TechnologyNCT05789979
The Effectiveness, Feasibility and Potential Risks of Resident Handling Devices in Elderly Residential Setting
A study testing The resident-handling device in people with Technology, run by The University of Hong Kong at 3 sites in Hong Kong.
Trial summary
The study has 12 research questions regarding the use of resident-handling device in elderly residential setting: Primary study questions: 1. Can the new resident-handling devices improve resident comfortability during the resident-handling task? 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Technology
- What is being tested?
- The resident-handling device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesHong Kong
- Study dates
- 13 Mar 2023to 20 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Lower limb cannot bear weight,
- Assessed by health care workers (e.g., occupational therapists, physiotherapists, nurses) that manual handling is not appropriate
- According to the study site instruction, require the use of resident-handling device
- Lower-limb can bear weight
- Assessed by health care workers (e.g., occupational therapists, physiotherapists, nurses) that manual handling is not appropriate
- According to the study site instruction, require the use of resident-handling device
- Responsible for transferring and lifting residents using any of the new resident-handling devices
Who cannot join
- Exclusion criteria for high dependency device, low dependency device and care staff:
- None
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Hong Kong3 sites
Haven of Hope Hang Hau Care and Attention Home for Severely Disabled
Hong Kong, 00
Haven of Hope Nursing Home
Hong Kong, 00
Haven of Hope Sister Annie Skau Holistic Care Centre
Hong Kong, 00
About this study
Official title: The Effectiveness, Feasibility and Potential Risks of Resident Handling Devices in Elderly Residential Setting: A Single Group Pre-post Test Study
The study has 12 research questions regarding the use of resident-handling device in elderly residential setting:
Primary study questions:
- Can the new resident-handling devices improve resident comfortability during the resident-handling task?
- Are the new resident-handling devices perceived as safe compared to the conventional resident-handling devices?
- What are the potential risks to the residents and care staff involve in the resident-handling tasks using the new and conventional resident-handling devices? Secondary study questions:
- What are care staff attitudes towards the new and conventional resident-handling devices?
- What are the perceived difficulties in using the new and conventional resident-handling devices? Auxiliary study questions:
- What are the operation difficulties in the use of the new resident-handling devices in actual operation?
- What are the perceived benefits and feasibility of using the new resident-handling devices compared to conventional resident-handling devices?
- [For resident-handling device for residents with low dependency only] Can the new resident-handling device improve resident comfortability in functional activities?
- [For resident-handling device for residents with low dependency only] Is the new resident-handling device perceived as safe for functional activities compared to the conventional resident-handling devices?
- [For resident-handling device for residents with low dependency only] What are the potential risks to the residents and care staff involve in functional activities using the new and conventional resident-handling devices?
- [For resident-handling device for residents with high dependency only] What is the average force exertion of care staff?
- [For resident-handling device for residents with high dependency only] How frequently does care staff exert excessive force (i.e. Ergo feedback)?
Read the detailed description
Study design
The trial is a single group pre-post test study at Haven of Hope (HOH) Nursing Home (NH), Sister Annie Skau Holistic Care Centre (SASHCC), and Care \& Attention Home for Severely Disabled (CASD). During the 4-week trial, one floor in SASHCC and one floor in NH will utilize the resident-handling device for residents with high dependency (i.e., lower-limb cannot bear weight). CASD and another floor in NH will use the resident-handling device for residents with low dependency (i.e. lower-limb can bear weight). Outcome indicators are examined during the 1-week pre-test the 4-week trial. Additionally, opinions and comments from care staff and residents regarding the new resident-handling devices will be collected at the end of the trial.
This protocol complies with the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use - Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) and Declaration of Helsinki.
Subjects
- Residents Residents of two selected floors at Nursing Home (NH), Care \& Attention for Severely Disabled (CASD), and Sister Annie Skau Holistic Care Centre (SASHCC) will be recruited. Inclusion criteria for high dependency device:
- Lower limb cannot bear weight,
- Assessed by health care workers (e.g., occupational therapists, physiotherapists, nurses) that manual handling is not appropriate
- According to the study site instruction, require the use of resident handling device Exclusion criteria:
- None Inclusion criteria for low dependency device:
- Lower-limb can bear weight
- Assessed by health care workers (e.g., occupational therapists, physiotherapists, nurses) that manual handling is not appropriate
- According to the study site instruction, require the use of resident handling device Exclusion criteria:
- None
- Care staff Care staff of two selected floors at Nursing Home (NH), Care \& Attention for Severely Disabled (CASD), and Sister Annie Skau Holistic Care Centre (SASHCC) will be recruited.
