Pancreatic FistulaNCT06198400
Indocyanine Green Fluorescence in Evaluation of Pancreatic Remnant Perfusion.
A study testing Perioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green-VerDye in people with Pancreatic Fistula, run by Charles University, Czech Republic at 1 site in Czechia.
Trial summary
Main goal of this study is to evaluate the blood flow in a post resection pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy with use of indocyanine green fluorescence. If the hypothesis will be proven, evaluation of perfusion of the pancreatic remnant with indocyanine green could be used to estimate the increased risk… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Fistula
- What is being tested?
- Perioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green-VerDye
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCzechia
- Study dates
- 1 May 2024to 1 Jul 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All consecutive patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy at our department in the selected period
Who cannot join
- Allergy to indocyanine green
- Refusal by the patient
- Mini-invasive procedure.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Czechia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, Czech Republic
Prague, Czech Republic, 16000
Štěpán-Ota Schütz, MD, +420 7332 24 640, schutz.stepan-ota@uvn.cz
Michael Rousek, MD, +420 973 202 903, michael.rousek@uvn.cz
About this study
Official title: Indocyanine Green Fluorescence in Evaluation of Post-resection Pancreatic Remnant Perfusion After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Main goal of this study is to evaluate the blood flow in a post resection pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy with use of indocyanine green fluorescence. If the hypothesis will be proven, evaluation of perfusion of the pancreatic remnant with indocyanine green could be used to estimate the increased risk of the development of pancreatic fistula.
Read the detailed description
Pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with nearly 25% incidence of postoperative complications. One of the most severe complications is a postoperative pancreatic fistula. The exact cause of postoperative fistula development is still unknown, but it appears to be multifactorial. Proper perfusion of pancreatic remnant is essential for the healing of pancreaticojejunostomy. To date, there is no method to reliably evaluate the vascular supply of the remnant. One of the methods for assessment of organ perfusion is the indocyanine green fluorescence. This study aims to determine if indocyanine green fluorescence is a reliable method to measure the perfusion of the post-resection pancreatic remnant. Secondary outcome is to determine, if perioperative evaluation of the vascular supply of the postresection remnant may predict the increased risk of the postoperative pancreatic fistula development.
This study is designed as a prospective experimental study. All consecutive patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy at our department in the 1.5.2024-31.12.2026 period will be enrolled. Exclusion criteria are allergy to indocyanine green and refusal by the patient.The adequacy of the vascular supply of the post-resection pancreatic remnant will be perioperatively evaluated using fluorescence detector. Patients will be divided into two groups. Those with hazardous and non-hazardous vascular supply. The incidence of pancreatic fistula in both groups is to be compared. Postoperative data including morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, intensive care unit stay and postoperative fistula development will be collected.
If a perioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green is proven to be a suitable method to estimate the increased risk of the pancreatic fistula, the list of the existing known risk factors could be expanded. In the most high-risk patients the modification of the surgical procedure could be considered.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Fistula
- Being tested
- Perioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green-VerDye
- Keywords
- Pancreatic surgery, ICG, Minimal invasive surgery,, Pancreatic cancer, Pancreatic perfusion
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Fistula, Pancreatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Perioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green-VerDyeDiagnostic test
The adequacy of the vascular supply of the post resection pancreatic remnant after pancreatic neck division will be evaluated using ICG detector. Indocyanine green fluorescence product -Verdye™ will be intravenously applied. The application of the substance will be performed according to the current consensus statement and recommendation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| All patients undergoing the pancreaticoduodenectomy | Experimental | All consecutive patients undergoing the pancreaticoduodenectomy at our institution in the 1.5.2024-31.12.2026 period will be enrolled in this study. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Perioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green-VerDye |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of the blood flow in pancreatic remnant with use of ICG
Primary outcome of this study is to evaluate the blood flow in a post resection pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy with use of ICG fluorescence.
Measured: Intraoperatively: 5-10 minutes
Secondary outcomes (1)
Correlation between ICG perfusion and development of pancreatic fistula
Secondary outcome of this study is to find possible correlation between ICG finding and higher rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula development which could lead to establishment of new predictive risk factor.
