Calcific Coronary ArteriosclerosisBENELUX-IVLNCT06577038
Prospective Registry on Intravascular Lithotripsy
An observational study of Calcific Coronary Arteriosclerosis, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 8 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
multicenter, international, all-comers registry aims to provide insights in the current application of IVL technology in patients with calcified coronary lesions undergoing PCI using IVL technology. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Calcific Coronary Arteriosclerosis
- What is being tested?
- PCI with use of IVL
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 1,000 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 1 May 2019to 1 May 2029
- How long will I take part?
- 5 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population will consist of patients with calcific CAD undergoing PCI and treated with IVL, irrespectively of the clinical indication (stable angina, acute coronary syndrome), anatomical scenario (de novo coronary stenosis, in-stent restenosis due to poorly stent expansion) and/or concomitant use of other debulking techniques (e.g. RA).
Who may be able to join
- Age >18 years-old
- Ability to provide written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patient has any comorbidity or condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, compromises the subject's ability to give written informed consent
- Patient belongs to a vulnerable population Subject is a member of a vulnerable population , including individuals with mental disability, persons in nursing homes, children, impoverished persons, persons in emergency situations, homeless persons, nomads, refugees, and those incapable of giving informed consent. Vulnerable populations also may include members of a group with a hierarchical structure such as university students, subordinate hospital and laboratory personnel, employees of the Sponsor, members of the armed forces, and persons kept in detention.
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 3 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
8 sites in 3 countries
Netherlands6 sites
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch
Amsterdam University Medical Center
Amsterdam, North Holland
Rijnstate Ziekenhuis
Arnhem
Medisch Centrum Leeuwaarden
Leeuwarden
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, South Holland, 2333ZA
Radboud University Medical Center
Nijmegen
About this study
Official title: Prospective, International, Multicenter, All-comers Registry for the Study of Intravascular Lithotripsy in Coronary Interventions
multicenter, international, all-comers registry aims to provide insights in the current application of IVL technology in patients with calcified coronary lesions undergoing PCI using IVL technology.
Read the detailed description
The primary objectives are:
- To analyze the trends of IVL use overall and according to clinical/anatomical indications
- To evaluate the rates of procedural success, defined as success in facilitating stent delivery with <30% residual stenosis and without in-hospital
- To describe the cumulative hierarchical incidence of MACE defined as: cardiac death, non-fatal target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 30-days following the index procedure
The secondary objectives are:
- To describe the rate of MACE at 3-, 6- and 12-months following the index procedure
- To assess the rates of all causes mortality, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or target vessel revascularization (TVR), any revascularization (non TLR, non TVR) and ARC-defined stent thrombosis at any time point, any type of angina at 30-days, 3-, 6- and 12-months following the index procedure
- To describe the rates of target lesion failure (TLF) (see end-points definitions section)
- To describe the rates of device crossing success (see end-points definitions section)
- To describe the rates of serious angiographic complications (see end-points definitions section)
- To assess predictors of clinical outcomes based on patient and procedural characteristics
- To analyze current standards of practice regarding IVL technology in a real-world multinational cohort (technique, training, local protocols).
