Concussion, BrainNCT05886400
The Effects of Environmental Distractions on SCAT6 Outcomes
A study testing SCAT6 and Visual/ Auditory Distraction in people with Concussion, Brain and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Indiana University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of visual and auditory distractions on SCAT5 scores. The study is designed to identify the effects of about 80 participants completing the SCAT5 in college-aged athletes. All participants will perform the same tasks in two settings (distracted and non-distracted). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 30 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Concussion, Brain, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
- What is being tested?
- SCAT6 and Visual/ Auditory Distraction
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2023to 1 May 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 30 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Previous athletic experience beginning at or after the age of 12
Who cannot join
- Diagnosed with a neurological condition (including epilepsy, stroke, seizures)
- Have had a concussion within the past 6 months (diagnosed or undiagnosed)
- have not participated in sport
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Indiana University School of Public Health
Bloomington, Indiana, 47405
About this study
The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of visual and auditory distractions on SCAT5 scores. The study is designed to identify the effects of about 80 participants completing the SCAT5 in college-aged athletes. All participants will perform the same tasks in two settings (distracted and non-distracted). The central hypothesis is that there will be a significant association between distractions and a lower score on the SCAT5. The cognitive screening, neurological screen, and mBESS should showcase a decrease scores during the distracted environment.
Read the detailed description
The researchers will use a randomized controlled trial design and recruit participants on a first-come, first-serve basis for the study. This crossover design will consist of two groups. The two groups are; distracted and non-distracted. The study will consist of two time points in an 8-day period.
After the initial recruitment email and enrollment questionnaire, those who are eligible for the study will be randomly assigned to begin in one of the two groups. The researchers will include a self-reported health questionnaire to obtain demographic information. The information includes age, sex, race/ ethnicity, years of athletic experience, number of previous concussions, favorite sports (with gender and level) to watch, and an assessment of other neurological conditions to screen participants' eligibility. Participants who meet the inclusion criteria and are free of exclusionary factors will advance to the consent forms and testing procedures. Consent forms will be filled out via Qualtrics.
Symptom Evaluation:
The symptom evaluation assesses severity and presence of symptoms. The symptom evaluation requires participants to self-report a total of 22 on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (none) to 7 (severe). Participants will be instructed to truthfully report their symptoms by circling their scores. Symptom scores will be manually transferred to an Excel spreadsheet for future analyses.
Cognitive Screening:
The cognitive screening portion of the SCAT5 is adapted from the standardized assessment of concussion (SAC). This section consists of orientation questions (like what day is it?) followed by immediate memory. Immediate memory consists of 5-item list of words presented to the participant three times and the participants are asked to recite the words back in any order. After the immediate memory assessment concentration is assessed using the digits backwards and months in reverse order tests. The digits backwards test starts with the participants being given a series of 3 numbers and asked to repeat them in reverse order, the test progresses up to 6 numbers. The test is discontinued after 2 consecutive incorrect answers. The months backwards test requires participants to recite the months of the year in reverse order. Following the months backwards the participant is asked to give as many words from the 5-item list as they can remember.
Neurological Screen :
The neurological screen is a brief series of questions assessing neurological function of the participant. This screen consists of participants ability to read out loud and follow instructions, perform full pain-free passive range of motion, vertical and horizontal eye movement (without moving the head), and complete tandem gait. Tandem gait requires participant to stand with their feet together (footwear off), they are instructed to walk as quickly and accurately as possible along the line in front of them maintaining an alternating foot heel to toe gait. The test is discontinued if the participant steps off of the line or does not maintain contact between heel and toe of opposite feet.
Modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS):
The balance testing is a modified version of the Balance Error Scoring System. The test consists of 20 second trials for 3 separate stances. The stances consist of double leg balance, single leg balance (non-dominant leg) and a tandem stance. Each stance will be performed with the participants hands on their hips and eyes closed. The scoring for this assessment is counted for every error that occurs during each stance. The errors include hands off hips, opening eyes, step/stumble/fall, moving hips into greater than 30 degrees of abduction, lifting heel or forefoot and staying out of position for greater than 5 seconds. Maximum number of errors is 10. If the participant cannot maintain position for a minimum of 5 seconds the test is discontinued and an automatic error score of 10 is given.
