AzTrials
AzTrials

Organ TransplantationPhase 2TRANSPERFNCT06950398

Normothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (NMP) Viability Testing Before Transplantation of Discarded Livers

A Phase 2 study testing NMP viability testing in people with Organ Transplantation and Liver Dysfunction, run by Rennes University Hospital at 6 sites in France.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Liver transplantation (LT) is a highly effective treatment for end-stage liver disease and early-stage primary liver cancer. As such, the demand for donor livers greatly exceeds supply; in 2021 in France, 12.9% of patients on the waitlist either died or were delisted for worsening of their condition. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
NMP viability testing
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
99 participants
Where
6 sitesFrance
Study dates
15 Dec 2025to 15 Jun 2029
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • FOR LIVER DONORS
  • Donation after brainstem death (DBD)
  • Liver graft refused by 5 different transplant centres and after rescue allocation ("hors tour")
  • FOR LIVER TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
  • ≥ 18 years old
  • Candidates for a first elective liver transplantation (patients with a pre-transplant work-up excluding: re-transplantation, emergency transplantation (e.g. fulminant hepatitis), multi-organ or heterotopic transplantation)
Show all 22Show fewer
  • UNOS status IV (non-ventilated, no vasopressor support)
  • Absence of renal insufficiency defined as a GFR of less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m² for three months or more
  • MELD Score ≤ 25
  • Willing and able to attend follow-up examinations
  • Having signed an informed consent document
  • NON-INCLUSION CRITERIA:
  • FOR LIVER DONORS
  • Macroscopic features of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis at procurement
  • Transplantation using a split graft, in situ or ex situ
  • Estimated cold ischemic time greater than 8 hours (5 hours maximum of graft transport in cold ischemia)
  • FOR LIVER TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
  • Mentally or legally incapacitated
  • Transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure
  • Early or late re-transplantation
  • Combined liver transplant with any other organ, en-bloc or not
  • Heterotopic liver transplantation

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

6 sites in 1 country

France6 sites
  • APHP_Hôpital Beaujon

    Clichy, 92110

    Mickael LESURTEL, MD

    mickael.lesurtel@aphp.fr

  • Hôpital Croix Rousse

    Lyon, 69003

    Jean-Yves MABRUT, MD, jean-yves.mabrut@chu-lyon.fr

  • CHU de Montpellier

    Montpellier, 34090

    Astrid HERRERO, MD, a-herrero@chu-montpellier.fr

  • CHU de Rennes PONTCHAILLOU

    Rennes, 35000

    Heithem JEDDOU, MD, Heithem.JEDDOU@chu-rennes.fr

  • CHRU Tours

    Tours, 37170

    Ephrem SALAME, ephrem.salame@chu-tours.fr

  • APHP_Hopital Paul Brousse

    Villejuif, 94800

    Marc Antoine ALLARD, MD, marcantoine.allard@aphp.fr

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Normothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (NMP) Viability Testing Before Transplantation of Discarded Livers. An Open Label, Non-randomized, Prospective, Single Arm Trial

Liver transplantation (LT) is a highly effective treatment for end-stage liver disease and early-stage primary liver cancer. As such, the demand for donor livers greatly exceeds supply; in 2021 in France, 12.9% of patients on the waitlist either died or were delisted for worsening of their condition.

However a substantial number of perfectly viable organs are wrongly discarded based on a highly subjective assessment as the level of acceptance varies widely depending on the physician's judgement.

Read more

The idea of using Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) not only to preserve the liver graft but also for selection purposes is a concept that has been already investigated. A few trials have analyzed the value of normothermic perfusion to assess rejected liver grafts.

Several teams demonstrated that NMP provides a tool to assess organ viability pre-transplantation as the liver is able to maintain an almost physiological metabolism.

These preliminary results came from small samples, 45% of which originated from donation after circulatory death (DCD). They need confirmation in a larger sample of organs from donors with brainstem death (DBD), adapted to the French liver allocation system.

This trial will reproduce and confirm the results of the previous studies in order to establish viability testing as the de facto method for high-risk or rejected grafts. It will also validate existing viability markers so as to define a new standard for viability testing using NMP.

Read the detailed description

Liver transplantation (LT) is a highly effective treatment for end-stage liver disease and early-stage primary liver cancer. As such, the demand for donor livers greatly exceeds supply; in 2021 in France, 12.9% of patients on the waitlist either died or were delisted for worsening of their condition.

Demand for liver grafts has driven the wider use of extended criteria donors (ECD). Grafts from ECD donors are associated with an increased risk of primary non-function, which is difficult to predict on an individual basis. The suitability of donor livers is determined based on donor history, age, weight, biological parameters of liver function, radiologic features, as well as the graft's macroscopic aspect at the time of procurement. The predictive value of these parameters to detect grafts unsuitable for transplantation is low, especially in the group of grafts obtained from ECD. Hence, the viability of donor livers can only be assessed after the fact, which could be life threatening for recipients of ECD livers.

As a result, a substantial number of perfectly viable organs are wrongly discarded based on a highly subjective assessment as the level of acceptance varies widely depending on the physician's judgement. In France, 253 (20%) of proposed livers were rejected in 2021.

Per current practices, livers are made available for rescue allocation after 5 refusals from 5 different transplant centers before being definitely discarded. Although the reasons for refusal are sometimes evident, (i.e. suspicious tumor or cirrhosis on the donor's CT-scan), most of the time refusal is based on the donor's clinical and biological characteristics.

This multicentric prospective non-randomized trial aims to evaluate the potential of NMP to provide an objective viability assessment of discarded livers. The co-primary endpoints will be (i) the rate of initially discarded livers eventually rescued after evaluation on a normothermic machine and (ii) the rate of functional grafts at 3 months among transplanted rescued livers.

