AzTrials
AzTrials

Circulatory ArrestEVALUATENCT06130033

The Physiology of Circulatory Arrest in Humans

An observational study of Circulatory Arrest, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to better understand what happens in the brain during the dying process. This is a prospective observational study conducted at the end of life in the ICU at VGH. At the time of withdrawal of life sustaining therapies the investigators will monitor brain blood flow and oxygenation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Circulatory Arrest
What is being tested?
Neuromonitoring
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
1 Jun 2023to 1 Jun 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Critically ill patients who will undergoing palliative measures following prognostication.

Who may be able to join

  • a) Age > 18 years
  • b) anticipated withdrawal of life-sustaining measures (WLSM) within the next 24 hours

Who cannot join

  • No in-situ arterial line
  • No legal authorized representative
  • Neurological brain death declared

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Mypinder Sekhon, MD PhD contact

6048754111

myp@mail.ubc.ca

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Vancouver General Hospital

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z1M9

    Mypinder Sekhon, MD PhD, 6048754111, myp@mail.ubc.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Characterizing the Cerebrovascular Physiology of Circulatory Death During Withdrawal of Life Sustaining Therapies in Humans

The purpose of this study is to better understand what happens in the brain during the dying process.

This is a prospective observational study conducted at the end of life in the ICU at VGH. At the time of withdrawal of life sustaining therapies the investigators will monitor brain blood flow and oxygenation. The investigators will also collect blood samples to measure biomarkers of brain dysfunction.

This may help us to determine when blood flow to the brain stops and when brain function ceases. This information may provide researchers and the medical community as a whole with important information as to the best timing for organ donation. This study is the first step in commencing a research program related to improving the organ donation process. Our goal is to determine how best to provide high quality organs to those who would otherwise die without an organ transplant.

Read the detailed description

MAIN STUDY

PURPOSE The goal of this project is to characterize the cerebrovascular physiology of circulatory death during withdrawal of life sustaining measures in humans.

JUSTIFICATION Death is defined as the permanent loss of brain function following absence of cerebral blood flow (CBF). Such physiology can result from two clinical scenarios: a) absent CBF in patients with a beating heart (neurological brain death) or b) after natural circulatory arrest. In the latter scenario, eventual cessation of innate cardiac output leads to absent CBF, brain tissue oxygenation and irreversible loss of brain function. Pertinent to solid organ transplantation, death must occur prior to consideration of organ donation. In the setting of circulatory death, withdrawal of life-sustaining measures (WLSM) is undertaken and organ donation commences after the declaration of death. This process is termed controlled donation after cardiac death (DCD). Due to the scarcity of available organ donation opportunities, the emergence of DCD has provided increased access to life-saving solid organ transplants for recipients. However, challenges remain with respect to successes of DCD graft organ function and optimal recipient outcomes. Principally, the timeliness from WLSM to circulatory death declaration is crucial to graft viability with prolonged periods associated with worse graft organ ischemia, function and adverse recipient outcomes. To this extent, the determination of the precise timing of death determination during DCD is imperative to inform timely diagnosis of death and optimize retrieval of high-quality grafts for solid organ transplant recipients.

The characterization of the cerebrovascular physiology of circulatory death in humans has knowledge gaps. Current guidelines define a pulse pressure < 5mmHg (systolic - diastolic blood pressure) using radial arterial line monitoring as the acceptable threshold for timing of circulatory death. Although pragmatic, this definition assumes that in vivo hemodynamic physiology generated by the heart (reflected by the arterial line) is simultaneously reflected in the cerebral circulation. It is well known that systemic hemodynamics do not necessarily correlate with cerebral hemodynamics during critical illness. Pathophysiologic sequelae (e.g. elevated intracranial pressure) in critically ill acutely brain injured patients who undergo WLSM suggest that cerebral perfusion may cease before systemic hemodynamics (detected by radial arterial line monitoring) deteriorate irreversibly. As such, it is plausible that cerebral perfusion ceases before a pulse pressure < 5mmHg is achieved thereby setting the conditions by which the physiologic requirement of circulatory death is present (absent CBF) but the clinical definition has not (pulse pressure < 5mmHg) been reached. Clinically, this scenario would expose viable graft organs to prolonged ischemia and negatively affect solid organ transplant recipient outcomes

HYPOTHESES AND AIMS

OBJECTIVES and associated HYPOTHESIS Aim 1 (Cerebral Hemodynamics): To determine the pulse pressure (measured with an in situ radial arterial catheter) at which cerebral hemodynamics cease (measured with transcranial Doppler derived middle [MCA-Fv] and posterior cerebral artery blood flow velocities [PCA-Fv]) following WLSM. The investigators hypothesize that cerebral hemodynamics will cease when the pulse pressure is > 5mmHg.