Measured: From admission to discharge, up to 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jan 2024
- Study start1 May 2024
- Primary completion1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pancreatic FistulaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Charles University, Czech RepublicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Charles University, Czech Republic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Štěpán-Ota Schütz, Charles University, Czech Republic
- Investigators
- Radek Pohnán, Study director, Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, Czech Republic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06198400
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MO1012
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 6 Dec 2023
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is not a plan to make IPD available.
Publications
Rawla P, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of Pancreatic Cancer: Global Trends, Etiology and Risk Factors. World J Oncol. 2019 Feb;10(1):10-27. doi: 10.14740/wjon1166. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
PubMed 30834048Karim SAM, Abdulla KS, Abdulkarim QH, Rahim FH. The outcomes and complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure): Cross sectional study. Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:383-387. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.041. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
PubMed 29438817Rousek M, Whitley A, Kachlik D, Balko J, Zaruba P, Belbl M, Nikov A, Ryska M, Gurlich R, Pohnan R. The dorsal pancreatic artery: A meta-analysis with clinical correlations. Pancreatology. 2022 Mar;22(2):325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
PubMed 35177332Nahm CB, Connor SJ, Samra JS, Mittal A. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: a review of traditional and emerging concepts. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar 15;11:105-118. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S120217. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 29588609Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CM, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
PubMed 28040257Bengtsson A, Andersson R, Ansari D. The actual 5-year survivors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on real-world data. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 2;10(1):16425. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73525-y.
PubMed 33009477de Muynck LDAN, White KP, Alseidi A, Bannone E, Boni L, Bouvet M, Falconi M, Fuchs HF, Ghadimi M, Gockel I, Hackert T, Ishizawa T, Kang CM, Kokudo N, Nickel F, Partelli S, Rangelova E, Swijnenburg RJ, Dip F, Rosenthal RJ, Vahrmeijer AL, Mieog JSD. Consensus Statement on the Use of Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging during Pancreatic Cancer Surgery Based on a Delphi Study: Surgeons' Perspectives on Current Use and Future Recommendations. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 20;15(3):652. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030652.
PubMed 36765609Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Mokadam NA, Green DW, Jones KL, Ehlers JP, Linehan D. Prospective trial of a blood supply-based technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: effect on anastomotic failure in the Whipple procedure. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Jun;194(6):746-58; discussion 759-60. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01202-4.
PubMed 12081065Boni L, David G, Mangano A, Dionigi G, Rausei S, Spampatti S, Cassinotti E, Fingerhut A. Clinical applications of indocyanine green (ICG) enhanced fluorescence in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):2046-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3895-x. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
PubMed 25303914CHERRICK GR, STEIN SW, LEEVY CM, DAVIDSON CS. Indocyanine green: observations on its physical properties, plasma decay, and hepatic extraction. J Clin Invest. 1960 Apr;39(4):592-600. doi: 10.1172/JCI104072. No abstract available.
PubMed 13809697Keller DS, Ishizawa T, Cohen R, Chand M. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in colorectal surgery: overview, applications, and future directions. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct;2(10):757-766. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30216-9.
PubMed 28895551Hackethal A, Hirschburger M, Eicker SO, Mucke T, Lindner C, Buchweitz O. Role of Indocyanine Green in Fluorescence Imaging with Near-Infrared Light to Identify Sentinel Lymph Nodes, Lymphatic Vessels and Pathways Prior to Surgery - A Critical Evaluation of Options. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018 Jan;78(1):54-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-123937. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
PubMed 29375146Degett TH, Andersen HS, Gogenur I. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography for intraoperative assessment of gastrointestinal anastomotic perfusion: a systematic review of clinical trials. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Sep;401(6):767-75. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1400-9. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
PubMed 26968863Doussot A, Decrock M, Calame P, Georges P, Turco C, Lakkis Z, Heyd B. Fluorescence-based pancreas stump perfusion is associated with postoperative acute pancreatitis after pancreatoduodenectomy a prospective cohort study. Pancreatology. 2021 Sep;21(6):1023-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 May 18.
