AzTrials
AzTrials

Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersNCT06568081

SloMo2: Implementation, Effectiveness, and Cost-effectiveness Study

A study testing SloMo in people with Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders and Affective Psychoses, run by King's College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Worries about harm from others (also known as paranoia) are common. Thinking fast or going on gut feelings is natural but can fuel these worries. For some, fast thinking and worries start to get in the way of life. Cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is the recommended talking therapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
SloMo
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
16 Oct 2024to 31 Dec 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Meet criteria for ICD-10 psychosis diagnoses (F20-29, F30-39)
  • Seeking therapy for paranoia
  • In contact with secondary care mental health services
  • Capacity to provide informed consent to engage in therapy

Who cannot join

  • Acute risk of harm to self or others
  • Unable to engage in therapy due to language barriers
  • Primary diagnosis of alcohol/substance dependence, learning disability, or organic brain injury or illness implicated in psychosis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Kathryn M Taylor contact

07876876164

kathryn.taylor@kcl.ac.uk

United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

    London

    Amy Hardy, amy.hardy@slam.nhs.uk

    Amy Hardy

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: SloMo2: A Process Evaluation, Effectiveness, and Cost-effectiveness Study of a Digitally Supported Therapy for Psychosis in Routine Care

Worries about harm from others (also known as paranoia) are common. Thinking fast or going on gut feelings is natural but can fuel these worries. For some, fast thinking and worries start to get in the way of life. Cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is the recommended talking therapy. However, only a minority of people can access CBTp due to limited resources, and even when available, therapy can be difficult to do and use in daily life.

SloMo is a digitally supported therapy that aims to overcome these barriers, and was developed by people with psychosis, designers, and psychologists. It supports people to notice worries and fast thinking habits. During therapy sessions, people learn to slow down and feel safer. Personalised spinning thought bubbles are slowed down using SloMo tips. An app provides access to helpful messages.

Read more

SloMo was previously tested in a randomised trial of 361 people attending mental health services. SloMo was found to be safe to use, with no adverse events linked to the software. People in the SloMo group had lower paranoia, and better confidence and wellbeing, over 6 months compared to people who just received their usual care. People found SloMo enjoyable and easy to use.

The next step is to evaluate if SloMo can be safely and effectively delivered by therapists working in NHS services. If SloMo works in routine care, the therapy will be made more widely available in the NHS.

An improved version of SloMo has been co-produced based on feedback. At least sixty therapists will be trained and supervised in 3 trusts to deliver SloMo to at least 150 people who fear harm from others. Safety, technical performance, uptake, engagement and acceptability data, alongside interviews with patients, therapists, and managers, will investigate how SloMo is used. Paranoia severity and wellbeing will be measured pre, post therapy, and at 12 months follow up, to find out if SloMo helps. Service use data will evaluate costs and savings.

Read the detailed description

DESIGN AND AIMS The study is a repeated measures design, with clinical outcome assessments pre-, post-delivery of SloMoR2, and a 12-month follow-up. The aim is to evaluate if SloMo is implementable and effective when delivered in routine care by therapists working in NHS routine services. Delivery with high and low intensity therapists will be evaluated, with the former holding doctorate or diploma therapy qualifications, and the latter representing graduate psychologists or the NHS's expanding workforce of psychological practitioners. Outcomes will be evaluated using questionnaires, software analytics, and medical record data (for adverse events, service use, and demographics when not self-reported). Interviews will be conducted with a subgroup of relevant stakeholders to understand their experiences of SloMo.

The project will be conducted in 3 NHS trusts. Each trust will have a local study team, funded by the research grant and directly employed by local services, to support training, supervision, and implementation. Design research has already been conducted in preparation for the study to support the co-production of an improved version of SloMo tailored for implementation (SloMoR2). The study will run for 42 months and consists of four stages:

  1. Site set-up (month 1-3) Site set-up will be conducted to pilot the training, supervision, and technical support procedures that will ensure SloMoR2's performance, data protection and clinical safety.

2a. Process evaluation: Implementation (month 4 - 39) A mixed-method process evaluation will be co-produced to understand how SloMoR2 is experienced, including safety, engagement, adherence, acceptability, fidelity \& usability, and to identify barriers and enablers to implementation.

2ba. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness (month 4 - 39) An evaluation will be conducted to establish the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of SloMoR2 when delivered in routine care, including 12 month follow-up.

  1. Analysis, resource development and dissemination (month 40 - 42) Findings will be summarised in consultation with our LEAP group. They will be written up in a plain English summary and as articles for submission to peer-review publications. Experiences of therapy delivery will inform any further refinements to the SloMoR2 software. Findings will also be used to support the co-design of an automated e-learning programme for therapists and develop a commercialisation strategy to assist being scaled up in the NHS.

