Bone AtrophyPhase 1Flexi2024NCT06552715
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness of a Flexible Hydroxyapatite-Based Composite for Jaw Bone Regeneration
A Phase 1 study testing Placement of resorbable HAp-based composite in people with Bone Atrophy and Edentulism, run by University of Bologna at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Following a review of the scientific literature, it was found that there are no clinical studies but only in vitro and in vivo studies, which show promising results in terms of bone formation and integration. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bone Atrophy, Edentulism, Bone Regeneration
- What is being tested?
- Placement of resorbable HAp-based composite
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Sep 2024to Sep 2025
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with partially edentulous and atrophic jaws, requiring implant-prosthetic rehabilitation (from 1 to 3 implants), classified as Seibert Class II or III, and needing a GBR bone regeneration intervention with defects not exceeding 7 mm in height
- Age 18 years or older
- Obtaining informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients who have received radiation therapy to the head and neck with more than 70 Gray.
- Immunocompromised and immunosuppressed patients.
- Patients treated with or currently receiving intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.
- Patients with poor oral hygiene and lack of motivation.
- Uncontrolled diabetes.
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Drug or alcohol dependence.
- Psychiatric conditions that contraindicate surgical treatment.
- Limited mouth opening (less than 3.5 cm distance between the two arches in the anterior area).
- Patients with acute or chronic inflammation/infection at the implant site.
- Patients referred solely for implant placement.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Dental Clinic, Unit of Oral Surgery, University of Bologna
Bologna, 40125
Pietro Felice, MD, DDS, PhD, +39 0512088157, pietro.felice@unibo.it
About this study
Official title: Pilot Clinical Study on the Efficacy of a Flexible Hydroxyapatite-Based Composite for the Regeneration of Jaw Bone Defects
Following a review of the scientific literature, it was found that there are no clinical studies but only in vitro and in vivo studies, which show promising results in terms of bone formation and integration. However, it is necessary to evaluate how well the regenerated bone maintains its structural integrity over time, considering masticatory function and real-life biomechanics. Factors such as mechanical load, remodeling dynamics, and interactions with surrounding tissues could influence the long-term stability of the regenerated bone. Additionally, another important aspect to study is the potential complications and adverse effects associated with the use of the flexible HAp-based composite.
Read the detailed description
Following a review of the scientific literature, it was found that there are no clinical studies but only in vitro and in vivo studies, which show promising results in terms of bone formation and integration. However, it is necessary to evaluate how well the regenerated bone maintains its structural integrity over time, considering masticatory function and biomechanics in real-life scenarios. Factors such as mechanical load, remodeling dynamics, and interactions with surrounding tissues could influence the long-term stability of the regenerated bone. Additionally, another important aspect to study is the potential complications and adverse effects associated with the use of the flexible HAp-based composite.
Study Objectives The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy in terms of regenerated bone volume using the new flexible HAp-based composite in mixed bone defects of the jawbones.
Primary Outcome Measures The volume of regenerated bone will be measured using CBCT scans before device placement, immediately after the surgical procedure, and at 8 months post-procedure. The percentage of regenerated bone obtained compared to the initially planned augmentation, i.e., the mean volume difference, will be calculated before the surgical procedure, immediately after device placement, and at 8 months.
Secondary Objectives These include evaluating intraoperative and postoperative complications occurring at the time of placement or after device placement, assessing the conditions of peri-implant hard and soft tissues, measuring overall patient satisfaction with the treatment, analyzing the correlation between implant survival and various systemic and clinical patient factors, and conducting a histological evaluation of vascularization and new bone formation in samples of regenerated bone taken during implant site preparation.
Secondary Outcome Measures The condition of hard tissues will be assessed based on periapical intraoral radiographs. For soft tissue conditions, for each implant site, peri-implant probing depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), presence of peri-implant plaque (mPLI), and the amount of keratinized gingiva will be considered at m3, m6, m9, and m12 from implant placement. Any pathological events such as neurological lesions, exposures, infections, inflammation, fractures, or loosening of prosthetic screws, and prosthesis fractures reported in the clinical record during or after device placement and throughout the clinical follow-up will be evaluated as outcomes of intraoperative and postoperative complications at m3, m6, m9, and m12 from device placement. To evaluate overall patient satisfaction, two validated questionnaires will be analyzed: the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and a Patient Satisfaction questionnaire. To assess the correlation between implant survival and certain systemic and clinical patient factors, the following independent variables will be studied: age, gender, smoking status, jaw in which the implants were placed, type of implant, implant length, implant diameter, and compared with implant survival data. Histological and histomorphometric analysis will be conducted on samples of regenerated bone collected during implant site preparation at the passage of the first preparation drill.