- Conditions
- Concussion, Brain, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
- Being tested
- SCAT6, Visual/ Auditory Distraction
- Keywords
- Standardized Concussion Assessment Tool, Modified Balance Error Scoring System, Sports Participation
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Concussion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SCAT6Other
Also called Standardized Concussion Assessment Tool
The SCAT6 is a standardized assessment tool to diagnose a concussion. This tool will be used for the experiment utilizing the 6th edition to recreate the methods used in an athletic situation. The SCAT6 is broken down into multiple subtests to focus on specific aspects of a person's wellbeing that could be affected by a possible concussion. The assessments are created to measure an athlete's subjectively experienced symptoms, cognitive functioning and balance and postural stability (mBESS).
Visual/ Auditory DistractionOther
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of environmental distractions on one's ability to complete the SCAT6. The environmental distractions will be visual and auditory by playing a sports event or sports clips during the completion of the assessment. The goal of this is to simulate the distraction of a sideline like a SCAT6 is typically used within athletic training.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Distracted | Experimental | Visual and audio distraction via sports video clips or a game will be playing during the testing session. Receives: Other: SCAT6; Other: Visual/ Auditory Distraction |
| Not Distracted | Sham comparator | No visual or auditory distractions will be used during testing session. Testing area will be in a controlled environment. Receives: Other: SCAT6 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Significant association between visual and auditory distractions and the outcomes of the Standardized Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT6) assessment
Scores on the SCAT6 will differ between the control and non-distracted environment. Specifically for the main portion of the SCAT6 the orientation, immediate memory, concentration, and delayed recall scores will be compiled. Scores can be a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 50. A higher score indicates better performance while a lower score indicates worse performance.
Measured: Completion of both environments to analyze the differences in scores will be completed on day 8.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Symptom list
Scores on the symptom list will not show differences between the control / non-distracted environment and experimental / distracted environment. The symptom list portion can have a minimum score of 0 for both the number of symptoms and severity of symptoms. It can have a maximum score of 22 for total number of symptoms and a maximum score of 132 for symptom severity. A lower score indicates a better outcome while a higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Measured: Completion of both environments to analyze the differences in scores will be completed on day 8.
Modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS)
Scores on the SCAT6 will differ between the control and non-distracted environment. During the mBESS the minimum score is a 0 and the maximum score is 30. A lower score indicates better performance while a higher score indicates worse performance.
Measured: Completion of both environments to analyze the differences in scores will be completed on day 8.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jun 2023
- Study start1 Sep 2023
- Primary completion1 May 2024
- Study completion1 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (28)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Concussion, BrainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Indiana UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Indiana University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Keisuke Kawata, Indiana University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05886400
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18810
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 23 May 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: All study data will be included in publications.
Publications
Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, Xu L. Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths - United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Mar 17;66(9):1-16. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6609a1.
PubMed 28301451Laker SR. Epidemiology of concussion and mild traumatic brain injury. PM R. 2011 Oct;3(10 Suppl 2):S354-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.07.017.
PubMed 22035677McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Johnston K, Dvorak J, Aubry M, Molloy M, Cantu R. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 3rd International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2008. J Athl Train. 2009 Jul-Aug;44(4):434-48. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-44.4.434. No abstract available.
PubMed 19593427Teel EF, Register-Mihalik JK, Appelbaum LG, Battaglini CL, Carneiro KA, Guskiewicz KM, Marshall SW, Mihalik JP. Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Aerobic Training and Common Sport-Related Concussion Outcomes in Healthy Participants. J Athl Train. 2018 Dec;53(12):1156-1165. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-7-18. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
PubMed 30562056Hanninen T, Parkkari J, Howell DR, Palola V, Seppanen A, Tuominen M, Iverson GL, Luoto TM. Reliability of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5 baseline testing: A 2-week test-retest study. J Sci Med Sport. 2021 Feb;24(2):129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
PubMed 32868203Echemendia RJ, Meeuwisse W, McCrory P, Davis GA, Putukian M, Leddy J, Makdissi M, Sullivan SJ, Broglio SP, Raftery M, Schneider K, Kissick J, McCrea M, Dvorak J, Sills AK, Aubry M, Engebretsen L, Loosemore M, Fuller G, Kutcher J, Ellenbogen R, Guskiewicz K, Patricios J, Herring S. The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition (SCAT5): Background and rationale. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jun;51(11):848-850. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097506. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
PubMed 28446453Yengo-Kahn AM, Hale AT, Zalneraitis BH, Zuckerman SL, Sills AK, Solomon GS. The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Apr;40(4):E6. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.FOCUS15611.
