BehaviorREACTNCT06507124
Rapid Examination of Acute CT
A study of Behavior, run by East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
CT scans are becoming increasingly prevalent in medicine. These are reviewed by radiologists and formal report provided. A recent survey suggests that non-radiologists are increasingly being expected to be able to interpret pathology on CT scans, however there is limited training provided in medical school and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Behavior
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2024to 8 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Doctors will be recruited from East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust (ELHT) and Participant Identification Centre (PIC) sites via a convenience sampling method.
- Participants must be currently working in UK NHS acute specialties (ED, Medicine, Surgery, etc).
- Includes doctor grades from Foundation to Consultant. Senior radiology trainees and consultants will also be recruited as an expert comparison.
Who cannot join
- Non-clinical doctors
- Radiologist
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
Blackburn, BB23HH
About this study
Official title: Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Non-radiologist Clinicians' Approach to CT Body Interpretation
CT scans are becoming increasingly prevalent in medicine. These are reviewed by radiologists and formal report provided. A recent survey suggests that non-radiologists are increasingly being expected to be able to interpret pathology on CT scans, however there is limited training provided in medical school and specialty training schemes.
This study aims to qualitatively analyse how non-radiologists of different seniority and specialties approach CT body scan interpretation. This will be done by recording participants as they look at a pre-selected CT scan.
The data will be reviewed with a thematic analysis. The eventual aim is to develop a CT interpretation system, which can be used by the non-radiologist to look for important pathology on a CT scan of the body
Read the detailed description
A recent survey published in a local conference (Master 2023) asked 100 junior doctors across 16 Trusts in the UK (including ELHT and MFT) about their experience of CT. This showed that confidence in CT requesting and interpretation is very limited. From the same survey it seems that CT is very superficially taught in medical schools with no system given for interpretation. 90% of those surveyed said they would benefit from more educational resources in CT. The investigators hope to develop a CT interpretation resource to help the non-radiologist when looking at CT scans. This study aims to see how non-radiologists currently approach a CT scan to gain understanding of the needs of the new resources.
There is no similar study in the literature investigating how the non-radiologist approaches CT scans. There has been investigation of foundation doctors experience in radiology, however the focus was on plain xrays, not CT interpretation.
The investigators plan to use a thematic analysis in data interpretation. Rationale for using Thematic analysis.
- Recognised method of identifying patterns/ themes in qualitative data for learning and teaching research.
- Provides a flexible methodology approach which is not reliant on a particular educational theory. Hence it is able to deal with relatively uncharted area of how non-radiologists interpret radiological images.
Process of thematic analysis . Using the 6-step approach. Step Aims Comments
- Data familiarisation Studying the transcripts \& video with notes on initial impressions.
- Initial codes derived Grouping data in a meaningful and systematic way.
- Search for themes Discerning any significant pattern in the data.
- Review themes Review the support for each theme and if they cover the entire data set.
- Define themes Clear description of each theme covering the points it is addressing, any sub-themes it contains and how they relate to one-another.
- Write-up Report on the key points, from this study, which are influencing CT scan interpretation and how it could be taught.
- The proposed study is using an inductive and latent level approach for the data analysis. This was selected as it allows the flexibility to look beyond what is being said. The semantic approach was considered too restrictive as it assumes a predefined understanding of the subjects' cognitive strategy in dealing with image interpretation. In contrast, by combining the oral presentation with the manipulation of the image and the answering of key questions there will be a better chance of appreciating the underlying cognitive approach being employed.
- Open coding will be used for the transcripts analysed so far. This allows them to be modified under the influence of more data.
- Currently,qualitative data analytic software (e.g. ATLAS, Nvivo etc.) are not using.
The reason being the researcher's need for first-hand familiarisation with a novel dataset. Once this preliminary phase has been carried out consideration will be given to using UCLan's access to Nvivo. This decision will take into account personal preferences, experiences with the preliminary data and the anticipated size of the data base.
- Once preliminary themes have been proposed a review will be made to see which codes they address. Unlinked codes will prompt further analysis of the themes, considered of new themes or development of sub-themes. This iterative process continues with new data until a steady state is achieved and no new themes are being generated.
- Conditions
- Behavior
- Being tested
- This is observational with no intervention
- Keywords
- Computed tomography, Medical education
- Medical subject headings
- Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
This is observational with no interventionOther
This is observational with no intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| One arm | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: This is observational with no intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Observe the difference in CT interpretation technique between traditionally trained radiology consultants and other clinicians of varying seniorities
Process of thematic analysis. The proposed study is using an inductive and latent level approach for the data analysis. This was selected as it allows the flexibility to look beyond what is being said. By combining the oral presentation with the manipulation of the image and the answering of key questions we feel there will be a better chance of appreciating the underlying cognitive approach being employed.
Open coding will be used for the transcript analysis. This allows them to be modified under the influence of more data.
Once preliminary themes have been proposed a review will be made to see which codes they address. Unlinked codes will prompt further analysis of the themes, considered of new themes or development of sub-themes. This iterative process continues with new data until a steady state is achieved and no new themes are being generated.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jul 2024
- Study start1 Mar 2024
- Primary completion8 Oct 2025
- Study completion8 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Doctors of various grades will be Invited to take part in the study. Thematic analysis will be used to assess the recordings.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Central Lancashire
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Joshua J Lauder, MBChB FRCR, Principal investigator, ELHT
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06507124
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 336924
- Acronym
- REACT
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Mar 2024
- Last updated
- 9 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Non-radiologist Clinicians' Approach to CT Body Interpretation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06507124
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REACT / 336924
- Conditions
- Behavior
- Keywords
- Computed tomography, Medical education
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- East Lancashire Hospitals NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Central Lancashire
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
CT scans are becoming increasingly prevalent in medicine. These are reviewed by radiologists and formal report provided. A recent survey suggests that non-radiologists are increasingly being expected to be able to interpret pathology on CT scans, however there is limited training provided in medical school and specialty training schemes.
