VaginismusVIVID 2NCT06923306
Virtual Reality Exposure for Vaginismus: A Replicated Single-Case Design
A study testing Virtual reality exposure in people with Vaginismus, run by University of British Columbia at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Vaginismus is a sexual dysfunction characterized by involuntary tightening of the pelvic floor muscles, preventing vaginal intercourse. It is defined by an intense fear of vaginal penetration, leading to persistent difficulties with vaginal intercourse and gynaecological exams. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Vaginismus
- What is being tested?
- Virtual reality exposure
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2025to 30 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The investigators will recruit individuals who have a vagina. They expect that most participants will identify as cisgender, where sex is female and gender is woman, while others may have a female sex but identify as a different gender (e.g., genderdiverse). Transwomen (i.e., birth assigned males but identify as woman) who have had gender-affirming surgery (and so have a vagina) are eligible, as are transmen (i.e., birth assigned females but identify as men) who have not had bottom surgery (so have a vagina).
- Inclusion criteria: In addition to having a vagina, participants must have a diagnosis of vaginismus that requires self-reported involuntary tightness of the vaginal musculature that causes persistent interference with vaginal penetration lasting >6 months; aged >19 y, of any sexual orientation. Participants must be fluent in English (psychoeducational materials and questionnaires delivered in English), have normal or corrected-to-normal vision (to view the VR scenes during exposure), and be able to travel to Vancouver.
Who cannot join
- Presence of: unprovoked vaginal pain; a vulvar skin condition (i.e., lichen sclerosus); an imperforate hymen; or epilepsy characterized by photosensitive seizures. Note: provoked vulvar pain is not an exclusion criterion because at least 40% of people with vaginismus report pain with attempted penetration.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Canada2 sites
UBC Sexual Health Lab, Vancouver Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5M 1M9
Diamond Health Care Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z1M9
About this study
Vaginismus is a sexual dysfunction characterized by involuntary tightening of the pelvic floor muscles, preventing vaginal intercourse. It is defined by an intense fear of vaginal penetration, leading to persistent difficulties with vaginal intercourse and gynaecological exams. Psychological factors play a significant role in vaginismus. If the pelvic floor muscle tightening represents a defensive reflex, then treatment using a gradual exposure to feared stimuli using virtual reality may lead to an extinction of the phobic response, and to amelioration of vaginismus. If effective, the use of virtual reality technology can directly improve clinical care offered to those suffering from vaginismus.
Read the detailed description
Purpose/Aims:
VR is a new, powerful technology that, if effective, can directly improve clinical care offered to those suffering from vaginismus across Canada. This study will advance health-related knowledge by providing new data on the efficacy of VRE for vaginismus and health outcomes by having the potential to increase access to effective treatment for women living in rural and remote areas as well as those who experience other barriers in accessing care-including extreme fear or anxiety. Thus, this research program has a high likelihood of filling a major gap in healthcare for women and others with a vagina and, if effective, our treatment paradigm has significant potential for scale-up.
Hypothesis:
The investigators will use the Marascuilo-Busk randomization test to test our hypothesis that the onset of VRE leads to an increase in vaginal insertion ease, a decrease in insertion pain, and an increase in the frequency of sexual activity that includes penetration. We also predict a decrease in both secondary outcomes of vaginal penetration related cognitions, and female sexual distress.
Justification:
Lack of Effective Treatments: Available psychological treatments for vaginismus involve self-insertion of vaginal accommodators (which resemble dildos) at home by progressively inserting larger sizes as the individual practices relaxation exercises that address both the psychological fear and the involuntary pelvic floor muscle tension. However, individuals with vaginismus experience significant and longstanding avoidance and struggle to complete accommodator exercises on their own at home, even if they believe the treatment will be effective. This avoidance significantly limits treatment effectiveness. For example, the largest RCT (n=117) evaluating the efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy for vaginismus, which included gradual self-insertion of accommodators into the vagina, yielded a small treatment effect: only 14% of women who attended ten 2-hour group therapy sessions were able to have vaginal intercourse at post-treatment.
