AzTrials
AzTrials

Cerebral PalsyCPNCT06537622

Best Practices Fo Early Diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy

A study testing Implementation group in people with Cerebral Palsy and Prematurity, run by St. Justine's Hospital at 1 site in Canada.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this research, the investigators are using an implementation science approach to enhance the uptake of a clinical practice guideline for earlier diagnosis of cerebral palsy (i.e. what is being implemented) in neonatal follow-up clinics across Canada. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 30 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cerebral Palsy, Prematurity
What is being tested?
Implementation group
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,000 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
1 Feb 2025to 1 Nov 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 30 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Infants born preterm at less than 29 weeks' GA and their parents
  • Admission to a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) participating in the Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN).

Who cannot join

  • Death prior to first visit in clinic
  • Major congenital malformation and/or significant chromosomal defects affecting development beyond preterm birth
  • Child moved outside Canada prior to first visit in clinic.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Canada1 site
  • CHU Sainte-Justine

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Implementation of Best Practices for Early Diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy (CP) in Very Preterm Infants: a Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

In this research, the investigators are using an implementation science approach to enhance the uptake of a clinical practice guideline for earlier diagnosis of cerebral palsy (i.e. what is being implemented) in neonatal follow-up clinics across Canada. This clinical practice guideline should be part of what neonatal follow-up specialists do in their routine clinical work with children born preterm. However, there is a wide variability in practice. The goal of this project is to harmonize practices in the neonatal follow-up community in agreement with international recommendations for earlier diagnosis of cerebral palsy. This research will measure if clinicians are truly following the clinical practice guideline. If not, implementation strategies that address barriers and leverage on facilitators will be deployed for successful uptake of the clinical practice guideline. This research will also assess whether implementation of the clinical practice guideline is associated with better patient outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Children born preterm have an increased risk for brain-based disabilities, including cerebral palsy (CP), with lower gestational age (GA) incurring higher vulnerability. The rate of CP in very preterm children born before 29 weeks' GA is 6.1%.The 2017 international recommendations for Early, accurate diagnosis and early intervention in CP provides an evidence-based approach for prompt referral to targeted services to optimize child outcomes. Early diagnosis and intervention during the optimal window of brain plasticity has the potential to improve developmental functioning. Best practice guidelines also exist on how to convey an early diagnosis of CP in a compassionate way, as poor communication can affect parental mental health. The Canadian Neonatal Follow-Up Network (CNFUN) has partnered with the parent-led Canadian Premature Babies Foundation (CPBF) and key stakeholders to adapt these clinical practice guidelines to the Canadian context (CPG-CP). These CPG-CP promote the use of the General Movement Assessment (GMA) and the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) for identification of early signs of CP. The CPG-CP also propose clinical care pathways and an approach for communicating findings. The overall goal of the CPG-CP is to improve clinicians' ability to accurately recognize the earliest signs of CP that warrant immediate actions (as opposed to a wait-and-see approach). Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial design, the investigators will assess whether the implementation strategy is successful in increasing the uptake of the CPG-CP by CNFUN programs. Concurrently, the investigators will test the effectiveness of implementing the CPG-CP in detecting early signs of CP at a younger age in preterm infants born <29 weeks' GA. The investigators will secondarily compare whether using both the GMA and HINE is more performant than the HINE alone in identifying early signs of CP. Finally, the investigators will examine whether developmental functioning at 18-24 months corrected age (CA) improves after CPG-CP implementation.

This proposal aims to reduce the gap in care related to the early identification of CP in children born very preterm across Canada. Using a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design, the investigators will implement the CPG-CP in the real-world setting of CNFUN sites, to improve clinicians' ability to detect the early signs of CP in very preterm infants. Early diagnosis enables the initiation of targeted interventions and engagement of support services. Harnessing neuroplasticity through early and specific therapy can improve children's overall development and functioning. The effectiveness of the CPG-CP on improving clinical outcomes relies on a successful implementation process that considers the interplay between inner (i.e., within neonatal follow-up programs), outer (e.g., local health care system), and individual patient and clinician characteristics.

Being tested
Implementation group, Standard of care
Keywords
Corrected age, very preterm infants, Developmental functioning, Guideline, Diagnosis, Randomized controlled trial
Medical subject headings
Cerebral Palsy, Premature Birth, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Implementation groupOther

    Implementation strategies to increase uptake of the clinical practice guidelines for earlier diagnosis of cerebral palsy

  • Standard of careOther

    No active implementation strategies

Study groups in NCT06537622
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention aimOtherTo assess the effectiveness of the clinical practice guideline - cerebral palsy detecting early signs of CP at a younger age. More specifically, to reduce the age at detecting early signs of CP from an estimated CA of 11 months (prior to CPG-CP implementation) to 8 months. To determine whether using both the general movement assessment and Hammersmith infant neurological examination is more performant than the HINE alone in identifying early signs of CP. To examine if CPG-CP implementation is associated with better developmental functioning at 18-24 months CA.
Receives: Other: Implementation group
Implementation aimOtherUsing the RE-AIM framework : To assess REAch of the intervention strategies to the target audience of clinicians in CNFUN programs.To assess Implementation fidelity to the CPG-CP and the implementation strategies. To assess Maintenance of the CPG-CP over time.
Receives: Other: Standard of care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intervention : corrected age at detection of early signs of CP.

    This is calculated from the date at which the clinician identifies early signs of CP and shares this diagnosis with family. This diagnosis must be followed by an immediate action i.e., referral for CP-targeted intervention and/or evaluation. Outcome data will be collected through retrospective chart review.

    Measured: Birth to 18-24 months CA

  2. Intervention : Developmental functioning at 18-24 month CA

    Evaluation of the developmental functioning using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 4th edition (Bayley-4), a widely used, standardized, norm-referenced instrument for direct assessment of children aged 1-42 mo. Cognition, language, and motor composite scores are obtained (mean 100±15).

    Measured: Birth to 18-24 months CA

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Implementation : RE-AIM framework - Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption

    Reach of the intervention strategies to the target audience of clinicians participating in the CNFUN.

    Measured: Up to 48 months

  2. Implementation : RE-AIM framework - Implementation

    Implementation fidelity to the CPG-CP and the implementation strategies.

    Measured: Up to 48 months

  3. Implementation : RE-AIM framework - Maintenance

    Maintenance of the practice of CPG-CP over time.

    Measured: Up to 48 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Aug 2024
  2. Study start1 Feb 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
CNFUN sites are the unit of randomization to the order in which they receive the implementation strategy
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06537622
Sponsor's protocol ID
MP-21-2024-7044
Acronym
CP
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
10 Jul 2024
Last updated
18 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual patient data will not be available for sharing. Only aggregated data can be shared.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Implementation group in people with Cerebral Palsy and Prematurity, run by St. Justine's Hospital at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Thuy Mai Luu, MD M.Sc. (514-345-4931 ext. 6642, thuy.mai.luu@umontreal.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intervention : corrected age at detection of early signs of CP. (time frame: Birth to 18-24 months CA). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in