Anesthetics, IntravenousNCT05843383
Comparison of Ciprofol-based and Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Quality of Recovery
A study testing Ciprofol and Propofol in people with Anesthetics, Intravenous and Postoperative Complications, run by Xijing Hospital at 2 sites in China.
Trial summary
Ciprofol is a novel 2,6-disubstituted phenol derivatives and is proved have much higher potency and tighter binding toward ɣ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor while maintaining a fast on-set and recovery time compared to propofol. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthetics, Intravenous, Postoperative Complications, Hypnotics and Sedatives
- What is being tested?
- Ciprofol and Propofol
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 280 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 16 May 2023to 1 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery under endotracheal intubation and general anesthesia
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification: I to III;
- Age ≥ 60 years, BMI < 30 kg/m2;
- Unconscious speech audiovisual impairment or unable to cooperate;
- Informed consent has been signed.
Who cannot join
- Taking any sedative, opioid, or sleep aid drugs;
- Psychiatric or neurological disorder;
- Allergic to ciprofol, propofol or soy, or a family history of malignant hyperthermia;
- Severe liver and kidney dysfunction;
- Operation duration < 2 hours;
- Plan to the intensive care unit with tracheal catheter;
- Have participated in this study or other clinical studies.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
China2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Xijing Hospital
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032
Wanwan Yang, 029-84775343, yangwanwan2017@163.com
Haopeng Zhang
- Recruiting
Xijing Hospital
Xi'an, Shaanxi
Wanwan Yang
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Ciprofol-based and Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Elderly Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
Ciprofol is a novel 2,6-disubstituted phenol derivatives and is proved have much higher potency and tighter binding toward ɣ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor while maintaining a fast on-set and recovery time compared to propofol. Except lower incidence of hypotension and respiratory depression, it has no injection pain and infusion syndrome compared with propofol. There is no study to investigate overall postoperative functional recovery in patients receiving total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using ciprofol yet. However, according to study, early quality of recovery according to QoR-15 score is associated with one-month postoperative complications after elective surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine whether there is any difference in the quality of postoperative recovery between ciprofol-based and propofol-based TIVA in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. The QoR-15 questionnaire score, pain, nausea/vomiting, and the frequency of complications are evaluated and compared between the two groups.
- Conditions
- Anesthetics, Intravenous, Postoperative Complications, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Postoperative Recovery
- Being tested
- Ciprofol, Propofol
- Keywords
- Ciprofol, Propofol
- Medical subject headings
- Postoperative Complications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CiprofolDrug
Also called HSK3486
Ciprofol group will be started and maintained total intravenous anesthesia with ciprofol and remifentanil
PropofolDrug
Also called 2,6-diisopropylphenol
Propofol group will be started and maintained total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ciprofol group | Experimental | Ciprofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is given for maintenance of general anesthesia Receives: Drug: Ciprofol |
| Propofol group | Experimental | Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is given for maintenance of general anesthesia Receives: Drug: Propofol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of Recovery(QoR)-15 questionnaire score at postoperative day 1
Quality of life will be evaluated using Quality of Recovery(QoR)-15 questionnaire score at postoperative day 1(minimum value: 0, maximum value: 150, the higher the score, the better the result)
Measured: Postoperative day 1
Secondary outcomes (12)
Quality of Recovery(QoR)-15 questionnaire score at postoperative day 2
Quality of life will be evaluated using Quality of Recovery(QoR)-15 questionnaire score at postoperative day 2 (minimum value: 0, maximum value: 150, the higher the score, the better the result)
Measured: Postoperative day 2
Incidence of injection pain
Record the incidence of injection pain ( yes or no)
Measured: during anesthesia induction
Hemodynamic change
Record the mean arterial pressure (MAP) at different points, including before induction, after induction, immediately after intubation, at the beginning of surgery, at the end of anesthesia, immediately after extubation, and before leaving the room
Measured: During the operation
Vasoactive agents
Percentage of patients needed vasoactive agents during anesthesia
Measured: from start of surgery to end of surgery
Tracheal extubation time
Time from cessation of main anaesthetics to tracheal extubation
Measured: From stopping ciprofol or propofol infusion to awake and withdrawal of tracheal tube, approximately 30 minutes
Postoperative sedation score
Monitored by the sedation scale called Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS). SAS is a medical scale used to measure the agitation or sedation level of a person.The score ranges from 1 to 7
Measured: Immediately after awake,approximately 1 hour after surgery
Postoperative pain score
postoperative pain score measured by 11-point VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) score (minimum : 0, maximum : 10, the lower the score, the lesser pain)