Exposure - An Essential Treatment Element: Therapist-guided exposure therapy includes a patient progressively inserting vaginal accomodators in the presence of a supportive clinician, and is highly effective in treating vaginismus, showing greater success than solo, self-guided interventions. Of 77 women who attended two therapist-guided sessions over one week, 89% reported vaginal intercourse 6-weeks post-treatment. Despite this effective treatment approach, in North America therapist-aided exposure practices are not permitted due to institutional restrictions, licensing regulations, and/or patient discomfort. As such, the development of alternative exposure-based treatments is needed. The investigators propose an innovative application of VR, as an alternative to exposure, to address this significant health gap.
VR Exposure - An Opportunity: VRE immerses individuals in 3D simulations of feared situations and is as effective as real-life exposure for specific phobias. VRE for vaginismus, which involves gradual exposure to feared (virtual) sexual encounters, may diminish phobic responses towards vaginal penetration. Given that women with vaginismus cope via longstanding avoidance, and often do not perform at-home exposure exercises included in frontline recommended treatments, the "immersive" nature of VRE can directly target this avoidance.
Proof of Concept: In 2022, the investigators conducted a proof-of-concept study in which they assessed the acceptability and feasibility of VRE for vaginismus. Our results indicated that patients with vaginismus experienced greater distress when viewing VR erotica and were more likely to use anxiety management strategies than controls. Despite this, 95% of participants with vaginismus endorsed VRE as an acceptable treatment option.
Theoretical Approach/Framework Fear in the Context of Genital Pain: Fear of pain elicits a cascade of cognitive-motivational and physio¬logical processes that interact with one another and influence pain processing via multiple pathways. Specifically, fear induces hypervigilance to (potentially) pain-inducing sexual stimuli, their appraisal as threatening, and draws attention away from sexually exciting cues. Negative appraisals of sexual stimuli paired with reduced attention to sexual cues inhibits genital arousal, which increases pelvic floor muscle tension and vaginal dryness. These physical changes cause mechanical friction, and in turn, pain. The association between pain and sexual activity leads to avoidance of sexual encounters. Therefore, tackling fear is a key piece of the genital pain puzzle.
Fear Learning as a Treatment Target: Research suggests that fear of genital pain is learned through classical conditioning when a neutral stimulus is paired with pain. For example, if an adolescent inserts a tampon for the first time and there is significant pain, they will learn to expect pain on subsequent insertions. As a result, they may avoid using tampons, which they think will prevent pain and/or reduce fear, reinforcing the avoidance behaviour. Their behavioural response maintains the tampon's threat value, as the absence of the painful outcome is attributed to the avoidance. In the case of vaginismus, fear generalization occurs, such that the adolescent's expectation of pain and consequent fear spreads to any type of stimulus that involves vulvar and/or vaginal touch, such as vaginal inter¬course and gynaecological exams, giving rise to a broader penetration-pain association that extends from tampons to all insertive objects.
Since fear acquisition and (especially) fear generalization play key roles in the development and maintenance of chronic genital pain, effective treatments require fear extinction via conditioning, commonly referred to as exposure therapy. Traditionally, this involves repeatedly exposing an individual to the fear-inducing stimulus until their fear decreases (habituates), which represents a corrective experience. However, recent work from experts in the study of anxiety disorders suggests that expectancy violation and inhibitory learning are the key mechanisms of exposure, with more robust treatment effects when there is a discrepancy between expected and actual outcomes. When exposure is successful, extinction does not erase the original penetration-pain association that was learned during acquisition, but a new inhibitory penetration-no pain association develops and inhibits the retrieval of the original acquisition memory.
The protocol proposed here will incorporate psychoeducation about these concepts before VRE treatment begins, repeated exposure to virtual sexual scenarios, and progressive insertion of vaginal accommodators for sensory-motor feedback training. Psychoeducation is an evidence-based intervention that provides information and support to individuals. It has been found to be beneficial when coupled with other treatments, and may be particularly important for e-health interventions. VRE treatment studies for anxiety disorders often include patient psychoeducation, VR technology, and use safety behaviours. Psychoeducational interventions for vaginismus have also proved beneficial for fear behaviours and overall well-being. Communication exercises, relaxation techniques, and sex education are common elements of these programs. The investigators predict that these treatment elements will promote the extinction of penetration-related fears for individuals with vaginismus. We also predict a reduction in sex related distress.
