Bile Acid MalabsorptionNCT06548009
Serum Metabolics-based Method for Diagnosing Bile Acid Diarrhoea
An observational study of Bile Acid Malabsorption and Bile Acid Diarrhea, run by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen at 3 sites in Denmark.
Trial summary
Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is a common yet under-diagnosed and under-recognised disease. The primary symptoms are watery diarrhoea with high frequency of unpredictable bowel movements,urgency and faecal incontinence making BAD a debilitating condition. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bile Acid Malabsorption, Bile Acid Diarrhea
- What is being tested?
- Metabolomics and other blood samples
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesDenmark
- Study dates
- 31 May 2024to 15 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population consists of SeHCAT referred patients for suspected bile acid diarrhoea.
Who may be able to join
- SeHCAT referral for suspected bile acid diarrhoea
- Age ≥18 years
Who cannot join
- Diabetes, except type 2 diabetes
- Nephropathy with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 min/1.73 m2
- Treatment with medicine that cannot be paused for 12 hours
- Hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, if not well regulated
- Active or recent (<6 months since last treatment) malignant disease
- Any treatment or condition requiring acute or subacute medical or surgical intervention
- Any condition considered incompatible with trial participation by the investigators
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Denmark3 sites
Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital
Copenhagen
Herlev Gentofte Hospital
Hellerup
Hillerød Hospital
Hillerød
About this study
Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is a common yet under-diagnosed and under-recognised disease. The primary symptoms are watery diarrhoea with high frequency of unpredictable bowel movements,urgency and faecal incontinence making BAD a debilitating condition. One of the challenges of BAD is the lack of a readily available and accurate diagnostic test.
The aim of this study is to validate a BAD diagnostic score (BDS) based on metabolomics.
Read the detailed description
Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is a common yet under-diagnosed and under-recognised disease. The primary symptoms are watery diarrhoea with high frequency of unpredictable bowel movements,urgency and faecal incontinence making BAD a debilitating condition. The pathophysiology of BAD involves spill-over of bile acids to the colon where bile acids irritate the colonic mucosa and cause osmotic-induced fluid secretion. The aetiology of BAD can be either idiopathic (termed primary BAD or type 2 BAD) or the disease can develop secondary to ileal dysfunction (due to, e.g., intestinal surgery or Chron's disease, termed type 1 BAD) or other conditions interfering with ileal absorption (due to, e.g., cholecystectomy or radiation therapy, termed type 3 BAD).
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with predominant diarrhoea is a common condition in the general population (prevalence of around 4%) and emerging data suggest that around 1/3 suffering from this condition in fact have BAD. Many of these patients remains undiagnosed and thus,inappropriately treated or even untreated. A major reason for this is challenges associated with diagnosing BAD. Several diagnostic modalities have been suggested including 14C-glycocholate breath test, stool test and assessment of 48-hour faecal bile acid output. These tests are cumbersome, time-consuming, and not widely available. The 75selenium homocholic acid taurine (SeHCAT) test is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of BAD. It measures, via a standard gamma camera, the 7-day retention of a taurine-conjugated bile acid analogue labelled with the gamma-emitter 75selenium. This test provides a quantitative assessment to estimate the severity of BAD, but there is no general agreement regarding its cut-off value and the test is not widely available or even approved for clinical use in many countries outside Europe, including the USA. Furthermore, the SeHCAT test is cumbersome due to its dependence on two visits to the clinic exactly seven days apart, it is expensive, and involves radioactive exposure to the patient. Given the limited availability and the challenges associated with the abovementioned tests, excluding BAD is unfortunately not within current routine investigational algorithms for diarrhoea-predominant IBS, Crohn's disease, or gastrointestinal cancers. In many cases, BAD diagnosis is considered after therapeutic trial using bile acid sequestrants. However, these agents are expensive, often ineffective and/or associated with gastrointestinal side effects in patients with established BAD why their potential as diagnostic tools is limited. Taken together, diagnosing BAD is currently associated with challenges that may preclude relevant treatment of this debilitating condition warranting development of easy and accessible yet safe and effective BAD diagnostics. Recently, the investigators have developed a new BAD diagnostic method based on a single blood sample from the patient. Our approach is based on unbiased, metabolic profiling of serum from BAD patients and carefully matched healthy individuals using comprehensive ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass-spectrometry. These comprehensive datasets were subjected to state-of-the-art machine learning and used to build a BAD diagnostic score (BDS) that can distinguish a patient suffering BAD from healthy individuals with high precision (sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 93%). In the present study, the investigators will refine the BDS to distinguish between patients suffering from BAD and patients suffering from other diarrhoeal diseases by using the same methods and data analyses as in the previous project, but in this case applied to serum samples collected from patients referred to diagnostic SeHCAT test, i.e., samples from both test-positive and test-negative patients.
