Nursing DiagnosisNCT05756218
Motivation of Nursing Students and Perception Levels of the Taboo Game Adapted for Nursing Diagnoses
A study testing nursing diagnoses - taboo game in people with Nursing Diagnosis and Taboo Game, run by Necmettin Erbakan University.
Trial summary
The goal of this To determine the effect of the taboo game adapted for nursing diagnoses in the professional practice course on the motivation and perception levels of nursing diagnoses in nursing students. Type of Research: It was designed as a parallel group randomized controlled trial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 25 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nursing Diagnosis, Taboo Game, Motivation
- What is being tested?
- nursing diagnoses - taboo game
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 27 Feb 2023to 14 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 25 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- NEU Faculty of Nursing 4. Becoming a classroom teacher
- NEU Seydişehir Kamil Akkanat SBF Nursing Department 4. Becoming a classroom teacher
- To be taking the Profession Application course for the first time
- to indicate that he will be eligible to actively participate in the taboo game at the end of 7 weeks
- Willingness to participate in the study of their own free will (representative informed consent)
Who cannot join
- 1) He does not understand Turkish, does not read and does not understand
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Taboo Game Adapted for Nursing Diagnoses in Professional Practice Lesson on Motivation and Perception of Nursing Diagnoses in Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Study
The goal of this To determine the effect of the taboo game adapted for nursing diagnoses in the professional practice course on the motivation and perception levels of nursing diagnoses in nursing students.
Type of Research:
Read more
It was designed as a parallel group randomized controlled trial. The reporting of the study was planned in accordance with the PEER criteria] in [describe participant population/health conditions]. The main question[s] it aims to answer are:The Research Hypothesis: H1: The taboo game organized for nursing diagnoses in the professional practice course has an effect on the motivation of nursing students.
H2: The taboo game organized for nursing diagnoses in the professional practice course has an effect on nursing students' perception of nursing diagnoses.
Participants will [The Universe of her Research: The universe of her research Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Nursing 4. Class (Quota: 145) and Necmettin Erbakan University Seydişehir Kamil Akkanat SBF Nursing department 4. The class (Quota: 42) students will be formed].
If there is a comparison group: It was increased by 10% for possible records, the research was planned to be completed with 80 people, with an error of 0.05, a power of 0.80 and an effect size of 0.600; 40 experiments, 40 control groups.
Read the detailed description
The other measure to be used in the study is the scale of perception of nursing definitions. In this calculation, the results of a study that looked at the perception of citizenship definitions of students were used. In the study in question, the scores of student nurses' choice of profession (101.95±18.29) and choice of profession (98.53±16.57) perception of citizenship definitions are different (Su \& Kose 2021). In the study, SDSpooled was calculated because the number of people in the groups was not equal (n1: 203, n2=79). The formula √ [(n1-1)212+(n2-1)222]/n1+n2-k was used in the calculation (SDpooled= 0.35). The results obtained were calculated in the G*Power3.1.9.4 package program. According to this calculation, the number of people to be reached with 0.05 error, 0.80 power and 0.600 effect size was determined as 36 people as the experimental group, 36 people as the control group, and a total of 72 students for the control and experimental group. It was increased by 10% for possible records, the research was planned to be completed with 80 people, with an error of 0.05, a power of 0.80 and an effect size of 0.600; 40 experiments, 40 control groups.
Randomization and Blinding:
Experimental group Necmettin Erbakan University Seydişehir Kamil Akkanat SBF Nursing department 4. Class students, control group Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Nursing 4. Class students will be formed. The class lists will be used depending on the list order taken from the school. Random.org according to the randomization table made from , the assignment will be made from their list. The experimental group "X" will be called the control group "Y".
Blinding; groups 'X" and "Y" are named as independent statistical posts statistical blinding, blinding the educational staff conducting the professional practice course, blinding the person preparing the randomization table and the control group. In order for the control group to be blinded, this group was planned from another faculty. The experimental group and the researchers were not blinded.
Randomization below will be performed by a statistical specialist other than randomization researchers for the purpose of preventing bias and ensuring confidentiality. He will not know which of the lecturers who are lecturing in both groups are in the experimental group and who are in the control group. Statistical analyzes were performed and after the research report is written, the encodings made for the intervention and control group will be opened. Blinding will be provided in terms of collecting and reporting departmental research data. By an independent statistic in random ranking list order random.org made on site.