PubMed 27032923Black AM, Miutz LN, Kv VW, Schneider KJ, Yeates KO, Emery CA. Baseline Performance of High School Rugby Players on the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5. J Athl Train. 2020 Feb;55(2):116-123. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-123-19. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
PubMed 31917599Iverson GL, Howell DR, Van Patten R, Bloomfield P, Gardner AJ. Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5th Edition (SCAT5): Normative Reference Values for the National Rugby League Women's Premiership. Front Sports Act Living. 2021 May 26;3:653743. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.653743. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34124655Petit KM, Savage JL, Bretzin AC, Anderson M, Covassin T. The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5 (SCAT5): Baseline Assessments in NCAA Division I Collegiate Student-Athletes. Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Aug 1;13(3):1143-1155. doi: 10.70252/SUJD2658. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32922635Bland DC, Zampieri C, Damiano DL. Effectiveness of physical therapy for improving gait and balance in individuals with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2011;25(7-8):664-79. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2011.576306. Epub 2011 May 11.
PubMed 21561297Dessy AM, Yuk FJ, Maniya AY, Gometz A, Rasouli JJ, Lovell MR, Choudhri TF. Review of Assessment Scales for Diagnosing and Monitoring Sports-related Concussion. Cureus. 2017 Dec 7;9(12):e1922. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1922.
PubMed 29456902West TA, Marion DW. Current recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of concussion in sport: a comparison of three new guidelines. J Neurotrauma. 2014 Jan 15;31(2):159-68. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3031. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
PubMed 23879529Mistry DA, Rainer TH. Concussion assessment in the emergency department: a preliminary study for a quality improvement project. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018 Dec 27;4(1):e000445. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000445. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30687512Lempke LB, Schmidt JD, Lynall RC. Athletic Trainers' Concussion-Assessment and Concussion-Management Practices: An Update. J Athl Train. 2020 Jan;55(1):17-26. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-322-18. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
PubMed 31855075
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effects of Environmental Distractions on SCAT6 Outcomes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05886400
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18810
- Conditions
- Concussion, Brain, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
- Keywords
- Standardized Concussion Assessment Tool, Modified Balance Error Scoring System, Sports Participation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Indiana UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of visual and auditory distractions on SCAT5 scores. The study is designed to identify the effects of about 80 participants completing the SCAT5 in college-aged athletes. All participants will perform the same tasks in two settings (distracted and non-distracted). The central hypothesis is that there will be a significant association between distractions and a lower score on the SCAT5. The cognitive screening, neurological screen, and mBESS should showcase a decrease scores during the distracted environment.
Detailed description
The researchers will use a randomized controlled trial design and recruit participants on a first-come, first-serve basis for the study. This crossover design will consist of two groups. The two groups are; distracted and non-distracted. The study will consist of two time points in an 8-day period.
After the initial recruitment email and enrollment questionnaire, those who are eligible for the study will be randomly assigned to begin in one of the two groups. The researchers will include a self-reported health questionnaire to obtain demographic information. The information includes age, sex, race/ ethnicity, years of athletic experience, number of previous concussions, favorite sports (with gender and level) to watch, and an assessment of other neurological conditions to screen participants' eligibility. Participants who meet the inclusion criteria and are free of exclusionary factors will advance to the consent forms and testing procedures. Consent forms will be filled out via Qualtrics.
