Thumb OsteoarthritisSWEX-TONCT06056765
Extracorporeal Shock Waves Therapy (ESWT) vs Exercise in Thumb Osteoarthritis
A study testing "Minilith", Storz, Swiss in people with Thumb Osteoarthritis and Hand Injuries, run by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic joint disease with a high prevalence and a negative impact on the quality of life and a high economic burden. The most common form of OA is that involving the hands, which affects females three times more often. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Thumb Osteoarthritis, Hand Injuries
- What is being tested?
- "Minilith", Storz, Swiss
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2024to 30 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- arthrosis of the trapezoid-metacarpal with stage 1 or 2 of the Eaton-Littler radiographic classification and pain (recent radiograph within 6 months previously);
- clinical picture that has been occurring for at least 6 months;
- pain scored with VAS scale at least 4/10.
Who cannot join
- rheumatoid arthritis or outcomes of trauma in the affected area,
- contra-indications to treatment with shock waves (neoplasia, pregnancy, thrombocytopenia, epilepsy, uncompensated heart disease or arrhythmia, pacemaker, local infections),
- corticosteroid infiltration or physical therapy in the previous 4 weeks.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of ESWT Versus Exercise Treatment for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Trial.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic joint disease with a high prevalence and a negative impact on the quality of life and a high economic burden. The most common form of OA is that involving the hands, which affects females three times more often. OA of the base of the first finger is present in 21% of the population over 40 years of age and is more frequently related to pain and disability than OA of the interphalangeal joint. In addition to pain, it can cause deformity, stiffness, reduced mobility and strength, resulting in difficulty performing common activities such as opening vessels, carrying weights and writing.
OA of the base of the first toe is mainly treated with conservative modalities, while surgical treatment will be reserved for those whose debilitating symptoms persist despite adequate conservative management. Surgical management, however, is associated with a number of complications, including tendon rupture, sensory changes, and wound infection.
Although a number of conservative therapies have proven effective for the management of hand OA, there are few high-quality clinical studies in the literature to date.
Read the detailed description
The review of the literature has shown that in thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis the use of braces leads to a reduction in pain, particularly in the long term, based on data from two studies. Additionally, hand exercises could improve grip strength and hand function.
Regarding pharmacological management, insufficient data are available to support the effectiveness of intra-articular therapy with corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid and their use is not recommended by the American College of Rheumatology guidelines (ACR) of 2012 . On the other hand, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are recommended to relieve pain associated with first toe base OA, and topical formulations are recommended over oral NSAIDs in more recent guidelines, due to a profile of superior security. However, their effect on function is minimal and transient (no more effective than placebo after 2 weeks).
The combination of non-pharmacological and pharmacological modalities in the management of hand OA is recommended by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines and is frequently used in clinical practice. Despite this, direct evidence of the effectiveness of this strategy is lacking. There have been some studies evaluating combined treatment, although they have generally not been specific to OA of the base of the first toe. Furthermore, the combinations studied usually included exclusively nonpharmacological modalities, and to date no strategy has been found to be highly effective for improving pain and function for first toe base OA.
Determining an evidence-based treatment approach with a clinically significant effect on clinical outcomes would provide healthcare providers with a basis for decision making for the treatment of patients with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. This strategy does not yet exist, and decisions about the best combination of interventions are generally based on personal experience and the personal opinion of healthcare professionals.