- Conditions
- Vaginismus
- Being tested
- Virtual reality exposure
- Keywords
- virtual reality, digital health, sexual health
- Medical subject headings
- Vaginismus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Virtual reality exposureBehavioural
This is a single case design and there is only one intervention. In the no-treatment arm, participants will only have assessment but no virtual reality exposure therapy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual reality exposure plus psychoeducation | Experimental | The investigators designed the VRE protocol based on interviews from our proof-of-concept study. Participants will take part in 3 x 2-hour sessions over a 3-week period. Treatment will adhere to three key principles: (i) Exposure will be prolonged, such that participants will use a VR headset to view a sexual scene multiple times; (ii) Treatment will proceed gradually, with the sexual activities depicted moving from non-penetrative (low fear) to penetrative (high fear); and (iii) Exposures will be repeated, with participants re-watching the videos until their fear response has habituated (i.e., level of distress = 10-20/100).
Prior to their first VRE session, participants will be given access to a website with descriptions and images of a variety of VR sexual videos, which will allow them to select an exposure film based on comfort with/attraction to the virtual actor. Receives: Behavioral: Virtual reality exposure |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ease of vaginal insertion
Ease of vaginal insertion will be measured using a modified version of the Tampon Test used extensively in Provoked Vestibulodynia research.It involves having the participant insert a small vaginal accommodator (approximately the size of a tampon) into their vagina, and rate the ease of insertion on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (unable to insert - too difficult) to 10 (can insert with great ease).
Measured: Assessed 2x per week during no treatment (Phase A) and Treatment (VRE - Phase B), and once at 3-weeks and 3-month follow-ups.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Insertion pain
Insertion pain will be assessed using the Tampon Test at the same time they are assessing ease of vaginal insertion; participants will self-report their insertion pain on an 11-pt scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Measured: Assessed 2x per week during no treatment (Phase A) and Treatment (VRE - Phase B), and once at 3-weeks and 3-month follow-ups.
Frequency of sexual activity that includes vaginal insertion
Participants will answer the following two questions the day before Treatment (VRE - Phase B), final day of Treatment (VRE - Phase B), and once at 3-weeks and 3-month follow-ups: 1. "In the past 3 weeks, have you engaged in any sexual activity that involved penetration?" Answer will be on a 3-point scale: 0 = I have not attempted to engage in sexual activity that included penetration; 1 = I have inserted my own finger or sex toy into my vagina; 2 = my partner has inserted a finger, sex toy, or penis into my vagina. 2. "How many times have you engaged in any sexual activity that involved penetration?"
Measured: Assessed the day before Treatment (VRE - Phase B), final day of Treatment (VRE - Phase B), and once at 3-weeks and 3-month follow-ups.
Frequency of vaginal accommodator/dilator use
Participants will answer the following two questions the day before Treatment (VRE - Phase B), final day of Treatment (VRE - Phase B), and once at 3-weeks and 3-month follow-ups: 1. "In the past 3 weeks, have you attempted to insert vaginal accommodators/dilators outside of the context of the study (i.e., not for ease of insertion or pain with insertion assessment?" Participants will be invited to select either: 0 = I have not attempted to insert a vaginal accommodator/dilator; 1 = I have attempted to insert a vaginal accommodator/dilator. 2. "How often have you attempted to insert vaginal accommodators/dilators outside of the context of the study (i.e., not for ease of insertion or pain with insertion assessment?"
Measured: Assessed day before Treatment (VRE - Phase B), final day of Treatment (VRE - Phase B), and once at 3-weeks and 3-month follow-ups.
Negative and catastrophic penetration-related cognitions (VPCQ)
Negative and catastrophic penetration-related cognitions, will be assessed using the Vaginal Penetration Cognition Questionnaire (VPCQ), validated for vaginismus. Individuals will rate the applicability of 40 statements (e.g., I am afraid that my vagina is too narrow for penetration) using a 7-pt scale ranging from 1 (not at all applicable) to 7 (very strongly applicable).