Study Plan A total of 20 patients will be included in the study.
Study Design This is a spontaneous, prospective, interventional clinical investigation with post-marketing medical device analysis, enrolling patients with jaw bone atrophy at the Oral Surgery Unit of the Dental Clinic, University of Bologna. Collaboration with the laboratory at the University of Chieti-Pescara, Department of Medical, Oral, and Biotechnological Sciences, is planned. Insurance will be covered by university funds for Oral Surgery.
Study Start Date/Enrollment: After Ethics Committee approval and obtaining corporate clearance Prospective Period: 1 year Total Study Duration: 5 years (including individual follow-ups and data processing)
Study Population Inclusion Criteria Patients with partially edentulous and atrophic jaws, requiring implant-prosthetic rehabilitation (from 1 to 3 implants), classified as Seibert Class II or III, and needing a GBR bone regeneration intervention with defects not exceeding 7 mm in height. Patients must be 18 years or older and must provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria General contraindications to implant surgery. Patients who have received head and neck irradiation of more than 70 Gray. Immunocompromised and immunosuppressed patients. Patients treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates. Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation. Uncontrolled diabetes. Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Drug or alcohol dependency. Psychiatric conditions that contraindicate surgical treatment. Limited mouth opening (less than 3.5 cm between the two arches in the anterior region). Patients with acute or chronic inflammation/infection at the implant site. Patients referred solely for implant placement.
Medical Device Under Study The study focuses on a bio-composite bone substitute based on hydroxyapatite (Flexi-Oss, Medical Inventi S.A., Lublin, Poland). This is a biphasic material comprising hydroxyapatite and a polymer component.
Statistical Methods Sample Size The mean regenerated bone volume using a semi-occlusive CAD/CAM titanium device from a previous study was 1524 mm³. Considering an estimate of 1380 mm³ of regenerated bone using the hydroxyapatite-based bio-composite bone substitute, with a standard deviation of 200 mm³, a significance level (alpha) of 0.05, and a statistical power of 80%, using the two-sided Z test, it was determined that 16 patients need to be enrolled. Considering a potential dropout rate of 20%, the number of patients to be included in the study has been increased to 20.
- Conditions
- Bone Atrophy, Edentulism, Bone Regeneration
- Being tested
- Placement of resorbable HAp-based composite
- Keywords
- bone regeneration, dental implants, jaws atrophy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Placement of resorbable HAp-based compositeDevice
The resorbable HAp-based composite device will be immersed in a saline solution for 15 minutes, allowing it to transition from a rigid state to a flexible and deformable one (Fig. 1). Subsequently, the device will be shaped appropriately on the resin model, ensuring proper placement within the bone defect to be regenerated. Patients will receive antibiotic prophylaxis of 1 g amoxicillin, 1 hour before the procedure (or 300 mg clindamycin in case of penicillin allergy). Before the surgical procedure, patients will rinse with 2% chlorhexidine for one minute to reduce the bacterial load in the oral cavity. For the surgical procedure, under local anesthesia with Articaine and Adrenaline 1:100000, mucoperiosteal flaps will be raised. The pre-shaped resorbable device will then be adapted to the defect and fixed with osteosynthesis screws, used according to clinical practice for this type of intervention. Finally, the flaps will be sutured to ensure primary intention closure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment with hydroxyapatite-based composite | Experimental | Patients with partially edentulous and atrophic jaws, requiring implant-prosthetic rehabilitation (from 1 to 3 implants), classified as Seibert Class II or III, and needing a GBR bone regeneration intervention with defects not exceeding 7 mm in height. Patients must be 18 years or older and must provide informed consent. Receives: Device: Placement of resorbable HAp-based composite |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Regenerated Bone Volume
he volume of regenerated bone will be measured using CBCT scans before device placement, immediately after the surgical procedure, and at 8 months post-procedure. The percentage of regenerated bone obtained compared to the initially planned augmentation, i.e., the mean volume difference, will be calculated before the surgical procedure, immediately after device placement, and at 8 months. It is specified that CBCT scans and the procedure are performed as part of routine clinical practice.