SAMPLE AND RECRUITMENT Service user recruitment: The recruitment target for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis is to deliver SloMo to 150 service user participants (across Stage 1 and 2) who are: Aged ≥18 years, meet criteria for ICD-10 psychosis diagnoses (F20-29, F30-39), seeking therapy for paranoia, in contact with secondary care mental health services, and capable of providing informed consent to engage in therapy. People will be excluded if they: are at acute risk of harm to self or others, are unable to engage in therapy due to language barriers, and have a primary diagnosis of alcohol/substance dependence, learning disability, or organic brain injury or illness implicated in psychosis. After 150 participants are recruited for the effectiveness/cost-effectiveness analysis, recruitment will continue until March 2027 for the implementation analysis.

Therapist recruitment, training, and supervision: In Stage 1, an initial cohort of therapists ('high intensity'; n = 5 per trust) will be selected from senior clinicians experienced in delivery and supervision of CBT for psychosis. Therapists will be required to complete training either through a 1-day workshop or using a self-guided online programme. They will subsequently be able to access on-demand clinical and technical supervision from their local study team as required to support SloMoR2 delivery. In Stage 2, at least 45 further 'high' and 'low' intensity therapists will be trained across the 3 sites. Training will be extended to 3 days for low intensity therapists. The local study team will liaise with local services to promote SloMo2 and support trainers to roll out training to other high and low intensity therapists.

Stakeholder recruitment: The experience of SloMo's delivery will be evaluated using subgroups of the therapist and participant samples recruited in Stages 1 and 2 (N = 60, and N = 150, respectively). This will involve interviewing subgroups of service users (n = 20) and therapists (n = 6) involved in SloMo's delivery, as well as senior managers (n = 5) and payers (stakeholders involved in the commissioning of mental health services; n = 5), about their experience of SloMo. The service users will be recruited by the local study team, and will be invited to interview post-therapy and at 12-month follow-up. The team will approach participants who consented to be contacted about further SloMo studies, once the participant has disengaged (therapist defined) or completed therapy. The four samples will be recruited to ensure a diverse range with respect to age, ethnicity, gender, site, and professional background (for staff interviews). All potential participants will be provided with a participant information sheet and given the opportunity to ask questions before signing the consent form.

PROCEDURE The local study team will initially conduct PPI consultation with their trust therapy workforce to scope readiness for adoption of SloMoR2. This work will identify implementation barriers and facilitators, to enable tailoring of implementation resources and strategies to site needs.

Trained therapists will identify potential participants and offer them SloMo, based on their clinical judgement. Following an initial introduction, participants will provide informed consent to receive SloMo and for their data to be collected for research purposes, with an optional opt-in for contact about further SloMo research. The burden of the informed consent process will be minimised where possible. This has been done by embedding the participant information sheet and consent form at the beginning of the SloMo webapp ('therapy platform'). Therapists will review this with potential participants and address any questions they have. Data storage and strategies for data protection will be emphasised, based on PPI feedback that this is a key area of concern. It will also be emphasised that service users will be free to withdraw their consent to engage in therapy at any time or to request that their data be deleted from the SloMo software or omitted from the research analysis.

If willing to proceed, participants' consent will be provided by indicating consent on the form. Participants will not sign the consent form with their name, to minimise the personally identifiable information stored in the software. Therapists will countersign and date the consent form. A copy of the countersigned consent form will be posted or sent electronically to the participant by the local SloMo team.

For the effectiveness analysis, pre and post therapy measures will be collected through the SloMo therapy platform at the first (R-GPTS (part B), short WEMWBS), second (GBO) and last therapy session (all), and will be repeated at 12-months post-consent. Sessional measures will be taken at each session and at 12-months follow-up. The local study team will collect demographic information from participants directly, and will extract adverse event and service use data from participants' medical record.

INTERVENTION SloMoR2 consists of up to 11 digitally supported therapy platform modules targeting paranoia and a mobile app for use outside of sessions. Therapy will be delivered according to the SloMo manual instructions for use. The therapy helps people learn to slow down for a moment to find ways of feeling safer and living well. Animated stories and interactive tasks support participants to learn how to apply SloMo tips to manage their worries, with in-session content synchronised to the mobile app which provides out of session support.