Measured: Assessed day before Treatment (VRE - Phase B), final day of Treatment (VRE - Phase B), and once at 3-weeks and 3-month follow-ups.
Sexual distress (FSDS-R)
Sexual distress will be measured by the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R), used extensively in sexuality treatment outcome studies. Participants will rate 13 statements using a 5-pt numeric scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always) to indicate how often they experience distress related to sexual problems.
Measured: Assessed day before Treatment (VRE - Phase B), final day of Treatment (VRE - Phase B), and once at 3-weeks and 3-month follow-ups.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Apr 2025
- Study start1 Apr 2025
- Primary completion30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for VaginismusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- This study uses a multiple baseline single case design (SCD) in which the investigators will compare no treatment with VRE using a non-concurrent randomized single case A-B phase design, with 4 cohorts of 5 participants (n=20). To establish an experimental effect in SCD, ongoing assessment of outcomes throughout each phase is a necessary condition, with best-practice guidelines mandating at least 3 observations per outcome variable per phase. Here, for each participant, primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed repeatedly during baseline (i.e., Baseline and Psychoeducation - Phase A, lasting 1.5 - 3.5 weeks, and during Virtual Reality Exposure therapy - Phase B), lasting 3 weeks.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lori Brotto, University of British Columbia
- Investigators
- Lori Brotto, PhD, RPsych, Principal investigator, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06923306
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H24-01258
- Acronym
- VIVID 2
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Mar 2025
- Last updated
- 30 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: We will be providing all IPD that underlie results in a publication. We will provide Analytic Code only in addition to the data and data dictionaries. Other information will be presented in the publications or available upon request from the main author or PI.
Publications
Ter Kuile MM, Melles R, de Groot HE, Tuijnman-Raasveld CC, van Lankveld JJDM. Therapist-aided exposure for women with lifelong vaginismus: a randomized waiting-list control trial of efficacy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Dec;81(6):1127-1136. doi: 10.1037/a0034292. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
PubMed 24060195Milani S, Jabs F, Brown NB, Zdaniuk B, Kingstone A, Brotto LA. Virtual Reality Erotica: Exploring General Presence, Sexual Presence, Sexual Arousal, and Sexual Desire in Women. Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Jan;51(1):565-576. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02111-8. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
PubMed 34697691Wechsler TF, Kumpers F, Muhlberger A. Inferiority or Even Superiority of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy in Phobias?-A Systematic Review and Quantitative Meta-Analysis on Randomized Controlled Trials Specifically Comparing the Efficacy of Virtual Reality Exposure to Gold Standard in vivo Exposure in Agoraphobia, Specific Phobia, and Social Phobia. Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 10;10:1758. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01758. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31551840
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Virtual Reality Exposure for Vaginismus: A Replicated Single-Case Design
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06923306
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VIVID 2 / H24-01258
- Conditions
- Vaginismus
- Keywords
- virtual reality, digital health, sexual health
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Vaginismus is a sexual dysfunction characterized by involuntary tightening of the pelvic floor muscles, preventing vaginal intercourse. It is defined by an intense fear of vaginal penetration, leading to persistent difficulties with vaginal intercourse and gynaecological exams. Psychological factors play a significant role in vaginismus. If the pelvic floor muscle tightening represents a defensive reflex, then treatment using a gradual exposure to feared stimuli using virtual reality may lead to an extinction of the phobic response, and to amelioration of vaginismus. If effective, the use of virtual reality technology can directly improve clinical care offered to those suffering from vaginismus.
Detailed description
Purpose/Aims:
VR is a new, powerful technology that, if effective, can directly improve clinical care offered to those suffering from vaginismus across Canada. This study will advance health-related knowledge by providing new data on the efficacy of VRE for vaginismus and health outcomes by having the potential to increase access to effective treatment for women living in rural and remote areas as well as those who experience other barriers in accessing care-including extreme fear or anxiety. Thus, this research program has a high likelihood of filling a major gap in healthcare for women and others with a vagina and, if effective, our treatment paradigm has significant potential for scale-up.
