AzTrials
AzTrials

Carpal Tunnel SyndromeNCT06598748

Effect of Mechanical Interface Mobilization Technique on Pain and Functional Status in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

A study testing Mechanical Interface Mobilisation Technique and Exercise Therapy in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to find out the influence of mechanical interface mobilization technique which consists of 5 different steps, in management of carpal tunnel syndrome and how this technique effects pain and functional status in individuals who has carpal tunnel syndrome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 24 to 45 years
Conditions the study is for
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
What is being tested?
Mechanical Interface Mobilisation Technique and Exercise Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
1 Dec 2023to 30 Jun 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 24 to 45 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Positive Phalen test and Tinel Test.
  • Positive symptoms of CTS (Pain, numbness, or tingling in the first three and lateral half of the fourth finger.

Who cannot join

  • No previous surgical treatments at the wrist joint, no fractures or open wounds at the wrist.
  • Patients with thoracic outlet syndrome, and cervical radiculopathy.
  • History of carpal tunnel release surgery.
  • Steroid injection in the carpal tunnel.
  • Pregnant females.
  • Metabolic diseases such as diabetes, severe thyroid disorders and anemia.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Dhqh Campus 2 Khushab

    Khushāb, Punjab Province, 41000

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

The aim of this study is to find out the influence of mechanical interface mobilization technique which consists of 5 different steps, in management of carpal tunnel syndrome and how this technique effects pain and functional status in individuals who has carpal tunnel syndrome.

Read the detailed description

The median nerve gets entrapped in the wrist, causing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the most prevalent peripheral neuropathy in the upper limb. A number of clinical findings, such as sensory issues with the first three digits of the hand sensory distribution of the median nerve, a positive Phalen test, weakness and atrophy of the thenar muscle, and electrophysiological findings (prolonged motor and sensory distal latencies of the median nerve) are used to diagnose CTS . The most frequent occupational risk factors for CTS are repetitive wrist and finger motions or holding uncomfortable wrist positions for extended periods of time. Tenosynovitis of the finger flexors, a thicker transverse carpal ligament, a fracture or dislocation of the distal radius or lunate, rheumatoid arthritis, lipoma, diabetes, and hyperthyroidism are other non-occupational causes . A combination of techniques has been used in the studies of Seradge H. et al and Sucher Benjamin M. Et al which included mechanical interface and neuro-dynamics, but the isolated effects of each method is yet to be determined by further studies as their combined effects are more focused on in the current literature. And that leads to an unclear decision about, which group of manual therapy techniques has better effects on individuals suffering from CTS .

Being tested
Mechanical Interface Mobilisation Technique, Exercise Therapy
Keywords
CTS
Medical subject headings
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mechanical Interface Mobilisation TechniqueOther

    In the mechanical interface group, five techniques, including; wrist distraction (3 sets for 3 minutes), rhythmic and gentle stretching of the transverse carpal ligaments, release of palmar hand fascia, gliding of the finger flexor tendons (using oscillatory flexion-extension movement of metacarpophalangeal joint), and release of the upper forearm muscle and fascia will be applied. To release the upper forearm muscle as demonstrated for pronator teres muscle in, the therapist applied a firm pressure on the origin of the muscle by one thumb and concurrently moved the forearm into extension and supination (17).

  • Exercise TherapyOther

    Participants in this group will perform myofascial stretching of the carpal ligament, 3 days per week for four weeks along with isometric exercises at wrist joint as demonstrated by the physiotherapist.

    The participants will be instructed to perform gentle, pain-free isometrics of the wrist and hand musculature (25). Exercise would be performed with 5-10-second hold, with 10 repetitions (26).

Study groups in NCT06598748
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mechanical Interface Mobilisation TechniqueExperimentalIn the mechanical interface group, five techniques, including; wrist distraction (3 sets for 3 minutes), rhythmic and gentle stretching of the transverse carpal ligaments, release of palmar hand fascia, gliding of the finger flexor tendons (using oscillatory flexion-extension movement of metacarpophalangeal joint), and release of the upper forearm muscle and fascia will be applied. To release the upper forearm muscle as demonstrated for pronator teres muscle in, the therapist applied a firm pressure on the origin of the muscle by one thumb and concurrently moved the forearm into extension and supination (17).
Receives: Other: Mechanical Interface Mobilisation Technique
Exercise TherapyActive comparatorParticipants in this group will perform myofascial stretching of the carpal ligament, 3 days per week for four weeks along with isometric exercises at wrist joint as demonstrated by the physiotherapist. The participants will be instructed to perform gentle, pain-free isometrics of the wrist and hand musculature (25). Exercise would be performed with 5-10-second hold, with 10 repetitions (26).
Receives: Other: Exercise Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual analogue scale (VAS)

    The VAS consists of a line, often 10 cm long, with verbal anchors at each end of the line, similar to a Numeric Rating Scale (i.e, no pain on the far left and severe pain on the far right). The patient places a mark at a point on the line corresponding to the patient's rating of pain intensity.

