Critical IllnessPRO-KIDNCT06721923
Continuous vs Bolus Protein (Protein Regimen Outcomes) in Critically Ill Children (Kids In Distress)
A study testing Dietary protein in people with Critical Illness and Pediatric Intensive Care, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The goal of this intervention study is to evaluate the difference in nutrition status markers (weight and muscle mass) when giving dietary protein by continuous or bolus delivery in critically ill children ages 1-11y. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 11 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Critical Illness, Pediatric Intensive Care, Enteral Nutrition Therapy
- What is being tested?
- Dietary protein
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 96 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 13 Feb 2024to 12 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 11 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children admitted to PICU over 1 year of age and younger than 11 years of life
- Expected to remain in the pediatric intensive care unit for longer than 72 hours
- Receiving standard pediatric formula via NGT/OGT/GT
Who cannot join
- Neuromuscular condition such as muscular dystrophy
- Admitted with home prescription for high dose steroids, receives growth hormone or insulin
- Enteral nutrition is contraindicated or if nutrition requirements are partially/fully met by parenteral nutrition
- Formula delivered into the small bowel (duodenum/jejunum, NJT/GJ)
- Those who require a highly specialized diet (E.g., large burns or metabolic diseases)
- Patients with a cow's milk protein allergy cannot safely receive a whey-based protein supplement
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
BC Childrens Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3N1
Kaitlin A Berris, BSc, 604-875-2000 ext. 1445, kaitlin.berris@bcchr.ca
Rajavel Elango, PhD
About this study
Official title: Continuous Versus Bolus Dietary Protein and Nutrition Status in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Pilot Study
The goal of this intervention study is to evaluate the difference in nutrition status markers (weight and muscle mass) when giving dietary protein by continuous or bolus delivery in critically ill children ages 1-11y.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
Primary: Bolus protein delivery will lessen the decline in mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) z-score by 0.5 standard deviation in critically ill children aged 1-11y after 1wk. Ultrasound will correlate to MUAC.
Secondary: Bolus protein delivery will provide more (grams per day) than when provided continuously, therefore it is more likely to meet the minimum estimated needs.
Participants will have daily nutrition intake data collected, and undergo body composition measures (weight, MUAC and ultrasound of the upper thigh muscle) at day of enrollment, and MUAC/Ultrasound on follow up days 3, 5, 7 and 14 after the intervention started.
Read the detailed description
Daily screening and research advertisement posters will identify patients that may be eligible and interested in the study, this will be performed by the unit dietitian, research assistant or the physician/fellow (intensivist-trainee).The clinician dietitian who is the primary contact for the research study will not be involved outside the usual standard of care for patients in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The following research steps will be completely by an established research team that is not directly involved in bedside care. Upon meeting inclusion criteria (age 1-11 years, expected length of stay >72h and enteral nutrition (EN) terminating in the stomach), informed consent will be presented verbally and in writing to the guardian present at bedside only if appropriate to approach the family during the early days (<48h) after admission. The research assistant or clinical nurse leader will review the project scope and any risks associated with participation with the family within 24-48 hours of admission if appropriate from a social and emotional viewpoint. For families that English is a second language, an interpreter will be used to provide information about the study and the consent details. Consent in escrow will be used for families admitted within traumatic circumstances where approaching research consent could cause undue stress to the guardians at bedside. The research team will have up to 14-days after admission to obtain written consent for the patients' data to be included in study analysis. Consent will be obtained or denied within 24 hours of presenting the study, or within 72 hours for deferred consent, after the formal conversation happens. All eligible patients will undergo non-invasive anthropometric assessment by trained professionals within 72 hours after admission to meet Assessment 0 criteria. Patients will be allocated into one of two intervention arms (continuous which is standard of care, or bolus) for supplemental protein delivery. We will allocate patients based on a blinded computer-generated draw utilizing block stratification for every 10 participants. Regular audits every 5 patients will allow evaluation of completed data so if one group appears to have more follow-up time points, the investigators will consult with the study team to determine whether temporary assignment into the underpowered group is required. Patients will be completely de-identified by research staff once data collection is complete to ensure no retrospective opinions or details are layered onto the result while data is being analyzed. Third-party statistician support will be sought out to further limit bias. Significant clinical changes, such as additional mechanical life support, will be noted to help enhance understanding and rationalize results when outcomes are discussed.