- Conditions
- Thumb Osteoarthritis, Hand Injuries
- Being tested
- "Minilith", Storz, Swiss
- Keywords
- shock waves, exercise, conservative treatment, hand
- Medical subject headings
- Hand Injuries, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
"Minilith", Storz, SwissDevice
Also called Extracorporeal Shock Waves Therapy, ESWT
shock waves
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ESWT group | Experimental | The therapy will be applied using a focused shock wave device ("Minilith", Storz, Swiss) at the pulley of the first extensor channel under ultrasound guidance. Shock wave therapy will be performed with the patient's hand in intermediate between pronation and supination and will be administered once a week, for 3 sessions. For each treatment session, 2000 pulses will be applied with an energy flux density of 0.09 mJ/mm2 (between 0.05 and 0.12 mJ/mm2) and a frequency of 4 pulses per second (4 Hz). Gel will be used between the probe and the skin during applications to ensure conductivity. No local anesthetic will be used. Patients in both groups will be instructed to use a brace during the day for 4 weeks following recruitment. Receives: Device: "Minilith", Storz, Swiss |
| Exercise group | No intervention | Patients will perform exercises for 4 weeks following recruitment. Patients in this group will be taught home exercises to improve the dynamic stability of the thumb metacarpal trapezius joint. The patient is instructed to perform a flexion of the trapeziometacarpal. If the individual is able to complete 10 repetitions with good technique, resistance will be added manually or with rubber bands. If this exercise is painful, they are asked to return to active movement only. Patients in both groups will be instructed to use a brace during the day for 4 weeks following recruitment. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
recovery of pain
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
Measured: change between baseline to 1 month
recovery of pain
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
Measured: change between baseline to 3 months
recovery of pain
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
Measured: change between baseline to 6 months
recovery of pain
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
Measured: change between baseline to 12 months
Secondary outcomes (10)
functional recovery
The Functional Index of Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) measures the effect of hand problems on function in terms of pain and disability.The scores range from 0 to 100; the higher the score, the more limitation/pain/disability is present. The scores range from 0 to 30; the higher the score, the more limitation/pain/disability is present.
Measured: change between baseline to 1 month
functional recovery
The Functional Index of Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) measures the effect of hand foot problems on function in terms of pain and disability.The scores range from 0 to 100; the higher the score, the more limitation/pain/disability is present. The scores range from 0 to 30; the higher the score, the more limitation/pain/disability is present.
Measured: change between baseline to 3 months
functional recovery
The Functional Index of Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) measures the effect of hand problems on function in terms of pain and disability.The scores range from 0 to 100; the higher the score, the more limitation/pain/disability is present. The scores range from 0 to 30; the higher the score, the more limitation/pain/disability is present.
Measured: change between baseline to 6 months
functional recovery
The Functional Index of Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) measures the effect of hand problems on function in terms of pain and disability.The scores range from 0 to 100; the higher the score, the more limitation/pain/disability is present. The scores range from 0 to 30; the higher the score, the more limitation/pain/disability is present.
Measured: change between baseline to 12 months
disability recovery
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDash) contains 11 questions related to ability and pain in the past week. Scores range from 0 to 100; the higher the score, the greater the limitation/pain/disability.
Measured: change between baseline to 1 month
disability recovery
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDash) contains 11 questions related to ability and pain in the past week. Scores range from 0 to 100; the higher the score, the greater the limitation/pain/disability.
Measured: change between baseline to 3 months
disability recovery
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDash) contains 11 questions related to ability and pain in the past week. Scores range from 0 to 100; the higher the score, the greater the limitation/pain/disability.
Measured: change between baseline to 6 months
disability recovery
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDash) contains 11 questions related to ability and pain in the past week. Scores range from 0 to 100; the higher the score, the greater the limitation/pain/disability.
Measured: change between baseline to 12 months
perception of clinical improvement
Maudsley and Roles scale scores range from 0-4 points for excellent to poor
Measured: change between 3 to 6 months
perception of clinical improvement
Maudsley and Roles scale scores range from 0-4 points for excellent to poor
Measured: change between 3 to 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Sep 2023
- Study start1 Jan 2024
- Primary completion31 Mar 2025
- Study completion30 Apr 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Thumb OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- randomized prospective
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06056765
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SWEX-TO
- Acronym
- SWEX-TO
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Sep 2023
- Last updated
- 29 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lane LB, Boretz RS, Stuchin SA. Treatment of de Quervain's disease:role of conservative management. J Hand Surg Br. 2001 Jun;26(3):258-60. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2001.0568.
PubMed 11386780Stepan JG, London DA, Boyer MI, Calfee RP. Blood glucose levels in diabetic patients following corticosteroid injections into the hand and wrist. J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Apr;39(4):706-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.01.014.