- Conditions
- Bile Acid Malabsorption, Bile Acid Diarrhea
- Being tested
- Metabolomics and other blood samples
- Keywords
- bile acid, diarrhea, diagnostics
- Medical subject headings
- Diarrhea
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Metabolomics and other blood samplesDiagnostic test
Blood samples taken with the objective of identifying a diagnostic test
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SeHCAT confirmed bile acid diarrhea | Patients referred to a SeHCAT scan due to suspected bile acid diarrhea, who afterwards turned out to be suffering from SeHCAT confirmed bile acid diarrhea Receives: Diagnostic Test: Metabolomics and other blood samples | |
| SeHCAT negative patients | Patients referred to a SeHCAT scan due to suspected bile acid diarrhea, who afterwards turned out to be SeHCAT negative Receives: Diagnostic Test: Metabolomics and other blood samples |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
AUROC curve of the BDS in the validation cohort
AUROC curve of the BDS in the validation cohort
Measured: 1 year from now
Secondary outcomes (5)
AUROC curve of BDS in patients with each of the three subtypes of BAD
Measured: 1 year from now
AUROC curve of BDS in the discovery cohort (see 8.2 Data analysis)
Measured: 1 year from now
Correlation of SeHCAT test result with severity of BAD symptoms
Measured: 1 year from now
Correlation of BDS test results with number of stools per day
Measured: 1 year from now
Biomarkers for BAD: C4 and FGF19
Measured: 1 year from now
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Aug 2024
- Study start31 May 2024
- Primary completion15 Apr 2025
- Study completion15 Apr 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bile Acid MalabsorptionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Asger Lund, MD, University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06548009
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BAD-DIVA
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 3 May 2024
- Last updated
- 25 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lewinska M, Karhus ML, Ellegaard AG, Romero-Gomez M, Macias RIR, Andersen JB, Knop FK. Serum lipidome unravels a diagnostic potential in bile acid diarrhoea. Gut. 2023 Sep;72(9):1698-1708. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-329213. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
PubMed 37072179
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Serum Metabolics-based Method for Diagnosing Bile Acid Diarrhoea
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06548009
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BAD-DIVA
- Conditions
- Bile Acid Malabsorption, Bile Acid Diarrhea
- Keywords
- bile acid, diarrhea, diagnostics
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Gentofte, CopenhagenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 31 May 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Apr 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is a common yet under-diagnosed and under-recognised disease. The primary symptoms are watery diarrhoea with high frequency of unpredictable bowel movements,urgency and faecal incontinence making BAD a debilitating condition. One of the challenges of BAD is the lack of a readily available and accurate diagnostic test.
The aim of this study is to validate a BAD diagnostic score (BDS) based on metabolomics.
Detailed description
Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is a common yet under-diagnosed and under-recognised disease. The primary symptoms are watery diarrhoea with high frequency of unpredictable bowel movements,urgency and faecal incontinence making BAD a debilitating condition. The pathophysiology of BAD involves spill-over of bile acids to the colon where bile acids irritate the colonic mucosa and cause osmotic-induced fluid secretion. The aetiology of BAD can be either idiopathic (termed primary BAD or type 2 BAD) or the disease can develop secondary to ileal dysfunction (due to, e.g., intestinal surgery or Chron's disease, termed type 1 BAD) or other conditions interfering with ileal absorption (due to, e.g., cholecystectomy or radiation therapy, termed type 3 BAD).
