Impact of Menstrual Phase on Oral Glucose Sensitivity

Participants: The participants consisted of 15 healthy, non-obese, cycling females between the ages of 18-46 years. All participants completed informed consent and the study protocol was approved by the Rutgers University Institutional Review Board. 30 participants were screened for eligibility requirements. Inclusion criteria consisted of a regular menstrual cycle of 21-35 days. Exclusion criteria included hormonal contraceptives or other hormonal treatments, a history of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), menstrual irregularities, pregnancy, diabetes mellitus, thyroid conditions, recent COVID-19 infection, alterations in taste or smell, and medications affecting blood pressure. 23 participants were recruited and 7 participants became ineligible due to a variety of factors including: starting hormonal contraception, an irregular or missed cycle, <100 ng/mL E3G throughout periovulation, a lack of increased E3G at ovulation as compared to menstruation or lost to follow up. The participants in the control group consisted of 7 healthy, non-obese males between the ages of 18-26 years old.

Ovulation Tracking: Participants were asked to test their urine at the first urination of the day with Mira fertility MAX wands (San Francisco, CA) according to product instructions for 5 days prior to expected ovulation. Mira fertility MAX wands detect urine luteinizing hormone (LH), oestrone-3-glucuronide (E3G), and pregnanediol (PdG). E3G is a metabolite of estrone and is a marker of plasma 17-beta-estradiol. When participants' E3Gs rose above their menstruation baseline and reached > 100 ng/mL, they were asked to undergo the taste testing.

Biological males were also tested under the same conditions at comparable time differences (approximately 2 weeks apart) as a control for variation in taste testing.

Detection Threshold Testing: Participants underwent detection threshold testing with 1/8 log step serial dilutions of D-(+)-glucose (> 99.5%, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), sucralose and methyl-D-glucopyranoside (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The participants were randomly presented with glucose or sucralose detection testing, followed by MDG detection testing. Detection threshold testing followed a 2-alternative-forced choice (2AFC) paradigm. Two medicine cups of Millipore water and dilute stimulus were presented to the participant in random order and the participant was asked which stimulus was "not water." A 4-down-1-up modified staircase method was used to obtain the oral detection threshold of the sweet stimulus. In this method, the participant is required to make the correct choice four times until the next more dilute stimulus is presented, and if the participant is wrong once, a more concentrated stimulus is presented in the next trial. Once the participant has made 5 reversals, the last 4 concentrations are averaged and defined as the detection threshold concentration for that stimulus. Participants wore nose clips throughout their testing.

Hedonic Rating Testing: Participants were trained to use the hedonic labeled magnitude scale. Participants were presented with three rows of randomized 450 mM and 900 mM glucose solutions and asked to taste and expectorate each solution and then rate their liking of the solution on a hedonic labeled magnitude scale. The solutions were presented in random order with a 30 second rinse of Millipore water in between each stimulus. Between each row there was a 2 minute break. Subjects did not wear nose clips for this part of the study.