The intervention will begin after being prescribed the initial goal rate for continuous EN, this typically happens within the first 72-96 hours after admission. The clinical dietitian will be blinded to the treatment arm the patient has been allocated to. The online charting system will allow this blinding as the nursing view for accurate recording of patient care to be seen by the attending physicians is different from the allied health/dietitian view. All formulas are delivered continuously in our PICU, rarely would bolus feeds be started after a critical event. However, if this were the case the patient would not be eligible for study inclusion. Formula additives are prepared once a day by a centralized formula room. Given the restrictions around working hours, 24 hours to initiate intervention will be allowed to match typical operating procedure. Typically feeds/modules are ordered before 1200h, delivered around 1600h, and would be initiated shortly afterwards. The first day of the intervention will begin at 1900h to align with the units' feeding practices, nursing schedules, and online charting.
Protein dose will be held steady to ensure we are evaluating the mode of delivery and not the quantity of protein intake. We are aiming for a minimum intake of 2g/kg/day based off previous (2009) guidelines and our understanding of higher protein needs in a healthy population compared to current standards. The hypothesis that quality of protein delivery will improve uptake is why this pilot trial is not focusing on low versus high dosing. With previous research describing the theory of the "muscle full effect", we suspect patients may not need as high of a dose if protein is delivered more effectively. Based on a retrospective study in our unit, average protein intake is 0.8 - 1.6g/kg (SD 0.4) for patients 1-8 years old. Adding 1g/kg of supplemental protein will achieve 1.8-2.6g/kg/day which will allow us to meet the 2g/kg goal most of the time, while allowing us to focus on the feasibility and acceptance of the protein additive within the study context.
The continuous protein group will have 1g/kg of protein calculated and added into the formula which will continue to be delivered around the clock. Rate will be ordered as milliliters per hour with the expectation of running for 24 hours a day per standard care. The bolus protein group will be ordered 1g/kg protein to be divided and provided six times a day. The protein will remain separate from the formula, the latter will continue to be provided continuously per standard of care within the study unit. Protein will be provided every 4 hours to ensure ease of incorporating into standard nursing practice and individual medication schedule. Time of day the protein bolus is given, and amount will be recorded by the study team to ensure the daily target is achieved.
Study data will continue to be collected in our standardized forms if a patient is being fed exclusively through EN: the patient will be required to have continuous formula delivery and the protein intervention as set out at time of randomization. If either of these requirements is altered before 7 DPI, such as a change in continuous formula delivery to a different time schedule, if supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN) is initiation, or if the distal end of nutrition delivery is changed (from the stomach into the small bowel), the patient will no longer be eligible to have the protocolized protein intervention and the family will be notified as such. They may continue to receive supplemental protein; however, the schedule and amount will be based on the clinical judgement of the medical team/unit dietitian. Protein needs may become altered during admission, for example needing an increase in dose for evidence of delayed wound healing (open wounds or surgical sites), or if the consulting nephrologist wants to decrease protein load due to worsening kidney function: these adjustments will override the standard operating procedure for supplemental protein intervention. The energy prescription will be adjusted during the patients stay based on IC or energy equations and our understanding of the transition between acute to recovery phase nutrition requirements. This will not exclude patients from continuing with the study and data collection as long as any increase in energy needs, and total formula delivery, does not exceed the upper limit of protein dosing (4g/kg/day) which is called the renal solute load/limit. For the pilot trial we will note the length of intervention and follow up with the nutrition status assessments at the predetermined time points. The duration of intervention will be included in statistical analysis. Transition to a more appropriate EN regime will not be prevented due to study participation.