Hypothesis:
The investigators will use the Marascuilo-Busk randomization test to test our hypothesis that the onset of VRE leads to an increase in vaginal insertion ease, a decrease in insertion pain, and an increase in the frequency of sexual activity that includes penetration. We also predict a decrease in both secondary outcomes of vaginal penetration related cognitions, and female sexual distress.
Justification:
Lack of Effective Treatments: Available psychological treatments for vaginismus involve self-insertion of vaginal accommodators (which resemble dildos) at home by progressively inserting larger sizes as the individual practices relaxation exercises that address both the psychological fear and the involuntary pelvic floor muscle tension. However, individuals with vaginismus experience significant and longstanding avoidance and struggle to complete accommodator exercises on their own at home, even if they believe the treatment will be effective. This avoidance significantly limits treatment effectiveness. For example, the largest RCT (n=117) evaluating the efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy for vaginismus, which included gradual self-insertion of accommodators into the vagina, yielded a small treatment effect: only 14% of women who attended ten 2-hour group therapy sessions were able to have vaginal intercourse at post-treatment.
Exposure - An Essential Treatment Element: Therapist-guided exposure therapy includes a patient progressively inserting vaginal accomodators in the presence of a supportive clinician, and is highly effective in treating vaginismus, showing greater success than solo, self-guided interventions. Of 77 women who attended two therapist-guided sessions over one week, 89% reported vaginal intercourse 6-weeks post-treatment. Despite this effective treatment approach, in North America therapist-aided exposure practices are not permitted due to institutional restrictions, licensing regulations, and/or patient discomfort. As such, the development of alternative exposure-based treatments is needed. The investigators propose an innovative application of VR, as an alternative to exposure, to address this significant health gap.
VR Exposure - An Opportunity: VRE immerses individuals in 3D simulations of feared situations and is as effective as real-life exposure for specific phobias. VRE for vaginismus, which involves gradual exposure to feared (virtual) sexual encounters, may diminish phobic responses towards vaginal penetration. Given that women with vaginismus cope via longstanding avoidance, and often do not perform at-home exposure exercises included in frontline recommended treatments, the "immersive" nature of VRE can directly target this avoidance.
Proof of Concept: In 2022, the investigators conducted a proof-of-concept study in which they assessed the acceptability and feasibility of VRE for vaginismus. Our results indicated that patients with vaginismus experienced greater distress when viewing VR erotica and were more likely to use anxiety management strategies than controls. Despite this, 95% of participants with vaginismus endorsed VRE as an acceptable treatment option.
Theoretical Approach/Framework Fear in the Context of Genital Pain: Fear of pain elicits a cascade of cognitive-motivational and physio¬logical processes that interact with one another and influence pain processing via multiple pathways. Specifically, fear induces hypervigilance to (potentially) pain-inducing sexual stimuli, their appraisal as threatening, and draws attention away from sexually exciting cues. Negative appraisals of sexual stimuli paired with reduced attention to sexual cues inhibits genital arousal, which increases pelvic floor muscle tension and vaginal dryness. These physical changes cause mechanical friction, and in turn, pain. The association between pain and sexual activity leads to avoidance of sexual encounters. Therefore, tackling fear is a key piece of the genital pain puzzle.
Fear Learning as a Treatment Target: Research suggests that fear of genital pain is learned through classical conditioning when a neutral stimulus is paired with pain. For example, if an adolescent inserts a tampon for the first time and there is significant pain, they will learn to expect pain on subsequent insertions. As a result, they may avoid using tampons, which they think will prevent pain and/or reduce fear, reinforcing the avoidance behaviour. Their behavioural response maintains the tampon's threat value, as the absence of the painful outcome is attributed to the avoidance. In the case of vaginismus, fear generalization occurs, such that the adolescent's expectation of pain and consequent fear spreads to any type of stimulus that involves vulvar and/or vaginal touch, such as vaginal inter¬course and gynaecological exams, giving rise to a broader penetration-pain association that extends from tampons to all insertive objects.