A graft is considered functional at 3 months if the recipient remains alive and no retransplantation has been necessary within that period.

The device that will be used to perfuse the grafts is the OrganOx metra. It perfuses the donor liver with blood, oxygen and nutrients, as well as a number of medications (bile salt, insulin, heparin and prostacyclin), at normal body temperature to mimic ideal physiological conditions and preserve the organ for up to 24 hours. The device provides information as to the haemodynamic, synthetic and metabolic function of the liver to assist the clinician in assessing the organ's suitability for transplantation.

For a liver to be considered viable it has to meet specific viability criteria that are easily assessed using the perfusion device. Several teams demonstrated that NMP provides a tool to assess organ viability pre-transplantation as the liver is able to maintain an almost physiological metabolism. This is especially important as NMP allows an objective assessment of grafts driving the decision to transplant based upon actual graft function rather than a rather superficial risk assessment, which is what is being done currently. Mergental et al. proposed in 2016 lactate clearance (i.e. < 2.5 mmol/l) as a marker of viability in high-risk or discarded livers while Watson et al. suggested that viability is a combination of several characteristics including transaminases, glucose metabolism, lactate clearance, and acid-base balance. In addition, the ability of the liver to maintain acid-base homeostasis was shown to be predictive of post-operative outcomes. Sutton et al. also suggested that bile output may differentiate viable from non-viable livers. Other proposed criteria include hemodynamic parameters (hepatic artery and portal vein flow) and bile composition during NMP.

In 2020, Mergental et al. reported validation of lactate clearance as a viability criteria (i.e. < 2.5 mmol/l within 4 hours) allowing transplantation to be performed using 22 of 31 discarded livers with 100% 90-day survival. Another trial reported successful transplantation after NMP using a custom-built device of 15 livers out of 21 discarded grafts. These preliminary results came from small samples, 45% of which originated from donation after circulatory death (DCD). They need confirmation in a larger sample of organs from donors with brainstem death (DBD), adapted to the French liver allocation system. Grafts from DCD donors will not be included because, in France, DCD donors are subjected to in situ normothermic regional perfusion before procurement. Only liver grafts procured from DBD donors will be included in this study.

Being tested
NMP viability testing
Keywords
Liver Transplantation, Normothermic oxygenated perfusion, NMP, Discarded livers, Viability assessment
Medical subject headings
Liver Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NMP viability testingOther

    NMP viability testing before transplantation of discarded livers

Study groups in NCT06950398
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Normothermic oxygenated perfusion (NMP) viability testingExperimentalDiscarded liver grafts are connected to a normothermic perfusion machine (OrganOx Metra®) for a period of 4 to 12 hours prior to transplantation, to assess their viability.
Receives: Other: NMP viability testing

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. - To assess the efficacy of NMP to provide objective assessment of the viability of livers which were initially discarded

    • Rate of initially discarded livers eventually transplanted after viability testing using NMP (A stopping rule will be implemented based on the incidence of initially discarded livers eventually transplanted. NMP would be considered as:
    • uninteresting if the rate of discarded livers finally rescued is ≤ 25%
    • and promising if ≥ 40%.)

    Measured: Day 0

  2. - To assess grafts survival of rescued livers after transplantation

    • Rate of functional grafts

    Measured: Month 3, among transplanted rescued livers

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. - To assess early graft dysfunction

    Rate of early allograft dysfunction (EAD). EAD is defined according to Olthoff criteria by the presence of at least one of the following criteria:

    • bilirubin level over 171 mmol/L on PTD7,
    • International Normalized Ratio (INR) over 1.6 on PTD7,
    • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels > 2000 IU/L within the first 7 PTDs

    Measured: Day 7

  2. - To assess primary non-function

    Need for re-transplantation and/or death of recipient from liver failure

    Measured: Day 7

  3. - To assess intraoperative morbidity

    Rate of incidents during reperfusion

    Measured: Day 0

  4. - To assess postoperative morbidity

    Rate of adverse event and severity, graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification

    Measured: Month 3

  5. - To assess infectious complications

    Rate of post-operative pulmonary or surgical site infections

    Measured: Month 3

  6. - To assess acute kidney injury

    Rate of requirement of renal replacement therapy

    Measured: Month 3

  7. - To asses biliary complications

    Rate of biliary strictures, anastomotic and non-anastomotic, bile duct leaks

    Measured: Month12

  8. - To assess vascular complications

    Rate of vascular complications (bleeding, hepatic artery stenosis, hepatic artery thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, portal vein stenosis)

    Measured: Month 3

  9. - To assess acute rejection risks

    Rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection

    Measured: Month 3

  10. - To assess the need for re-operation

    Rate of re-operation (re-laparotomy and/or laparoscopy)

    Measured: Month 3

  11. - To assess lengths of stay

    Median length of intensive care unit stay (days)

    Measured: Month12

  12. - To assess graft survival

    Time from liver transplantation to re-transplantation or patient death

    Measured: Month12

  13. - To assess recipient survival

    The time from liver transplantation to death

    Measured: Month12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Apr 2025
  2. Study start15 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Jun 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
National, multicenter, exploratory open-label, prospective, non-randomized, single-arm trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
99 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06950398
Sponsor's protocol ID
35RC22_9768_TRANSPERF
Acronym
TRANSPERF
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
19 Nov 2024
Last updated
15 Aug 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing NMP viability testing in people with Organ Transplantation and Liver Dysfunction, run by Rennes University Hospital at 6 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 22 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Heithem JEDDOU, MD (+0033299289841, Heithem.JEDDOU@chu-rennes.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

- To assess the efficacy of NMP to provide objective assessment of the viability of livers which were initially discarded (time frame: Day 0). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Aug 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in