Inclusion criteria:
- Responsible for transferring and lifting residents using any of the new resident handling devices
Exclusion criteria:
- None
Procedures
- Participants' recruitment and consent The criteria stated in the Alzheimer Europe Report (2011) will be followed to ensure that the participants are provided chances to give consent. In particular, four criteria will be evaluated, including 1) the person must have sufficient capacity to understand the information, 2) the person is able to retain, use and weight up such information for making a decision, 3) the person will understand the benefit, risk, and convenience, 4) the person must have the ability to communicate the decision. The University of Hong Kong (HKU) research staff and the care staff will first commit them in a causal chat to assess their ability to communicate and understand the dialogues. If residents meet all the four criteria, both residents and their next of kin will be approached for consent. Otherwise, only their next of kin will be approached for consent. For the residents who will be approached for consent, the HKU research staff will elaborate the study based on the opt-out consent script and give them the opt-out consent document. Neither HKU nor the supplier will get personal or sensitive information of the participants due to the study. If they do not want to participate, they can notify the care staff. Unless they indicate withdrawal from the study, they are treated as consenting to join the study (opt-out participation). Every time before using the devices, the care staff will inform the use of the devices. Devices will be used only when participants do not raise objections. Their next of kin will be informed of the new devices and the study through standard channel of the test site (i.e. messaging mobile phone app or phone). If they do not want the residents to participate, they can notify the care staff. Unless they indicate withdrawal from the study, they are treated as consenting the residents to join the study (opt-out participation). For the care staff, it will be presumed that they agree to participate in the study if they complete the anonymous questionnaire (implied consent). Before qualitative interviews with the participants, written consent will be obtained from them and their next of kin. Before qualitative interviews with the care staff, written consent will be obtained from them.
- Baseline data collection Before the trial, all test sites use the conventional resident-handling devices available in their service units. In the week before the trial, the baseline data of the level of comfort during transfer and lifting, care staff attitudes towards the conventional resident-handling devices and perceived difficulties in using conventional resident-handling devices will be collected. It is a standard practice for the study site to require all staff operating the devices to pass yearly audit to ensure that they can operate the devices properly. Potential risks to residents and care staff during using the conventional resident-handling device resident-handling and/or functional activities will be assessed based on the audit reports in last year. The safety audit reports will be provided by study site manager.
- Training of resident-handling device for care staff A few 1.5- to 2-hour trainings on the use of resident-handling device will be delivered to all care staff. During the training, care staff will learn how to use the device with hands-on experience. Also, the product supplier will provide a 10-minute demonstration video for care staff to better understand the operation procedure. A protocol detailing related device operations will be prepared for the staff.
- Safety audit After the staff training, care staff who are responsible for transferring and lifting residents using the new resident-handling devices will be audited by clinical professionals (e.g., occupational therapists, physiologists) to ensure that they can operate the devices properly. The audit items are developed based on the experience of using and auditing various types and models of resident-handling devices of the study sites, and are in use for years. The audit takes around 2 to 3 weeks to complete. Potential risks to residents and care staff during using the new resident-handling device for resident-handling and/or functional activities will be assessed based on the audit reports. The safety audit reports will be provided by study site manager.
- Implementation Care staff at one selected floor of Nursing Home (NH) and Care \& Attention for Severely Disabled (CASD) will use the resident handling device for participants with low dependency during the 4-week trial. The device helps care staff to assist residents in making a transition from a sit to a standing posture, vice versa. This device is used for functional activities and transferring and lifting participants. On the other hand, care staff at another selected floor at Nursing Home (NH) and Sister Annie Skau Holistic Care Centre (SASHCC) will use the resident handling device for residents with high dependency during the 4-week trial. When care staff are performing resident handling tasks, the device moves with little force in any direction. The handlebar's force sensors detect and transfer force in the appropriate directions, speeding up the 5th wheel below. There will be a real-time alert if the care staff pushes or pulls at a force more than 20 kilogram (which should not be exceeded as per the recommendation of Occupational Safety and Health Council).