Data Collection Techniques and Tools: The taboo game has been adapted to meet the content and organization of the professional practice course, which is 27 ECTS (32 Applications) compulsory for fourth grade students in the spring semester. The goal of the game is for the individual to make his partner guess as many primary (WIP) words as possible in a given time, without using the "taboo" words to describe the main term. The one who correctly defines the most basic words wins. The creation of playing cards is as follows; the cards will be prepared using nursing diagnostics. At Taboo (Hasbro Inc., Pawtucket, RI), a person is given a set of cards containing both the primary word or phrase and five "taboo" words. The primary word (WIP) at the top of each card is clearly separated from the five taboo words at the bottom. For example, the taboo words under the WIP "constipation" may be "rectum", "great ablution", "diarrhea", "buttocks" and "excretion". Taboo words can be adjusted according to the student's level and difficulty, and the cards can be laminated for repeated use. Finally, a voice alert and a 1-minute timer (eg. October Jul. Additional materials will be provided, including (hourglass) (Lofton 2022).
NANDA Nursing diagnoses are grouped according to functional health patterns and according to this distribution; Health perception-Health Management 10 cards, Nutritional-Metabolic card 15, excretory, 15 cards and gas exchange, Activity/rest for 25 cards, perception/Cognition 8 cards, self-image 6 Cards, Role-relationship 10 cards, 4 cards, Sexuality, coping/stress tolerance, 30 Card, 6 card Life Principles, safety/protection card 30, the comfort, the card 8, and growth/Development, so it will be 3 cards in total, 170 card will be issued.
The students of the experimental group will be asked to follow the following rules by playing the taboo game created with that topic every week after the lesson:
- A person from the research team comes with a set of playing cards in his hand and starts the game.
- Students have one minute to guess as many terms as possible.
- Another person who is on the research team is next to the student to make sure that he does not use the words "taboo" and to save time.
- A student cannot skip terms right away when defining words. If the student is experiencing a certain difficulty, someone from the team can help. The student can move to the next one only after the allotted time (∼ 10-15 seconds).
Below are the NANDA Nursing diagnoses grouped according to functional health patterns:
- Health Promotion
- Nutrition
- Discharge and Gas Exchange
- Activity/Recreation
- Perception/Cognition
- Self-Perception
- Role relationship
- Sexuality
- Coping/Stress tolerance
- Life principles
- Security/Protection
- Comfort
- Growth/Development Both the control group (Konya-Nursing 4. Class) as well as students in the experimental group (Seydişehir-Nursing 4. Class) takes the internship application course with the same credit. The application is carried out in the same hospital. Similar programs are implemented in both schools.
Before the taboo game, obtaining Consent, Demographic information form, Teaching Materials Motivation Scale and Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale will be applied to both groups. Together with the experimental group, the taboo game prepared for two of the groups according to the functional health patterns of NANDA Nursing diagnoses will be played every week. The cards prepared about the subject are written next to each subject. after the 7-week period is over, the Teaching Materials Motivation Scale and the Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale will be applied again.
Data Collection: After the data of the research are approved by the Ethics Committee and the permissions of the institution are obtained, the first data will be collected on February 06, 2023 and the taboo game will start to be played. It is planned to collect the latest data on March 25, 2023. The data will be collected by filling in face-to-face by the researchers. Nursing diagnoses taboo game will be played for a total of 7 weeks on the day when students who practice 4 days every week do not practice.
Variables of the Research Dependent variables; Teaching Materials Motivation Scale total score and Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale total score Independent variables; sociodemographic characteristics and taboo game application
- Conditions
- Nursing Diagnosis, Taboo Game, Motivation
- Being tested
- nursing diagnoses - taboo game
- Keywords
- Nursing Diagnosis Perception, Taboo Game, Motivation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
nursing diagnoses - taboo gameOther
Playing 7 weeks nursing diagnoses taboo cards
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Experimental | Obtaining Consent, Demographic Information Form, Teaching Material Motivation Scale and Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale face-to-face filling Playing the game with nursing diagnosis taboo cards prepared on the day of no practice for 7 weeks Receives: Other: nursing diagnoses - taboo game |
| Control | No intervention | Obtaining Consent, Demographic Information Form, Teaching Material Motivation Scale and Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale face-to-face filling Continuing the application as in the curriculum for 7 weeks |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time Frame
a day before the taboo game Obtaining Consent, Demographic Information Form, to measure motivation Teaching Material Motivation Scale face-to-face filling
Sociodemographic Information Form: The literature was reviewed and prepared by the researchers. The form consists of 9 questions in total.