Aim 2 (Feasibility): To measure the feasibility to conducting multimodal monitoring and data collection during the dying process in humans until circulatory arrest. Specific physiologic variables being collected during the dying process include telemetry, peripheral oximetry, mean arterial pressure monitoring, PCA-Fv \& MCA-Fv, jugular venous bulb oximetry, pulmonary artery mixed venous oximetry and regional oxygen saturation (from near infrared spectroscopy). The investigators hypothesize that feasibility will be strong and we will successfully gather > 80% of data points for each case.

Aim 3) To evaluate relationship between mean arterial pressure (mmHg) and brain blood flow velocity (cm/sec) during the dying process in humans until circulatory arrest.

Aim 4) To evaluate relationship between mean arterial pressure (mmHg) and oxygen extraction fraction (%) and regional oxygen saturation (%) during the dying process in humans until circulatory arrest.

Aim 5: The investigate the impact of brain biomarker release during the ischemic phase of the dying process in humans until circulatory arrest. The investigators hypothesize that brain biomarker levels will increase during the dying process.

Aim 6 (Pathology): To conduct post-mortem heart and brain autopsy to contextualize and associate tissue-based injury characteristics with physiologic observations. The investigate hypothesize that brain pathology will be related to physiologic observations.

RESEARCH DESIGN This is a prospective observational study of the evaluation of the cerebrovascular physiology of circulatory death.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Our sample size is one of convenience. We will enroll 50 participants. Discrete variables will be summarized by frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables will be summarized by mean (SD) or median (IQR) if data are skewed.

Aim 1: The pulse pressure at which MCA-Fv and PCA-Fv cease will be summarized as a median and range across the cohort. The percentage of patients exhibiting absent CBF with a pulse pressure of > 5mmHg will be stated as well. Sub Aim 1b: Random slope and intercepted linear mixed effects models will be used to assess relationships between cerebrovascular and cardiovascular variables during the dying process in humans until circulatory arrest.

Aim 2: The feasibility of data elements collected will be reported by percentage of data elements obtained in each case across the cohort. In each case, a dichotomous (yes/no) reported collection of the data element will be reported. The overall percentage of data elements collected will be reported for each case and across the entire cohort as a numerical measure of feasibility.

Aim 3: Relationships between select variables will be analyzed with random slope, random intercept linear mixed-effects model with continuous predictors (MAP,) as fixed factors and patient as a random factor. Cerebrovascular responses to progressive hypotension (MAP) following WLSM will be determined via random slope and random intercept linear mixed effects models with MAP or pulse pressure as a continuous predictor and patient as a random factor.

Aim 4: Wilcoxon signed-rank tests will be used to evaluate the change in brain biomarker levels during the dying process in humans until circulatory arrest.

Aim 5: Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's post-hoc correction will be used to assess the relationship between brain pathology and continuous physiologic variables.

Sex Based Analysis: Assessing sex-related differences will encompass an exploratory analysis to inform future hypothesis generation. In our neuromonitoring patients, the proportion of patients has been approximately 60% male and 40% female. The investigators expect a similar ratio of males to females in the current study. Data will be stratified by sex, across all patients and within each study group. Further, for both study groups the investigators will assess differences between males and females by including an interaction term group*sex into our linear mixed models.

PATHOLOGY SUB STUDY

PURPOSE To perform post-mortem pathological examination of nervous system tissue (brain and spinal cord)

HYPOTHESIS The investigators hypothesize that the brain will show histological features correlated with early cessation of blood perfusion such as abnormalities in and around small vessels and in the blood-brain barrier, tissue edema, and markers of early cellular necrosis, and that these changes will not be present, or will be present to a much lesser extent, in the spinal cord of the same individuals.

JUSTIFICATION AND OBJECTIVES Post-mortem brain and spinal cord autopsy will be obtained in patients to provide a tissue correlate and context to the neuromonitoring data. The investigators will evaluate whether two distinct areas of the central nervous system (brain and spinal cord) with different blood supply show the same degree of histopathological changes. Specifically, pathologic examination will be undertaken to provide macroscopic evaluation of the middle and posterior cerebral arteries for signs of vascular pathology (e.g. intravascular thrombi, vasoconstricted state) to provide mechanistic explanations for the anticipated results. Examination will also be undertaken in the regions of anterior and posterior circulation to assess microvascular pathology that could explain the cerebrovascular physiologic results. This will also be compared to the spinal cord which has a different blood supply from the brain. Specifically, the formalin fixed samples will be used for hematoxylin and eosin and special stains to assess for abnormalities in and around small vessels and in the blood-brain barrier, tissue edema, and markers of early cellular necrosis.