Measured: From the treatment and after 8 months,
Secondary outcomes (8)
Complications
Any pathological events such as neurological lesions, exposures or infections of the placed medical device, inflammation, fractures or loosening of prosthetic screws, prosthesis fracture, etc., reported in the clinical record and occurring during or after implant placement and throughout the clinical follow-up (m1; m3; m6; m8; and m12 from the surgical placement of the device) will be evaluated as outcomes of intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Measured: Months 1, 3, 6, 8, and 12.
Patient Satisfaction
To evaluate the overall satisfaction of patients undergoing the treatment, a validated questionnaire, the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), is completed by patients during follow-up visits. The same questionnaire will be administered to patients one month after the surgical procedure and eight months after the procedure. OHIP is a 14-item questionnaire.
Measured: At 1 month and 9 months after treatment
Correlation between implant survival and certain systemic and clinical patient factors
The following independent variables will be studied: age, gender, smoking status, jaw in which the implants were placed, type of implant, implant length, implant diameter, and compared with implant survival data (m6, m12, and 3 years)
Measured: After Treatment for 3 years
Histological analysis
Histological analysis on samples of regenerated bone collected during the preparation of the implant site, specifically during the passage of the first preparation drill. Paraffin sections will be cut at 4 µm, fixed in formalin, and mounted on slides treated with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane. The sections will then undergo immunostaining for blood vessels using antibodies against CD31, VEGF, and KDR epitopes.The criteria established by Weidner and Folkman will be used to identify blood vessels in the immunostained sections. Specifically, positively stained endothelial cells or groups of endothelial cells, regardless of shape and size, that are clearly separated from adjacent blood vessels or other connective tissues, will be counted as blood vessels. Vascular nodules, although usually present, will not be considered a definition of a blood vessel, and red blood cells will not be used to calculate the vascular lumen.
Measured: 8 months after device placement.
Hard Tissues Conditions
The condition of hard tissues is assessed based on periapical intraoral radiographs, taken using the parallel technique before and after the preservation procedure, at the time of implant placement, at the initial loading, and at the final prosthetic loading and various follow-ups.
Measured: At months: 3, 6, 12 and 3 years after treatment
Peri-implant probing depth (PPD) in mm
The condition of soft tissues is evaluated using periodontal indices and recorded in the clinical record: using a periodontal probe, the peri-implant probing depth (PPD) will be evaluated in millimiters, and the are measured for each implant site (at m3, m6, m12, and 3 years post-implant placement).
Measured: At months: 3, 6, 12 and 3 years after treatment
bleeding on probing (BOP),
Using a periodontal probe, the presence of bleeding around the implants will be recorded in the clinical record.
Measured: At months: 3, 6, 12 and 3 years after treatment
Amount of keratinized gingiva
Using a periodontal probe, the amount of keratinized gingiva will be assessed in millimiters and recorded in clinical record.
Measured: At months: 3, 6, 12 and 3 years after treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Aug 2024
- Study startSep 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionApr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Bone AtrophyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Bologna
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Pietro Felice, University of Bologna
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06552715
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PG0091421_2024
- Acronym
- Flexi2024
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 7 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 14 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Original articles in international journals
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Clinical Study on the Efficacy of a Flexible Hydroxyapatite-Based Composite for the Regeneration of Jaw Bone Defects
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06552715
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Flexi2024 / PG0091421_2024
- Conditions
- Bone Atrophy, Edentulism, Bone Regeneration
- Keywords
- bone regeneration, dental implants, jaws atrophy
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of BolognaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Following a review of the scientific literature, it was found that there are no clinical studies but only in vitro and in vivo studies, which show promising results in terms of bone formation and integration. However, it is necessary to evaluate how well the regenerated bone maintains its structural integrity over time, considering masticatory function and real-life biomechanics. Factors such as mechanical load, remodeling dynamics, and interactions with surrounding tissues could influence the long-term stability of the regenerated bone. Additionally, another important aspect to study is the potential complications and adverse effects associated with the use of the flexible HAp-based composite.