Teaching Materials Motivation Scale: It is a 24-item scale. This scale consists of two sub-dimensions: "attention-attention" and "confidence-satisfaction". The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 24, and the highest score is 120.
Measured: 1 day
Time Frame
a day before the taboo game, to measure the perception levels of nursing diagnoses Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale face-to-face filling The Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale: Scale consists of 26 items in total. The total scale score ranges from 1 to 5. Dec. The low total score obtained from the scale shows that nurses perceive nursing diagnoses in a positive way. The subfields of the scale are also calculated as the total score of the scale.
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (2)
Time Frame
at the time end of 7 weeks, to measure motivation Teaching Material Motivation Scale face-to-face filling
Sociodemographic Information Form: The literature was reviewed and prepared by the researchers. The form consists of 9 questions in total.
Teaching Materials Motivation Scale: It is a 24-item scale. This scale consists of two sub-dimensions: "attention-attention" and "confidence-satisfaction". The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 24, and the highest score is 120.
Measured: 7 weeks
Time Frame
at the time end of 7 weeks, to measure the perception levels of nursing diagnoses Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale face-to-face filling
The Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale: Scale consists of 26 items in total. The total scale score ranges from 1 to 5. Dec. The low total score obtained from the scale shows that nurses perceive nursing diagnoses in a positive way. The subfields of the scale are also calculated as the total score of the scale.
Measured: 7 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Mar 2023
- Study start27 Feb 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion24 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion14 Apr 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nursing DiagnosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Necmettin Erbakan UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- It was designed as a parallel group randomized controlled trial. The reporting of the study was planned in accordance with the PEER criteria
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Necmettin Erbakan University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tuba KORKMAZ ASLAN, Necmettin Erbakan University
- Investigators
- Hilal Türkben Polat, PhD, Study chair, hturkbenpolat@erbakan.edu.tr
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05756218
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Taboo Game Nursing Diagnoses
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Boctor L. Active-learning strategies: the use of a game to reinforce learning in nursing education. A case study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2013 Mar;13(2):96-100. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Aug 19.
PubMed 22910398Karaca T, Aslan S. Effect of 'nursing terminologies and classifications' course on nursing students' perception of nursing diagnosis. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Aug;67:114-117. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 May 23.
PubMed 29857304Kim SC, Jillapali R, Boyd S. Impacts of peer tutoring on academic performance of first-year baccalaureate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jan;96:104658. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104658. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
PubMed 33186748Lofton CM. Laying the Foundation for Critical Thinking With the Nursing Taboo Game. J Nurs Educ. 2022 Jun;61(6):355. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20220404-05. Epub 2022 Jun 1. No abstract available.
PubMed 35667116Mousavinasab ES, Rostam Niakan Kalhori S, Zarifsanaiey N, Rakhshan M, Ghazisaeedi M. Nursing process education: A review of methods and characteristics. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Oct;48:102886. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102886. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
PubMed 32961511Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG; CONSORT. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
PubMed 22036893Pitkanen S, Kaariainen M, Oikarainen A, Tuomikoski AM, Elo S, Ruotsalainen H, Saarikoski M, Karsamanoja T, Mikkonen K. Healthcare students' evaluation of the clinical learning environment and supervision - a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Mar;62:143-149. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
PubMed 29353088Sanson G, Vellone E, Kangasniemi M, Alvaro R, D'Agostino F. Impact of nursing diagnoses on patient and organisational outcomes: a systematic literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):3764-3783. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13717. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
PubMed 28042921Yu M, Tong H, Li S, Wu XV, Hong J, Wang W. Clinical competence and its association with self-efficacy and clinical learning environments among Chinese undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 May;53:103055. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103055. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
PubMed 33951599Aslan TK, Burucu R, Polat HT. In the effect of the game taboo(R) on nursing students' motivation and perception levels of nursing diagnoses: a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Nurs. 2026 Apr 6;25(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12912-026-04619-7.
