TendinitisNCT06834425
Efficacy of NSAID Peritendinous Injection for Acute Tendinitis
A study testing Peritendinous NSAID injection in people with Tendinitis and Acute Tendonitis, run by Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
This study evaluates whether NSAID peritendinous or ligament injections at acute sprain sites can relieve pain and restore function. Forty patients will be randomly assigned to either the injection or oral NSAID group. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Tendinitis, Acute Tendonitis, NSAID (Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug)
- What is being tested?
- Peritendinous NSAID injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 10 Feb 2025to 1 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Ultrasonography diagnosed acute tendinitis with inflammation
- 20-70 years old
Who cannot join
- Cognitive impairment.
- Post operation at painful site.
- Neuropathic pain or vascularity disease
- Unable to receive injection therapy, including a history of syncope during injection.
- Allergy history to NSAID
- Within 14 days after coronary artery bypass graft, CABG
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study evaluates whether NSAID peritendinous or ligament injections at acute sprain sites can relieve pain and restore function.
Forty patients will be randomly assigned to either the injection or oral NSAID group. Pain will be assessed subjectively using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and objectively through pressure pain threshold measurements. Functional outcomes (DASH for the upper limb, FADI for the lower limb) will be evaluated before treatment and at 3 days, 1 week, and 4 weeks post-treatment.
Read the detailed description
Acute tendon inflammation is a common sports injury, typically treated with oral or topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or local corticosteroid injections at the affected site. Direct corticosteroid injections provide the fastest relief; however, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has restricted the use of corticosteroids by any route in its latest banned substance list. As a result, corticosteroid injections into tendons or joints, which were previously allowed during competitions, can no longer be used. Currently, the only methods available for acute inflammation relief during competitions are oral NSAIDs and ice therapy. For athletes without structural damage who need to quickly reduce inflammation and return to play, these methods may be insufficient.
Previous clinical studies on NSAID injections into tendons and joints have shown that local NSAID injections are equally effective as corticosteroid injections for treating shoulder impingement syndrome and knee osteoarthritis. However, these studies mainly focused on patients with chronic arthritis and tendinitis. The difference in efficacy between oral NSAIDs and tendon injections during the acute phase of inflammation remains unknown. This study aims to compare different routes of NSAID administration to identify the most appropriate treatment for managing acute tendinitis in high-level athletes.
We hypothesize that peritendinous NSAID injections will provide greater pain relief and functional improvement.
- Being tested
- Peritendinous NSAID injection, Control group (placebo)
- Medical subject headings
- Tendinopathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Peritendinous NSAID injectionDrug
Also called NSAID injection
Peritendinous NSAID (parecoxib) injection
Control group (placebo)Drug
Also called Sham injection
Normal saline mixed with local anesthetics injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Local anesthetics and NSAID(parecoxib) peritendinous Injection for acute tendinitis Receives: Drug: Peritendinous NSAID injection |
| Control group | Placebo comparator | Local anesthetics and normal saline peritendinous injection for acute tendinitis Receives: Drug: Control group (placebo) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
The 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a subjective pain assessment tool that ranges from 0 to 10. A score of '0' indicates the complete absence of pain (e.g., "no pain"), while a score of '10' represents the most severe pain imaginable (e.g., "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable"). This scale allows individuals to quantify their pain intensity, facilitating communication between patients and healthcare providers for better pain management.
Measured: Baseline, at 12 hours post-injection, and on each day from 1 to 7 days after the injection.
Secondary outcomes (3)
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH)
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire for upper limb functionality
Measured: Baseline, 3-day, 7-day and 28-day after injection
Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI)
Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) for lower limb functionality.
Measured: Baseline, 3-day, 7-day and 28-day after injection
Pain pressure threshold
A manometer was used to measure the pain pressure threshold at the most tender point of the affected area.
