AzTrials
AzTrials

Achalasia CardiaRECAPNCT07022886

INCIDENCE, PREVALENCE AND OVERALL RISK OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER IN ACHALASIA: A PROPENSITY-MATCHED POPULATION-BASED STUDY FROM A LARGE MULTICENTER DATABASE

An observational study of Achalasia Cardia and Esophageal Cancer (EsC), run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 1 site in Italy.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Esophageal Achalasia has been investigated as a potential risk factor for esophageal cancer (EC). Longstanding disease, repeated treatment, age and male sex seem the most relevant risk factors, but no clear effect size estimation from large sample cohorts has been provided so far. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Achalasia Cardia, Esophageal Cancer (EsC)
What is being tested?
achalasia treatments
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
47,000 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
3 Jun 2025to 7 Sep 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Achalasia diagnosis according to guidelines as stated in Electronic Health Records (EHR) data.

Who may be able to join

  • Esophageal achalasia diagnosed according to guidelines (ICD-10-K22.0)

Who cannot join

  • Primary esophaeal and pharyngeal motility disorders (ICD-10-J39.2)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital

    Milan, Lombardy, 20132

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Esophageal Achalasia has been investigated as a potential risk factor for esophageal cancer (EC). Longstanding disease, repeated treatment, age and male sex seem the most relevant risk factors, but no clear effect size estimation from large sample cohorts has been provided so far. The aim of the investigators is to estimate EC risk in large sample-size population, and to provide sub-analyses per cancer type and treatment impact on EC risk.

Read the detailed description

Achalasia is a chronic idiopathic condition characterized by the absence of esophageal peristalsis and reduced relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter, causing progressive dysphagia and weight loss. Achalasia has been investigated as a potential risk factor for esophageal cancer (EC); squamous cancer due to chronic inflammation related to stasis due to poor esophageal emptying and adenocarcinoma due to uncontrolled gastroesophageal reflux after treatment. Longstanding disease, repeated treatment, age and male sex have been addressed as the most relevant risk factors, but no clear effect size estimation from large sample cohorts has been provided so far.

The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study, accessing the global federated health research network "TriNetX", that provides access to electronic medical records from approximately a hundred million patients across large healthcare organizations (HCOs). The analysis will be performed on achalasia patients, based on the ICD-10 code (K22.0), from January 1st 2000 until May 31st 2025. The incidence rate (cases/1000 persons-year) and cumulative prevalence of EC in an achalasia cohort in a span of 25 years will be firstly assessed. Then the absolute and time-to-event risk of EC, by comparing the achalasia cohort with control cohort, after propensity score nearest neighbor greedy matching, for relevant covariates. Kaplan-Meyer (KM) analysis with censoring, Hazard Ratios (HRs) and Risk Ratio (RR) and Risk Difference (RD) estimation for EC risk will be calculated. Log Rank test will be used to compare KM curves. Further sub-group analysis will be implemented between two population of achalasia patients, treated (with endoscopic/surgical myotomy or pneumatic dilation) and treatment-naïve. Further in-depth analyses between histologic type of EC, esophageal localization and comparing different achalasia treatment (myotomy vs pneumatic dilation) will be performed, in order to categorize the risk of EC, if more linked to treatment and therefore to the development of reflux, Barrett esophagus eventually leading to adenocarcinoma, or towards squamous cell cancer driven by chronic stasis and degeneration of the squamous esophageal epithelium

Being tested
achalasia treatments
Keywords
achalasia, esophageal cancer
Medical subject headings
Esophageal Achalasia, Esophageal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • achalasia treatmentsProcedure or surgery

    Also called POEM, LHM

    esophageal achalasia treatments

Study groups in NCT07022886
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Achalasia primary cohortAchalasia cohort (both naive or treated)
Control subjectsHealthy controls, with the exclusion of achalasia
Achalasia without Barrett EsophagusSensitivity analysis of achalasia both treated or untreated without Barrett esophagus
Treated achalasiaachalasia undergone to various treatments
Receives: Procedure: achalasia treatments
Untreated achalasiaAchalasia without previous treatment
LHMHeller-Dor myotomy
Receives: Procedure: achalasia treatments
POEMPeroral endoscopic myotomy
Receives: Procedure: achalasia treatments

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hazard Ratio

    Hazard Ratio (HR) with Kaplan Meyer (KM) analysis of EC occurrence in achalasia vs control subjects

    Measured: from Jan 1st 2000 to June 3rd 2025

  2. Incidence proportion, prevalence and incidence rate

    Incidence proportion (%), prevalence (%) and incidence rate (100,000 persons-year) of EC (and different histological subtypes)

    Measured: Jan 1st 2000- June 3rd 2025

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Risk Ratio

    Risk Ratio of EC (and different histologic subtypes) occurrence in achalasia cohort compared to controls, in treated vs untreated achalasia, LHM vs POEM group

    Measured: Jan 1st 2000-Jun 3rd 2025

  2. Risk Difference

    Risk Difference of EC (and different histological subtypes) occurrence in achalasia cohort compared to controls, in treated vs untreated achalasia, LHM vs POEM group

    Measured: Jan 1st 2000-June 3rd 2025

  3. Hazard Ratio (HR) with Kaplan Meyer (KM) analysis of EC occurrence

    Hazard Ratio (HR) with Kaplan Meyer (KM) analysis of EC occurrence (according to different subtypes) in achalasia vs control subjects and in treated vs untreated achalasia, and in LHM vs POEM

    Measured: Jan 1st 2000- June 3rd 2025

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jun 2025
  2. Study start3 Jun 2025
  3. Primary completion3 Jun 2025
  4. Study completion7 Sep 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
47,000 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07022886
Sponsor's protocol ID
RECAP
Acronym
RECAP
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
8 Jun 2025
Last updated
30 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: No IPD used in this study

Publications

  • Ponds FA, Moonen A, Smout AJPM, Rohof WOA, Tack J, van Gool S, Bisschops R, Bredenoord AJ, Boeckxstaens GE. Screening for dysplasia with Lugol chromoendoscopy in longstanding idiopathic achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun;113(6):855-862. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0064-1.

    PubMed 29748564
  • Tustumi F, Bernardo WM, da Rocha JRM, Szachnowicz S, Seguro FC, Bianchi ET, Sallum RAA, Cecconello I. Esophageal achalasia: a risk factor for carcinoma. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2017 Oct 1;30(10):1-8. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox072.

    PubMed 28859394
  • Gillies CL, Farrukh A, Abrams KR, Mayberry JF. Risk of esophageal cancer in achalasia cardia: A meta-analysis. JGH Open. 2019 Feb 8;3(3):196-200. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12132. eCollection 2019 Jun.

    PubMed 31276035

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Achalasia Cardia and Esophageal Cancer (EsC), run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hazard Ratio (time frame: from Jan 1st 2000 to June 3rd 2025). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07022886, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in