Symptom Evaluation:
The symptom evaluation assesses severity and presence of symptoms. The symptom evaluation requires participants to self-report a total of 22 on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (none) to 7 (severe). Participants will be instructed to truthfully report their symptoms by circling their scores. Symptom scores will be manually transferred to an Excel spreadsheet for future analyses.
Cognitive Screening:
The cognitive screening portion of the SCAT5 is adapted from the standardized assessment of concussion (SAC). This section consists of orientation questions (like what day is it?) followed by immediate memory. Immediate memory consists of 5-item list of words presented to the participant three times and the participants are asked to recite the words back in any order. After the immediate memory assessment concentration is assessed using the digits backwards and months in reverse order tests. The digits backwards test starts with the participants being given a series of 3 numbers and asked to repeat them in reverse order, the test progresses up to 6 numbers. The test is discontinued after 2 consecutive incorrect answers. The months backwards test requires participants to recite the months of the year in reverse order. Following the months backwards the participant is asked to give as many words from the 5-item list as they can remember.
Neurological Screen :
The neurological screen is a brief series of questions assessing neurological function of the participant. This screen consists of participants ability to read out loud and follow instructions, perform full pain-free passive range of motion, vertical and horizontal eye movement (without moving the head), and complete tandem gait. Tandem gait requires participant to stand with their feet together (footwear off), they are instructed to walk as quickly and accurately as possible along the line in front of them maintaining an alternating foot heel to toe gait. The test is discontinued if the participant steps off of the line or does not maintain contact between heel and toe of opposite feet.
Modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS):
The balance testing is a modified version of the Balance Error Scoring System. The test consists of 20 second trials for 3 separate stances. The stances consist of double leg balance, single leg balance (non-dominant leg) and a tandem stance. Each stance will be performed with the participants hands on their hips and eyes closed. The scoring for this assessment is counted for every error that occurs during each stance. The errors include hands off hips, opening eyes, step/stumble/fall, moving hips into greater than 30 degrees of abduction, lifting heel or forefoot and staying out of position for greater than 5 seconds. Maximum number of errors is 10. If the participant cannot maintain position for a minimum of 5 seconds the test is discontinued and an automatic error score of 10 is given.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Distracted | Experimental | Other: SCAT6, Other: Visual/ Auditory DistractionVisual and audio distraction via sports video clips or a game will be playing during the testing session. |
| Not Distracted | Sham comparator | Other: SCAT6No visual or auditory distractions will be used during testing session. Testing area will be in a controlled environment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Previous athletic experience beginning at or after the age of 12
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosed with a neurological condition (including epilepsy, stroke, seizures)
- Have had a concussion within the past 6 months (diagnosed or undiagnosed)
- have not participated in sport
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SCAT6Also: Standardized Concussion Assessment ToolThe SCAT6 is a standardized assessment tool to diagnose a concussion. This tool will be used for the experiment utilizing the 6th edition to recreate the methods used in an athletic situation. The SCAT6 is broken down into multiple subtests to focus on specific aspects of a person's wellbeing that could be affected by a possible concussion. The assessments are created to measure an athlete's subjectively experienced symptoms, cognitive functioning and balance and postural stability (mBESS). | Other | Distracted, Not Distracted |
| Visual/ Auditory DistractionThe purpose of this study is to examine the effect of environmental distractions on one's ability to complete the SCAT6. The environmental distractions will be visual and auditory by playing a sports event or sports clips during the completion of the assessment. The goal of this is to simulate the distraction of a sideline like a SCAT6 is typically used within athletic training. | Other | Distracted |
Primary outcome
Significant association between visual and auditory distractions and the outcomes of the Standardized Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT6) assessment
Time frame: Completion of both environments to analyze the differences in scores will be completed on day 8.
Scores on the SCAT6 will differ between the control and non-distracted environment. Specifically for the main portion of the SCAT6 the orientation, immediate memory, concentration, and delayed recall scores will be compiled. Scores can be a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 50. A higher score indicates better performance while a lower score indicates worse performance.
2 secondary outcomes
Symptom list
Time frame: Completion of both environments to analyze the differences in scores will be completed on day 8.
Modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS)
Time frame: Completion of both environments to analyze the differences in scores will be completed on day 8.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jun 2024.
