AzTrials
AzTrials

Bile Acid MalabsorptionNCT06548009

Serum Metabolics-based Method for Diagnosing Bile Acid Diarrhoea

An observational study of Bile Acid Malabsorption and Bile Acid Diarrhea, run by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen at 3 sites in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is a common yet under-diagnosed and under-recognised disease. The primary symptoms are watery diarrhoea with high frequency of unpredictable bowel movements,urgency and faecal incontinence making BAD a debilitating condition. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bile Acid Malabsorption, Bile Acid Diarrhea
What is being tested?
Metabolomics and other blood samples
How many people
150 participants
Where
3 sitesDenmark
Study dates
31 May 2024to 15 Apr 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population consists of SeHCAT referred patients for suspected bile acid diarrhoea.

Who may be able to join

  • SeHCAT referral for suspected bile acid diarrhoea
  • Age ≥18 years

Who cannot join

  • Diabetes, except type 2 diabetes
  • Nephropathy with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 min/1.73 m2
  • Treatment with medicine that cannot be paused for 12 hours
  • Hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, if not well regulated
  • Active or recent (<6 months since last treatment) malignant disease
  • Any treatment or condition requiring acute or subacute medical or surgical intervention
  • Any condition considered incompatible with trial participation by the investigators

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Denmark3 sites
  • Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital

    Copenhagen

  • Herlev Gentofte Hospital

    Hellerup

  • Hillerød Hospital

    Hillerød

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is a common yet under-diagnosed and under-recognised disease. The primary symptoms are watery diarrhoea with high frequency of unpredictable bowel movements,urgency and faecal incontinence making BAD a debilitating condition. One of the challenges of BAD is the lack of a readily available and accurate diagnostic test.

The aim of this study is to validate a BAD diagnostic score (BDS) based on metabolomics.

Read the detailed description

Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is a common yet under-diagnosed and under-recognised disease. The primary symptoms are watery diarrhoea with high frequency of unpredictable bowel movements,urgency and faecal incontinence making BAD a debilitating condition. The pathophysiology of BAD involves spill-over of bile acids to the colon where bile acids irritate the colonic mucosa and cause osmotic-induced fluid secretion. The aetiology of BAD can be either idiopathic (termed primary BAD or type 2 BAD) or the disease can develop secondary to ileal dysfunction (due to, e.g., intestinal surgery or Chron's disease, termed type 1 BAD) or other conditions interfering with ileal absorption (due to, e.g., cholecystectomy or radiation therapy, termed type 3 BAD).

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with predominant diarrhoea is a common condition in the general population (prevalence of around 4%) and emerging data suggest that around 1/3 suffering from this condition in fact have BAD. Many of these patients remains undiagnosed and thus,inappropriately treated or even untreated. A major reason for this is challenges associated with diagnosing BAD. Several diagnostic modalities have been suggested including 14C-glycocholate breath test, stool test and assessment of 48-hour faecal bile acid output. These tests are cumbersome, time-consuming, and not widely available. The 75selenium homocholic acid taurine (SeHCAT) test is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of BAD. It measures, via a standard gamma camera, the 7-day retention of a taurine-conjugated bile acid analogue labelled with the gamma-emitter 75selenium. This test provides a quantitative assessment to estimate the severity of BAD, but there is no general agreement regarding its cut-off value and the test is not widely available or even approved for clinical use in many countries outside Europe, including the USA. Furthermore, the SeHCAT test is cumbersome due to its dependence on two visits to the clinic exactly seven days apart, it is expensive, and involves radioactive exposure to the patient. Given the limited availability and the challenges associated with the abovementioned tests, excluding BAD is unfortunately not within current routine investigational algorithms for diarrhoea-predominant IBS, Crohn's disease, or gastrointestinal cancers. In many cases, BAD diagnosis is considered after therapeutic trial using bile acid sequestrants. However, these agents are expensive, often ineffective and/or associated with gastrointestinal side effects in patients with established BAD why their potential as diagnostic tools is limited. Taken together, diagnosing BAD is currently associated with challenges that may preclude relevant treatment of this debilitating condition warranting development of easy and accessible yet safe and effective BAD diagnostics. Recently, the investigators have developed a new BAD diagnostic method based on a single blood sample from the patient. Our approach is based on unbiased, metabolic profiling of serum from BAD patients and carefully matched healthy individuals using comprehensive ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass-spectrometry. These comprehensive datasets were subjected to state-of-the-art machine learning and used to build a BAD diagnostic score (BDS) that can distinguish a patient suffering BAD from healthy individuals with high precision (sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 93%). In the present study, the investigators will refine the BDS to distinguish between patients suffering from BAD and patients suffering from other diarrhoeal diseases by using the same methods and data analyses as in the previous project, but in this case applied to serum samples collected from patients referred to diagnostic SeHCAT test, i.e., samples from both test-positive and test-negative patients.

Being tested
Metabolomics and other blood samples
Keywords
bile acid, diarrhea, diagnostics
Medical subject headings
Diarrhea

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Metabolomics and other blood samplesDiagnostic test

    Blood samples taken with the objective of identifying a diagnostic test

Study groups in NCT06548009
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SeHCAT confirmed bile acid diarrheaPatients referred to a SeHCAT scan due to suspected bile acid diarrhea, who afterwards turned out to be suffering from SeHCAT confirmed bile acid diarrhea
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Metabolomics and other blood samples
SeHCAT negative patientsPatients referred to a SeHCAT scan due to suspected bile acid diarrhea, who afterwards turned out to be SeHCAT negative
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Metabolomics and other blood samples

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. AUROC curve of the BDS in the validation cohort

    AUROC curve of the BDS in the validation cohort

    Measured: 1 year from now

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. AUROC curve of BDS in patients with each of the three subtypes of BAD

    Measured: 1 year from now

  2. AUROC curve of BDS in the discovery cohort (see 8.2 Data analysis)

    Measured: 1 year from now

  3. Correlation of SeHCAT test result with severity of BAD symptoms

    Measured: 1 year from now

  4. Correlation of BDS test results with number of stools per day

    Measured: 1 year from now

  5. Biomarkers for BAD: C4 and FGF19

    Measured: 1 year from now

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Aug 2024
  2. Study start31 May 2024
  3. Primary completion15 Apr 2025
  4. Study completion15 Apr 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
150 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06548009
Sponsor's protocol ID
BAD-DIVA
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
3 May 2024
Last updated
25 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Lewinska M, Karhus ML, Ellegaard AG, Romero-Gomez M, Macias RIR, Andersen JB, Knop FK. Serum lipidome unravels a diagnostic potential in bile acid diarrhoea. Gut. 2023 Sep;72(9):1698-1708. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-329213. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

    PubMed 37072179

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Bile Acid Malabsorption and Bile Acid Diarrhea, run by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen at 3 sites in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

AUROC curve of the BDS in the validation cohort (time frame: 1 year from now). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06548009, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in