Since fear acquisition and (especially) fear generalization play key roles in the development and maintenance of chronic genital pain, effective treatments require fear extinction via conditioning, commonly referred to as exposure therapy. Traditionally, this involves repeatedly exposing an individual to the fear-inducing stimulus until their fear decreases (habituates), which represents a corrective experience. However, recent work from experts in the study of anxiety disorders suggests that expectancy violation and inhibitory learning are the key mechanisms of exposure, with more robust treatment effects when there is a discrepancy between expected and actual outcomes. When exposure is successful, extinction does not erase the original penetration-pain association that was learned during acquisition, but a new inhibitory penetration-no pain association develops and inhibits the retrieval of the original acquisition memory.
The protocol proposed here will incorporate psychoeducation about these concepts before VRE treatment begins, repeated exposure to virtual sexual scenarios, and progressive insertion of vaginal accommodators for sensory-motor feedback training. Psychoeducation is an evidence-based intervention that provides information and support to individuals. It has been found to be beneficial when coupled with other treatments, and may be particularly important for e-health interventions. VRE treatment studies for anxiety disorders often include patient psychoeducation, VR technology, and use safety behaviours. Psychoeducational interventions for vaginismus have also proved beneficial for fear behaviours and overall well-being. Communication exercises, relaxation techniques, and sex education are common elements of these programs. The investigators predict that these treatment elements will promote the extinction of penetration-related fears for individuals with vaginismus. We also predict a reduction in sex related distress.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- This study uses a multiple baseline single case design (SCD) in which the investigators will compare no treatment with VRE using a non-concurrent randomized single case A-B phase design, with 4 cohorts of 5 participants (n=20). To establish an experimental effect in SCD, ongoing assessment of outcomes throughout each phase is a necessary condition, with best-practice guidelines mandating at least 3 observations per outcome variable per phase. Here, for each participant, primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed repeatedly during baseline (i.e., Baseline and Psychoeducation - Phase A, lasting 1.5 - 3.5 weeks, and during Virtual Reality Exposure therapy - Phase B), lasting 3 weeks.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual reality exposure plus psychoeducation | Experimental | Behavioral: Virtual reality exposureThe investigators designed the VRE protocol based on interviews from our proof-of-concept study. Participants will take part in 3 x 2-hour sessions over a 3-week period. Treatment will adhere to three key principles: (i) Exposure will be prolonged, such that participants will use a VR headset to view a sexual scene multiple times; (ii) Treatment will proceed gradually, with the sexual activities depicted moving from non-penetrative (low fear) to penetrative (high fear); and (iii) Exposures will be repeated, with participants re-watching the videos until their fear response has habituated (i.e., level of distress = 10-20/100). Prior to their first VRE session, participants will be given access to a website with descriptions and images of a variety of VR sexual videos, which will allow them to select an exposure film based on comfort with/attraction to the virtual actor. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- The investigators will recruit individuals who have a vagina. They expect that most participants will identify as cisgender, where sex is female and gender is woman, while others may have a female sex but identify as a different gender (e.g., genderdiverse). Transwomen (i.e., birth assigned males but identify as woman) who have had gender-affirming surgery (and so have a vagina) are eligible, as are transmen (i.e., birth assigned females but identify as men) who have not had bottom surgery (so have a vagina).
- Inclusion criteria: In addition to having a vagina, participants must have a diagnosis of vaginismus that requires self-reported involuntary tightness of the vaginal musculature that causes persistent interference with vaginal penetration lasting >6 months; aged >19 y, of any sexual orientation. Participants must be fluent in English (psychoeducational materials and questionnaires delivered in English), have normal or corrected-to-normal vision (to view the VR scenes during exposure), and be able to travel to Vancouver.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Presence of: unprovoked vaginal pain; a vulvar skin condition (i.e., lichen sclerosus); an imperforate hymen; or epilepsy characterized by photosensitive seizures. Note: provoked vulvar pain is not an exclusion criterion because at least 40% of people with vaginismus report pain with attempted penetration.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual reality exposureThis is a single case design and there is only one intervention. In the no-treatment arm, participants will only have assessment but no virtual reality exposure therapy. | Behavioural | Virtual reality exposure plus psychoeducation |
Primary outcome
Ease of vaginal insertion
Time frame: Assessed 2x per week during no treatment (Phase A) and Treatment (VRE - Phase B), and once at 3-weeks and 3-month follow-ups.