- Trial data collection
In the first trial week, clinical consultant(s) will observe the actual operation for once for each device model to investigate operation difficulties, and record the observations in an observation report. Operation protocol may be revised. A 5 to 15 minutes follow-up staff training may be delivered to all care staff based on the revised protocol.
During the 4-week trial, care staff will complete a self-administrated questionnaire about the level of comfort expressed by residents and perceived safety when they perform resident handling and/or functional activities using the resident handling device every week.
At the end of the trial, 2 to 4 residents and 3 to 4 cares staff at each test site will be selected by convenience and invited to an interview. Interview contents include the perceived benefits and feasibility of new resident handling devices compared to conventional resident handling devices. For the resident handling device for participants with high dependency, data of care staff's average force exertion and number of Ergo feedback (a proxy measure of number of times care staff use excessive force) will be retrieved.
Blinding
No blinding will be done for this single group study.
Sample size determination
The sample size is estimated by the current number of care staff who are responsible for resident handling tasks and residents who require the use of resident handling device at the study sites. It is estimated that a total of 35 residents and 28 care staff will be using the resident handling device for residents with high dependency, while a total of 22 residents and 35 care staff will be using the resident handling device for residents with low dependency.
Data analysis
- Main analysis Independent sample t-test will be used to evaluate the change in the anonymous pre-post data of level of comfort expressed by residents, perceived safety, care staff attitudes towards the resident-handling device and perceived difficulties in using of new resident-handling device. Independent sample t-test with Bonferroni correction will be used to evaluate the change in the anonymous weekly data of level of comfort expressed by residents, perceived safety, care staff attitudes towards the resident-handling device and perceived difficulties in using of new resident-handling device. Safety audit reports regarding the potential risks involved in the resident-handling tasks and functional activities during pre-test and trial period will be compared. Descriptive statistics will used to show the average force that care staff exert and number of Ergo feedback (a proxy measure of number of times care staff use excessive force) generated by the device. The operation difficulties in the use of the new resident-handling devices in actual operation will be summarised.
- Qualitative interview
The content will be transcribed verbatim in Chinese for further analysis. Transcripts will be analysed using framework analysis to construct a coherent and logical structure from the classification of many opinions and perceptions of the new and conventional resident-handling device. The results will then be discussed and consolidated in the panel meetings with the co-authors.
- Conditions
- Technology
- Being tested
- The resident-handling device
- Keywords
- Gerontechnology, Resident handling devices, Elderly residential setting
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
The resident-handling deviceDevice
Care staff will perform resident-handling tasks using the new resident-handling devices. For low dependency during trial, the device helps care staff to assist residents in making a transition from a sit to a standing posture, vice versa. This device is used for functional activities and transferring and lifting participants. For high dependency during trial, when care staff are performing resident-handling tasks, the device moves with little force in any direction.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| The resident-handling device | Experimental | This group will use the resident-handling device during the 4-week trial. Receives: Device: The resident-handling device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
5-week change in the level of comfort expressed by residents
Care staff will complete an item indicating the level of comfort expressed by residents in using the conventional and new resident handling devices on a 5-point Likert scale (i.e. 1 indicating very uncomfortable and 5 indicating very comfortable). The minimum and maximum values of the scale are 1 and 5 respectively. Higher score indicates higher level of comfort.
Measured: From the start of 1-week pre-test to the end of the 4-week trial period
5-week change in perceived safety
Care staff will complete two items indicating the perceived safety in using the conventional and new resident handling devices on a 5-point Likert scale (i.e. 1 indicating very unsafety and 5 indicating very safety). The minimum and maximum values of the scale are 2 and 10 respectively, with higher score indicating higher level of safety.
Measured: From the start of 1-week pre-test to the end of the 4-week trial period
Qualitative measures: The potential risks to residents and staff involved in resident-handling tasks
Potential risks to residents and care staff during the use of the new resident handling device for resident handling and/or functional activities will be assessed based on the audit reports. The safety audit reports will be provided by study site manager. Safety audit reports regarding the potential risks involved in the resident-handling tasks and functional activities during pre-test and trial period will be compared. The contents include the preparation of residents and environment, the preparation of staff and tools, the operation process and the aftermath.