PubMed 24679910Cavaleri R, Schabrun SM, Te M, Chipchase LS. Hand therapy versus corticosteroid injections in the treatment of de Quervain's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Ther. 2016 Jan-Mar;29(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
PubMed 26705671Brinks A, Koes BW, Volkers AC, Verhaar JA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Adverse effects of extra-articular corticosteroid injections: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Sep 13;11:206. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-206.
PubMed 20836867Peters-Veluthamaningal C, Winters JC, Groenier KH, Meyboom-DeJong B. Randomised controlled trial of local corticosteroid injections for de Quervain's tenosynovitis in general practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Oct 27;10:131. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-131.
PubMed 19860883Kjeken I, Smedslund G, Moe RH, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Uhlig T, Hagen KB. Systematic review of design and effects of splints and exercise programs in hand osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Jun;63(6):834-48. doi: 10.1002/acr.20427.
PubMed 21630479Trellu S, Dadoun S, Berenbaum F, Fautrel B, Gossec L. Intra-articular injections in thumb osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Joint Bone Spine. 2015 Oct;82(5):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
PubMed 25776442Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, Benkhalti M, Guyatt G, McGowan J, Towheed T, Welch V, Wells G, Tugwell P; American College of Rheumatology. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Apr;64(4):465-74. doi: 10.1002/acr.21596.
PubMed 22563589Zhang W, Doherty M, Leeb BF, Alekseeva L, Arden NK, Bijlsma JW, Dincer F, Dziedzic K, Hauselmann HJ, Herrero-Beaumont G, Kaklamanis P, Lohmander S, Maheu E, Martin-Mola E, Pavelka K, Punzi L, Reiter S, Sautner J, Smolen J, Verbruggen G, Zimmermann-Gorska I. EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis: report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Mar;66(3):377-88. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.062091. Epub 2006 Oct 17.
PubMed 17046965Henry KD, Rosemond C, Eckert LB. Effect of number of home exercises on compliance and performance in adults over 65 years of age. Phys Ther. 1999 Mar;79(3):270-7.
PubMed 10078770O'Brien VH, Giveans MR. Effects of a dynamic stability approach in conservative intervention of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: a retrospective study. J Hand Ther. 2013 Jan-Mar;26(1):44-51; quiz 52. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
PubMed 23177671Mobargha N, Esplugas M, Garcia-Elias M, Lluch A, Megerle K, Hagert E. The effect of individual isometric muscle loading on the alignment of the base of the thumb metacarpal: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016 May;41(4):374-9. doi: 10.1177/1753193415597114. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
PubMed 26253421Pellegrini VD Jr. Osteoarthritis at the base of the thumb. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992 Jan;23(1):83-102.
PubMed 1729673Moulton MJ, Parentis MA, Kelly MJ, Jacobs C, Naidu SH, Pellegrini VD Jr. Influence of metacarpophalangeal joint position on basal joint-loading in the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 May;83(5):709-16. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200105000-00009.
PubMed 11379740Pisano K, Wolfe T, Lubahn J, Cooney T. Effect of a stabilization exercise program versus standard treatment for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: A randomized trial. J Hand Ther. 2023 Jul-Sep;36(3):546-559. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
PubMed 35811182
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of ESWT Versus Exercise Treatment for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06056765
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SWEX-TO / SWEX-TO
- Conditions
- Thumb Osteoarthritis, Hand Injuries
- Keywords
- shock waves, exercise, conservative treatment, hand
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di BariUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic joint disease with a high prevalence and a negative impact on the quality of life and a high economic burden. The most common form of OA is that involving the hands, which affects females three times more often. OA of the base of the first finger is present in 21% of the population over 40 years of age and is more frequently related to pain and disability than OA of the interphalangeal joint. In addition to pain, it can cause deformity, stiffness, reduced mobility and strength, resulting in difficulty performing common activities such as opening vessels, carrying weights and writing.
OA of the base of the first toe is mainly treated with conservative modalities, while surgical treatment will be reserved for those whose debilitating symptoms persist despite adequate conservative management. Surgical management, however, is associated with a number of complications, including tendon rupture, sensory changes, and wound infection.
