, Harvey WF, Hawker G, Herzig E, Kwoh CK, Nelson AE, Samuels J, Scanzello C, White D, Wise B, Altman RD, DiRenzo D, Fontanarosa J, Giradi G, Ishimori M, Misra D, Shah AA, Shmagel AK, Thoma LM, Turgunbaev M, Turner AS, Reston J. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hand, Hip, and Knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Feb;72(2):149-162. doi: 10.1002/acr.24131. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
PubMed 31908149Bannuru RR, Osani MC, Vaysbrot EE, Arden NK, Bennell K, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Kraus VB, Lohmander LS, Abbott JH, Bhandari M, Blanco FJ, Espinosa R, Haugen IK, Lin J, Mandl LA, Moilanen E, Nakamura N, Snyder-Mackler L, Trojian T, Underwood M, McAlindon TE. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Nov;27(11):1578-1589. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
PubMed 31278997Pearson N, Prosko S, Sullivan M, Taylor MJ. White Paper: Yoga Therapy and Pain-How Yoga Therapy Serves in Comprehensive Integrative Pain Management, and How It Can Do More. Int J Yoga Therap. 2020 Jan 1;30(1):117-133. doi: 10.17761/2020-D-19-00074.
PubMed 32412808Busch V, Magerl W, Kern U, Haas J, Hajak G, Eichhammer P. The effect of deep and slow breathing on pain perception, autonomic activity, and mood processing--an experimental study. Pain Med. 2012 Feb;13(2):215-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01243.x. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
PubMed 21939499Ma X, Yue ZQ, Gong ZQ, Zhang H, Duan NY, Shi YT, Wei GX, Li YF. The Effect of Diaphragmatic Breathing on Attention, Negative Affect and Stress in Healthy Adults. Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 6;8:874. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00874. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28626434
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pain Informed Movement for People With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot and Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05730829
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HiREB 15700
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- pain modulation, mind-body exercise
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 69 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Boston University, University of Melbourne, University of British Columbia
- Study start
- 3 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 16 Apr 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare a pain informed movement program to standard neuromuscular exercise in people with knee osteoarthritis. The main question it aims to answer are:
- Are the two interventions a) pain informed movement program plus pain neuroscience education and b) neuromuscular exercise plus standard osteoarthritis education feasible in terms of recruitment, treatment adherence, timelines, data collection procedures, patient follow-up, and resources required?
- Is there a difference in patient's satisfaction and acceptability of the two programs?
- Are there any differences in the potential effects of the two programs on subjective pain measures, self-reported function, quality of life, functional leg strength, nervous system pain modulation, brain derived neurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor levels, and psychological factors?
Detailed description
It is critical to understand the underlying mechanism of knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain in order to effectively manage knee OA. It has become clear that alterations in central and peripheral nervous system functioning occurs in people with knee OA and pain sensitization is a common feature. Descending modulation from the central nervous system can facilitate or inhibit nociception. Endogenous pain modulation through the descending system is an important factor as its dysregulation has significant ramifications in pain facilitation and promotion of chronic pain development and maintenance at all levels of the nervous system. The current guidelines lack focus on how to effectively manage it, which is a potential reason for why the current methods in conservative management of knee OA pain are only moderately effective. Mind-body approaches are uniquely positioned to potentially reverse the sensitization, induce positive neuroplastic changes, and improve descending pain modulation resulting in decreased pain intensity in many chronic pain populations. This study involves an exercise program which the investigators call 'Pain Informed Movement' that includes evidence-based exercises combined with mind-body techniques and pain neuroscience education. The data from this phase will be used to inform a multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the program's effectiveness with the primary outcome of change in pain severity mediated by change in descending pain modulation.
Exercise is regularly used as a first-line management option for knee OA, and its use is supported by high quality evidence to improve pain and function. Clinical practice guidelines for people with knee OA recommend the use of aerobic and strength training for the reduction of pain and improved physical function. Currently, one of the key components of conservative management of knee OA often implemented by clinicians is a type of exercise called neuromuscular exercise, which aims at improving sensorimotor control and the functionality of the knee joint by addressing movement in all three movement planes. Previous research has showed that the neuromuscular exercise programs designed specifically for knee OA can reduce pain, improve function, alter knee biomechanics, and improve the muscle-activation patterns of the surrounding knee musculature. While exercise is the first line treatment for knee OA and can lead to improvements in physical function and pain, it is important to highlight that it has a moderate effect, which may be short term.