PubMed 41943125
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Taboo Game Adapted for Nursing Diagnoses in Professional Practice Lesson on Motivation and Perception of Nursing Diagnoses in Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05756218
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Taboo Game Nursing Diagnoses
- Conditions
- Nursing Diagnosis, Taboo Game, Motivation
- Keywords
- Nursing Diagnosis Perception, Taboo Game, Motivation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Necmettin Erbakan UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Feb 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 24 Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 14 Apr 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this To determine the effect of the taboo game adapted for nursing diagnoses in the professional practice course on the motivation and perception levels of nursing diagnoses in nursing students.
Type of Research:
It was designed as a parallel group randomized controlled trial. The reporting of the study was planned in accordance with the PEER criteria] in [describe participant population/health conditions]. The main question[s] it aims to answer are:The Research Hypothesis: H1: The taboo game organized for nursing diagnoses in the professional practice course has an effect on the motivation of nursing students.
H2: The taboo game organized for nursing diagnoses in the professional practice course has an effect on nursing students' perception of nursing diagnoses.
Participants will [The Universe of her Research: The universe of her research Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Nursing 4. Class (Quota: 145) and Necmettin Erbakan University Seydişehir Kamil Akkanat SBF Nursing department 4. The class (Quota: 42) students will be formed].
If there is a comparison group: It was increased by 10% for possible records, the research was planned to be completed with 80 people, with an error of 0.05, a power of 0.80 and an effect size of 0.600; 40 experiments, 40 control groups.
Detailed description
The other measure to be used in the study is the scale of perception of nursing definitions. In this calculation, the results of a study that looked at the perception of citizenship definitions of students were used. In the study in question, the scores of student nurses' choice of profession (101.95±18.29) and choice of profession (98.53±16.57) perception of citizenship definitions are different (Su \& Kose 2021). In the study, SDSpooled was calculated because the number of people in the groups was not equal (n1: 203, n2=79). The formula √ [(n1-1)212+(n2-1)222]/n1+n2-k was used in the calculation (SDpooled= 0.35). The results obtained were calculated in the G*Power3.1.9.4 package program. According to this calculation, the number of people to be reached with 0.05 error, 0.80 power and 0.600 effect size was determined as 36 people as the experimental group, 36 people as the control group, and a total of 72 students for the control and experimental group. It was increased by 10% for possible records, the research was planned to be completed with 80 people, with an error of 0.05, a power of 0.80 and an effect size of 0.600; 40 experiments, 40 control groups.
Randomization and Blinding:
Experimental group Necmettin Erbakan University Seydişehir Kamil Akkanat SBF Nursing department 4. Class students, control group Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Nursing 4. Class students will be formed. The class lists will be used depending on the list order taken from the school. Random.org according to the randomization table made from , the assignment will be made from their list. The experimental group "X" will be called the control group "Y".
Blinding; groups 'X" and "Y" are named as independent statistical posts statistical blinding, blinding the educational staff conducting the professional practice course, blinding the person preparing the randomization table and the control group. In order for the control group to be blinded, this group was planned from another faculty. The experimental group and the researchers were not blinded.
Randomization below will be performed by a statistical specialist other than randomization researchers for the purpose of preventing bias and ensuring confidentiality. He will not know which of the lecturers who are lecturing in both groups are in the experimental group and who are in the control group. Statistical analyzes were performed and after the research report is written, the encodings made for the intervention and control group will be opened. Blinding will be provided in terms of collecting and reporting departmental research data. By an independent statistic in random ranking list order random.org made on site.
Data Collection Techniques and Tools: The taboo game has been adapted to meet the content and organization of the professional practice course, which is 27 ECTS (32 Applications) compulsory for fourth grade students in the spring semester. The goal of the game is for the individual to make his partner guess as many primary (WIP) words as possible in a given time, without using the "taboo" words to describe the main term. The one who correctly defines the most basic words wins. The creation of playing cards is as follows; the cards will be prepared using nursing diagnostics. At Taboo (Hasbro Inc., Pawtucket, RI), a person is given a set of cards containing both the primary word or phrase and five "taboo" words. The primary word (WIP) at the top of each card is clearly separated from the five taboo words at the bottom. For example, the taboo words under the WIP "constipation" may be "rectum", "great ablution", "diarrhea", "buttocks" and "excretion". Taboo words can be adjusted according to the student's level and difficulty, and the cards can be laminated for repeated use. Finally, a voice alert and a 1-minute timer (eg. October Jul. Additional materials will be provided, including (hourglass) (Lofton 2022).