- Being tested
- Dietary protein
- Keywords
- enteral nutrition, pediatric critical care, bolus protein delivery, continuous protein delivery, ultrasound, mid-upper arm circumference
- Medical subject headings
- Critical Illness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dietary proteinDietary supplement
Beneprotein powder, a whey-based supplement, will be used in both arms. Intervention dose will be 1g/kg of dietary protein (or 1.2g/kg of the powder), provided to both arms with different modes of delivery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous protein | Active comparator | Continuous protein arm will have dietary protein supplement mixed into the enteral formula product to be provided around the clock without break. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Dietary protein |
| Bolus protein | Experimental | Bolus protein arm will provide protein powder mixed with water every 4h through syringe. This will be in addition to continuous enteral formula feeding which remains standard of care. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Dietary protein |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mid-upper arm circumference
Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) will be the primary outcome measure with a standard deviation change in z-score of 0.5 being considered significant. The measure (in centimeters) will be assessed against the WHO validated growth standard (for sex and age) and reported as z-score to standardized the measures against the population as a whole.
Measured: admission, 7 and 14 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Ultrasound of the Rectus Femoris Quadricep
Ultrasound of the upper thigh (quadricep) muscle (rectus femoris) will be used (in centimeters) to compare with MUAC (in centimeters) and protein delivery (grams per day and percentage of minimum intake). This will be an exploratory measurement to detect the percentage change over time between ultrasound and MUAC. It will then be explored whether both protein groups (continuous vs bolus) have a similar change in percentage over time.
Measured: admission, 7 and 14 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Dec 2024
- Study start13 Feb 2024
- Primary completion30 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion12 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Critical IllnessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rajavel Elango, PhD, University of British Columbia
- Investigators
- Rajavel Elango, PhD, Principal investigator, University of British Columbia, Department of Pediatrics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06721923
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H23-00276
- Acronym
- PRO-KID
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 12 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: At this time we are performing pilot work and have indicated to ethics this was not the intention of this work.
Publications
El-Kadi SW, Boutry C, Suryawan A, Gazzaneo MC, Orellana RA, Srivastava N, Nguyen HV, Kimball SR, Fiorotto ML, Davis TA. Intermittent bolus feeding promotes greater lean growth than continuous feeding in a neonatal piglet model. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Oct 1;108(4):830-841. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy133.
PubMed 30239549Davis TA, Fiorotto ML, Suryawan A. Bolus vs. continuous feeding to optimize anabolism in neonates. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015 Jan;18(1):102-8. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000128.
PubMed 25474017Rudar M, Naberhuis JK, Suryawan A, Nguyen HV, Stoll B, Style CC, Verla MA, Olutoye OO, Burrin DG, Fiorotto ML, Davis TA. Intermittent bolus feeding does not enhance protein synthesis, myonuclear accretion, or lean growth more than continuous feeding in a premature piglet model. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Dec 1;321(6):E737-E752. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00236.2021. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
PubMed 34719946Ong C, Lee JH, Senna S, Chia AZH, Wong JJM, Fortier MV, Leow MKS, Puthucheary ZA. Body Composition and Acquired Functional Impairment in Survivors of Pediatric Critical Illness. Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;47(6):e445-e453. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003720.
PubMed 30958426Ong C, Lee JH, Wong JJM, Leow MKS, Puthucheary ZA. Skeletal Muscle Changes, Function, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Survivors of Pediatric Critical Illness. Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep 1;49(9):1547-1557. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004970.