Detailed description
Following a review of the scientific literature, it was found that there are no clinical studies but only in vitro and in vivo studies, which show promising results in terms of bone formation and integration. However, it is necessary to evaluate how well the regenerated bone maintains its structural integrity over time, considering masticatory function and biomechanics in real-life scenarios. Factors such as mechanical load, remodeling dynamics, and interactions with surrounding tissues could influence the long-term stability of the regenerated bone. Additionally, another important aspect to study is the potential complications and adverse effects associated with the use of the flexible HAp-based composite.
Study Objectives The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy in terms of regenerated bone volume using the new flexible HAp-based composite in mixed bone defects of the jawbones.
Primary Outcome Measures The volume of regenerated bone will be measured using CBCT scans before device placement, immediately after the surgical procedure, and at 8 months post-procedure. The percentage of regenerated bone obtained compared to the initially planned augmentation, i.e., the mean volume difference, will be calculated before the surgical procedure, immediately after device placement, and at 8 months.
Secondary Objectives These include evaluating intraoperative and postoperative complications occurring at the time of placement or after device placement, assessing the conditions of peri-implant hard and soft tissues, measuring overall patient satisfaction with the treatment, analyzing the correlation between implant survival and various systemic and clinical patient factors, and conducting a histological evaluation of vascularization and new bone formation in samples of regenerated bone taken during implant site preparation.
Secondary Outcome Measures The condition of hard tissues will be assessed based on periapical intraoral radiographs. For soft tissue conditions, for each implant site, peri-implant probing depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), presence of peri-implant plaque (mPLI), and the amount of keratinized gingiva will be considered at m3, m6, m9, and m12 from implant placement. Any pathological events such as neurological lesions, exposures, infections, inflammation, fractures, or loosening of prosthetic screws, and prosthesis fractures reported in the clinical record during or after device placement and throughout the clinical follow-up will be evaluated as outcomes of intraoperative and postoperative complications at m3, m6, m9, and m12 from device placement. To evaluate overall patient satisfaction, two validated questionnaires will be analyzed: the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and a Patient Satisfaction questionnaire. To assess the correlation between implant survival and certain systemic and clinical patient factors, the following independent variables will be studied: age, gender, smoking status, jaw in which the implants were placed, type of implant, implant length, implant diameter, and compared with implant survival data. Histological and histomorphometric analysis will be conducted on samples of regenerated bone collected during implant site preparation at the passage of the first preparation drill.
Study Plan A total of 20 patients will be included in the study.
Study Design This is a spontaneous, prospective, interventional clinical investigation with post-marketing medical device analysis, enrolling patients with jaw bone atrophy at the Oral Surgery Unit of the Dental Clinic, University of Bologna. Collaboration with the laboratory at the University of Chieti-Pescara, Department of Medical, Oral, and Biotechnological Sciences, is planned. Insurance will be covered by university funds for Oral Surgery.
Study Start Date/Enrollment: After Ethics Committee approval and obtaining corporate clearance Prospective Period: 1 year Total Study Duration: 5 years (including individual follow-ups and data processing)
Study Population Inclusion Criteria Patients with partially edentulous and atrophic jaws, requiring implant-prosthetic rehabilitation (from 1 to 3 implants), classified as Seibert Class II or III, and needing a GBR bone regeneration intervention with defects not exceeding 7 mm in height. Patients must be 18 years or older and must provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria General contraindications to implant surgery. Patients who have received head and neck irradiation of more than 70 Gray. Immunocompromised and immunosuppressed patients. Patients treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates. Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation. Uncontrolled diabetes. Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Drug or alcohol dependency. Psychiatric conditions that contraindicate surgical treatment. Limited mouth opening (less than 3.5 cm between the two arches in the anterior region). Patients with acute or chronic inflammation/infection at the implant site. Patients referred solely for implant placement.
Medical Device Under Study The study focuses on a bio-composite bone substitute based on hydroxyapatite (Flexi-Oss, Medical Inventi S.A., Lublin, Poland). This is a biphasic material comprising hydroxyapatite and a polymer component.