Measured: Immediately after awake, approximately 1 hour after surgery
Postoperative nausea and vomiting
Postoperative nausea and vomiting will be evaluated by PONV (Post Operative Nausea And Vomiting) score (no : 0, vomit: 4)
Measured: Immediately after awake, approximately 1 hour after surgery
First exhaust time
Record the first exhaust time After the operation
Measured: 24 hours after end of surgery, approximately 24 hours
Hospital stay
days of hospital stay
Measured: From end of surgery to discharge from hospital, on an average of 7 days
Postoperative complications
Various complications occurred during hospitalization
Measured: From end of surgery to discharge from hospital, on an average of 7 days
Adverse event
Percentage of adverse events occurred during hospitalization
Measured: From end of surgery to discharge from hospital, on an average of 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2023
- Study start16 May 2023
- Primary completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anesthetics, IntravenousStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Xijing HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Xijing Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Haopeng Zhang, Study chair, Air Force Military Medical University, China
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05843383
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KY20222308-C-1
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 3 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 9 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Qin L, Ren L, Wan S, Liu G, Luo X, Liu Z, Li F, Yu Y, Liu J, Wei Y. Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel 2,6-Disubstituted Phenol Derivatives as General Anesthetics. J Med Chem. 2017 May 11;60(9):3606-3617. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00254. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
PubMed 28430430Bian Y, Zhang H, Ma S, Jiao Y, Yan P, Liu X, Ma S, Xiong Y, Gu Z, Yu Z, Huang C, Miao L. Mass balance, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous HSK3486, a novel anaesthetic, administered to healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jan;87(1):93-105. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14363. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
PubMed 32415708Bakhtiari E, Mousavi SH, Gharavi Fard M. Pharmacological control of pain during propofol injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jul;14(7):889-899. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2021.1919084. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
PubMed 33896305Jalota L, Kalira V, George E, Shi YY, Hornuss C, Radke O, Pace NL, Apfel CC; Perioperative Clinical Research Core. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011 Mar 15;342:d1110. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1110.
PubMed 21406529Luo Z, Tu H, Zhang X, Wang X, Ouyang W, Wei X, Zou X, Zhu Z, Li Y, Shangguan W, Wu H, Wang Y, Guo Q. Efficacy and Safety of HSK3486 for Anesthesia/Sedation in Patients Undergoing Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Propofol-Controlled, Randomized, Phase 3 Study. CNS Drugs. 2022 Mar;36(3):301-313. doi: 10.1007/s40263-021-00890-1. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
PubMed 35157236Campfort M, Cayla C, Lasocki S, Rineau E, Leger M. Early quality of recovery according to QoR-15 score is associated with one-month postoperative complications after elective surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2022 Jun;78:110638. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110638. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
PubMed 35033845
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Ciprofol-based and Propofol-based Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Elderly Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05843383
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KY20222308-C-1
- Conditions
- Anesthetics, Intravenous, Postoperative Complications, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Postoperative Recovery
- Keywords
- Ciprofol, Propofol
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Xijing HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 May 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Ciprofol is a novel 2,6-disubstituted phenol derivatives and is proved have much higher potency and tighter binding toward ɣ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor while maintaining a fast on-set and recovery time compared to propofol. Except lower incidence of hypotension and respiratory depression, it has no injection pain and infusion syndrome compared with propofol. There is no study to investigate overall postoperative functional recovery in patients receiving total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using ciprofol yet. However, according to study, early quality of recovery according to QoR-15 score is associated with one-month postoperative complications after elective surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine whether there is any difference in the quality of postoperative recovery between ciprofol-based and propofol-based TIVA in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. The QoR-15 questionnaire score, pain, nausea/vomiting, and the frequency of complications are evaluated and compared between the two groups.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ciprofol group | Experimental | Drug: CiprofolCiprofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is given for maintenance of general anesthesia |
| Propofol group | Experimental | Drug: PropofolPropofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is given for maintenance of general anesthesia |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery under endotracheal intubation and general anesthesia
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification: I to III;
- Age ≥ 60 years, BMI < 30 kg/m2;