PubMed 33861558Valverde Montoro D, Rosa Camacho V, Artacho Gonzalez L, Camacho Alonso JM. Thigh ultrasound monitoring identifies muscle atrophy in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients. Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Dec;182(12):5543-5551. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05233-4. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
PubMed 37782351Hulst JM, Huysentruyt K, Gerasimidis K, Shamir R, Koletzko B, Chourdakis M, Fewtrell M, Joosten KF; Special Interest Group Clinical Malnutrition of ESPGHAN. A Practical Approach to Identifying Pediatric Disease-Associated Undernutrition: A Position Statement from the ESPGHAN Special Interest Group on Clinical Malnutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022 May 1;74(5):693-705. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003437. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
PubMed 35258497Becker P, Carney LN, Corkins MR, Monczka J, Smith E, Smith SE, Spear BA, White JV; Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Consensus statement of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: indicators recommended for the identification and documentation of pediatric malnutrition (undernutrition). Nutr Clin Pract. 2015 Feb;30(1):147-61. doi: 10.1177/0884533614557642. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
PubMed 25422273
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Continuous Versus Bolus Dietary Protein and Nutrition Status in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06721923
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRO-KID / H23-00276
- Keywords
- enteral nutrition, pediatric critical care, bolus protein delivery, continuous protein delivery, ultrasound, mid-upper arm circumference
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 12 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this intervention study is to evaluate the difference in nutrition status markers (weight and muscle mass) when giving dietary protein by continuous or bolus delivery in critically ill children ages 1-11y.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Primary: Bolus protein delivery will lessen the decline in mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) z-score by 0.5 standard deviation in critically ill children aged 1-11y after 1wk. Ultrasound will correlate to MUAC.
Secondary: Bolus protein delivery will provide more (grams per day) than when provided continuously, therefore it is more likely to meet the minimum estimated needs.
Participants will have daily nutrition intake data collected, and undergo body composition measures (weight, MUAC and ultrasound of the upper thigh muscle) at day of enrollment, and MUAC/Ultrasound on follow up days 3, 5, 7 and 14 after the intervention started.
Detailed description
Daily screening and research advertisement posters will identify patients that may be eligible and interested in the study, this will be performed by the unit dietitian, research assistant or the physician/fellow (intensivist-trainee).The clinician dietitian who is the primary contact for the research study will not be involved outside the usual standard of care for patients in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). The following research steps will be completely by an established research team that is not directly involved in bedside care. Upon meeting inclusion criteria (age 1-11 years, expected length of stay >72h and enteral nutrition (EN) terminating in the stomach), informed consent will be presented verbally and in writing to the guardian present at bedside only if appropriate to approach the family during the early days (<48h) after admission. The research assistant or clinical nurse leader will review the project scope and any risks associated with participation with the family within 24-48 hours of admission if appropriate from a social and emotional viewpoint. For families that English is a second language, an interpreter will be used to provide information about the study and the consent details. Consent in escrow will be used for families admitted within traumatic circumstances where approaching research consent could cause undue stress to the guardians at bedside. The research team will have up to 14-days after admission to obtain written consent for the patients' data to be included in study analysis. Consent will be obtained or denied within 24 hours of presenting the study, or within 72 hours for deferred consent, after the formal conversation happens. All eligible patients will undergo non-invasive anthropometric assessment by trained professionals within 72 hours after admission to meet Assessment 0 criteria. Patients will be allocated into one of two intervention arms (continuous which is standard of care, or bolus) for supplemental protein delivery. We will allocate patients based on a blinded computer-generated draw utilizing block stratification for every 10 participants. Regular audits every 5 patients will allow evaluation of completed data so if one group appears to have more follow-up time points, the investigators will consult with the study team to determine whether temporary assignment into the underpowered group is required. Patients will be completely de-identified by research staff once data collection is complete to ensure no retrospective opinions or details are layered onto the result while data is being analyzed. Third-party statistician support will be sought out to further limit bias. Significant clinical changes, such as additional mechanical life support, will be noted to help enhance understanding and rationalize results when outcomes are discussed.
The intervention will begin after being prescribed the initial goal rate for continuous EN, this typically happens within the first 72-96 hours after admission. The clinical dietitian will be blinded to the treatment arm the patient has been allocated to. The online charting system will allow this blinding as the nursing view for accurate recording of patient care to be seen by the attending physicians is different from the allied health/dietitian view. All formulas are delivered continuously in our PICU, rarely would bolus feeds be started after a critical event. However, if this were the case the patient would not be eligible for study inclusion. Formula additives are prepared once a day by a centralized formula room. Given the restrictions around working hours, 24 hours to initiate intervention will be allowed to match typical operating procedure. Typically feeds/modules are ordered before 1200h, delivered around 1600h, and would be initiated shortly afterwards. The first day of the intervention will begin at 1900h to align with the units' feeding practices, nursing schedules, and online charting.