- Conditions
- Calcific Coronary Arteriosclerosis
- Being tested
- PCI with use of IVL
- Keywords
- calcific coronary lesions, intravascular lithotripsy, debulking, Complex percutaneous coronary interventions
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PCI with use of IVLDevice
Also called Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy system
Use of IVL for the treatment of calcific coronary artery lesions at operator's discretion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IVL cohort | Patients with calcific CAD undergoing PCI and treated with IVL, irrespectively of the clinical indication (stable angina, acute coronary syndrome), anatomical scenario (de novo coronary stenosis, in-stent restenosis, etc) and/or concomitant use of other debulking techniques Receives: Device: PCI with use of IVL |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
procedural success
success in facilitating stent delivery with <30% residual stenosis and without in-hospital MACE
Measured: Periprocedurally and from hospital admission to discharge (an average of 2 days)
cumulative hierarchical incidence of MACE
cardiac death, non-fatal target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 30-days following the index procedure
Measured: At 30 days follow-up
Secondary outcomes (8)
rate of MACE at 3 months
rate of MACE at 3-months following the index procedure
Measured: At 3 months follow-up
rate of MACE at 6 months
rate of MACE at 6-months following the index procedure
Measured: At 6 months follow-up
rate of MACE at 12 months
rate of MACE at 12-months following the index procedure
Measured: At 12 months follow-up
the rates of all causes mortality, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or target vessel revascularization (TVR), any revascularization (non TLR, non TVR) and ARC-defined stent thrombosis
at any time point, any type of angina at 30-days, 3-, 6- and 12-months following the index procedure
Measured: 30-days, 3-, 6- and 12-months
the rates of all causes mortality, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or target vessel revascularization (TVR), any revascularization (non TLR, non TVR) and ARC-defined stent thrombosis
at any time point, any type of angina at 30-days follow-up
Measured: at 30-days follow-up
the rates of all causes mortality, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or target vessel revascularization (TVR), any revascularization (non TLR, non TVR) and ARC-defined stent thrombosis
at any time point, any type of angina at 3 months follow-up
Measured: at 3 months follow-up
the rates of all causes mortality, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or target vessel revascularization (TVR), any revascularization (non TLR, non TVR) and ARC-defined stent thrombosis
at any time point, any type of angina at 6 months follow-up
Measured: at 6 months follow-up
the rates of all causes mortality, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or target vessel revascularization (TVR), any revascularization (non TLR, non TVR) and ARC-defined stent thrombosis
at any time point, any type of angina at 12-months follow-up
Measured: at 12-months follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Aug 2024
- Study start1 May 2019
- Primary completion1 Feb 2024
- Study completion1 May 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (24)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Calcific Coronary ArteriosclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 5 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Leiden University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Shockwave Medical, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, José M Montero Cabezas, Leiden University Medical Center
- Investigators
- José M Montero Cabezas, MD PhD, Study chair, Leiden University Medical CenterIbtihal Al Amri, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Leiden University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06577038
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CardioLUMC
- Acronym
- BENELUX-IVL
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 29 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
Kawashima H, Serruys PW, Hara H, Ono M, Gao C, Wang R, Garg S, Sharif F, de Winter RJ, Mack MJ, Holmes DR, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Thuijs DJFM, Milojevic M, Noack T, Mohr FW, Davierwala PM, Onuma Y; SYNTAX Extended Survival Investigators. 10-Year All-Cause Mortality Following Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Heavy Calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 24;15(2):193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.10.026. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
PubMed 34973904Rheude T, Koch T, Joner M, Lenz T, Xhepa E, Wiebe J, Coughlan JJ, Aytekin A, Cassese S, Laugwitz KL, Schunkert H, Kastrati A, Kufner S. Ten-year clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stents with different polymer coating strategies by degree of coronary calcification: a pooled analysis of the ISAR-TEST 4 and 5 randomised trials. EuroIntervention. 2023 Feb 20;18(14):1188-1196. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00781.
PubMed 36453826Lee MS, Shah N. The Impact and Pathophysiologic Consequences of Coronary Artery Calcium Deposition in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Apr;28(4):160-7. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
PubMed 26301561Madhavan MV, Tarigopula M, Mintz GS, Maehara A, Stone GW, Genereux P. Coronary artery calcification: pathogenesis and prognostic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 6;63(17):1703-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.017. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
PubMed 24530667Mintz GS. Intravascular imaging of coronary calcification and its clinical implications. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Apr;8(4):461-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.02.003.
PubMed 25882575Kassimis G, Raina T, Kontogiannis N, Patri G, Abramik J, Zaphiriou A, Banning AP. How Should We Treat Heavily Calcified Coronary Artery Disease in Contemporary Practice? From Atherectomy to Intravascular Lithotripsy. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Dec;20(12):1172-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
PubMed 30711477Barbato E, Gallinoro E, Abdel-Wahab M, Andreini D, Carrie D, Di Mario C, Dudek D, Escaned J, Fajadet J, Guagliumi G, Hill J, McEntegart M, Mashayekhi K, Mezilis N, Onuma Y, Reczuch K, Shlofmitz R, Stefanini G, Tarantini G, Toth GG, Vaquerizo B, Wijns W, Ribichini FL. Management strategies for heavily calcified coronary stenoses: an EAPCI clinical consensus statement in collaboration with the EURO4C-PCR group. Eur Heart J. 2023 Nov 1;44(41):4340-4356. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad342.