Measured: Within a year before the 4-week trial to before the start of the 4-week trial
Secondary outcomes (10)
Care staff attitudes towards resident-handling devices
Care staff will complete four items indicating their attitudes towards conventional and new resident handling devices in the past week at week 0 and 4 on a 5-point Likert scale (i.e. 1 indicating strongly disagree and 5 indicating strongly agree). The minimum and maximum values of the scale are 4 and 20 respectively, with higher score indicating higher level of acceptability.
Measured: From the start of 1-week pre-test to the end of the 4-week trial period
Perceived easiness in using resident-handling devices
Care staff will complete nine items indicating the perceived easiness in using conventional and new resident handling devices on a 5-point Likert scale (i.e. 1 indicating many difficulties and 5 indicating no difficulties) in the past week at week 0 and 4. The minimum and maximum values of the scale are 8 and 40 respectively, with higher score indicating perceived easier use of the devices.
Measured: From the start of 1-week pre-test to the end of the 4-week trial period
Qualitative measures: The operation difficulties in the use of the new resident-handling devices in actual operation
In the first trial week, clinical consultant will observe the actual operation for once for each device model to investigate operation difficulties and record the observation in an observation report.
Measured: In the first week of the 4-week trial period
Qualitative measures: The perceived benefits and feasibility of the resident-handling devices of residents
At the end of the trial, 2 to 4 residents at each test site will be selected by convenience and invited to an interview. Interview contents include the perceived benefits and feasibility of new resident-handling devices compared to conventional resident-handling devices.
- Is it safe in using the new handling devices during transfer and lifting and/or functional activities?
- Do you feel comfortable in using new handling devices during transfer and lifting and/or functional activities?
- On the whole, are you satisfied with the new handling devices?
- Do you want the service unit to continue to use the new handling devices in the future?
Measured: At the end of the 4-week trial period
Qualitative measures: The perceived benefits and feasibility of the resident-handling devices of care staff
At the end of the trial, 3 to 4 cares staff at each test site will be selected by convenience and invited to an interview. Interview contents include the perceived benefits and feasibility of new resident-handling devices compared to conventional resident-handling devices.
- Do you want bigger or smaller size of handling devices?
- Is the new handling device safe?
- Is there any abnormal operation during the testing?
- Is there any accident during the testing?
- What can be improved in using the new handling devices?
- Is it easy to operate?
- Does it spend less time in operation?
- What is the attitude of residents?
- Do the new handling devices fulfill your expectation?
- Can you give advice to other care staff while using this handling device?
- Do you worry about using the new handling devices or refuse to use because of wrong operation?
Measured: At the end of the 4-week trial period
The level of comfort expressed by residents with low dependency on using the functional activities
Care staff will complete an item indicating the level of comfort expressed by residents with low dependency in using new resident handling devices on a 5-point Likert scale (i.e. 1 indicating very uncomfortable and 5 indicating very comfortable). The minimum and maximum values of the scale are 1 and 5 respectively. Higher score indicates higher level of comfort.
Measured: From the start of 1-week pre-test to the end of the 4-week trial period
Perceived safety of residents with low dependency on using the functional activities
Care staff will complete two items indicating the perceived safety on using the functional activities of new handling devices on a 5-point Likert scale (i.e. 1 indicating very unsafety and 5 indicating very safety). The minimum and maximum values of the scale are 2 and 10 respectively, with higher score indicating high level of safety.
Measured: From the start of 1-week pre-test to the end of the 4-week trial period
Qualitative measures: The potential risks to residents with low dependency and staff when the device is used for functional activities
Potential risks to residents and care staff during the use of the new resident handling device for resident handling and/or functional activities will be assessed based on the audit reports. The safety audit reports will be provided by study site manager. Safety audit reports regarding the potential risks involved in the resident-handling tasks and functional activities during pre-test and trial period will be compared. The contents include the preparation of residents and environment, the preparation of staff and tools, the operation process and the aftermath.