Protein dose will be held steady to ensure we are evaluating the mode of delivery and not the quantity of protein intake. We are aiming for a minimum intake of 2g/kg/day based off previous (2009) guidelines and our understanding of higher protein needs in a healthy population compared to current standards. The hypothesis that quality of protein delivery will improve uptake is why this pilot trial is not focusing on low versus high dosing. With previous research describing the theory of the "muscle full effect", we suspect patients may not need as high of a dose if protein is delivered more effectively. Based on a retrospective study in our unit, average protein intake is 0.8 - 1.6g/kg (SD 0.4) for patients 1-8 years old. Adding 1g/kg of supplemental protein will achieve 1.8-2.6g/kg/day which will allow us to meet the 2g/kg goal most of the time, while allowing us to focus on the feasibility and acceptance of the protein additive within the study context.
The continuous protein group will have 1g/kg of protein calculated and added into the formula which will continue to be delivered around the clock. Rate will be ordered as milliliters per hour with the expectation of running for 24 hours a day per standard care. The bolus protein group will be ordered 1g/kg protein to be divided and provided six times a day. The protein will remain separate from the formula, the latter will continue to be provided continuously per standard of care within the study unit. Protein will be provided every 4 hours to ensure ease of incorporating into standard nursing practice and individual medication schedule. Time of day the protein bolus is given, and amount will be recorded by the study team to ensure the daily target is achieved.
Study data will continue to be collected in our standardized forms if a patient is being fed exclusively through EN: the patient will be required to have continuous formula delivery and the protein intervention as set out at time of randomization. If either of these requirements is altered before 7 DPI, such as a change in continuous formula delivery to a different time schedule, if supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN) is initiation, or if the distal end of nutrition delivery is changed (from the stomach into the small bowel), the patient will no longer be eligible to have the protocolized protein intervention and the family will be notified as such. They may continue to receive supplemental protein; however, the schedule and amount will be based on the clinical judgement of the medical team/unit dietitian. Protein needs may become altered during admission, for example needing an increase in dose for evidence of delayed wound healing (open wounds or surgical sites), or if the consulting nephrologist wants to decrease protein load due to worsening kidney function: these adjustments will override the standard operating procedure for supplemental protein intervention. The energy prescription will be adjusted during the patients stay based on IC or energy equations and our understanding of the transition between acute to recovery phase nutrition requirements. This will not exclude patients from continuing with the study and data collection as long as any increase in energy needs, and total formula delivery, does not exceed the upper limit of protein dosing (4g/kg/day) which is called the renal solute load/limit. For the pilot trial we will note the length of intervention and follow up with the nutrition status assessments at the predetermined time points. The duration of intervention will be included in statistical analysis. Transition to a more appropriate EN regime will not be prevented due to study participation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous protein | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: Dietary proteinContinuous protein arm will have dietary protein supplement mixed into the enteral formula product to be provided around the clock without break. |
| Bolus protein | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Dietary proteinBolus protein arm will provide protein powder mixed with water every 4h through syringe. This will be in addition to continuous enteral formula feeding which remains standard of care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 11 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Children admitted to PICU over 1 year of age and younger than 11 years of life
- Expected to remain in the pediatric intensive care unit for longer than 72 hours
- Receiving standard pediatric formula via NGT/OGT/GT
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Neuromuscular condition such as muscular dystrophy
- Admitted with home prescription for high dose steroids, receives growth hormone or insulin
- Enteral nutrition is contraindicated or if nutrition requirements are partially/fully met by parenteral nutrition
- Formula delivered into the small bowel (duodenum/jejunum, NJT/GJ)
- Those who require a highly specialized diet (E.g., large burns or metabolic diseases)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dietary proteinBeneprotein powder, a whey-based supplement, will be used in both arms. Intervention dose will be 1g/kg of dietary protein (or 1.2g/kg of the powder), provided to both arms with different modes of delivery. | Dietary supplement | Bolus protein, Continuous protein |
Primary outcome
Mid-upper arm circumference
Time frame: admission, 7 and 14 days
Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) will be the primary outcome measure with a standard deviation change in z-score of 0.5 being considered significant. The measure (in centimeters) will be assessed against the WHO validated growth standard (for sex and age) and reported as z-score to standardized the measures against the population as a whole.