PubMed 37208199Hill JM, Kereiakes DJ, Shlofmitz RA, Klein AJ, Riley RF, Price MJ, Herrmann HC, Bachinsky W, Waksman R, Stone GW; Disrupt CAD III Investigators. Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 1;76(22):2635-2646. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.603. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
PubMed 33069849Forero MNT, Daemen J. The Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy System. Interv Cardiol. 2019 Nov 18;14(3):174-181. doi: 10.15420/icr.2019.18.R1. eCollection 2019 Nov.
PubMed 31867065Kereiakes DJ, Di Mario C, Riley RF, Fajadet J, Shlofmitz RA, Saito S, Ali ZA, Klein AJ, Price MJ, Hill JM, Stone GW. Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Calcified Coronary Lesions: Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the Disrupt CAD Studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 28;14(12):1337-1348. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 May 3.
PubMed 33939604Ali ZA, Brinton TJ, Hill JM, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Karimi Galougahi K, Illindala U, Gotberg M, Whitbourn R, Van Mieghem N, Meredith IT, Di Mario C, Fajadet J. Optical Coherence Tomography Characterization of Coronary Lithoplasty for Treatment of Calcified Lesions: First Description. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Aug;10(8):897-906. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.05.012.
PubMed 28797412Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, Morice MC, Colombo A, Dawkins K, van den Brand M, Van Dyck N, Russell ME, Mohr FW, Serruys PW. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention. 2005 Aug;1(2):219-27. No abstract available.
PubMed 19758907Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Satler LF, Chuang YC, Ditrano CJ, Leon MB. Patterns of calcification in coronary artery disease. A statistical analysis of intravascular ultrasound and coronary angiography in 1155 lesions. Circulation. 1995 Apr 1;91(7):1959-65. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1959.
PubMed 7895353Tearney GJ, Regar E, Akasaka T, Adriaenssens T, Barlis P, Bezerra HG, Bouma B, Bruining N, Cho JM, Chowdhary S, Costa MA, de Silva R, Dijkstra J, Di Mario C, Dudek D, Falk E, Feldman MD, Fitzgerald P, Garcia-Garcia HM, Gonzalo N, Granada JF, Guagliumi G, Holm NR, Honda Y, Ikeno F, Kawasaki M, Kochman J, Koltowski L, Kubo T, Kume T, Kyono H, Lam CC, Lamouche G, Lee DP, Leon MB, Maehara A, Manfrini O, Mintz GS, Mizuno K, Morel MA, Nadkarni S, Okura H, Otake H, Pietrasik A, Prati F, Raber L, Radu MD, Rieber J, Riga M, Rollins A, Rosenberg M, Sirbu V, Serruys PW, Shimada K, Shinke T, Shite J, Siegel E, Sonoda S, Suter M, Takarada S, Tanaka A, Terashima M, Thim T, Uemura S, Ughi GJ, van Beusekom HM, van der Steen AF, van Es GA, van Soest G, Virmani R, Waxman S, Weissman NJ, Weisz G; International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography (IWG-IVOCT). Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Mar 20;59(12):1058-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.079.
PubMed 22421299Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, Prescott E, Storey RF, Deaton C, Cuisset T, Agewall S, Dickstein K, Edvardsen T, Escaned J, Gersh BJ, Svitil P, Gilard M, Hasdai D, Hatala R, Mahfoud F, Masip J, Muneretto C, Valgimigli M, Achenbach S, Bax JJ; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425. No abstract available.
PubMed 31504439
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, International, Multicenter, All-comers Registry for the Study of Intravascular Lithotripsy in Coronary Interventions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06577038
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BENELUX-IVL / CardioLUMC
- Conditions
- Calcific Coronary Arteriosclerosis
- Keywords
- calcific coronary lesions, intravascular lithotripsy, debulking, Complex percutaneous coronary interventions
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Leiden University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Shockwave Medical, Inc.
- Study start
- 1 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
multicenter, international, all-comers registry aims to provide insights in the current application of IVL technology in patients with calcified coronary lesions undergoing PCI using IVL technology.