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with predominant diarrhoea is a common condition in the general population (prevalence of around 4%) and emerging data suggest that around 1/3 suffering from this condition in fact have BAD. Many of these patients remains undiagnosed and thus,inappropriately treated or even untreated. A major reason for this is challenges associated with diagnosing BAD. Several diagnostic modalities have been suggested including 14C-glycocholate breath test, stool test and assessment of 48-hour faecal bile acid output. These tests are cumbersome, time-consuming, and not widely available. The 75selenium homocholic acid taurine (SeHCAT) test is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of BAD. It measures, via a standard gamma camera, the 7-day retention of a taurine-conjugated bile acid analogue labelled with the gamma-emitter 75selenium. This test provides a quantitative assessment to estimate the severity of BAD, but there is no general agreement regarding its cut-off value and the test is not widely available or even approved for clinical use in many countries outside Europe, including the USA. Furthermore, the SeHCAT test is cumbersome due to its dependence on two visits to the clinic exactly seven days apart, it is expensive, and involves radioactive exposure to the patient. Given the limited availability and the challenges associated with the abovementioned tests, excluding BAD is unfortunately not within current routine investigational algorithms for diarrhoea-predominant IBS, Crohn's disease, or gastrointestinal cancers. In many cases, BAD diagnosis is considered after therapeutic trial using bile acid sequestrants. However, these agents are expensive, often ineffective and/or associated with gastrointestinal side effects in patients with established BAD why their potential as diagnostic tools is limited. Taken together, diagnosing BAD is currently associated with challenges that may preclude relevant treatment of this debilitating condition warranting development of easy and accessible yet safe and effective BAD diagnostics. Recently, the investigators have developed a new BAD diagnostic method based on a single blood sample from the patient. Our approach is based on unbiased, metabolic profiling of serum from BAD patients and carefully matched healthy individuals using comprehensive ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass-spectrometry. These comprehensive datasets were subjected to state-of-the-art machine learning and used to build a BAD diagnostic score (BDS) that can distinguish a patient suffering BAD from healthy individuals with high precision (sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 93%). In the present study, the investigators will refine the BDS to distinguish between patients suffering from BAD and patients suffering from other diarrhoeal diseases by using the same methods and data analyses as in the previous project, but in this case applied to serum samples collected from patients referred to diagnostic SeHCAT test, i.e., samples from both test-positive and test-negative patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SeHCAT confirmed bile acid diarrhea | – | Diagnostic Test: Metabolomics and other blood samplesPatients referred to a SeHCAT scan due to suspected bile acid diarrhea, who afterwards turned out to be suffering from SeHCAT confirmed bile acid diarrhea |
| SeHCAT negative patients | – | Diagnostic Test: Metabolomics and other blood samplesPatients referred to a SeHCAT scan due to suspected bile acid diarrhea, who afterwards turned out to be SeHCAT negative |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population consists of SeHCAT referred patients for suspected bile acid diarrhoea.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- SeHCAT referral for suspected bile acid diarrhoea
- Age ≥18 years
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Diabetes, except type 2 diabetes
- Nephropathy with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 min/1.73 m2
- Treatment with medicine that cannot be paused for 12 hours
- Hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, if not well regulated
- Active or recent (<6 months since last treatment) malignant disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Metabolomics and other blood samplesBlood samples taken with the objective of identifying a diagnostic test | Diagnostic test | SeHCAT confirmed bile acid diarrhea, SeHCAT negative patients |
Primary outcome
AUROC curve of the BDS in the validation cohort
Time frame: 1 year from now
AUROC curve of the BDS in the validation cohort
5 secondary outcomes
AUROC curve of BDS in patients with each of the three subtypes of BAD
Time frame: 1 year from now
AUROC curve of BDS in the discovery cohort (see 8.2 Data analysis)
Time frame: 1 year from now
Correlation of SeHCAT test result with severity of BAD symptoms
Time frame: 1 year from now
Correlation of BDS test results with number of stools per day
Time frame: 1 year from now
Biomarkers for BAD: C4 and FGF19
Time frame: 1 year from now
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 37072179Lewinska M, Karhus ML, Ellegaard AG, Romero-Gomez M, Macias RIR, Andersen JB, Knop FK. Serum lipidome unravels a diagnostic potential in bile acid diarrhoea. Gut. 2023 Sep;72(9):1698-1708. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-329213. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bile Acid Malabsorption
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Treatment of Bile Acid Diarrhoea With Atorvastatin
Bile Acid Diarrhea, Bile Acid Malabsorption
RecruitingObservational study
Chronic Loose Stools Following Right-sided Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer and the Association With Bile Acid Malabsorption and Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth Using a Novel Sampling Device
Colon Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Changes in Bile Acids and Microbiota in Patients With Hepatitis D Treated With Bulvertide
HBV, HBV Coinfection
RecruitingObservational study
Magnesium in Gastrointestinal Disease
Colitis Ulcerosa, Colitis Ulcerative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Bile Acid Malabsorption and Bile Acid Diarrhea, run by University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen at 3 sites in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
AUROC curve of the BDS in the validation cohort (time frame: 1 year from now). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06548009, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2026.