1 secondary outcome
Ultrasound of the Rectus Femoris Quadricep
Time frame: admission, 7 and 14 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Feb 2026.
- Background: PubMed 30239549El-Kadi SW, Boutry C, Suryawan A, Gazzaneo MC, Orellana RA, Srivastava N, Nguyen HV, Kimball SR, Fiorotto ML, Davis TA. Intermittent bolus feeding promotes greater lean growth than continuous feeding in a neonatal piglet model. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Oct 1;108(4):830-841. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy133.
- Background: PubMed 25474017Davis TA, Fiorotto ML, Suryawan A. Bolus vs. continuous feeding to optimize anabolism in neonates. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015 Jan;18(1):102-8. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000128.
- Background: PubMed 34719946Rudar M, Naberhuis JK, Suryawan A, Nguyen HV, Stoll B, Style CC, Verla MA, Olutoye OO, Burrin DG, Fiorotto ML, Davis TA. Intermittent bolus feeding does not enhance protein synthesis, myonuclear accretion, or lean growth more than continuous feeding in a premature piglet model. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Dec 1;321(6):E737-E752. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00236.2021. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
- Background: PubMed 30958426Ong C, Lee JH, Senna S, Chia AZH, Wong JJM, Fortier MV, Leow MKS, Puthucheary ZA. Body Composition and Acquired Functional Impairment in Survivors of Pediatric Critical Illness. Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;47(6):e445-e453. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003720.
- Background: PubMed 33861558Ong C, Lee JH, Wong JJM, Leow MKS, Puthucheary ZA. Skeletal Muscle Changes, Function, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Survivors of Pediatric Critical Illness. Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep 1;49(9):1547-1557. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004970.
- Background: PubMed 37782351Valverde Montoro D, Rosa Camacho V, Artacho Gonzalez L, Camacho Alonso JM. Thigh ultrasound monitoring identifies muscle atrophy in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients. Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Dec;182(12):5543-5551. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05233-4. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
- Background: PubMed 35258497Hulst JM, Huysentruyt K, Gerasimidis K, Shamir R, Koletzko B, Chourdakis M, Fewtrell M, Joosten KF; Special Interest Group Clinical Malnutrition of ESPGHAN. A Practical Approach to Identifying Pediatric Disease-Associated Undernutrition: A Position Statement from the ESPGHAN Special Interest Group on Clinical Malnutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022 May 1;74(5):693-705. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003437. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
- Background: PubMed 25422273Becker P, Carney LN, Corkins MR, Monczka J, Smith E, Smith SE, Spear BA, White JV; Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Consensus statement of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: indicators recommended for the identification and documentation of pediatric malnutrition (undernutrition). Nutr Clin Pract. 2015 Feb;30(1):147-61. doi: 10.1177/0884533614557642. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. At this time we are performing pilot work and have indicated to ethics this was not the intention of this work.
Related trials for Critical Illness
Recruiting
Cycling Within an Interactive and Immersive Virtual Environment During Critical Illness: a Patient-centred Approach for Lower Limb Rehabilitation
Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Dynamic Inflammatory Changes and Nutritional Risk Scores in ICU Patients Aged 65 Years and Older
Critical Illness, Geriatric Patient
Recruiting
Individualised Blood Pressure Targets Versus Standard Care Among Critically Ill Patients With Shock
Critical Illness, Shock
Recruiting
Characterization and Longitudinal Monitoring of Muscular Phenotype in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care for Sepsis
Sepsis, Myopathy Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio and Glucose Variability in Critically Ill Patients
Critical Illness, Hyperglycemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Rajavel Elango, PhD principal investigator
University of British Columbia, Department of Pediatrics
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dietary protein in people with Critical Illness and Pediatric Intensive Care, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kaitlin A Berris, BSc (604-875-2000 ext. 1445, kaitlin.berris@bcchr.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mid-upper arm circumference (time frame: admission, 7 and 14 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06721923, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2026.