Measured: Within a year before the 4-week trial to before the start of the 4-week trial
The average force exertion of care staff on residents with high dependency
The average force that care staff exert in using the high dependency device will be generated by the device.
Measured: From the start to the end of the 4-week trial period
The number of Ergo feedback (a proxy measure of the number of times care staff use excessive force) of residents with high dependency
The number of Ergo feedback (a proxy measure of number of times care staff use excessive force) will be generated by the device.
Measured: From the start to the end of the 4-week trial period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2023
- Study start13 Mar 2023
- Primary completion20 Oct 2023
- Study completion20 Oct 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for TechnologyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Hong KongThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- The trial is a single group pre-post test study at HOH Nursing Home (NH), Sister Annie Skau Holistic Care Centre (SASHCC), and Care \& Attention Home for Severely Disabled (CASD). During the 4-week trial, one floor in SASHCC and one floor in NH will utilize the resident-handling device for residents with high dependency (i.e., lower-limb cannot bear weight). CASD and another floor in NH will use the resident-handling device for residents with low dependency (i.e. lower-limb can bear weight). Outcome indicators are examined during the 1-week pre-test the 4-week trial. Additionally, opinions and comments from care staff and residents regarding the new resident-handling devices will be collected at the end of the trial.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Haven of Hope Hospital, The Social Innovation and Entrepreneurship Development Fund, Hong Kong
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Derek Yee-Tak Cheung, The University of Hong Kong
- Investigators
- Yee Tak Cheung, PhD, Principal investigator, The University of Hong Kong
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05789979
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- handling devices_protocol
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 16 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 29 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Research data and documentation will be available upon request.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effectiveness, Feasibility and Potential Risks of Resident Handling Devices in Elderly Residential Setting: A Single Group Pre-post Test Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05789979
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- handling devices_protocol
- Conditions
- Technology
- Keywords
- Gerontechnology, Resident handling devices, Elderly residential setting
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Haven of Hope Hospital, The Social Innovation and Entrepreneurship Development Fund, Hong Kong
- Study start
- 13 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Oct 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study has 12 research questions regarding the use of resident-handling device in elderly residential setting:
Primary study questions:
- Can the new resident-handling devices improve resident comfortability during the resident-handling task?
- Are the new resident-handling devices perceived as safe compared to the conventional resident-handling devices?
- What are the potential risks to the residents and care staff involve in the resident-handling tasks using the new and conventional resident-handling devices? Secondary study questions:
- What are care staff attitudes towards the new and conventional resident-handling devices?
- What are the perceived difficulties in using the new and conventional resident-handling devices? Auxiliary study questions:
- What are the operation difficulties in the use of the new resident-handling devices in actual operation?
- What are the perceived benefits and feasibility of using the new resident-handling devices compared to conventional resident-handling devices?
- [For resident-handling device for residents with low dependency only] Can the new resident-handling device improve resident comfortability in functional activities?
- [For resident-handling device for residents with low dependency only] Is the new resident-handling device perceived as safe for functional activities compared to the conventional resident-handling devices?
- [For resident-handling device for residents with low dependency only] What are the potential risks to the residents and care staff involve in functional activities using the new and conventional resident-handling devices?
- [For resident-handling device for residents with high dependency only] What is the average force exertion of care staff?
- [For resident-handling device for residents with high dependency only] How frequently does care staff exert excessive force (i.e. Ergo feedback)?
Detailed description
Study design
The trial is a single group pre-post test study at Haven of Hope (HOH) Nursing Home (NH), Sister Annie Skau Holistic Care Centre (SASHCC), and Care \& Attention Home for Severely Disabled (CASD). During the 4-week trial, one floor in SASHCC and one floor in NH will utilize the resident-handling device for residents with high dependency (i.e., lower-limb cannot bear weight). CASD and another floor in NH will use the resident-handling device for residents with low dependency (i.e. lower-limb can bear weight). Outcome indicators are examined during the 1-week pre-test the 4-week trial. Additionally, opinions and comments from care staff and residents regarding the new resident-handling devices will be collected at the end of the trial.
This protocol complies with the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use - Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) and Declaration of Helsinki.