    Measured: 4 week (will be measured at the end of every week)]

  2. Symptom Severity Scale

    Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) (24) The SSS consists of 11 items related to six domains said to be critical for the evaluation of CTS.

    Each item is rated by the patient on a 1-5 (most severe) Likert scale, with higher ratings indicating more pain and disability.

    Measured: 1st week(pre) and 4th week(post)]

  3. Hand functional status scale

    Hand functional status scale (FSS) (24) The FSS consists of eight-items related to a variety of activities commonly performed by a diverse of patients. Each item is rated by the patient on a 1-5 (most severe) Likert scale, with higher ratings indicating more pain and disability.

    Measured: 1st week(pre) and 4th week(post)]

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2024
  2. Study start1 Dec 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2024
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants were randomly assigned to the experimental group or control group. Participants were not notified which group was assigned to
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06598748
Sponsor's protocol ID
RCRAHS-ISB/REC/MS-PT/017
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
29 Apr 2024
Last updated
19 Sep 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Chammas M, Boretto J, Burmann LM, Ramos RM, Dos Santos Neto FC, Silva JB. Carpal tunnel syndrome - Part I (anatomy, physiology, etiology and diagnosis). Rev Bras Ortop. 2014 Aug 20;49(5):429-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2014.08.001. eCollection 2014 Sep-Oct.

    PubMed 26229841
  • Michlovitz SL. Conservative interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 Oct;34(10):589-600. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.10.589.

    PubMed 15552705
  • Rota E, Morelli N. Entrapment neuropathies in diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2016 Sep 15;7(17):342-53. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i17.342.

    PubMed 27660694
  • Naeser MA, Hahn KA, Lieberman BE, Branco KF. Carpal tunnel syndrome pain treated with low-level laser and microamperes transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation: A controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Jul;83(7):978-88. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.33096.

    PubMed 12098159
  • Bland JD. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2007 Aug;36(2):167-71. doi: 10.1002/mus.20802.

    PubMed 17534984
  • Fernandez-de-Las Penas C, Ortega-Santiago R, de la Llave-Rincon AI, Martinez-Perez A, Fahandezh-Saddi Diaz H, Martinez-Martin J, Pareja JA, Cuadrado-Perez ML. Manual Physical Therapy Versus Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Parallel-Group Trial. J Pain. 2015 Nov;16(11):1087-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Aug 15.

    PubMed 26281946
  • Kanaan N, Sawaya RA. Carpal tunnel syndrome: modern diagnostic and management techniques. Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Apr;51(465):311-4.

    PubMed 11458486
  • Zaralieva A, Georgiev GP, Karabinov V, Iliev A, Aleksiev A. Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Approaches in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Cureus. 2020 Mar 3;12(3):e7171. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7171.

    PubMed 32257712
  • Huisstede BM, Hoogvliet P, Randsdorp MS, Glerum S, van Middelkoop M, Koes BW. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Part I: effectiveness of nonsurgical treatments--a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jul;91(7):981-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.03.022.

    PubMed 20599038
  • Jarvik JG, Comstock BA, Kliot M, Turner JA, Chan L, Heagerty PJ, Hollingworth W, Kerrigan CL, Deyo RA. Surgery versus non-surgical therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomised parallel-group trial. Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1074-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61517-8.

    PubMed 19782873
  • Bialosky JE, Bishop MD, Price DD, Robinson ME, George SZ. The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model. Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):531-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Nov 21.

    PubMed 19027342
  • Nijs J, Van Houdenhove B, Oostendorp RA. Recognition of central sensitization in patients with musculoskeletal pain: Application of pain neurophysiology in manual therapy practice. Man Ther. 2010 Apr;15(2):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.12.001. Epub 2009 Dec 24.

    PubMed 20036180
  • Lim YH, Chee DY, Girdler S, Lee HC. Median nerve mobilization techniques in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2017 Oct-Dec;30(4):397-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

    PubMed 28764878
  • Medina McKeon JM, Yancosek KE. Neural gliding techniques for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review. J Sport Rehabil. 2008 Aug;17(3):324-41. doi: 10.1123/jsr.17.3.324.

    PubMed 18708684
  • Burke J, Buchberger DJ, Carey-Loghmani MT, Dougherty PE, Greco DS, Dishman JD. A pilot study comparing two manual therapy interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 Jan;30(1):50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.11.014.

    PubMed 17224356

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mechanical Interface Mobilisation Technique and Exercise Therapy in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual analogue scale (VAS) (time frame: 4 week (will be measured at the end of every week)]). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06598748, which also lists 26 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in