Although a number of conservative therapies have proven effective for the management of hand OA, there are few high-quality clinical studies in the literature to date.
Detailed description
The review of the literature has shown that in thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis the use of braces leads to a reduction in pain, particularly in the long term, based on data from two studies. Additionally, hand exercises could improve grip strength and hand function.
Regarding pharmacological management, insufficient data are available to support the effectiveness of intra-articular therapy with corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid and their use is not recommended by the American College of Rheumatology guidelines (ACR) of 2012 . On the other hand, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are recommended to relieve pain associated with first toe base OA, and topical formulations are recommended over oral NSAIDs in more recent guidelines, due to a profile of superior security. However, their effect on function is minimal and transient (no more effective than placebo after 2 weeks).
The combination of non-pharmacological and pharmacological modalities in the management of hand OA is recommended by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines and is frequently used in clinical practice. Despite this, direct evidence of the effectiveness of this strategy is lacking. There have been some studies evaluating combined treatment, although they have generally not been specific to OA of the base of the first toe. Furthermore, the combinations studied usually included exclusively nonpharmacological modalities, and to date no strategy has been found to be highly effective for improving pain and function for first toe base OA.
Determining an evidence-based treatment approach with a clinically significant effect on clinical outcomes would provide healthcare providers with a basis for decision making for the treatment of patients with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. This strategy does not yet exist, and decisions about the best combination of interventions are generally based on personal experience and the personal opinion of healthcare professionals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- randomized prospective
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ESWT group | Experimental | Device: "Minilith", Storz, SwissThe therapy will be applied using a focused shock wave device ("Minilith", Storz, Swiss) at the pulley of the first extensor channel under ultrasound guidance. Shock wave therapy will be performed with the patient's hand in intermediate between pronation and supination and will be administered once a week, for 3 sessions. For each treatment session, 2000 pulses will be applied with an energy flux density of 0.09 mJ/mm2 (between 0.05 and 0.12 mJ/mm2) and a frequency of 4 pulses per second (4 Hz). Gel will be used between the probe and the skin during applications to ensure conductivity. No local anesthetic will be used. Patients in both groups will be instructed to use a brace during the day for 4 weeks following recruitment. |
| Exercise group | No intervention | –Patients will perform exercises for 4 weeks following recruitment. Patients in this group will be taught home exercises to improve the dynamic stability of the thumb metacarpal trapezius joint. The patient is instructed to perform a flexion of the trapeziometacarpal. If the individual is able to complete 10 repetitions with good technique, resistance will be added manually or with rubber bands. If this exercise is painful, they are asked to return to active movement only. Patients in both groups will be instructed to use a brace during the day for 4 weeks following recruitment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- arthrosis of the trapezoid-metacarpal with stage 1 or 2 of the Eaton-Littler radiographic classification and pain (recent radiograph within 6 months previously);
- clinical picture that has been occurring for at least 6 months;
- pain scored with VAS scale at least 4/10.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- rheumatoid arthritis or outcomes of trauma in the affected area,
- contra-indications to treatment with shock waves (neoplasia, pregnancy, thrombocytopenia, epilepsy, uncompensated heart disease or arrhythmia, pacemaker, local infections),
- corticosteroid infiltration or physical therapy in the previous 4 weeks.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| "Minilith", Storz, SwissAlso: Extracorporeal Shock Waves Therapy, ESWTshock waves | Device | ESWT group |
Primary outcome
recovery of pain
Time frame: change between baseline to 1 month
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
recovery of pain
Time frame: change between baseline to 3 months
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
recovery of pain
Time frame: change between baseline to 6 months
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
recovery of pain
Time frame: change between baseline to 12 months
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
10 secondary outcomes
functional recovery
Time frame: change between baseline to 1 month
functional recovery
Time frame: change between baseline to 3 months
functional recovery
Time frame: change between baseline to 6 months
functional recovery
Time frame: change between baseline to 12 months
disability recovery
Time frame: change between baseline to 1 month
disability recovery
Time frame: change between baseline to 3 months
disability recovery
Time frame: change between baseline to 6 months
disability recovery
Time frame: change between baseline to 12 months
perception of clinical improvement
Time frame: change between 3 to 6 months
perception of clinical improvement
Time frame: change between 3 to 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 May 2025.