In recent years multiple guidelines for non-surgical management of knee OA have begun to include mind-body therapies, such as yoga or tai-chi, as conditional or core treatment recommendations. Mind-body therapies can lead to pain reductions and improvement of function through various techniques. For instance, breathing exercises including breath awareness and regulation can activate the parasympathetic nervous system and decrease the danger signals of pain, leading to improvement of pain levels. Meditative breathing can lead to reductions in pain levels by modulating the somatosensory cortex. Relaxation techniques focused on relaxing the muscles that become tense as a result of pain and by association can re-enforce or aggravate pain, can influence the pain experience by reversing that association. Mindfulness meditation and mindful movement which can lead to a switch from sensory pain to the interoceptive awareness of the movements of the different body parts, resulting in reduced muscle tension, improvements in postural stability and proprioception, and reductions in pain levels. Mind-body therapies also lead to improvement of psychological factors such as depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, increasing pain acceptance, changing patients' relationships to their pain, which in turn lead to reductions in pain levels. The positive effects of mindfulness practices have been reported to last in longer-term follow ups such as 15 months, and 3 years.
Education is another core component recommended by clinical guidelines and known to be effective particularly when combined with exercise. Pain Neuroscience education (PNE) is an alternative technique of teaching patients about pain and how to rethink and re-evaluate the way pain is viewed. The use of PNE in physical therapy interventions has been steadily increasing due to its positive effects on pain and function in many chronic pain patient populations. PNE includes an explanation of the neurophysiology of pain and its process by the nervous system. This includes how pain can be modulated through upregulation or downregulation of signals to increase or decrease the pain experience and that these changes are not necessarily related to tissue damage, particularly when pain becomes chronic. PNE also provides information regarding the influence of various psychosocial aspects. By offering avenues to reconceptualize pain as a threat to the body and movement as imminent danger, patients may become more willing to participate in physical activity and tolerate slight increases in pain and discomfort.
In contrast standard OA education is the traditional and most widely used educational model in people with knee OA, focuses heavily on a pathoanatomical perspective of pain referring mainly to anatomy, biomechanics, and patho-anatomy of OA and the knee joint.
Given the importance of finding effective management strategies for pain modulation in people with knee OA, there is a need to further our understanding of the impact of evidence-based exercise combined with mind-body techniques (e.g., breathing exercises and mindfulness) with PNE on pain mechanisms.
The study is a pilot RCT with a nested qualitative component. The study will be guided by the Conceptual Framework for Defining Feasibility and Pilot studies and the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Intervention Trials.
Study Population
A sample of 66 adults will be sought. The sample size is based on the primary outcome of complete follow-up using the confidence interval method for calculating sample size in pilot trials. 90% follow-up rate is the aim but the trial will be considered successful if 81% is achieved. To achieve a margin of error of 9%, with 10% added for attrition, 66 participants is required.
Recruitment Participants will be recruited through the email lists of the McMaster Physical Activity Centre of Excellence (PACE) community and the McMaster Institute for Research on Aging (MIRA) newsletter. Postings will be placed on both PACE and MIRA social media pages. In addition, the study poster will be placed on other social media channels (i.e., Twitter, Facebook advertisements). In addition, flyers will be placed in local orthopaedic surgeon, Rheumatologist and Physiatrists offices. Physicians will provide potential participants with a one-page study information sheet in lay language. If interested, potential participants can then contact the research team through the contact information provided in the flyer.
Setting The in-person 8-week exercise program will be held twice weekly at McMaster University's Physical Activity Centre of Excellence (PACE) located in the Ivor-Wynne Centre or in one of two local community churches. Participants will complete the pain assessment, and have blood drawn at PACE by PACE staff who are certified phlebotomists.
Assessment As part of participation in the study, participants will be asked to attend an assessment at the beginning of the study, and once again upon completing the 8-week exercise program. Participants will conditioned undergo pain modulation (CPM) and mechanical temporal summation testing, and the 30 Second Sit to Stand Test to determine leg strength and endurance. Lastly, participants will have their blood drawn (fasting) at the beginning and end of the study. Participants will then be asked to complete a series of questionnaires about their pain and mood.
Interventions Twice weekly group exercise sessions will be 75 minutes for the intervention group and 60 minutes in duration for the control group. The intervention arm class is slightly longer due to the detailed delivery of instructions for the techniques during the class. Participants will be given instructions to complete these exercises at home at least one other time during the week for the same duration. Participants will receive education videos that are ~15-20 minutes each week, for up to 4 weeks.
Pain Informed Movement and PNE - During the neuromuscular exercise sessions, the PNE components and concepts such as mindfulness, muscle tension regulation, and breathing techniques will be applied by the instructor.
