End Stage Renal Disease on DialysisPhase 4NCT06807905
Efficiency and Biocompatibility in Hemodiafiltration Procedure
A Phase 4 study testing Heparin anticoagulation and Citrate anticoagulation in people with End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis and Biocompatibility, run by University Medical Centre Ljubljana at 1 site in Slovenia.
Trial summary
Hemodiafiltration is a modern, increasingly used special hemodialysis method. Compared to hemodialysis, it allows greater clearance of medium- and high-molecular-weight molecules. Modern hemofiltration membranes are approaching the properties of the glomerular membrane in their properties. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis, Biocompatibility, Anticoagulation
- What is being tested?
- Heparin anticoagulation and Citrate anticoagulation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSlovenia
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2019to 1 Feb 2021
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- CKD on dialysis
Who cannot join
- AKI on dialysis
- patients on anticoagulant therapy
- systemic bacterial infection
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Slovenia1 site
University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Ljubljana, 1000
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Interventional Study to Iivestigate the Efficiency and Biocompatibility in Hemodiafiltration Procedure
Hemodiafiltration is a modern, increasingly used special hemodialysis method. Compared to hemodialysis, it allows greater clearance of medium- and high-molecular-weight molecules. Modern hemofiltration membranes are approaching the properties of the glomerular membrane in their properties.
During hemodiafiltration, blood contact with the semipermeable membrane and blood lines causes activation of the coagulation system, so anticoagulation during the procedure is absolutely necessary. Heparin is routinely used as a method of anticoagulation in hemodiafiltration. Regional citrate anticoagulation is used primarily in patients with risk of bleeding.
The purpose of our study is to evaluate the kinetics of citrate, calcium, and magnesium during hemodiafiltration and citrate anticoagulation, and in these way optimizing the citrate anticoagulation protocol during hemodiafiltration, and to compare the clearance of small and medium molecules between the two anticoagulations (citrate and heparin). The purpose of the study is also to compare biocompatibility parameters for heparin and citrate anticoagulation in hemodiafiltration.
Read the detailed description
Aim of the study
Hemodiafiltration is a modern, increasingly used special hemodialysis method. Compared to hemodialysis, it allows greater clearance of medium- and high-molecular-weight molecules. Modern hemofiltration membranes are approaching the properties of the glomerular membrane in their properties.
During hemodiafiltration, blood contact with the semipermeable membrane and blood lines causes activation of the coagulation system, so anticoagulation during the procedure is absolutely necessary. Heparin is routinely used as a method of anticoagulation in hemodiafiltration. Regional citrate anticoagulation is used primarily in patients with risk of bleeding.
The purpose of our study is to evaluate the kinetics of citrate, calcium, and magnesium during hemodiafiltration and citrate anticoagulation, and in these way optimizing the citrate anticoagulation protocol during hemodiafiltration, and to compare the clearance of small and medium molecules between the two anticoagulations (citrate and heparin). The purpose of the study is also to compare biocompatibility parameters for heparin and citrate anticoagulation in hemodiafiltration.
Hypothesis
In the research, there are two hypotheses:
- The removal of small and medium molecules is better at citrate than heparin hemodiafiltration.
- The biocompatibility of the procedure is better with citrate than with heparin hemodiafiltration.
Backgorund
The hemodiafiltration procedure better removal of medium molecules compared to hemodialysis procedure. No comparisons were made in the literature for the removal of these molecules by heparin and citrate hemodiafiltration. Research has shown that citrate anticoagulation improves the biocompatibility of the dialysis system in hemodialysis, since many blood-body interactions with foreign substances are largely dependent on calcium and magnesium. Hemodiafiltration has not yet examined the biocompatibility of hemodiafiltration procedures with heparin or. citrate as an anticoagulant. In hemodiafiltration, the kinetics of citrate, calcium, and magnesium are unpredictable, since part of the calcium is also eliminated at the expense of the infusion, respectively. hemofiltration. Patients should be temporarily transferred to conventional hemodialysis if citrate anticoagulation is required. Given that we do not have this information so far, we will optimize the citrate anticoagulation protocol using this research.