- Background: PubMed 28301451Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, Xu L. Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths - United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Mar 17;66(9):1-16. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6609a1.
- Background: PubMed 22035677Laker SR. Epidemiology of concussion and mild traumatic brain injury. PM R. 2011 Oct;3(10 Suppl 2):S354-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.07.017.
- Background: PubMed 19593427McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Johnston K, Dvorak J, Aubry M, Molloy M, Cantu R. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 3rd International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2008. J Athl Train. 2009 Jul-Aug;44(4):434-48. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-44.4.434. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30562056Teel EF, Register-Mihalik JK, Appelbaum LG, Battaglini CL, Carneiro KA, Guskiewicz KM, Marshall SW, Mihalik JP. Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Aerobic Training and Common Sport-Related Concussion Outcomes in Healthy Participants. J Athl Train. 2018 Dec;53(12):1156-1165. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-7-18. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
- Background: PubMed 32868203Hanninen T, Parkkari J, Howell DR, Palola V, Seppanen A, Tuominen M, Iverson GL, Luoto TM. Reliability of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5 baseline testing: A 2-week test-retest study. J Sci Med Sport. 2021 Feb;24(2):129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
- Background: PubMed 28446453Echemendia RJ, Meeuwisse W, McCrory P, Davis GA, Putukian M, Leddy J, Makdissi M, Sullivan SJ, Broglio SP, Raftery M, Schneider K, Kissick J, McCrea M, Dvorak J, Sills AK, Aubry M, Engebretsen L, Loosemore M, Fuller G, Kutcher J, Ellenbogen R, Guskiewicz K, Patricios J, Herring S. The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition (SCAT5): Background and rationale. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jun;51(11):848-850. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097506. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
- Background: PubMed 27032923Yengo-Kahn AM, Hale AT, Zalneraitis BH, Zuckerman SL, Sills AK, Solomon GS. The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Apr;40(4):E6. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.FOCUS15611.
- Background: PubMed 31917599Black AM, Miutz LN, Kv VW, Schneider KJ, Yeates KO, Emery CA. Baseline Performance of High School Rugby Players on the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5. J Athl Train. 2020 Feb;55(2):116-123. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-123-19. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
- Background: PubMed 34124655Iverson GL, Howell DR, Van Patten R, Bloomfield P, Gardner AJ. Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5th Edition (SCAT5): Normative Reference Values for the National Rugby League Women's Premiership. Front Sports Act Living. 2021 May 26;3:653743. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.653743. eCollection 2021.
- Background: PubMed 32922635Petit KM, Savage JL, Bretzin AC, Anderson M, Covassin T. The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5 (SCAT5): Baseline Assessments in NCAA Division I Collegiate Student-Athletes. Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Aug 1;13(3):1143-1155. doi: 10.70252/SUJD2658. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 21561297Bland DC, Zampieri C, Damiano DL. Effectiveness of physical therapy for improving gait and balance in individuals with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2011;25(7-8):664-79. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2011.576306. Epub 2011 May 11.
- Background: PubMed 29456902Dessy AM, Yuk FJ, Maniya AY, Gometz A, Rasouli JJ, Lovell MR, Choudhri TF. Review of Assessment Scales for Diagnosing and Monitoring Sports-related Concussion. Cureus. 2017 Dec 7;9(12):e1922. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1922.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. All study data will be included in publications.
Related trials for Concussion, Brain
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Pilot Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of PSC-05 for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Recruiting
Evaluation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) in Individuals With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)
Sleep Architecture, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Active, not recruiting
Pilot TMS in Mild TBI
Persistent Post Concussive Headache, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Recruiting
Non-invasive Stimulation of the Glymphatic System for Slowing Cognitive Decline
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Post Concussion Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation
Improving In-hospital and Post-discharge Patient Education for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Concussion, Mild, Traumatic Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SCAT6 and Visual/ Auditory Distraction in people with Concussion, Brain and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Indiana University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Significant association between visual and auditory distractions and the outcomes of the Standardized Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT6) assessment (time frame: Completion of both environments to analyze the differences in scores will be completed on day 8.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05886400, which also lists 28 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2024.