NANDA Nursing diagnoses are grouped according to functional health patterns and according to this distribution; Health perception-Health Management 10 cards, Nutritional-Metabolic card 15, excretory, 15 cards and gas exchange, Activity/rest for 25 cards, perception/Cognition 8 cards, self-image 6 Cards, Role-relationship 10 cards, 4 cards, Sexuality, coping/stress tolerance, 30 Card, 6 card Life Principles, safety/protection card 30, the comfort, the card 8, and growth/Development, so it will be 3 cards in total, 170 card will be issued.
The students of the experimental group will be asked to follow the following rules by playing the taboo game created with that topic every week after the lesson:
- A person from the research team comes with a set of playing cards in his hand and starts the game.
- Students have one minute to guess as many terms as possible.
- Another person who is on the research team is next to the student to make sure that he does not use the words "taboo" and to save time.
- A student cannot skip terms right away when defining words. If the student is experiencing a certain difficulty, someone from the team can help. The student can move to the next one only after the allotted time (∼ 10-15 seconds).
Below are the NANDA Nursing diagnoses grouped according to functional health patterns:
- Health Promotion
- Nutrition
- Discharge and Gas Exchange
- Activity/Recreation
- Perception/Cognition
- Self-Perception
- Role relationship
- Sexuality
- Coping/Stress tolerance
- Life principles
- Security/Protection
- Comfort
- Growth/Development Both the control group (Konya-Nursing 4. Class) as well as students in the experimental group (Seydişehir-Nursing 4. Class) takes the internship application course with the same credit. The application is carried out in the same hospital. Similar programs are implemented in both schools.
Before the taboo game, obtaining Consent, Demographic information form, Teaching Materials Motivation Scale and Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale will be applied to both groups. Together with the experimental group, the taboo game prepared for two of the groups according to the functional health patterns of NANDA Nursing diagnoses will be played every week. The cards prepared about the subject are written next to each subject. after the 7-week period is over, the Teaching Materials Motivation Scale and the Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale will be applied again.
Data Collection: After the data of the research are approved by the Ethics Committee and the permissions of the institution are obtained, the first data will be collected on February 06, 2023 and the taboo game will start to be played. It is planned to collect the latest data on March 25, 2023. The data will be collected by filling in face-to-face by the researchers. Nursing diagnoses taboo game will be played for a total of 7 weeks on the day when students who practice 4 days every week do not practice.
Variables of the Research Dependent variables; Teaching Materials Motivation Scale total score and Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale total score Independent variables; sociodemographic characteristics and taboo game application
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- It was designed as a parallel group randomized controlled trial. The reporting of the study was planned in accordance with the PEER criteria
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Experimental | Other: nursing diagnoses - taboo gameObtaining Consent, Demographic Information Form, Teaching Material Motivation Scale and Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale face-to-face filling Playing the game with nursing diagnosis taboo cards prepared on the day of no practice for 7 weeks |
| Control | No intervention | –Obtaining Consent, Demographic Information Form, Teaching Material Motivation Scale and Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale face-to-face filling Continuing the application as in the curriculum for 7 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 25 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- NEU Faculty of Nursing 4. Becoming a classroom teacher
- NEU Seydişehir Kamil Akkanat SBF Nursing Department 4. Becoming a classroom teacher
- To be taking the Profession Application course for the first time
- to indicate that he will be eligible to actively participate in the taboo game at the end of 7 weeks
- Willingness to participate in the study of their own free will (representative informed consent)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1) He does not understand Turkish, does not read and does not understand
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| nursing diagnoses - taboo gamePlaying 7 weeks nursing diagnoses taboo cards | Other | Experiment |
Primary outcome
Time Frame
Time frame: 1 day
a day before the taboo game Obtaining Consent, Demographic Information Form, to measure motivation Teaching Material Motivation Scale face-to-face filling Sociodemographic Information Form: The literature was reviewed and prepared by the researchers. The form consists of 9 questions in total. Teaching Materials Motivation Scale: It is a 24-item scale. This scale consists of two sub-dimensions: "attention-attention" and "confidence-satisfaction". The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 24, and the highest score is 120.