PubMed 34030965Marchegiani G, Perri G, Burelli A, Zoccatelli F, Andrianello S, Luchini C, Donadello K, Bassi C, Salvia R. High-risk Pancreatic Anastomosis Versus Total Pancreatectomy After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Postoperative Outcomes and Quality of Life Analysis. Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):e905-e913. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004840. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
PubMed 33914471
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Indocyanine Green Fluorescence in Evaluation of Post-resection Pancreatic Remnant Perfusion After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06198400
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MO1012
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Fistula
- Keywords
- Pancreatic surgery, ICG, Minimal invasive surgery,, Pancreatic cancer, Pancreatic perfusion
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Charles University, Czech RepublicUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Main goal of this study is to evaluate the blood flow in a post resection pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy with use of indocyanine green fluorescence. If the hypothesis will be proven, evaluation of perfusion of the pancreatic remnant with indocyanine green could be used to estimate the increased risk of the development of pancreatic fistula.
Detailed description
Pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with nearly 25% incidence of postoperative complications. One of the most severe complications is a postoperative pancreatic fistula. The exact cause of postoperative fistula development is still unknown, but it appears to be multifactorial. Proper perfusion of pancreatic remnant is essential for the healing of pancreaticojejunostomy. To date, there is no method to reliably evaluate the vascular supply of the remnant. One of the methods for assessment of organ perfusion is the indocyanine green fluorescence. This study aims to determine if indocyanine green fluorescence is a reliable method to measure the perfusion of the post-resection pancreatic remnant. Secondary outcome is to determine, if perioperative evaluation of the vascular supply of the postresection remnant may predict the increased risk of the postoperative pancreatic fistula development.
This study is designed as a prospective experimental study. All consecutive patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy at our department in the 1.5.2024-31.12.2026 period will be enrolled. Exclusion criteria are allergy to indocyanine green and refusal by the patient.The adequacy of the vascular supply of the post-resection pancreatic remnant will be perioperatively evaluated using fluorescence detector. Patients will be divided into two groups. Those with hazardous and non-hazardous vascular supply. The incidence of pancreatic fistula in both groups is to be compared. Postoperative data including morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, intensive care unit stay and postoperative fistula development will be collected.
If a perioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green is proven to be a suitable method to estimate the increased risk of the pancreatic fistula, the list of the existing known risk factors could be expanded. In the most high-risk patients the modification of the surgical procedure could be considered.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| All patients undergoing the pancreaticoduodenectomy | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Perioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green-VerDyeAll consecutive patients undergoing the pancreaticoduodenectomy at our institution in the 1.5.2024-31.12.2026 period will be enrolled in this study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All consecutive patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy at our department in the selected period
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Allergy to indocyanine green
- Refusal by the patient
- Mini-invasive procedure.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Perioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green-VerDyeThe adequacy of the vascular supply of the post resection pancreatic remnant after pancreatic neck division will be evaluated using ICG detector. Indocyanine green fluorescence product -Verdye™ will be intravenously applied. The application of the substance will be performed according to the current consensus statement and recommendation | Diagnostic test | All patients undergoing the pancreaticoduodenectomy |
Primary outcome
Evaluation of the blood flow in pancreatic remnant with use of ICG
Time frame: Intraoperatively: 5-10 minutes
Primary outcome of this study is to evaluate the blood flow in a post resection pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy with use of ICG fluorescence.