Detailed description
The primary objectives are:
- To analyze the trends of IVL use overall and according to clinical/anatomical indications
- To evaluate the rates of procedural success, defined as success in facilitating stent delivery with <30% residual stenosis and without in-hospital
- To describe the cumulative hierarchical incidence of MACE defined as: cardiac death, non-fatal target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 30-days following the index procedure
The secondary objectives are:
- To describe the rate of MACE at 3-, 6- and 12-months following the index procedure
- To assess the rates of all causes mortality, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or target vessel revascularization (TVR), any revascularization (non TLR, non TVR) and ARC-defined stent thrombosis at any time point, any type of angina at 30-days, 3-, 6- and 12-months following the index procedure
- To describe the rates of target lesion failure (TLF) (see end-points definitions section)
- To describe the rates of device crossing success (see end-points definitions section)
- To describe the rates of serious angiographic complications (see end-points definitions section)
- To assess predictors of clinical outcomes based on patient and procedural characteristics
- To analyze current standards of practice regarding IVL technology in a real-world multinational cohort (technique, training, local protocols).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 5 Years
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IVL cohort | – | Device: PCI with use of IVLPatients with calcific CAD undergoing PCI and treated with IVL, irrespectively of the clinical indication (stable angina, acute coronary syndrome), anatomical scenario (de novo coronary stenosis, in-stent restenosis, etc) and/or concomitant use of other debulking techniques |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population will consist of patients with calcific CAD undergoing PCI and treated with IVL, irrespectively of the clinical indication (stable angina, acute coronary syndrome), anatomical scenario (de novo coronary stenosis, in-stent restenosis due to poorly stent expansion) and/or concomitant use of other debulking techniques (e.g. RA).
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age >18 years-old
- Ability to provide written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient has any comorbidity or condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, compromises the subject's ability to give written informed consent
- Patient belongs to a vulnerable population Subject is a member of a vulnerable population , including individuals with mental disability, persons in nursing homes, children, impoverished persons, persons in emergency situations, homeless persons, nomads, refugees, and those incapable of giving informed consent. Vulnerable populations also may include members of a group with a hierarchical structure such as university students, subordinate hospital and laboratory personnel, employees of the Sponsor, members of the armed forces, and persons kept in detention.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PCI with use of IVLAlso: Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy systemUse of IVL for the treatment of calcific coronary artery lesions at operator's discretion | Device | IVL cohort |
Primary outcome
procedural success
Time frame: Periprocedurally and from hospital admission to discharge (an average of 2 days)
success in facilitating stent delivery with <30% residual stenosis and without in-hospital MACE
cumulative hierarchical incidence of MACE
Time frame: At 30 days follow-up
cardiac death, non-fatal target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 30-days following the index procedure
8 secondary outcomes
rate of MACE at 3 months
Time frame: At 3 months follow-up
rate of MACE at 6 months
Time frame: At 6 months follow-up
rate of MACE at 12 months
Time frame: At 12 months follow-up
the rates of all causes mortality, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or target vessel revascularization (TVR), any revascularization (non TLR, non TVR) and ARC-defined stent thrombosis
Time frame: 30-days, 3-, 6- and 12-months
the rates of all causes mortality, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or target vessel revascularization (TVR), any revascularization (non TLR, non TVR) and ARC-defined stent thrombosis
Time frame: at 30-days follow-up
the rates of all causes mortality, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or target vessel revascularization (TVR), any revascularization (non TLR, non TVR) and ARC-defined stent thrombosis
Time frame: at 3 months follow-up
the rates of all causes mortality, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or target vessel revascularization (TVR), any revascularization (non TLR, non TVR) and ARC-defined stent thrombosis
Time frame: at 6 months follow-up
the rates of all causes mortality, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or target vessel revascularization (TVR), any revascularization (non TLR, non TVR) and ARC-defined stent thrombosis
Time frame: at 12-months follow-up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Aug 2024.
- Background: PubMed 34973904Kawashima H, Serruys PW, Hara H, Ono M, Gao C, Wang R, Garg S, Sharif F, de Winter RJ, Mack MJ, Holmes DR, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Thuijs DJFM, Milojevic M, Noack T, Mohr FW, Davierwala PM, Onuma Y; SYNTAX Extended Survival Investigators. 10-Year All-Cause Mortality Following Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Heavy Calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 24;15(2):193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.10.026. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
- Background: PubMed 36453826Rheude T, Koch T, Joner M, Lenz T, Xhepa E, Wiebe J, Coughlan JJ, Aytekin A, Cassese S, Laugwitz KL, Schunkert H, Kastrati A, Kufner S. Ten-year clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stents with different polymer coating strategies by degree of coronary calcification: a pooled analysis of the ISAR-TEST 4 and 5 randomised trials. EuroIntervention. 2023 Feb 20;18(14):1188-1196. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00781.