Measured: Baseline, 3-day, 7-day and 28-day after injection
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Feb 2025
- Study start10 Feb 2025
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Mar 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TendinitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yu-Hsuan Cheng, Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital
- Investigators
- Yu-Hsuan Cheng, MD, MS, Study chair, Taipei Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06834425
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- N202412008
- Other IDs
- 114-wf-eva-19
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 19 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rhim HC, Ruiz J, Taseh A, Afunugo W, Crockett Z, Schon J, Pan X, Shin J, Schowalter S, Jang KM, Robinson DM. Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Injections versus Steroid Injections in the Management of Upper and Lower Extremity Orthopedic Conditions: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 17;13(4):1132. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041132.
PubMed 38398445Ziradkar R, Best TM, Quintero D, Paultre K. Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory and Corticosteroid Injections for Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Health. 2023 Jul-Aug;15(4):579-591. doi: 10.1177/19417381221108726. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
PubMed 35897160Sardana V, Burzynski J, Hasan K, Zalzal P. Are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug injections an alternative to steroid injections for musculoskeletal pain?: A systematic review. J Orthop. 2018 Aug 16;15(3):812-816. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.022. eCollection 2018 Sep.
PubMed 30140124Kim YB, Lee WS, Won JS. The effects of a single-dose subacromial injection of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug in geriatric patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized double-blind study. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021 Mar;24(1):4-8. doi: 10.5397/cise.2021.00052. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
PubMed 33652505Bellamy JL, Goff BJ, Sayeed SA. Economic Impact of Ketorolac vs Corticosteroid Intra-Articular Knee Injections for Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Study. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 May 18.
PubMed 27402605Min KS, St Pierre P, Ryan PM, Marchant BG, Wilson CJ, Arrington ED. A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of subacromial injection with corticosteroid versus NSAID in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 May;22(5):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.026. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
PubMed 23177167Shakeel H, Ahmad TS. Steroid injection versus NSAID injection for trigger finger: a comparative study of early outcomes. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Jul;37(7):1319-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.03.040.
PubMed 22721455
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of NSAID Peritendinous Injection for Acute Tendinitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06834425
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- N202412008
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Medical University WanFang HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates whether NSAID peritendinous or ligament injections at acute sprain sites can relieve pain and restore function.
Forty patients will be randomly assigned to either the injection or oral NSAID group. Pain will be assessed subjectively using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and objectively through pressure pain threshold measurements. Functional outcomes (DASH for the upper limb, FADI for the lower limb) will be evaluated before treatment and at 3 days, 1 week, and 4 weeks post-treatment.
Detailed description
Acute tendon inflammation is a common sports injury, typically treated with oral or topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or local corticosteroid injections at the affected site. Direct corticosteroid injections provide the fastest relief; however, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has restricted the use of corticosteroids by any route in its latest banned substance list. As a result, corticosteroid injections into tendons or joints, which were previously allowed during competitions, can no longer be used. Currently, the only methods available for acute inflammation relief during competitions are oral NSAIDs and ice therapy. For athletes without structural damage who need to quickly reduce inflammation and return to play, these methods may be insufficient.
Previous clinical studies on NSAID injections into tendons and joints have shown that local NSAID injections are equally effective as corticosteroid injections for treating shoulder impingement syndrome and knee osteoarthritis. However, these studies mainly focused on patients with chronic arthritis and tendinitis. The difference in efficacy between oral NSAIDs and tendon injections during the acute phase of inflammation remains unknown. This study aims to compare different routes of NSAID administration to identify the most appropriate treatment for managing acute tendinitis in high-level athletes.
We hypothesize that peritendinous NSAID injections will provide greater pain relief and functional improvement.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Drug: Peritendinous NSAID injectionLocal anesthetics and NSAID(parecoxib) peritendinous Injection for acute tendinitis |
| Control group | Placebo comparator | Drug: Control group (placebo)Local anesthetics and normal saline peritendinous injection for acute tendinitis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Ultrasonography diagnosed acute tendinitis with inflammation
- 20-70 years old
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Cognitive impairment.