This study aims to qualitatively analyse how non-radiologists of different seniority and specialties approach CT body scan interpretation. This will be done by recording participants as they look at a pre-selected CT scan.
The data will be reviewed with a thematic analysis. The eventual aim is to develop a CT interpretation system, which can be used by the non-radiologist to look for important pathology on a CT scan of the body
Detailed description
A recent survey published in a local conference (Master 2023) asked 100 junior doctors across 16 Trusts in the UK (including ELHT and MFT) about their experience of CT. This showed that confidence in CT requesting and interpretation is very limited. From the same survey it seems that CT is very superficially taught in medical schools with no system given for interpretation. 90% of those surveyed said they would benefit from more educational resources in CT. The investigators hope to develop a CT interpretation resource to help the non-radiologist when looking at CT scans. This study aims to see how non-radiologists currently approach a CT scan to gain understanding of the needs of the new resources.
There is no similar study in the literature investigating how the non-radiologist approaches CT scans. There has been investigation of foundation doctors experience in radiology, however the focus was on plain xrays, not CT interpretation.
The investigators plan to use a thematic analysis in data interpretation. Rationale for using Thematic analysis.
- Recognised method of identifying patterns/ themes in qualitative data for learning and teaching research.
- Provides a flexible methodology approach which is not reliant on a particular educational theory. Hence it is able to deal with relatively uncharted area of how non-radiologists interpret radiological images.
Process of thematic analysis . Using the 6-step approach. Step Aims Comments
- Data familiarisation Studying the transcripts \& video with notes on initial impressions.
- Initial codes derived Grouping data in a meaningful and systematic way.
- Search for themes Discerning any significant pattern in the data.
- Review themes Review the support for each theme and if they cover the entire data set.
- Define themes Clear description of each theme covering the points it is addressing, any sub-themes it contains and how they relate to one-another.
- Write-up Report on the key points, from this study, which are influencing CT scan interpretation and how it could be taught.
- The proposed study is using an inductive and latent level approach for the data analysis. This was selected as it allows the flexibility to look beyond what is being said. The semantic approach was considered too restrictive as it assumes a predefined understanding of the subjects' cognitive strategy in dealing with image interpretation. In contrast, by combining the oral presentation with the manipulation of the image and the answering of key questions there will be a better chance of appreciating the underlying cognitive approach being employed.
- Open coding will be used for the transcripts analysed so far. This allows them to be modified under the influence of more data.
- Currently,qualitative data analytic software (e.g. ATLAS, Nvivo etc.) are not using.
The reason being the researcher's need for first-hand familiarisation with a novel dataset. Once this preliminary phase has been carried out consideration will be given to using UCLan's access to Nvivo. This decision will take into account personal preferences, experiences with the preliminary data and the anticipated size of the data base.
- Once preliminary themes have been proposed a review will be made to see which codes they address. Unlinked codes will prompt further analysis of the themes, considered of new themes or development of sub-themes. This iterative process continues with new data until a steady state is achieved and no new themes are being generated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Doctors of various grades will be Invited to take part in the study. Thematic analysis will be used to assess the recordings.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| One arm | Experimental | Other: This is observational with no intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Doctors will be recruited from East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust (ELHT) and Participant Identification Centre (PIC) sites via a convenience sampling method.
- Participants must be currently working in UK NHS acute specialties (ED, Medicine, Surgery, etc).
- Includes doctor grades from Foundation to Consultant. Senior radiology trainees and consultants will also be recruited as an expert comparison.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Non-clinical doctors
- Radiologist
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| This is observational with no interventionThis is observational with no intervention | Other | One arm |
Primary outcome
Observe the difference in CT interpretation technique between traditionally trained radiology consultants and other clinicians of varying seniorities
Time frame: 1 year
Process of thematic analysis. The proposed study is using an inductive and latent level approach for the data analysis. This was selected as it allows the flexibility to look beyond what is being said. By combining the oral presentation with the manipulation of the image and the answering of key questions we feel there will be a better chance of appreciating the underlying cognitive approach being employed. Open coding will be used for the transcript analysis. This allows them to be modified under the influence of more data. Once preliminary themes have been proposed a review will be made to see which codes they address. Unlinked codes will prompt further analysis of the themes, considered of new themes or development of sub-themes. This iterative process continues with new data until a steady state is achieved and no new themes are being generated.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Behavior
Active, not recruiting
Digital Therapeutics for Behavior Problems
Problem Behavior, Child Behavior
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessing the Impact of Perceptions of Unpredictability on Objective Measures of Food Consumption and Metabolism
Healthy Volunteer, Obestity
Not yet recruiting
Be Well at Work-Plus: A Depression and Physical Activity Intervention for Hospital Service Workers (Aim 3)
Depression, Physical Inactivity
Active, not recruiting
Economic Empowerment and Health Promotion of Uganda Grandmother-caregivers.
Financial Burden, Health Behavior
Enrolling by invitation
Social Media Intervention for Risky Drinking
Drinking Behavior
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joshua J Lauder, MBChB FRCR principal investigator
ELHT
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study of Behavior, run by East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Observe the difference in CT interpretation technique between traditionally trained radiology consultants and other clinicians of varying seniorities (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.