Study design, method description, subjects
We will include 20 adult dialysis-dependent patients with end-stage renal impairment who are enrolled in a regular dialysis replacement dialysis program. In the study, patients will be randomized to two groups after obtaining written consent, which will differ in the order of anticoagulation used: 1) heparin anticoagulation group and then citrate anticoagulation, 2) citrate anticoagulation group and then heparin anticoagulation. Each patient will undergo two hemodiafiltration procedures, which will be study (research), one with heparin and one with citrate as an anticoagulant, so that each patient will be in control of himself. The first group of patients will use standard heparin. In the group of patients with citrate anticoagulation, the following protocol will be used: anticoagulation with 8% 3-sodium citrate, with a blood flow of 300 ml / min, with a dialysate flow of 500 ml / min. At the venous limb of the system, 1M CaCl2 will be added at an initial dose of 16-18 ml / h, which will then be adjusted according to the normal values of ionized calcium according to regular controls during the procedure (normal values of ionized calcium from 1.1-1.2 mmol / L). For the appropriate effect of anticoagulation, the value of ionized calcium in the dialysis circuit would be below 0.40 mmol / L (sampling point directly behind the filter). In both patient groups, gas analysis of venous blood, electrolytes (including magnesium, calcium and phosphorus), uremic toxins (urea, creatinine), B2-microglobulin will be monitored before and after the procedure. In the citrate group, the values of ionized calcium (before and after the filter) will be monitored at regular intervals during hemodiafiltration. We will also calculate the screening coefficient (SC) after 15 min. and just before the end of the procedure ( SC = 2D / (A+V), A = concentration on arterial line, V = concentration on venous line: D = concentration in filtrate or dialysate). The following biocompatibility parameters will be measured: hemogram (e. Leukopenia, thrombocytopenia), complement activation by C5a determination. Biocompatibility parameters will be measured before hemodiafiltration, after 15 min, after 1 hour, and after the end of the procedure. All dialysate will be collected, which is otherwise dumped into the water drain during routine work. Phosphate, B2-microglobulin, will be determined from all dialysate. The main outcome of the study is the screening coefficient for beta 2-microglobulin, the screening coefficient for phosphate is a secondary outcome.
Following the completion of the hemodiafiltration procedure, five patients in both groups will be subjected to electron microscopy after dialysis to evaluate cell adsorption, protein and clot formation on the dialysis membrane.
Expected results
We expect better removal efficiency of small and medium molecules in hemodiafiltration with citrate anticoagulation compared to standard heparin anticoagulation. With citrate anticoagulation, reduced activation of complement and hemostasis, leukocytes and platelets is expected. The results of the study will help to clarify the role of citrate anticoagulation in improving the biocompatibility of hemodiafiltration. With positive results, citrate anticoagulation during hemodiafiltration could be performed in all chronic dialysis patients in the future. We also expect better removal of low and medium molecular weight solutes in citrate anticoagulation, due to globally better anticoagulation and, consequently, better preservation of the permeability of the dialyzer membrane throughout the dialysis procedure.
- Being tested
- Heparin anticoagulation, Citrate anticoagulation
- Keywords
- Dialysis, Hemodifiltraton, Biocompatibility, Anticoagulation, regional citrate anticoagulation, heparin
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Heparin anticoagulationDrug
Hemodiafiltration will be performed with heparine anticoagulation
Citrate anticoagulationDrug
Patient will perform dialysis with citrate anticoagulation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Heparin anticoagulation | Active comparator | Heparin anticoagulation in hemodiafiltration procedure Receives: Drug: Heparin anticoagulation |
| Citrate anticoagulation | Experimental | Hemodiafiltration will be performed with regional citrate anticoagulation Receives: Drug: Citrate anticoagulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
removal of small and medium molecules
The removal of small and medium molecules is different comparing citrate and heparin anticoagulation.
Measured: during 4 hour dialysis
Secondary outcomes (1)
biocompatibility
The biocompatibility of the procedure is different comparing citrate than with heparin anticoagulation.
