Feedback, PsychologicalNCT06207773
The Effect of Verbal Feedback Given by the Educator
A study testing Educator verbal feedback in people with Feedback, Psychological and Self Efficacy, run by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Purpose of the research; To examine the effect of verbal feedback given by the educator on nursing students' clinical competence, academic self-efficacy and perceived stress levels. Hypotheses of the research; H1: Nursing students' academic self-efficacy level increases after the intervention. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Feedback, Psychological, Self Efficacy
- What is being tested?
- Educator verbal feedback
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 15 Sep 2023to 15 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- a 3rd year nursing student,
- Taking part in the Mental Health and Diseases Nursing clinical internship program
Who cannot join
- Not volunteering to participate in the study
- previously participated in the Mental Health and Diseases Nursing clinical internship program
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Verbal Feedback Given by the Educator on Nursing Students' Clinical Self-Efficacy, Academic Self-Efficacy and Perceived Stress Level
Purpose of the research; To examine the effect of verbal feedback given by the educator on nursing students' clinical competence, academic self-efficacy and perceived stress levels.
Hypotheses of the research; H1: Nursing students' academic self-efficacy level increases after the intervention.
H2: Nursing students' clinical self-efficacy level increases after the intervention.
H3: The level of stress perceived by nursing students decreases after the intervention.
Read the detailed description
The single-group pretest/posttest experimental study consisted of 25 nursing students.
After determining the nursing students who meet the inclusion criteria in the study, data will be collected twice: pre-test (T0) and post-intervention post-test (T1). The data collection process is as follows:
Before the intervention: The Academic Self-Efficacy Scale for Undergraduate Nursing Students, the Self-Efficacy Scale in Clinical Performance, and the Perceived Stress Scale will be administered to nursing students who give written and verbal consent to participate in the research and meet the inclusion criteria.
Intervention: During the study, the educator will hold one-on-one meetings with the students regarding their clinical internship for at least 20 minutes every week for a total of 6 weeks. Within the scope of this interview, the educator will give verbal feedback about the strengths and development aspects of the student's diagnosis, planning, implementation, evaluation stages and clinical skills in line with the nursing care plan. In addition, if there are clinical assignments (such as case analysis) given to the student, the educator will give feedback on this subject as well.
Post-intervention: Academic Self-Efficacy Scale, Clinical Performance Self-Efficacy Scale and Perceived Stress Level Scale will be administered to Undergraduate Nursing Students.
- Conditions
- Feedback, Psychological, Self Efficacy
- Being tested
- Educator verbal feedback
- Keywords
- academic self efficacy, clinic self efficacy, verbal feedback, stres
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Educator verbal feedbackOther
the educator will hold one-on-one meetings with the students regarding their clinical internship for at least 20 minutes every week for a total of 6 weeks. Within the scope of this interview, the educator will give verbal feedback about the strengths and development aspects of the student's diagnosis, planning, implementation, evaluation stages and clinical skills in line with the nursing care plan. In addition, if there are clinical assignments (such as case analysis) given to the student, the educator will give feedback on this subject as well.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Educator verbal feedback | Experimental | During the study, the educator will hold one-on-one meetings with the students regarding their clinical internship for at least 20 minutes every week for a total of 6 weeks Receives: Other: Educator verbal feedback |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Academic Self-Efficacy Scale in Nursing Undergraduate Students
Nursing students' academic self-efficacy scale point increases after intervention.Scale 's minimum point is 14, maksimum point is 70.An increase in the scale score indicates that the individual's academic self-efficacy increases.
Measured: 8 weeks
Clinic self-efficacy
Nursing students' clinical self-efficacy scale point increases after intervention.Scale's minimum point is 37 and maksimum point is 370. An increase in the scale score indicates that the individual's clinical self-efficacy increases.
Measured: 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Perceived Stress Scale
The perceived stress scale level of nursing students decreases after the intervention.Scale minimum point is 14 and maksimum point is 60.A decrease in the scale score indicates that the person's stress level is decreasing.
intervention.Scale's mimimum point is 14 and maksimum point is 60.A high score indicates a person's perception of stress is high.