Subjects
- Residents Residents of two selected floors at Nursing Home (NH), Care \& Attention for Severely Disabled (CASD), and Sister Annie Skau Holistic Care Centre (SASHCC) will be recruited. Inclusion criteria for high dependency device:
- Lower limb cannot bear weight,
- Assessed by health care workers (e.g., occupational therapists, physiotherapists, nurses) that manual handling is not appropriate
- According to the study site instruction, require the use of resident handling device Exclusion criteria:
- None Inclusion criteria for low dependency device:
- Lower-limb can bear weight
- Assessed by health care workers (e.g., occupational therapists, physiotherapists, nurses) that manual handling is not appropriate
- According to the study site instruction, require the use of resident handling device Exclusion criteria:
- None
- Care staff Care staff of two selected floors at Nursing Home (NH), Care \& Attention for Severely Disabled (CASD), and Sister Annie Skau Holistic Care Centre (SASHCC) will be recruited.
Inclusion criteria:
- Responsible for transferring and lifting residents using any of the new resident handling devices
Exclusion criteria:
- None
Procedures
- Participants' recruitment and consent The criteria stated in the Alzheimer Europe Report (2011) will be followed to ensure that the participants are provided chances to give consent. In particular, four criteria will be evaluated, including 1) the person must have sufficient capacity to understand the information, 2) the person is able to retain, use and weight up such information for making a decision, 3) the person will understand the benefit, risk, and convenience, 4) the person must have the ability to communicate the decision. The University of Hong Kong (HKU) research staff and the care staff will first commit them in a causal chat to assess their ability to communicate and understand the dialogues. If residents meet all the four criteria, both residents and their next of kin will be approached for consent. Otherwise, only their next of kin will be approached for consent. For the residents who will be approached for consent, the HKU research staff will elaborate the study based on the opt-out consent script and give them the opt-out consent document. Neither HKU nor the supplier will get personal or sensitive information of the participants due to the study. If they do not want to participate, they can notify the care staff. Unless they indicate withdrawal from the study, they are treated as consenting to join the study (opt-out participation). Every time before using the devices, the care staff will inform the use of the devices. Devices will be used only when participants do not raise objections. Their next of kin will be informed of the new devices and the study through standard channel of the test site (i.e. messaging mobile phone app or phone). If they do not want the residents to participate, they can notify the care staff. Unless they indicate withdrawal from the study, they are treated as consenting the residents to join the study (opt-out participation). For the care staff, it will be presumed that they agree to participate in the study if they complete the anonymous questionnaire (implied consent). Before qualitative interviews with the participants, written consent will be obtained from them and their next of kin. Before qualitative interviews with the care staff, written consent will be obtained from them.
- Baseline data collection Before the trial, all test sites use the conventional resident-handling devices available in their service units. In the week before the trial, the baseline data of the level of comfort during transfer and lifting, care staff attitudes towards the conventional resident-handling devices and perceived difficulties in using conventional resident-handling devices will be collected. It is a standard practice for the study site to require all staff operating the devices to pass yearly audit to ensure that they can operate the devices properly. Potential risks to residents and care staff during using the conventional resident-handling device resident-handling and/or functional activities will be assessed based on the audit reports in last year. The safety audit reports will be provided by study site manager.
- Training of resident-handling device for care staff A few 1.5- to 2-hour trainings on the use of resident-handling device will be delivered to all care staff. During the training, care staff will learn how to use the device with hands-on experience. Also, the product supplier will provide a 10-minute demonstration video for care staff to better understand the operation procedure. A protocol detailing related device operations will be prepared for the staff.
- Safety audit After the staff training, care staff who are responsible for transferring and lifting residents using the new resident-handling devices will be audited by clinical professionals (e.g., occupational therapists, physiologists) to ensure that they can operate the devices properly. The audit items are developed based on the experience of using and auditing various types and models of resident-handling devices of the study sites, and are in use for years. The audit takes around 2 to 3 weeks to complete. Potential risks to residents and care staff during using the new resident-handling device for resident-handling and/or functional activities will be assessed based on the audit reports. The safety audit reports will be provided by study site manager.