- Post operation at painful site.
- Neuropathic pain or vascularity disease
- Unable to receive injection therapy, including a history of syncope during injection.
- Allergy history to NSAID
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Peritendinous NSAID injectionAlso: NSAID injectionPeritendinous NSAID (parecoxib) injection | Drug | Intervention group |
| Control group (placebo)Also: Sham injectionNormal saline mixed with local anesthetics injection | Drug | Control group |
Primary outcome
Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Time frame: Baseline, at 12 hours post-injection, and on each day from 1 to 7 days after the injection.
The 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a subjective pain assessment tool that ranges from 0 to 10. A score of '0' indicates the complete absence of pain (e.g., "no pain"), while a score of '10' represents the most severe pain imaginable (e.g., "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable"). This scale allows individuals to quantify their pain intensity, facilitating communication between patients and healthcare providers for better pain management.
3 secondary outcomes
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH)
Time frame: Baseline, 3-day, 7-day and 28-day after injection
Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI)
Time frame: Baseline, 3-day, 7-day and 28-day after injection
Pain pressure threshold
Time frame: Baseline, 3-day, 7-day and 28-day after injection
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Feb 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 38398445Rhim HC, Ruiz J, Taseh A, Afunugo W, Crockett Z, Schon J, Pan X, Shin J, Schowalter S, Jang KM, Robinson DM. Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Injections versus Steroid Injections in the Management of Upper and Lower Extremity Orthopedic Conditions: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 17;13(4):1132. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041132.
- Results publication: PubMed 35897160Ziradkar R, Best TM, Quintero D, Paultre K. Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory and Corticosteroid Injections for Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Health. 2023 Jul-Aug;15(4):579-591. doi: 10.1177/19417381221108726. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 30140124Sardana V, Burzynski J, Hasan K, Zalzal P. Are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug injections an alternative to steroid injections for musculoskeletal pain?: A systematic review. J Orthop. 2018 Aug 16;15(3):812-816. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.022. eCollection 2018 Sep.
- Results publication: PubMed 33652505Kim YB, Lee WS, Won JS. The effects of a single-dose subacromial injection of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug in geriatric patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized double-blind study. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021 Mar;24(1):4-8. doi: 10.5397/cise.2021.00052. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 27402605Bellamy JL, Goff BJ, Sayeed SA. Economic Impact of Ketorolac vs Corticosteroid Intra-Articular Knee Injections for Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Prospective Study. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 May 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 23177167Min KS, St Pierre P, Ryan PM, Marchant BG, Wilson CJ, Arrington ED. A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of subacromial injection with corticosteroid versus NSAID in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 May;22(5):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.026. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 22721455Shakeel H, Ahmad TS. Steroid injection versus NSAID injection for trigger finger: a comparative study of early outcomes. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Jul;37(7):1319-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.03.040.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Tendinitis
Recruiting
Effects of Cervicothoracic Mobilization in Patients With Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Rotator Cuff Tendonitis
Recruiting
HILT vs ESWT in Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Recruiting
Anatomical Evaluation of Supraspinatus Through Ultrasonography and Biomechanical Measurements Following Blood Flow Restriction Therapy and Eccentric Exercise in Patients of Supraspinatus Tendinitis.
Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Recruiting
Reverse Fly Exercise On Supraspinatus Tendinitis In Patients Receiving Aromatase Inhibitors Therapy After Mastectomy
Mastectomy, Aromatase Inhibitors Therapy
Active, not recruiting
Anatomical Evaluation of Supraspinatus Through Ultrasonography and Biomechanical Measurements Following Different Combinations of Physical Therapies in Patients of Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yu-Hsuan Cheng, MD, MS study chair
Taipei Medical University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Peritendinous NSAID injection in people with Tendinitis and Acute Tendonitis, run by Taipei Medical University WanFang Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (time frame: Baseline, at 12 hours post-injection, and on each day from 1 to 7 days after the injection.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06834425, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Feb 2025.