- Background: PubMed 26301561Lee MS, Shah N. The Impact and Pathophysiologic Consequences of Coronary Artery Calcium Deposition in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016 Apr;28(4):160-7. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
- Background: PubMed 24530667Madhavan MV, Tarigopula M, Mintz GS, Maehara A, Stone GW, Genereux P. Coronary artery calcification: pathogenesis and prognostic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 6;63(17):1703-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.017. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
- Background: PubMed 25882575Mintz GS. Intravascular imaging of coronary calcification and its clinical implications. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Apr;8(4):461-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.02.003.
- Background: PubMed 30711477Kassimis G, Raina T, Kontogiannis N, Patri G, Abramik J, Zaphiriou A, Banning AP. How Should We Treat Heavily Calcified Coronary Artery Disease in Contemporary Practice? From Atherectomy to Intravascular Lithotripsy. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Dec;20(12):1172-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
- Background: PubMed 37208199Barbato E, Gallinoro E, Abdel-Wahab M, Andreini D, Carrie D, Di Mario C, Dudek D, Escaned J, Fajadet J, Guagliumi G, Hill J, McEntegart M, Mashayekhi K, Mezilis N, Onuma Y, Reczuch K, Shlofmitz R, Stefanini G, Tarantini G, Toth GG, Vaquerizo B, Wijns W, Ribichini FL. Management strategies for heavily calcified coronary stenoses: an EAPCI clinical consensus statement in collaboration with the EURO4C-PCR group. Eur Heart J. 2023 Nov 1;44(41):4340-4356. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad342.
- Background: PubMed 33069849Hill JM, Kereiakes DJ, Shlofmitz RA, Klein AJ, Riley RF, Price MJ, Herrmann HC, Bachinsky W, Waksman R, Stone GW; Disrupt CAD III Investigators. Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 1;76(22):2635-2646. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.603. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
- Background: PubMed 31867065Forero MNT, Daemen J. The Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy System. Interv Cardiol. 2019 Nov 18;14(3):174-181. doi: 10.15420/icr.2019.18.R1. eCollection 2019 Nov.
- Background: PubMed 33939604Kereiakes DJ, Di Mario C, Riley RF, Fajadet J, Shlofmitz RA, Saito S, Ali ZA, Klein AJ, Price MJ, Hill JM, Stone GW. Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Calcified Coronary Lesions: Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the Disrupt CAD Studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 28;14(12):1337-1348. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 May 3.
- Background: PubMed 28797412Ali ZA, Brinton TJ, Hill JM, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Karimi Galougahi K, Illindala U, Gotberg M, Whitbourn R, Van Mieghem N, Meredith IT, Di Mario C, Fajadet J. Optical Coherence Tomography Characterization of Coronary Lithoplasty for Treatment of Calcified Lesions: First Description. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Aug;10(8):897-906. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.05.012.
- Background: PubMed 19758907Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, Morice MC, Colombo A, Dawkins K, van den Brand M, Van Dyck N, Russell ME, Mohr FW, Serruys PW. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention. 2005 Aug;1(2):219-27. No abstract available.
Related trials for Calcific Coronary Arteriosclerosis
RecruitingObservational study
Brazilian Prospective Registry of the Inspiron EVO Drug-Eluting Stent in Complex Coronary Lesions
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Stenosis Coronary
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Calcified Coronary Lesion Preparation With the Naviscore Scoring Balloon
Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD), Calcific Coronary Arteriosclerosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Overviewing Real-World Outcomes to Boost Interventional Management of CAlcified Coronary Lesions: the OROBICA Registry.
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Calcific Coronary Arteriosclerosis
Active, not recruiting
ClinicAL outComes of IntraVascular Lithotripsy Combined With Conventional Lesion Preparation in Patients With Moderate to Severe Coronary Artery Calcification
Coronary Artery Calcification, Calcific Coronary Arteriosclerosis
Recruiting
The Value of IVL Compared To OPN Non-Compliant Balloons for Treatment of RefractorY Coronary Lesions (VICTORY) Trial
Coronary Disease, Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
José M Montero Cabezas, MD PhD study chair
Leiden University Medical Center
Ibtihal Al Amri, MD PhD principal investigator
Leiden University Medical Center
8 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Calcific Coronary Arteriosclerosis, run by Leiden University Medical Center at 8 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in Netherlands, Belgium, Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
procedural success (time frame: Periprocedurally and from hospital admission to discharge (an average of 2 days)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06577038, which also lists 24 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.