- Unconscious speech audiovisual impairment or unable to cooperate;
- Informed consent has been signed.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Taking any sedative, opioid, or sleep aid drugs;
- Psychiatric or neurological disorder;
- Allergic to ciprofol, propofol or soy, or a family history of malignant hyperthermia;
- Severe liver and kidney dysfunction;
- Operation duration < 2 hours;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CiprofolAlso: HSK3486Ciprofol group will be started and maintained total intravenous anesthesia with ciprofol and remifentanil | Drug | Ciprofol group |
| PropofolAlso: 2,6-diisopropylphenolPropofol group will be started and maintained total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil | Drug | Propofol group |
Primary outcome
Quality of Recovery(QoR)-15 questionnaire score at postoperative day 1
Time frame: Postoperative day 1
Quality of life will be evaluated using Quality of Recovery(QoR)-15 questionnaire score at postoperative day 1(minimum value: 0, maximum value: 150, the higher the score, the better the result)
12 secondary outcomes
Quality of Recovery(QoR)-15 questionnaire score at postoperative day 2
Time frame: Postoperative day 2
Incidence of injection pain
Time frame: during anesthesia induction
Hemodynamic change
Time frame: During the operation
Vasoactive agents
Time frame: from start of surgery to end of surgery
Tracheal extubation time
Time frame: From stopping ciprofol or propofol infusion to awake and withdrawal of tracheal tube, approximately 30 minutes
Postoperative sedation score
Time frame: Immediately after awake,approximately 1 hour after surgery
Postoperative pain score
Time frame: Immediately after awake, approximately 1 hour after surgery
Postoperative nausea and vomiting
Time frame: Immediately after awake, approximately 1 hour after surgery
First exhaust time
Time frame: 24 hours after end of surgery, approximately 24 hours
Hospital stay
Time frame: From end of surgery to discharge from hospital, on an average of 7 days
Postoperative complications
Time frame: From end of surgery to discharge from hospital, on an average of 7 days
Adverse event
Time frame: From end of surgery to discharge from hospital, on an average of 7 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Apr 2024.
- Background: PubMed 28430430Qin L, Ren L, Wan S, Liu G, Luo X, Liu Z, Li F, Yu Y, Liu J, Wei Y. Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel 2,6-Disubstituted Phenol Derivatives as General Anesthetics. J Med Chem. 2017 May 11;60(9):3606-3617. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00254. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
- Background: PubMed 32415708Bian Y, Zhang H, Ma S, Jiao Y, Yan P, Liu X, Ma S, Xiong Y, Gu Z, Yu Z, Huang C, Miao L. Mass balance, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous HSK3486, a novel anaesthetic, administered to healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jan;87(1):93-105. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14363. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
- Background: PubMed 33896305Bakhtiari E, Mousavi SH, Gharavi Fard M. Pharmacological control of pain during propofol injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jul;14(7):889-899. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2021.1919084. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
- Background: PubMed 21406529Jalota L, Kalira V, George E, Shi YY, Hornuss C, Radke O, Pace NL, Apfel CC; Perioperative Clinical Research Core. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011 Mar 15;342:d1110. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1110.
- Background: PubMed 35157236Luo Z, Tu H, Zhang X, Wang X, Ouyang W, Wei X, Zou X, Zhu Z, Li Y, Shangguan W, Wu H, Wang Y, Guo Q. Efficacy and Safety of HSK3486 for Anesthesia/Sedation in Patients Undergoing Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Propofol-Controlled, Randomized, Phase 3 Study. CNS Drugs. 2022 Mar;36(3):301-313. doi: 10.1007/s40263-021-00890-1. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
- Background: PubMed 35033845Campfort M, Cayla C, Lasocki S, Rineau E, Leger M. Early quality of recovery according to QoR-15 score is associated with one-month postoperative complications after elective surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2022 Jun;78:110638. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110638. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Anesthetics, Intravenous
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Effect of Magnesium on Post-spinal Headaches
Post-spinal Headache
RecruitingPhase 4
Remimazolam Versus Propofol for Maintenance of Anaesthesia During Major Hepatectomy Under Low Central Venous Pressure
Intraoperative Hypotension, Hepatectomy
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Oral Gabapentin Versus Intravenous Neostigmine/Atropine Versus Combination of Both for Prevention of PDPH
Postdural Puncture Headache (PDPH)
RecruitingPhase 4
Time to Loss of Consciousness With Remimazolam Versus Propofol for Anesthetic Induction in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Intravenous Anesthesia, Cholelithiasis
RecruitingPhase 3
Intravenous Lidocaine Plus Port-Site Ropivacaine for Recovery After Laparoscopic Surgery
Intravenous Lidocaine, Laparoscopic Surgery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Haopeng Zhang study chair
Air Force Military Medical University, China
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ciprofol and Propofol in people with Anesthetics, Intravenous and Postoperative Complications, run by Xijing Hospital at 2 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Wanwan Yang (029-84775343, yangwanwan2017@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of Recovery(QoR)-15 questionnaire score at postoperative day 1 (time frame: Postoperative day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05843383, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Apr 2024.