Neuromuscular exercise and standard OA education - The exercise component (i.e., the specific movements) of this group will be similar to those of the intervention group without the added mind-body techniques.
Randomization and allocation concealment Participants will be randomized with an allocation ratio of 1:1 into one of two treatment groups (Pain informed movement and PNE versus neuromuscular exercise and standard OA education) using a REDCap randomization module. Following consent and completion of baseline assessment, the assessor (different person than the recruiter) will log in to the website, open the participants' identification record and click on the randomize button. Randomization will be blocked and this process will ensure allocation concealment. As allocation concealment occurs following the baseline assessment, the assessors will be blinded at baseline and follow up assessment. Blinding of instructors is generally not possible in studies of physical interventions (i.e., exercise). Participants will be blinded to study hypotheses and the two treatment groups. As both arms of the study are providing exercise based interventions and education, participants will be provided limited details of each intervention arm so as to blind them from knowing which is the intervention and which is the control. This will help minimize any bias that occurs by knowledge of group assignment and perception of treatment effects.
Exit Survey and Focus Group In addition to the primary and secondary outcomes, a satisfaction survey will be conducted at the end of the program to evaluate the a priori feasibility criteria. Participants who indicated upon initially consenting to the study that would like to participate in a focus group, will be contacted. Qualitative data collection will be used to explore participants experience and perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of the program. A focus group will be conducted using audio or video recording (using Zoom), lasting between 45-60 minutes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Informed Movement and pain neuroscience education | Experimental | Other: pain informed movement, Other: Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE)Participants will receive a twice weekly, 8 week in-person group exercise program, consisting of exercise instruction (75 minutes) and pain neuroscience education (PNE) videos (20 to 30 minutes/week for the first 4 weeks). During the exercise sessions, the educational components and concepts such as mindfulness, muscle tension regulation, and breathing techniques will be applied by the instructor. A third home session (weekly) will be facilitated by exercise handout sheets. The exercise component will be delivered by an experienced yoga teacher that has been extensively trained. The PNE video component will cover the following topics: The purpose of pain, neurophysiological changes of pain, movement guidelines when pain persists, and self-care techniques to impact neurophysiology and support moving with ease that include breath awareness and regulation, muscle tension regulation, awareness of pain related thoughts and emotions, relaxation, and body awareness. |
| Standard neuromuscular exercise and OA education | Active comparator | Other: standard neuromuscular exercise, Other: Standard osteoarthritis (OA) educationParticipants in this group will receive an 8-week in-person group exercise program held twice weekly, in which they will receive exercise instructions (60 minutes) and standard osteoarthritis (OA) education (15 to 20 minutes/week for the first 4 weeks). A third home session (weekly) will be facilitated by exercise handout sheets. The exercise component (i.e., the specific movements) of this group will be similar to those of the other group without the added techniques of breath awareness and regulation, muscle tension regulation, awareness of pain related thoughts and emotions, relaxation, and body awareness. The standard OA education videos will cover the following topics: common OA symptoms, risk factors associated with knee OA, and the effects of exercise and self-management tips. The exercise and education components will be delivered by a physiotherapist in the research team. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- - ≥40 years of age with diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (OA) by a physician OR;
- ≥45 years of age and having activity-related knee joint pain with or without morning stiffness lasting 30 minutes (NICE criteria)
- Having an average pain intensity of 3/10 on a numeric pain scale on most days of the past month
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Cannot communicate in English;
- Has inflammatory arthritis or other systemic conditions;
- Have had lower limb trauma or surgery within the past 6 months;
- Have participated in a knee OA exercise program in the prior 3 months;
- Have had any injection in the index knee within 3-months prior to baseline assessment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| pain informed movementgroup classes twice weekly for 8 weeks of neuromuscular exercise in combination with mind-body techniques such as breath regulation, muscle tension regulation, relaxation, mindfulness, awareness of pain related thoughts and emotions. | Other | Pain Informed Movement and pain neuroscience education |
| standard neuromuscular exercisegroup classes twice weekly for 8 weeks of neuromuscular exercise. | Other | Standard neuromuscular exercise and OA education |
| Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE)The pain neuroscience education (PNE) will be delivered in videos addressing concepts such as the purpose of pain, neurophysiological changes of pain, movement guidelines when pain persists, and self-care techniques to impact neurophysiology and support moving with ease that include breath awareness and regulation, muscle tension regulation, awareness of pain related thoughts and emotions, relaxation, and body awareness. | Other | Pain Informed Movement and pain neuroscience education |
| Standard osteoarthritis (OA) educationThe standard osteoarthritis (OA) education will address the following topics, OA prevalence, risk factors, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, role of exercise, surgery, self-management | Other | Standard neuromuscular exercise and OA education |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Follow up
Time frame: 8 weeks
The follow-up rate is calculated as the number (percentage) of participants who completed the study out of those who completed the baseline assessment.