Measured: during 4 hour dialysis
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Feb 2025
- Study start1 Feb 2019
- Primary completion1 Sep 2020
- Study completion1 Feb 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for End Stage Renal Disease on DialysisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Centre Ljubljana
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Milena Andonova, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
- Investigators
- Milena Andonova, MD, Principal investigator, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06807905
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HDFCOMP
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 4 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Interventional Study to Iivestigate the Efficiency and Biocompatibility in Hemodiafiltration Procedure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06807905
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HDFCOMP
- Keywords
- Dialysis, Hemodifiltraton, Biocompatibility, Anticoagulation, regional citrate anticoagulation, heparin
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Medical Centre LjubljanaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Feb 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hemodiafiltration is a modern, increasingly used special hemodialysis method. Compared to hemodialysis, it allows greater clearance of medium- and high-molecular-weight molecules. Modern hemofiltration membranes are approaching the properties of the glomerular membrane in their properties.
During hemodiafiltration, blood contact with the semipermeable membrane and blood lines causes activation of the coagulation system, so anticoagulation during the procedure is absolutely necessary. Heparin is routinely used as a method of anticoagulation in hemodiafiltration. Regional citrate anticoagulation is used primarily in patients with risk of bleeding.
The purpose of our study is to evaluate the kinetics of citrate, calcium, and magnesium during hemodiafiltration and citrate anticoagulation, and in these way optimizing the citrate anticoagulation protocol during hemodiafiltration, and to compare the clearance of small and medium molecules between the two anticoagulations (citrate and heparin). The purpose of the study is also to compare biocompatibility parameters for heparin and citrate anticoagulation in hemodiafiltration.
Detailed description
Aim of the study
Hemodiafiltration is a modern, increasingly used special hemodialysis method. Compared to hemodialysis, it allows greater clearance of medium- and high-molecular-weight molecules. Modern hemofiltration membranes are approaching the properties of the glomerular membrane in their properties.
During hemodiafiltration, blood contact with the semipermeable membrane and blood lines causes activation of the coagulation system, so anticoagulation during the procedure is absolutely necessary. Heparin is routinely used as a method of anticoagulation in hemodiafiltration. Regional citrate anticoagulation is used primarily in patients with risk of bleeding.
The purpose of our study is to evaluate the kinetics of citrate, calcium, and magnesium during hemodiafiltration and citrate anticoagulation, and in these way optimizing the citrate anticoagulation protocol during hemodiafiltration, and to compare the clearance of small and medium molecules between the two anticoagulations (citrate and heparin). The purpose of the study is also to compare biocompatibility parameters for heparin and citrate anticoagulation in hemodiafiltration.
Hypothesis
In the research, there are two hypotheses:
- The removal of small and medium molecules is better at citrate than heparin hemodiafiltration.
- The biocompatibility of the procedure is better with citrate than with heparin hemodiafiltration.
Backgorund
The hemodiafiltration procedure better removal of medium molecules compared to hemodialysis procedure. No comparisons were made in the literature for the removal of these molecules by heparin and citrate hemodiafiltration. Research has shown that citrate anticoagulation improves the biocompatibility of the dialysis system in hemodialysis, since many blood-body interactions with foreign substances are largely dependent on calcium and magnesium. Hemodiafiltration has not yet examined the biocompatibility of hemodiafiltration procedures with heparin or. citrate as an anticoagulant. In hemodiafiltration, the kinetics of citrate, calcium, and magnesium are unpredictable, since part of the calcium is also eliminated at the expense of the infusion, respectively. hemofiltration. Patients should be temporarily transferred to conventional hemodialysis if citrate anticoagulation is required. Given that we do not have this information so far, we will optimize the citrate anticoagulation protocol using this research.