Statistical Methods Sample Size The mean regenerated bone volume using a semi-occlusive CAD/CAM titanium device from a previous study was 1524 mm³. Considering an estimate of 1380 mm³ of regenerated bone using the hydroxyapatite-based bio-composite bone substitute, with a standard deviation of 200 mm³, a significance level (alpha) of 0.05, and a statistical power of 80%, using the two-sided Z test, it was determined that 16 patients need to be enrolled. Considering a potential dropout rate of 20%, the number of patients to be included in the study has been increased to 20.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment with hydroxyapatite-based composite | Experimental | Device: Placement of resorbable HAp-based compositePatients with partially edentulous and atrophic jaws, requiring implant-prosthetic rehabilitation (from 1 to 3 implants), classified as Seibert Class II or III, and needing a GBR bone regeneration intervention with defects not exceeding 7 mm in height. Patients must be 18 years or older and must provide informed consent. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with partially edentulous and atrophic jaws, requiring implant-prosthetic rehabilitation (from 1 to 3 implants), classified as Seibert Class II or III, and needing a GBR bone regeneration intervention with defects not exceeding 7 mm in height
- Age 18 years or older
- Obtaining informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients who have received radiation therapy to the head and neck with more than 70 Gray.
- Immunocompromised and immunosuppressed patients.
- Patients treated with or currently receiving intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.
- Patients with poor oral hygiene and lack of motivation.
- Uncontrolled diabetes.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Placement of resorbable HAp-based compositeThe resorbable HAp-based composite device will be immersed in a saline solution for 15 minutes, allowing it to transition from a rigid state to a flexible and deformable one (Fig. 1). Subsequently, the device will be shaped appropriately on the resin model, ensuring proper placement within the bone defect to be regenerated. Patients will receive antibiotic prophylaxis of 1 g amoxicillin, 1 hour before the procedure (or 300 mg clindamycin in case of penicillin allergy). Before the surgical procedure, patients will rinse with 2% chlorhexidine for one minute to reduce the bacterial load in the oral cavity. For the surgical procedure, under local anesthesia with Articaine and Adrenaline 1:100000, mucoperiosteal flaps will be raised. The pre-shaped resorbable device will then be adapted to the defect and fixed with osteosynthesis screws, used according to clinical practice for this type of intervention. Finally, the flaps will be sutured to ensure primary intention closure. | Device | Treatment with hydroxyapatite-based composite |
Primary outcome
Regenerated Bone Volume
Time frame: From the treatment and after 8 months,
he volume of regenerated bone will be measured using CBCT scans before device placement, immediately after the surgical procedure, and at 8 months post-procedure. The percentage of regenerated bone obtained compared to the initially planned augmentation, i.e., the mean volume difference, will be calculated before the surgical procedure, immediately after device placement, and at 8 months. It is specified that CBCT scans and the procedure are performed as part of routine clinical practice.
8 secondary outcomes
Complications
Time frame: Months 1, 3, 6, 8, and 12.
Patient Satisfaction
Time frame: At 1 month and 9 months after treatment
Correlation between implant survival and certain systemic and clinical patient factors
Time frame: After Treatment for 3 years
Histological analysis
Time frame: 8 months after device placement.
Hard Tissues Conditions
Time frame: At months: 3, 6, 12 and 3 years after treatment
Peri-implant probing depth (PPD) in mm
Time frame: At months: 3, 6, 12 and 3 years after treatment
bleeding on probing (BOP),
Time frame: At months: 3, 6, 12 and 3 years after treatment
Amount of keratinized gingiva
Time frame: At months: 3, 6, 12 and 3 years after treatment
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Aug 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Original articles in international journals
Related trials for Bone Atrophy
Recruiting
The Application of a Biphasic Calcium Sulfate Graft Material in Sinus Floor Elevation
Alveolar Bone Loss, Edentulism Nos
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Enrolling by invitation
Investigation of the Effect of Horizontal Platelet Rich Fibrin Placed in Tooth Extraction Sockets on Bone Formation
Tooth Loss, Dental Implant Failed
RecruitingObservational study
Bone Health in Adults With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Survey on Osteoporosis, Fractures and Treatment.
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)
Recruiting
Effect of Collagen Membrane on Ridge Preservation
Dehiscence, Tooth Extraction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Placement of resorbable HAp-based composite in people with Bone Atrophy and Edentulism, run by University of Bologna at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Pietro Felice, MD, DDS, PhD (+39 0512088157, pietro.felice@unibo.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Regenerated Bone Volume (time frame: From the treatment and after 8 months,). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2024.