- Implementation Care staff at one selected floor of Nursing Home (NH) and Care \& Attention for Severely Disabled (CASD) will use the resident handling device for participants with low dependency during the 4-week trial. The device helps care staff to assist residents in making a transition from a sit to a standing posture, vice versa. This device is used for functional activities and transferring and lifting participants. On the other hand, care staff at another selected floor at Nursing Home (NH) and Sister Annie Skau Holistic Care Centre (SASHCC) will use the resident handling device for residents with high dependency during the 4-week trial. When care staff are performing resident handling tasks, the device moves with little force in any direction. The handlebar's force sensors detect and transfer force in the appropriate directions, speeding up the 5th wheel below. There will be a real-time alert if the care staff pushes or pulls at a force more than 20 kilogram (which should not be exceeded as per the recommendation of Occupational Safety and Health Council).
- Trial data collection
In the first trial week, clinical consultant(s) will observe the actual operation for once for each device model to investigate operation difficulties, and record the observations in an observation report. Operation protocol may be revised. A 5 to 15 minutes follow-up staff training may be delivered to all care staff based on the revised protocol.
During the 4-week trial, care staff will complete a self-administrated questionnaire about the level of comfort expressed by residents and perceived safety when they perform resident handling and/or functional activities using the resident handling device every week.
At the end of the trial, 2 to 4 residents and 3 to 4 cares staff at each test site will be selected by convenience and invited to an interview. Interview contents include the perceived benefits and feasibility of new resident handling devices compared to conventional resident handling devices. For the resident handling device for participants with high dependency, data of care staff's average force exertion and number of Ergo feedback (a proxy measure of number of times care staff use excessive force) will be retrieved.
Blinding
No blinding will be done for this single group study.
Sample size determination
The sample size is estimated by the current number of care staff who are responsible for resident handling tasks and residents who require the use of resident handling device at the study sites. It is estimated that a total of 35 residents and 28 care staff will be using the resident handling device for residents with high dependency, while a total of 22 residents and 35 care staff will be using the resident handling device for residents with low dependency.
Data analysis
- Main analysis Independent sample t-test will be used to evaluate the change in the anonymous pre-post data of level of comfort expressed by residents, perceived safety, care staff attitudes towards the resident-handling device and perceived difficulties in using of new resident-handling device. Independent sample t-test with Bonferroni correction will be used to evaluate the change in the anonymous weekly data of level of comfort expressed by residents, perceived safety, care staff attitudes towards the resident-handling device and perceived difficulties in using of new resident-handling device. Safety audit reports regarding the potential risks involved in the resident-handling tasks and functional activities during pre-test and trial period will be compared. Descriptive statistics will used to show the average force that care staff exert and number of Ergo feedback (a proxy measure of number of times care staff use excessive force) generated by the device. The operation difficulties in the use of the new resident-handling devices in actual operation will be summarised.
- Qualitative interview
The content will be transcribed verbatim in Chinese for further analysis. Transcripts will be analysed using framework analysis to construct a coherent and logical structure from the classification of many opinions and perceptions of the new and conventional resident-handling device. The results will then be discussed and consolidated in the panel meetings with the co-authors.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- The trial is a single group pre-post test study at HOH Nursing Home (NH), Sister Annie Skau Holistic Care Centre (SASHCC), and Care \& Attention Home for Severely Disabled (CASD). During the 4-week trial, one floor in SASHCC and one floor in NH will utilize the resident-handling device for residents with high dependency (i.e., lower-limb cannot bear weight). CASD and another floor in NH will use the resident-handling device for residents with low dependency (i.e. lower-limb can bear weight). Outcome indicators are examined during the 1-week pre-test the 4-week trial. Additionally, opinions and comments from care staff and residents regarding the new resident-handling devices will be collected at the end of the trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| The resident-handling device | Experimental | Device: The resident-handling deviceThis group will use the resident-handling device during the 4-week trial. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Lower limb cannot bear weight,
- Assessed by health care workers (e.g., occupational therapists, physiotherapists, nurses) that manual handling is not appropriate
- According to the study site instruction, require the use of resident-handling device
- Lower-limb can bear weight
- Assessed by health care workers (e.g., occupational therapists, physiotherapists, nurses) that manual handling is not appropriate
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| The resident-handling deviceCare staff will perform resident-handling tasks using the new resident-handling devices. For low dependency during trial, the device helps care staff to assist residents in making a transition from a sit to a standing posture, vice versa. This device is used for functional activities and transferring and lifting participants. For high dependency during trial, when care staff are performing resident-handling tasks, the device moves with little force in any direction. | Device | The resident-handling device |
Primary outcome
5-week change in the level of comfort expressed by residents
Time frame: From the start of 1-week pre-test to the end of the 4-week trial period
Care staff will complete an item indicating the level of comfort expressed by residents in using the conventional and new resident handling devices on a 5-point Likert scale (i.e. 1 indicating very uncomfortable and 5 indicating very comfortable). The minimum and maximum values of the scale are 1 and 5 respectively. Higher score indicates higher level of comfort.