Study design, method description, subjects
We will include 20 adult dialysis-dependent patients with end-stage renal impairment who are enrolled in a regular dialysis replacement dialysis program. In the study, patients will be randomized to two groups after obtaining written consent, which will differ in the order of anticoagulation used: 1) heparin anticoagulation group and then citrate anticoagulation, 2) citrate anticoagulation group and then heparin anticoagulation. Each patient will undergo two hemodiafiltration procedures, which will be study (research), one with heparin and one with citrate as an anticoagulant, so that each patient will be in control of himself. The first group of patients will use standard heparin. In the group of patients with citrate anticoagulation, the following protocol will be used: anticoagulation with 8% 3-sodium citrate, with a blood flow of 300 ml / min, with a dialysate flow of 500 ml / min. At the venous limb of the system, 1M CaCl2 will be added at an initial dose of 16-18 ml / h, which will then be adjusted according to the normal values of ionized calcium according to regular controls during the procedure (normal values of ionized calcium from 1.1-1.2 mmol / L). For the appropriate effect of anticoagulation, the value of ionized calcium in the dialysis circuit would be below 0.40 mmol / L (sampling point directly behind the filter). In both patient groups, gas analysis of venous blood, electrolytes (including magnesium, calcium and phosphorus), uremic toxins (urea, creatinine), B2-microglobulin will be monitored before and after the procedure. In the citrate group, the values of ionized calcium (before and after the filter) will be monitored at regular intervals during hemodiafiltration. We will also calculate the screening coefficient (SC) after 15 min. and just before the end of the procedure ( SC = 2D / (A+V), A = concentration on arterial line, V = concentration on venous line: D = concentration in filtrate or dialysate). The following biocompatibility parameters will be measured: hemogram (e. Leukopenia, thrombocytopenia), complement activation by C5a determination. Biocompatibility parameters will be measured before hemodiafiltration, after 15 min, after 1 hour, and after the end of the procedure. All dialysate will be collected, which is otherwise dumped into the water drain during routine work. Phosphate, B2-microglobulin, will be determined from all dialysate. The main outcome of the study is the screening coefficient for beta 2-microglobulin, the screening coefficient for phosphate is a secondary outcome.
Following the completion of the hemodiafiltration procedure, five patients in both groups will be subjected to electron microscopy after dialysis to evaluate cell adsorption, protein and clot formation on the dialysis membrane.
Expected results
We expect better removal efficiency of small and medium molecules in hemodiafiltration with citrate anticoagulation compared to standard heparin anticoagulation. With citrate anticoagulation, reduced activation of complement and hemostasis, leukocytes and platelets is expected. The results of the study will help to clarify the role of citrate anticoagulation in improving the biocompatibility of hemodiafiltration. With positive results, citrate anticoagulation during hemodiafiltration could be performed in all chronic dialysis patients in the future. We also expect better removal of low and medium molecular weight solutes in citrate anticoagulation, due to globally better anticoagulation and, consequently, better preservation of the permeability of the dialyzer membrane throughout the dialysis procedure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Heparin anticoagulation | Active comparator | Drug: Heparin anticoagulationHeparin anticoagulation in hemodiafiltration procedure |
| Citrate anticoagulation | Experimental | Drug: Citrate anticoagulationHemodiafiltration will be performed with regional citrate anticoagulation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- CKD on dialysis
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- AKI on dialysis
- patients on anticoagulant therapy
- systemic bacterial infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Heparin anticoagulationHemodiafiltration will be performed with heparine anticoagulation | Drug | Heparin anticoagulation |
| Citrate anticoagulationPatient will perform dialysis with citrate anticoagulation | Drug | Citrate anticoagulation |
Primary outcome
removal of small and medium molecules
Time frame: during 4 hour dialysis
The removal of small and medium molecules is different comparing citrate and heparin anticoagulation.
1 secondary outcome
biocompatibility
Time frame: during 4 hour dialysis
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Feb 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis
RecruitingPhase 2
Empagliflozin on Residual Kidney Function in Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis, Peritoneal Dialysis Complication
Not yet recruiting
Acupuncture for Symptom Burden and Quality of Life in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease
End Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD)
RecruitingPhase 3
CSP #2026 - Beta Blocker Dialyzability on Cardiovascular Outcomes
End-Stage Kidney Disease, End-Stage Renal Disease
RecruitingPhase 1
CAR-T Cell Therapy for Desensitization in Kidney Transplantation
Kidney Transplant, Kidney Failure
Recruiting
Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients With End-stage Renal Disease on Dialysis
End Stage Renal Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Milena Andonova, MD principal investigator
University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Heparin anticoagulation and Citrate anticoagulation in people with End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis and Biocompatibility, run by University Medical Centre Ljubljana at 1 site in Slovenia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Slovenia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
removal of small and medium molecules (time frame: during 4 hour dialysis). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2025.