Time Frame
Time frame: 1 day
a day before the taboo game, to measure the perception levels of nursing diagnoses Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale face-to-face filling The Nursing Diagnosis Perception Scale: Scale consists of 26 items in total. The total scale score ranges from 1 to 5. Dec. The low total score obtained from the scale shows that nurses perceive nursing diagnoses in a positive way. The subfields of the scale are also calculated as the total score of the scale.
2 secondary outcomes
Time Frame
Time frame: 7 weeks
Time Frame
Time frame: 7 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2023.
- Background: PubMed 22910398Boctor L. Active-learning strategies: the use of a game to reinforce learning in nursing education. A case study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2013 Mar;13(2):96-100. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Aug 19.
- Background: PubMed 29857304Karaca T, Aslan S. Effect of 'nursing terminologies and classifications' course on nursing students' perception of nursing diagnosis. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Aug;67:114-117. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 May 23.
- Background: PubMed 33186748Kim SC, Jillapali R, Boyd S. Impacts of peer tutoring on academic performance of first-year baccalaureate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jan;96:104658. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104658. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
- Background: PubMed 35667116Lofton CM. Laying the Foundation for Critical Thinking With the Nursing Taboo Game. J Nurs Educ. 2022 Jun;61(6):355. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20220404-05. Epub 2022 Jun 1. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 32961511Mousavinasab ES, Rostam Niakan Kalhori S, Zarifsanaiey N, Rakhshan M, Ghazisaeedi M. Nursing process education: A review of methods and characteristics. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Oct;48:102886. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102886. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
- Background: PubMed 22036893Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG; CONSORT. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
- Background: PubMed 29353088Pitkanen S, Kaariainen M, Oikarainen A, Tuomikoski AM, Elo S, Ruotsalainen H, Saarikoski M, Karsamanoja T, Mikkonen K. Healthcare students' evaluation of the clinical learning environment and supervision - a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Mar;62:143-149. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
- Background: PubMed 28042921Sanson G, Vellone E, Kangasniemi M, Alvaro R, D'Agostino F. Impact of nursing diagnoses on patient and organisational outcomes: a systematic literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):3764-3783. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13717. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
- Background: PubMed 33951599Yu M, Tong H, Li S, Wu XV, Hong J, Wang W. Clinical competence and its association with self-efficacy and clinical learning environments among Chinese undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 May;53:103055. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103055. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41943125Aslan TK, Burucu R, Polat HT. In the effect of the game taboo(R) on nursing students' motivation and perception levels of nursing diagnoses: a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Nurs. 2026 Apr 6;25(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12912-026-04619-7.
Related trials for Nursing Diagnosis
Not yet recruiting
The Effectiveness of Comic-based Learning Materials on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence in Dementia Care
Dementia Care Education, Students, Nursing
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Oxygen Cage Support During Cataract Surgery
Cataract
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Soap-and-Water Bed Bath Versus Disposable Wipe Bath in the Same ICU Patients
Critical Illness, Pain
Not yet recruitingObservational study
AI-Based Model for Predicting Type 2 Diabetes Risk Using Lifestyle Factors Among Senior Nursing Students
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Active, not recruiting
This Research Proposal Focuses on Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Nursing Care Protocol in Preventing Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) in Patients Undergoing On-pump Cardiac Surgery. The Study Will Include an Intervention Group That Receives the Nursing Protocol and a Control Group That Receives Routine
On-pump Cardiac Surgery - Prevention - Intervention - Experimental Group - Control Group - Incidence - Complications, DVT - Deep Vein Thrombosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hilal Türkben Polat, PhD study chair
hturkbenpolat@erbakan.edu.tr
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing nursing diagnoses - taboo game in people with Nursing Diagnosis and Taboo Game, run by Necmettin Erbakan University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Tuba Korkmaz Aslan, PhD (+905376231630, tkorkmazaslan@erbakan.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time Frame (time frame: 1 day). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05756218, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2023.