AzTrials
AzTrials

Full Rotator Cuff TearNCT06431191

Does Medial Raw Anchor Necessary During Tendon Repair Combined With Microfracture

A study testing lateral raw and double raw in people with Full Rotator Cuff Tear and Microfracture Procedure, run by Beijing Jishuitan Hospital at 1 site in China.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a prospective randomized controlled study of rotator cuff repair with lateral raw or double raw combined with microfracture procedure. The patients with rotator cuff tear were randomly divided into groups before the operation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 60 years
What is being tested?
lateral raw and double raw
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2023to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Arthroscopy confirmed small to medium full rotator cuff tear
  • Unilateral rotator cuff injury
  • Voluntarily accept randomized controlled grouping, cooperate with treatment and follow up patients
  • Young and middle-aged patients aged 20 to 60

Who cannot join

  • Previous shoulder surgery (incision or arthroscopy)
  • Combined with diseases of other parts of the same limb
  • Combined with Bankart injury, acromioclavicular joint disease, greater tuberosity fracture, glenoid fracture and so on
  • Bilateral onset
  • Unable or unwilling to receive clinical follow-up

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site
  • Beijing Jishuitan hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100000

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Does Medial Raw Anchor Necessary During Tendon Repair Combined With Microfracture in Small to Medium Size Rotator Cuff Tear

This study is a prospective randomized controlled study of rotator cuff repair with lateral raw or double raw combined with microfracture procedure. The patients with rotator cuff tear were randomly divided into groups before the operation. The patients were followed up before and, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after surgery. In different time periods, the quantitative and qualitative indicators including pain, functional score, muscle strength, MRI performance, etc. were compared between groups at the same time period to evaluate the difference in the effect of double raw or only lateral raw repair combined with microfracture on the treatment of rotator cuff. In order to figure out whether medial raw anchor necessary during tendon repair combined with microfracture in small to medium size rotator cuff tear.

Being tested
lateral raw, double raw

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • lateral rawProcedure or surgery

    lateral raw repair for full tear rotator cuff combined microfracture procedure, without medial raw

  • double rawProcedure or surgery

    double raw repair for full tear rotator cuff combined microfracture procedure

Study groups in NCT06431191
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Study groupExperimentallateral raw repair for full tear rotator cuff combined microfracture procedure
Receives: Procedure: lateral raw
Control groupPlacebo comparatordouble raw repair for full tear rotator cuff combined microfracture procedure
Receives: Procedure: double raw

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. rotator cuff re-tear rate

    the rotator cuff re-tear rate was measured by MRI, MRI was performed to identify the status of the tendon

    Measured: 6, 12, 24 months postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)

    A score used to evaluate the pain, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: 1,2,3,7 days postoperatively and 3,6,12,24 months postoperatively

  2. ASES(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons'Form)

    A score used to evaluate the shoulder function, higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Measured: 3,6,12,24 months postoperatively

  3. Constant score

    A score used to evaluate the shoulder function,higher scores mean a better outcome.

    Measured: 3,6,12,24 months postoperatively

  4. UCLA (University LosAngeles scoring system)

    A score used to evaluate the shoulder function

    Measured: 3,6,12,24 months postoperatively

  5. SST (simple shoulder test)

    A score used to evaluate the shoulder function,higher scores mean a better

    Measured: 3,6,12,24 months postoperatively

  6. front extension, external rotation and internal rotation strength of shoulder

    Use a dynamometer to measure in N

    Measured: 6,12,24 months postoperatively

  7. surgical time

    surgical time, describe with minute

    Measured: immediately after the surgery

  8. Hospitalization expenses

    payment during the hospital stay, Treatment fee is calculated in RMB

    Measured: immediately after the patient discharge

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 May 2024
  2. Study start1 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06431191
Sponsor's protocol ID
luyi
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
18 Mar 2023
Last updated
28 May 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing lateral raw and double raw in people with Full Rotator Cuff Tear and Microfracture Procedure, run by Beijing Jishuitan Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

rotator cuff re-tear rate (time frame: 6, 12, 24 months postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in