OUTCOMES

1a) Implementation To address the primary research question, is SloMoR2 implementable in routine care post-therapy, quantitative data will be gathered for the following primary outcomes: i) safety, measured by frequency of any unanticipated serious therapy and/or device-related adverse events, and ii) service user engagement, measured by the proportion of participants who are delivered 5 or more SloMo sessions ('minimum therapeutic dose'). In addition, data will be gathered for the following secondary outcomes: i) service user engagement, measured by the number of individuals who begin (1 or more sessions) and complete therapy (8 or more sessions, 'full course' as three modules are optional), ii) therapist uptake, measured by the percentage of therapists that receive SloMo R2 training who commence therapy with at least one participant, iii) adherence, measured by percentage completion of sessions started, iv) usage, service user usage of mobile app, v) acceptability, measured by the percentage of positive responses on the NHS Family and Friends Test, vi) fidelity, competence of therapy delivery (with a random selection of 10 sessions per site assessed by the local study lead), vii) stakeholder experience of implementation, based on qualitative interviews with service users, therapists, senior managers, and payers, and viii) usability, measured by the User Experience Survey (UES; Service user and therapist).

To address the secondary research question, is SloMoR2 implementable in routine care at 12-month, quantitative safety data and qualitative data regarding stakeholder experiences will also be gathered to 12-month follow up.

The qualitative interviews exploring user experience in participants who have been offered SloMo will be lived experience researcher-led. The qualitative interviews with therapists will explore experiences of training and delivery of SloMoR2 in more detail. Finally, senior managers and payers, who have and have not been involved in implementing SloMo, will be interviewed to understand their perspective on SloMo and its scale-up. All interviews will be audio recorded and transcribed for analysis. Participants will be reimbursed for their time according to INVOLVE guidelines.

1b) Effectiveness To address the primary research question, is SloMoR2 effective for paranoia and wellbeing when delivered in routine care post-therapy, participants will complete (via the SloMo therapy platform) three brief questionnaires at the beginning and end of therapy. The primary effectiveness outcome measure is the persecution subscale (part B) of the Revised Green Paranoid Thoughts Scale (RGPTS-B). Secondary effectiveness outcome measures are the short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS) and the Goal Based Outcome Scale. Sessional measures will be collected during therapy sessions to monitor progress, using four scales (rated from 0 - 100) of paranoia distress, fast and slow thinking, safety beliefs and confidence. To address the secondary research question, is SloMoR2 effective for paranoia and wellbeing when delivered in routine care at 12-months follow-up, participants will re-complete the RGPTS-B, SWEMWBS, GBOS and sessional measures.

1b) Cost-effectiveness To address the primary research question, is SloMoR2 cost-effective when delivered in routine care, costs and savings will be evaluated by the local study team extracting mental health service use data from participant medical records using the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI), and QALYs derived from an algorithm applied to the Revised Green Paranoid Thoughts Scale, persecution subscale (part B) (RGPTS-B). Mental health service use data will cover the 6-month period prior to the intervention, and a 12-month period following consent (including both the intervention period and follow-up). This analysis will also incorporate the service use data collected for the SlowMoR1 trial as this will provide additional data to enhance the health economic modelling.

Being tested
SloMo
Keywords
Digital health, User-centred design
Medical subject headings
Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders, Affective Disorders, Psychotic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SloMoOther

    SloMo, is a blended digital therapeutic for people who fear harm from others. It is based on cognitive-behavioural therapy for psychosis. An online therapy platform supports the delivery of 11 face-to-face modules, which are synchronised to a native mobile app for use in daily life. SloMo works by helping people to notice their worries and fast thinking habits, and encourages them to slow down for a moment to find ways of feeling safer.

Study groups in NCT06568081
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SloMoExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: SloMo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Implementation: Safety (adverse event incidence)

    Frequency of any unanticipated serious therapy and/or device-related adverse events

    Measured: Pre-therapy to post-therapy.

  2. Implementation: Service user engagement

    Proportion of participants who are delivered 5 or more SloMo sessions ('minimum therapeutic dose')

    Measured: Duration of therapy (typically up to 6 months)

  3. Effectiveness: Paranoid thoughts

    Revised Green Paranoid Thoughts Scale, persecution subscale (part B) (RGPTS-B, Freeman et al, 2021). Range 0-40, higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Measured: Pre- to post-therapy.

  4. Cost-effectiveness: Service use

    Unit costs calculated from the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI, Beecham and Knapp, 2001)

    Measured: Pre-therapy to post-therapy.

  5. Cost-effectiveness: Paranoid thoughts

    QALYs derived from an algorithm applied to the Revised Green Paranoid Thoughts Scale, persecution subscale (part B) (RGPTS-B, Freeman et al, 2021)

    Measured: Pre-therapy to post-therapy.

