Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD)NCT07289061
Positive Psychology for Early Cognitive Decline: Effects on Cognitive and Brain Function
A study testing Positive Psychology Intervention and Treatment as usual (TAU) in people with Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), run by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
This randomized study tests whether a new multicomponent Positive Psychology program can improve cognition and wellbeing in older adults at the earliest stages of dementia-related decline. About 128 participants with Subjective Cognitive Decline or Mild Cognitive Impairment will be enrolled. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Alzheimer Dementia (AD)
- What is being tested?
- Positive Psychology Intervention and Treatment as usual (TAU)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 128 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 17 Dec 2025to Jul 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- -Documented diagnosis of Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) according to clinical evaluation and site standard criteria.
Who cannot join
- Diagnosis of dementia (major neurocognitive disorder) or other major neurocognitive disorder that is moderate or severe.
- Major psychiatric disorder currently unstable or untreated (e.g., major depression with psychotic features, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia).
- Neurological conditions that affect cognition.
- Uncorrected hearing or vision problems that prevent participation in assessments or online sessions.
- Concurrent participation in another interventional study targeting cognition or wellbeing during the study period.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Greece1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Thessaloniki, 54124
About this study
Official title: Application of Positive Psychology Interventions in Individuals With Early-stage Cognitive Decline Related to Dementia: Their Impact on Cognitive and Brain Functioning
This randomized study tests whether a new multicomponent Positive Psychology program can improve cognition and wellbeing in older adults at the earliest stages of dementia-related decline.
About 128 participants with Subjective Cognitive Decline or Mild Cognitive Impairment will be enrolled. Half will be randomized to the Positive Psychology program and half to Treatment As Usual (TAU).
Read more
The program consists of weekly, small-group online sessions for ~24 weeks plus brief home practices. All participants (both arms) will complete questionnaires and cognitive tests at baseline, during treatment, post-treatment, and 9-month follow-up.
Primary question: Do participants receiving the Positive Psychology program show better cognitive and brain-function outcomes than TAU at post-treatment and at 9 months? Secondary question: Are effects larger for SCD than MCI? No medicines are used and risks are minimal. If effective, this scalable, low-cost, non-pharmacological approach could complement usual care for people in very early cognitive decline.
Read the detailed description
Background Dementia affects tens of millions of people and no curative therapy exists. Non-pharmacological interventions that are safe, scalable, and acceptable are therefore essential to delay decline and preserve functioning. Positive Psychology Interventions (PPIs) have shown promising effects on wellbeing and, more recently, on cognitive performance and neural markers in older adults with early cognitive decline. Positive Neuropsychology proposes that cultivating positive traits and eudaimonic wellbeing may support brain plasticity and cognitive control through multiple pathways, including increased engagement, motivation, and adoption of protective lifestyles. Building on this framework, the present trial tests an online, multi-component PPI tailored for adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). The program is designed to be feasible, scalable, and low-risk, and to generate clinically relevant outcomes on cognition and brain functioning.
Objectives and Hypotheses Primary objective: determine whether the PPI produces greater improvements than Treatment As Usual (TAU) in (a) cognitive performance and (b) neurophysiological indices of brain functioning at post-intervention and at 9-month follow-up. Secondary objectives: evaluate effects on wellbeing and related psychosocial constructs (character strengths, mindfulness), and assess feasibility, adherence, and safety of online delivery. We hypothesize larger gains with PPI at 16 weeks and sustained benefits at follow-up, with potentially stronger effects in SCD than MCI.
Study Design and Setting Randomized, parallel-group, superiority behavioral trial with two diagnostic groups (SCD, MCI) recruited via Alzheimer Hellas. Within each cohort, participants are randomized 1:1 to PPI or TAU, yielding four arms (SCD-PPI, SCD-TAU, MCI-PPI, MCI-TAU). Randomization is concealed and performed by site personnel who are not involved in outcome assessment. The trial is minimal risk, uses no FDA-regulated products, and is approved by the Bioethics Committee of Alzheimer Hellas (Approval No. 99/5-6-2024). Outcome assessors are trained and, where feasible, blinded to assignment.
Participants Community-dwelling older adults with a documented diagnosis of SCD or MCI from Alzheimer Hellas according to site procedures are eligibl. Key capabilities include informed consent, sufficient sensory ability for testing, and access/ability to join online groups. Major neurological/psychiatric conditions that would confound outcomes, severe sensory impairment preventing testing, and concurrent participation in similar psychological programs during the trial are excluded. After consent, participants receive unique study IDs; identifiers are stored separately, with controlled access, and destroyed after data lock.
Intervention: Multicomponent Positive Psychology Program Delivery: weekly small-group videoconference sessions (~60 minutes) for 16 weeks led by trained psychologists.
Assessment schedule and procedures
Assessments occur at four time points:
T0 baseline (pre-randomization); T1 mid-intervention (~6 weeks); T2 post-intervention (~16 weeks; primary endpoint); T3 follow-up (~9 months post-T2). Attendance and home-practice adherence are tracked. Adverse events (AEs) are monitored each visit and during sessions per institutional policy.