- Background: PubMed 11386780Lane LB, Boretz RS, Stuchin SA. Treatment of de Quervain's disease:role of conservative management. J Hand Surg Br. 2001 Jun;26(3):258-60. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2001.0568.
- Background: PubMed 24679910Stepan JG, London DA, Boyer MI, Calfee RP. Blood glucose levels in diabetic patients following corticosteroid injections into the hand and wrist. J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Apr;39(4):706-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.01.014.
- Background: PubMed 26705671Cavaleri R, Schabrun SM, Te M, Chipchase LS. Hand therapy versus corticosteroid injections in the treatment of de Quervain's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Ther. 2016 Jan-Mar;29(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
- Background: PubMed 20836867Brinks A, Koes BW, Volkers AC, Verhaar JA, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Adverse effects of extra-articular corticosteroid injections: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Sep 13;11:206. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-206.
- Background: PubMed 19860883Peters-Veluthamaningal C, Winters JC, Groenier KH, Meyboom-DeJong B. Randomised controlled trial of local corticosteroid injections for de Quervain's tenosynovitis in general practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Oct 27;10:131. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-131.
- Background: PubMed 21630479Kjeken I, Smedslund G, Moe RH, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Uhlig T, Hagen KB. Systematic review of design and effects of splints and exercise programs in hand osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Jun;63(6):834-48. doi: 10.1002/acr.20427.
- Background: PubMed 25776442Trellu S, Dadoun S, Berenbaum F, Fautrel B, Gossec L. Intra-articular injections in thumb osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Joint Bone Spine. 2015 Oct;82(5):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
- Background: PubMed 22563589Hochberg MC, Altman RD, April KT, Benkhalti M, Guyatt G, McGowan J, Towheed T, Welch V, Wells G, Tugwell P; American College of Rheumatology. American College of Rheumatology 2012 recommendations for the use of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapies in osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Apr;64(4):465-74. doi: 10.1002/acr.21596.
- Background: PubMed 17046965Zhang W, Doherty M, Leeb BF, Alekseeva L, Arden NK, Bijlsma JW, Dincer F, Dziedzic K, Hauselmann HJ, Herrero-Beaumont G, Kaklamanis P, Lohmander S, Maheu E, Martin-Mola E, Pavelka K, Punzi L, Reiter S, Sautner J, Smolen J, Verbruggen G, Zimmermann-Gorska I. EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis: report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Mar;66(3):377-88. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.062091. Epub 2006 Oct 17.
- Background: PubMed 10078770Henry KD, Rosemond C, Eckert LB. Effect of number of home exercises on compliance and performance in adults over 65 years of age. Phys Ther. 1999 Mar;79(3):270-7.
- Background: PubMed 23177671O'Brien VH, Giveans MR. Effects of a dynamic stability approach in conservative intervention of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: a retrospective study. J Hand Ther. 2013 Jan-Mar;26(1):44-51; quiz 52. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
- Background: PubMed 26253421Mobargha N, Esplugas M, Garcia-Elias M, Lluch A, Megerle K, Hagert E. The effect of individual isometric muscle loading on the alignment of the base of the thumb metacarpal: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016 May;41(4):374-9. doi: 10.1177/1753193415597114. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Thumb Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Efficacy of Trapeziectomy Versus Sham Surgery in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis at the Base of the Thumb
Thumb Osteoarthritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Intraarticular Steroids, Saline and Occupational Therapy in People With CMC1 Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis Thumb
Recruiting
Surgery for Thumb Base Osteoarthritis: Joint Replacement vs. Trapeziectomy
Thumb Osteoarthritis, Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Thumb Muscle Activation During Different Activities of Daily Living in Thumb Base Osteoarthritis and Healthy Controls
Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Thumb Base Osteoarthritis: Ultrasound-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Placebo Injection
Thumb Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing "Minilith", Storz, Swiss in people with Thumb Osteoarthritis and Hand Injuries, run by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
recovery of pain (time frame: change between baseline to 1 month). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06056765, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2025.