5-week change in perceived safety
Time frame: From the start of 1-week pre-test to the end of the 4-week trial period
Care staff will complete two items indicating the perceived safety in using the conventional and new resident handling devices on a 5-point Likert scale (i.e. 1 indicating very unsafety and 5 indicating very safety). The minimum and maximum values of the scale are 2 and 10 respectively, with higher score indicating higher level of safety.
Qualitative measures: The potential risks to residents and staff involved in resident-handling tasks
Time frame: Within a year before the 4-week trial to before the start of the 4-week trial
Potential risks to residents and care staff during the use of the new resident handling device for resident handling and/or functional activities will be assessed based on the audit reports. The safety audit reports will be provided by study site manager. Safety audit reports regarding the potential risks involved in the resident-handling tasks and functional activities during pre-test and trial period will be compared. The contents include the preparation of residents and environment, the preparation of staff and tools, the operation process and the aftermath.
10 secondary outcomes
Care staff attitudes towards resident-handling devices
Time frame: From the start of 1-week pre-test to the end of the 4-week trial period
Perceived easiness in using resident-handling devices
Time frame: From the start of 1-week pre-test to the end of the 4-week trial period
Qualitative measures: The operation difficulties in the use of the new resident-handling devices in actual operation
Time frame: In the first week of the 4-week trial period
Qualitative measures: The perceived benefits and feasibility of the resident-handling devices of residents
Time frame: At the end of the 4-week trial period
Qualitative measures: The perceived benefits and feasibility of the resident-handling devices of care staff
Time frame: At the end of the 4-week trial period
The level of comfort expressed by residents with low dependency on using the functional activities
Time frame: From the start of 1-week pre-test to the end of the 4-week trial period
Perceived safety of residents with low dependency on using the functional activities
Time frame: From the start of 1-week pre-test to the end of the 4-week trial period
Qualitative measures: The potential risks to residents with low dependency and staff when the device is used for functional activities
Time frame: Within a year before the 4-week trial to before the start of the 4-week trial
The average force exertion of care staff on residents with high dependency
Time frame: From the start to the end of the 4-week trial period
The number of Ergo feedback (a proxy measure of the number of times care staff use excessive force) of residents with high dependency
Time frame: From the start to the end of the 4-week trial period
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Nov 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Research data and documentation will be available upon request.
Related trials for Technology
Active, not recruiting
Flipped Classroom vs. Flip-Jigsaw in Theoretical Physiotherapy Education
Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Educational Technology
Not yet recruiting
HMD-Based Virtual Reality Simulation in Nursing Skills Education
Nursing Education Research, Nursing Education
Recruiting
225 IU Versus 300 IU Starting FSH Dose in PPOS for Good-Prognosis Women
Infertility (IVF Patients), Infertility Assisted Reproductive Technology
Not yet recruiting
Technology Use, Safe Health Information, and Artificial Intelligence Among Older Adults
Older Adults, Nursing Homes
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Association Between Serum Progesterone Levels on Embryo Transfer Day and Clinical Pregnancy in Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles Using Hormone Replacement Therapy
Infertility Assisted Reproductive Technology
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yee Tak Cheung, PhD principal investigator
The University of Hong Kong
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing The resident-handling device in people with Technology, run by The University of Hong Kong at 3 sites in Hong Kong.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
5-week change in the level of comfort expressed by residents (time frame: From the start of 1-week pre-test to the end of the 4-week trial period). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.