7 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Who Considered the Program Useful and Very Useful
Time frame: 8 weeks
Number of Participants Who Considered the Program Frequent Enough
Time frame: 8 weeks
Number of Participants Who Considered the Educational Session Frequency Enough
Time frame: 8 weeks
Rate of Recruitment Measured by Number of People Recruited in a Year
Time frame: 1 year
Percentage of Participants Who Did Not Find the Study Procedures Burdensome (Questionnaires, Tests, Blood Draws) Measured on 0-10 Scale
Time frame: 8 weeks
Rate of Adherence Measured by Number of Sessions Attended and Home Sessions Completed
Time frame: 8 weeks
Rate of Adverse Events Measured by Question Regarding Symptom Flare and Seeking Treatment
Time frame: 8 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Aug 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 25749012Fingleton C, Smart K, Moloney N, Fullen BM, Doody C. Pain sensitization in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Jul;23(7):1043-56. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.163. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
- Background: PubMed 30307131Carlesso LC, Segal NA, Frey-Law L, Zhang Y, Na L, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Neogi T. Pain Susceptibility Phenotypes in Those Free of Knee Pain With or at Risk of Knee Osteoarthritis: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Apr;71(4):542-549. doi: 10.1002/art.40752. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
- Background: PubMed 24351516Neogi T, Frey-Law L, Scholz J, Niu J, Arendt-Nielsen L, Woolf C, Nevitt M, Bradley L, Felson DT; Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) Study. Sensitivity and sensitisation in relation to pain severity in knee osteoarthritis: trait or state? Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Apr;74(4):682-8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204191. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
- Background: PubMed 27331347Petersen KK, Graven-Nielsen T, Simonsen O, Laursen MB, Arendt-Nielsen L. Preoperative pain mechanisms assessed by cuff algometry are associated with chronic postoperative pain relief after total knee replacement. Pain. 2016 Jul;157(7):1400-1406. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000531.
- Background: PubMed 26405113Fransen M, McConnell S, Harmer AR, Van der Esch M, Simic M, Bennell KL. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee: a Cochrane systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;49(24):1554-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095424. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
- Background: PubMed 25695471Anwer S, Alghadir A, Brismee JM. Effect of Home Exercise Program in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2016 Jan-Mar;39(1):38-48. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000045.
- Background: PubMed 31652929Rice D, McNair P, Huysmans E, Letzen J, Finan P. Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 5: Osteoarthritis. J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 24;8(11):1769. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111769.
- Background: PubMed 25789433Yarnitsky D. Role of endogenous pain modulation in chronic pain mechanisms and treatment. Pain. 2015 Apr;156 Suppl 1:S24-S31. doi: 10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460343.46847.58.
- Background: PubMed 30146050Damien J, Colloca L, Bellei-Rodriguez CE, Marchand S. Pain Modulation: From Conditioned Pain Modulation to Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Experimental and Clinical Pain. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;139:255-296. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.07.024. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
- Background: PubMed 23529519Hassed C. Mind-body therapies--use in chronic pain management. Aust Fam Physician. 2013 Mar;42(3):112-7.
- Background: PubMed 31908149Kolasinski SL, Neogi T, Hochberg MC, Oatis C, Guyatt G, Block J, Callahan L, Copenhaver C, Dodge C, Felson D, Gellar K, Harvey WF, Hawker G, Herzig E, Kwoh CK, Nelson AE, Samuels J, Scanzello C, White D, Wise B, Altman RD, DiRenzo D, Fontanarosa J, Giradi G, Ishimori M, Misra D, Shah AA, Shmagel AK, Thoma LM, Turgunbaev M, Turner AS, Reston J. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hand, Hip, and Knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Feb;72(2):149-162. doi: 10.1002/acr.24131. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
- Background: PubMed 31278997Bannuru RR, Osani MC, Vaysbrot EE, Arden NK, Bennell K, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Kraus VB, Lohmander LS, Abbott JH, Bhandari M, Blanco FJ, Espinosa R, Haugen IK, Lin J, Mandl LA, Moilanen E, Nakamura N, Snyder-Mackler L, Trojian T, Underwood M, McAlindon TE. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Nov;27(11):1578-1589. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Knee Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lisa Carlesso, PhD principal investigator
McMaster University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing pain informed movement, standard neuromuscular exercise and Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Apr 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Follow up (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05730829, which also lists 25 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2026.