Ease of vaginal insertion will be measured using a modified version of the Tampon Test used extensively in Provoked Vestibulodynia research.It involves having the participant insert a small vaginal accommodator (approximately the size of a tampon) into their vagina, and rate the ease of insertion on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (unable to insert - too difficult) to 10 (can insert with great ease).
5 secondary outcomes
Insertion pain
Time frame: Assessed 2x per week during no treatment (Phase A) and Treatment (VRE - Phase B), and once at 3-weeks and 3-month follow-ups.
Frequency of sexual activity that includes vaginal insertion
Time frame: Assessed the day before Treatment (VRE - Phase B), final day of Treatment (VRE - Phase B), and once at 3-weeks and 3-month follow-ups.
Frequency of vaginal accommodator/dilator use
Time frame: Assessed day before Treatment (VRE - Phase B), final day of Treatment (VRE - Phase B), and once at 3-weeks and 3-month follow-ups.
Negative and catastrophic penetration-related cognitions (VPCQ)
Time frame: Assessed day before Treatment (VRE - Phase B), final day of Treatment (VRE - Phase B), and once at 3-weeks and 3-month follow-ups.
Sexual distress (FSDS-R)
Time frame: Assessed day before Treatment (VRE - Phase B), final day of Treatment (VRE - Phase B), and once at 3-weeks and 3-month follow-ups.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 24060195Ter Kuile MM, Melles R, de Groot HE, Tuijnman-Raasveld CC, van Lankveld JJDM. Therapist-aided exposure for women with lifelong vaginismus: a randomized waiting-list control trial of efficacy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Dec;81(6):1127-1136. doi: 10.1037/a0034292. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 34697691Milani S, Jabs F, Brown NB, Zdaniuk B, Kingstone A, Brotto LA. Virtual Reality Erotica: Exploring General Presence, Sexual Presence, Sexual Arousal, and Sexual Desire in Women. Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Jan;51(1):565-576. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02111-8. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 31551840Wechsler TF, Kumpers F, Muhlberger A. Inferiority or Even Superiority of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy in Phobias?-A Systematic Review and Quantitative Meta-Analysis on Randomized Controlled Trials Specifically Comparing the Efficacy of Virtual Reality Exposure to Gold Standard in vivo Exposure in Agoraphobia, Specific Phobia, and Social Phobia. Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 10;10:1758. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01758. eCollection 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. We will be providing all IPD that underlie results in a publication. We will provide Analytic Code only in addition to the data and data dictionaries. Other information will be presented in the publications or available upon request from the main author or PI.
Related trials for Vaginismus
Enrolling by invitation
Immersive Visual Modulation and Ambient Music Therapy During Transvaginal Ultrasonography in Women With Vaginismus
Vaginismus
Not yet recruiting
Implementing Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Vaginismus: From Efficacy to Clinical Integration (VIVID 3)
Vaginismus, Difficulties With Vaginal Penetration
Not yet recruiting
Measuring Pelvic Floor Muscle Fitness Before and After Treatment
Myofacial Pain, Pelvic Pain
Active, not recruiting
Early Psychological Intervention After Rape
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Rape Sexual Assault
Recruiting
VIBRating vs Traditional Therapy for Treatment of ENTry Dyspareunia
Genito-Pelvic Pain/Penetration Disorder, Dyspareunia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lori Brotto, PhD, RPsych principal investigator
University of British Columbia
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Virtual reality exposure in people with Vaginismus, run by University of British Columbia at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ease of vaginal insertion (time frame: Assessed 2x per week during no treatment (Phase A) and Treatment (VRE - Phase B), and once at 3-weeks and 3-month follow-ups.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06923306, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jun 2026.