Measured: 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jan 2024
- Study start15 Sep 2023
- Primary completion30 Oct 2023
- Study completion15 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Feedback, PsychologicalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Istanbul University - CerrahpasaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Olga Incesu, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
- Investigators
- Olga İncesu, Study director, Dr
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06207773
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Florence Nightingale Faculty-2
- Status last verified
- Sep 2023
- First submitted
- 23 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Verbal Feedback Given by the Educator on Nursing Students' Clinical Self-Efficacy, Academic Self-Efficacy and Perceived Stress Level
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06207773
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Florence Nightingale Faculty-2
- Conditions
- Feedback, Psychological, Self Efficacy
- Keywords
- academic self efficacy, clinic self efficacy, verbal feedback, stres
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul University - CerrahpasaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Purpose of the research; To examine the effect of verbal feedback given by the educator on nursing students' clinical competence, academic self-efficacy and perceived stress levels.
Hypotheses of the research; H1: Nursing students' academic self-efficacy level increases after the intervention.
H2: Nursing students' clinical self-efficacy level increases after the intervention.
H3: The level of stress perceived by nursing students decreases after the intervention.
Detailed description
The single-group pretest/posttest experimental study consisted of 25 nursing students.
After determining the nursing students who meet the inclusion criteria in the study, data will be collected twice: pre-test (T0) and post-intervention post-test (T1). The data collection process is as follows:
Before the intervention: The Academic Self-Efficacy Scale for Undergraduate Nursing Students, the Self-Efficacy Scale in Clinical Performance, and the Perceived Stress Scale will be administered to nursing students who give written and verbal consent to participate in the research and meet the inclusion criteria.
Intervention: During the study, the educator will hold one-on-one meetings with the students regarding their clinical internship for at least 20 minutes every week for a total of 6 weeks. Within the scope of this interview, the educator will give verbal feedback about the strengths and development aspects of the student's diagnosis, planning, implementation, evaluation stages and clinical skills in line with the nursing care plan. In addition, if there are clinical assignments (such as case analysis) given to the student, the educator will give feedback on this subject as well.
Post-intervention: Academic Self-Efficacy Scale, Clinical Performance Self-Efficacy Scale and Perceived Stress Level Scale will be administered to Undergraduate Nursing Students.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Educator verbal feedback | Experimental | Other: Educator verbal feedbackDuring the study, the educator will hold one-on-one meetings with the students regarding their clinical internship for at least 20 minutes every week for a total of 6 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- a 3rd year nursing student,
- Taking part in the Mental Health and Diseases Nursing clinical internship program
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Not volunteering to participate in the study
- previously participated in the Mental Health and Diseases Nursing clinical internship program
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Educator verbal feedbackthe educator will hold one-on-one meetings with the students regarding their clinical internship for at least 20 minutes every week for a total of 6 weeks. Within the scope of this interview, the educator will give verbal feedback about the strengths and development aspects of the student's diagnosis, planning, implementation, evaluation stages and clinical skills in line with the nursing care plan. In addition, if there are clinical assignments (such as case analysis) given to the student, the educator will give feedback on this subject as well. | Other | Educator verbal feedback |
Primary outcome
Academic Self-Efficacy Scale in Nursing Undergraduate Students
Time frame: 8 weeks
Nursing students' academic self-efficacy scale point increases after intervention.Scale 's minimum point is 14, maksimum point is 70.An increase in the scale score indicates that the individual's academic self-efficacy increases.
Clinic self-efficacy
Time frame: 8 weeks
Nursing students' clinical self-efficacy scale point increases after intervention.Scale's minimum point is 37 and maksimum point is 370. An increase in the scale score indicates that the individual's clinical self-efficacy increases.
1 secondary outcome
Perceived Stress Scale
Time frame: 8 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Feedback, Psychological
Active, not recruiting
Impact of Force Feedback in VR Training on EEG Biomarkers and Real-World Motor Performance
Motor Skills, Healthy Volunteer
Recruiting
Perfectionism and Daily Coping and Emotion Regulation Processes: A Trial of Two Explanatory Feedback Interventions
Perfectionism, Psychological Well-being
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Teen Driving Translation Study (NIH)
Drive, Recidivism
Recruiting
Mindfulness Training and Respiration Biosignal Feedback - Study 2
Psychological Distress, Mindfulness Skills
Recruiting
STEPS - Stress Training and Engagement Via Phone-Based Systems
Psychological Distress, Mindfulness Skills
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Olga İncesu study director
Dr
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Educator verbal feedback in people with Feedback, Psychological and Self Efficacy, run by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Academic Self-Efficacy Scale in Nursing Undergraduate Students (time frame: 8 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2025.