1 secondary outcome
Correlation between ICG perfusion and development of pancreatic fistula
Time frame: From admission to discharge, up to 2 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Aug 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 30834048Rawla P, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V. Epidemiology of Pancreatic Cancer: Global Trends, Etiology and Risk Factors. World J Oncol. 2019 Feb;10(1):10-27. doi: 10.14740/wjon1166. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 29438817Karim SAM, Abdulla KS, Abdulkarim QH, Rahim FH. The outcomes and complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure): Cross sectional study. Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:383-387. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.041. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 35177332Rousek M, Whitley A, Kachlik D, Balko J, Zaruba P, Belbl M, Nikov A, Ryska M, Gurlich R, Pohnan R. The dorsal pancreatic artery: A meta-analysis with clinical correlations. Pancreatology. 2022 Mar;22(2):325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 29588609Nahm CB, Connor SJ, Samra JS, Mittal A. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: a review of traditional and emerging concepts. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar 15;11:105-118. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S120217. eCollection 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 28040257Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CM, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 33009477Bengtsson A, Andersson R, Ansari D. The actual 5-year survivors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on real-world data. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 2;10(1):16425. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73525-y.
- Results publication: PubMed 36765609de Muynck LDAN, White KP, Alseidi A, Bannone E, Boni L, Bouvet M, Falconi M, Fuchs HF, Ghadimi M, Gockel I, Hackert T, Ishizawa T, Kang CM, Kokudo N, Nickel F, Partelli S, Rangelova E, Swijnenburg RJ, Dip F, Rosenthal RJ, Vahrmeijer AL, Mieog JSD. Consensus Statement on the Use of Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging during Pancreatic Cancer Surgery Based on a Delphi Study: Surgeons' Perspectives on Current Use and Future Recommendations. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 20;15(3):652. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030652.
- Results publication: PubMed 12081065Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Mokadam NA, Green DW, Jones KL, Ehlers JP, Linehan D. Prospective trial of a blood supply-based technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: effect on anastomotic failure in the Whipple procedure. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Jun;194(6):746-58; discussion 759-60. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01202-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 25303914Boni L, David G, Mangano A, Dionigi G, Rausei S, Spampatti S, Cassinotti E, Fingerhut A. Clinical applications of indocyanine green (ICG) enhanced fluorescence in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul;29(7):2046-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3895-x. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 13809697CHERRICK GR, STEIN SW, LEEVY CM, DAVIDSON CS. Indocyanine green: observations on its physical properties, plasma decay, and hepatic extraction. J Clin Invest. 1960 Apr;39(4):592-600. doi: 10.1172/JCI104072. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 28895551Keller DS, Ishizawa T, Cohen R, Chand M. Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in colorectal surgery: overview, applications, and future directions. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct;2(10):757-766. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30216-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 29375146Hackethal A, Hirschburger M, Eicker SO, Mucke T, Lindner C, Buchweitz O. Role of Indocyanine Green in Fluorescence Imaging with Near-Infrared Light to Identify Sentinel Lymph Nodes, Lymphatic Vessels and Pathways Prior to Surgery - A Critical Evaluation of Options. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018 Jan;78(1):54-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-123937. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
- Indocyanine Green-Fluorescent Pancreatic Perfusion-Guided Resection of Distal Pancreas in Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm: Usefulness and Feasibility During Pancreaticobiliary SurgeryLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is not a plan to make IPD available.
Related trials for Pancreatic Fistula
RecruitingPhase 3
Lanreotide Versus Placebo Before Surgery to Prevent a Surgical Complication Called a Pancreatic Fistula
Pancreatic Carcinoma, Pancreatic Neoplasm
RecruitingObservational study
Management and Outcomes of Local Complications of Acute Pancreatitis and Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula
Acute Pancreatitis, Pancreatic Fluid Collection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Recruiting
Tissue Adhesive Glue Modified Cyanoacrylate (Glubran® 2) in Soft Pancreas
Pancreatic Cancer, Periampullary Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Predicting Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatic Surgery Using Preoperative Immunity
Pancreatic Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Radek Pohnán study director
Department of Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine of Charles University and Military University Hospital Prague, Czech Republic
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Perioperative assessment of the perfusion of post-resection pancreatic remnant using indocyanine green-VerDye in people with Pancreatic Fistula, run by Charles University, Czech Republic at 1 site in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Štěpán-Ota Schutz (+420 7332 24 640, schutz.stepan-ota@uvn.cz), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of the blood flow in pancreatic remnant with use of ICG (time frame: Intraoperatively: 5-10 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06198400, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2024.