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Implementation: Service user engagement

    Number of individuals who begin (1 or more sessions) and complete therapy (8 or more sessions, 'full course' as three modules are optional)

    Measured: Duration of therapy (typically up to 6 months)

  2. Implementation: Therapist uptake

    Percentage of therapists that receive SloMo R2 training who commence therapy with at least one participant

    Measured: Duration of study (42 months)

  3. Implementation: Adherence

    Percentage completion of sessions started.

    Measured: Duration of therapy (typically up to 6 months)

  4. Implementation: Usage

    Percentage of service users meeting mobile app adherence criteria (at least 1 home screen interaction after a minimum of 3 therapy sessions).

    Measured: Pre- to post-therapy (typically up to 6 months)

  5. Implementation: Acceptability

    Percentage of positive responses on the NHS Family and Friends Test

    Measured: Post-therapy (typically up to 6 months)

  6. Implementation: Fidelity

    Proportion of therapists meeting competence on the Revised Cognitive Therapy Scale (CTS-R) (of a random selection of 10 sessions scored per site, assessed by the local study lead).

    Measured: Duration of study (42 months)

  7. Effectiveness: Paranoid thoughts - follow-up

    Revised Green Paranoid Thoughts Scale, persecution subscale (part B) (RGPTS-B, Freeman et al, 2021). Range 0-40, higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Measured: Pre-therapy to 12 months follow-up

  8. Cost-effectiveness: Paranoid thoughts - follow-up

    QALYs derived from an algorithm applied to the Revised Green Paranoid Thoughts Scale, persecution subscale (part B) (RGPTS-B, Freeman et al, 2021)

    Measured: Pre-therapy to 12 months follow-up.

  9. Cost-effectiveness: Service use - follow-up

    Unit costs calculated from the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI, Beecham and Knapp, 2001)

    Measured: Pre-therapy to 12 months follow-up.

  10. Implementation: Safety (adverse event incidence) - follow-up

    Frequency of any unanticipated serious therapy and/or device-related adverse events

    Measured: Pre-therapy to 12 months follow-up

  11. Implementation: Stakeholder experience of implementation

    Qualitative interviews with i) service users, ii) therapists, iii) senior managers, iv) payers

    Measured: Duration of study (42 months)

  12. Implementation: Usability

    User Experience Survey (UES, Hardy et al, 2022; Service user and therapist)

    Measured: Post-therapy (typically up to 6 months)

  13. Effectiveness: Wellbeing

    Short-Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS, Stewart-Brown et al, 2009). Range 7-35, higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: Pre- to post-therapy (typically up to 6 months)

  14. Effectiveness: Sessional measures

    Collected using visual analogue scales (rated from 0 - 100) of paranoia distress, fast and slow thinking, safety beliefs and confidence

    Measured: Duration of therapy (typically up to 6 months)

  15. Effectiveness: Goal attainment

    Goal Based Outcome (GBO, Law et al, 2015). Range 0 (no progress) to 10 (goal has been reached), higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: Pre- to post-therapy (typically up to 6 months)

  16. Effectiveness: Wellbeing - follow-up

    Short-Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS, Stewart-Brown et al, 2009). Range 7-35, higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: Pre-therapy to 12 months follow-up

  17. Effectiveness: Sessional measures - follow-up

    Collected using visual analogue scales (rated from 0 - 100) of paranoia distress, fast and slow thinking, safety beliefs and confidence

    Measured: Pre-therapy to 12 month follow-up

  18. Effectiveness: Goal attainment - follow-up

    Goal Based Outcome (GBO, Law et al, 2015). Range 0 (no progress) to 10 (goal has been reached), higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: Pre-therapy to 12 months follow-up

  19. Cost-effectiveness: Wellbeing

    QALYs derived from an algorithm applied to the Short-Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS, Stewart-Brown et al, 2009)

    Measured: Pre- to 6 months post-therapy.

  20. Cost-effectiveness: Wellbeing - follow-up

    QALYs derived from an algorithm applied to the Short-Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS, Stewart-Brown et al, 2009)

    Measured: Pre-therapy to 12 months follow-up.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2024
  2. Study start16 Oct 2024
  3. Primary completionSep 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06568081
Sponsor's protocol ID
338439
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
13 Aug 2024
Last updated
11 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: A fully anonymised, aggregate dataset will be shared with the wider research community. We will upload the data resulting from the study to ClinicalStudyDataRequest.com (CSDR), a consortium of clinical study sponsors/funders which is endorsed by Wellcome. In addition, other researchers may request access to IPD by contacting the study team, and will be shared in line with access criteria below.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing SloMo in people with Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders and Affective Psychoses, run by King's College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Kathryn M Taylor (07876876164, kathryn.taylor@kcl.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Implementation: Safety (adverse event incidence) (time frame: Pre-therapy to post-therapy.). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in