RESEARCH DESIGN This single-center prospective post-mortem pathological analysis of patients who underwent WLST will describe the pathologic characteristics of neurological injury in the neurovascular unit.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The pathology tissue analysis will be used to draw descriptive analyses pertaining to the macrovascular and microvascular abnormalities present on post-mortem examination. The change in the concentrations of the arterial and cerebral arterio-venous gradients of the brain biomarkers will be analyzed before WLST and immediately following circulatory death using a one-way ANOVA analysis. Comparisons between the pulse pressure at which cerebral hemodynamics, brain oxygenation and neural electrical activity cease will be conducted between patients with an antecedent acquired brain injury versus those without using a Kruskal-Wallis test.

Being tested
Neuromonitoring

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NeuromonitoringDevice

    Multimodal Neuromonitoring:

    Transcranial Doppler - middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity Jugular venous bulb oximetry - hemoglobin oxygen saturation at the jugular venous bulb Arterial blood pressure monitoring - mean arterial, systolic and diastolic pressure monitoring at the radial artery via an in situ radial arterial line catheter Pulmonary artery catheter - to measure continuous cardiac output and mixed venous oxygen saturation Near infrared spectroscopy - to measure regional cerebral saturation of oxygen

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cerebral Hemodynamics

    To describe the timing and physiologic relationships between brain perfusion relative to cardiovascular function. Specifically, we will assess the pulse pressure (measured with an in situ radial arterial catheter) at which cerebral hemodynamics cease (measured with transcranial Doppler derived middle [MCA-Fv] and posterior cerebral artery blood flow velocities [PCA-Fv]) following withdrawal of life sustaining measures.

    Measured: Up to 52 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Feasibility

    To measure the feasibility of conducting multimodal neuro and cardiac monitoring and data collection during the dying process until circulatory arrest in humans. Specific physiologic variables being collected during the dying process include telemetry, peripheral oximetry, mean arterial pressure monitoring, PCA-Fv \& MCA-Fv, jugular venous bulb oximetry, pulmonary artery mixed venous oximetry and regional oxygen saturation (from near infrared spectroscopy). To numerically represent the feasibility of data collection, a dichotomized description (yes/no) will be applied to each data element regarding whether it was successfully collected for each case and the percentage of data elements collected for each case and across the entire cohort will be reported.

    Measured: Up to 52 weeks

  2. Brain and Systemic Physiology

    To evaluate relationship between mean arterial pressure (mmHg) and brain blood flow velocity (cm/sec) during the dying process in humans until circulatory arrest.

    Measured: Up to 52 weeks

  3. Oxygen Extraction Fraction

    To evaluate relationship between mean arterial pressure (mmHg) and oxygen extraction fraction (%) during the dying process in humans until circulatory arrest.

    Measured: Up to 52 weeks

  4. Brain Biomarker

    We will investigate the impact of global brain ischemia during the dying process on brain tissue injury using blood-based brain biomarkers.

    Measured: Up to 52 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Nov 2023
  2. Study start1 Jun 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06130033
Sponsor's protocol ID
H23-00172
Acronym
EVALUATE
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
15 Oct 2023
Last updated
13 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Bird JD, Hornby L, Hirsch-Reinshagen V, Allen CP, Isac G, Gooderham PA, Shemie SD, Dhanani S, Thiara S, Stukas S, Grey R, Foster DA, Maier LE, LeBlanc AE, Kanji HD, Morelli TF, Agbay AM, Wellington CL, Chahal D, Belanger EC, Ren H, Mattu PS, Su S, Hrazdil CT, Percy J, Sangha P, Plewes LV, Sweet DD, Romano KR, Vu EN, Chittock DR, Dhingra VK, Henderson WR, Garraway NR, Morad Hameed S, Finlayson GN, MacLeod DB, Gibbons TD, Ainslie PN, Hoiland RL, Griesdale DE, Ronco JJ, Sekhon MS. Characterizing the physiology of circulatory arrest in humans. Nat Med. 2025 Oct;31(10):3542-3552. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03889-z. Epub 2025 Oct 16.

    PubMed 41102468

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Circulatory Arrest, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Mypinder Sekhon, MD PhD (6048754111, myp@mail.ubc.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cerebral Hemodynamics (time frame: Up to 52 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06130033, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in