Outcomes and Data Acquisition
Primary outcomes (analyzed from T0 to T3):
Cognitive performance: a composite derived from the REMEDES4Alzheimer computerized battery capturing episodic memory, working memory, attention subdomains, and executive functions, with minimized demographic bias.
Brain functioning: EEG and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) markers obtained during standardized cognitive tasks using harmonized acquisition and artifact-handling protocols.
Secondary outcomes: validated indices of wellbeing (PERMA-Profiler; PANAS) measured at all time points to model trajectories. Exploratory psychosocial measures include character strengths (VIA-114GR) and mindfulness (MAAS). Feasibility metrics include recruitment and retention, session attendance, and self-reported practice.
Sample Size and Power Four arms (SCD-PPI, SCD-TAU, MCI-PPI, MCI-TAU). A priori power calculations indicate a minimum of 32 participants per arm; target enrollment N=128.
Data management and quality control Data are captured on secure, password-protected platforms under unique study IDs; personally identifying information is maintained in a separate, access-restricted file. Quality procedures include range and logic checks, double verification of key variables, and standardized preprocessing pipelines for EEG/fNIRS feature extraction. After database lock, the re-identification log is destroyed. De-identified data may be shared as described in the IPD plan.
Statistical analysis Analyses follow the intent-to-treat principle with participants analyzed as randomized. For longitudinal outcomes, linear mixed-effects models estimate change and Arm×Time interactions, with random intercepts for participants and adjustment for diagnosis cohort (SCD/MCI) and prespecified covariates (e.g., age, sex, baseline value). The two primary outcomes will be tested with appropriate multiplicity control. EEG/fNIRS features are derived via prespecified pipelines and analyzed analogously. Exploratory mediation models will assess whether changes in mindfulness or strengths use relate to cognitive and neural changes.
Safety and ethics Risks are minimal (time burden; potential fatigue during EEG and fNIRS). Standardized procedures and scheduled breaks mitigate burden. AEs are recorded, assessed for relatedness and severity, and reported to the ethics committee per policy. The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable data-protection laws.
Implementation and expected impact Remote delivery enhances access for older adults with mobility or caregiving constraints and lowers cost for participants and providers. If efficacious, the program can be scaled across community and clinical settings through brief facilitator training and manualized materials. The trial will provide mechanistic evidence on whether cultivating character strengths and mindfulness improves cognitive functioning and alters neural activity in early decline. Demonstration of sustained benefits at nine months would support PPIs as practical, low-risk adjuncts to usual care for SCD and MCI, with potential to delay progression.
Follow-up and data sharing All participants are invited to T3 follow-up to assess durability. De-identified datasets may be shared on reasonable request after publication, subject to approvals and data-use agreements, consistent with the IPD sharing plan.
- Conditions
- Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Alzheimer Dementia (AD)
- Being tested
- Positive Psychology Intervention, Treatment as usual (TAU)
- Keywords
- positive psychology, non-pharmacological intervention for dementia, character strengths, mindfulness, forgiveness, gratitude, humor, alzheimer's disease
- Medical subject headings
- Cognitive Dysfunction, Alzheimer Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Positive Psychology InterventionBehavioural
Online, group-based Positive Psychology intervention delivered by trained psychologist. One 60-minute session per week for ~16 weeks plus brief daily home practice (~10 minutes). Core components: identification and use of character strengths and mindfulness practices. Includes goal setting and habit formation. Materials provided in Greek. The sessions will take place via secure videoconference. No medications are administered. Participants will continue to receive TAU but they will have one extra hour per week for Positive Psychology Intervention.
Treatment as usual (TAU)Behavioural
Structured cognitive training program targeting attention, memory, and executive functions. Participants will continue to receive cognitive training at Alzheimer Hellas. Activities include paper-and-pencil and computerized tasks (e.g., working-memory, processing speed, problem solving). No Positive Psychology components are included.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Psychology Intervention | Experimental | Multi-component Positive Psychology Intervention delivered online in small groups. One session per week (~60 minutes) for about 16 weeks plus brief daily home practice (about 10 minutes). Core components include identifying and using character strengths and mindfulness. Facilitated by trained psychologist. No medicines are given. Receives: Behavioral: Positive Psychology Intervention |
| Treatment as Usual | Active comparator | Participants continue the treatment they already receive (e.g. cognitive training) from their usual providers. No additional structured positive psychology program is delivered by the study team. Assessments occur at the same time points as the experimental arm (baseline, mid-program, post-program, and follow-up). Receives: Behavioral: Treatment as usual (TAU) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Global cognitive composite (z-score) from REMEDES4Alzheimer
Composite derived from REMEDES4Alzheimer subtests covering episodic memory, working memory, attention subdomains, and executive functions. Raw scores are standardized to z using baseline means,SDs and averaged to a global composite (higher scores indicate better cognition).
Unit of measure: z-score (higher = better)
Measured: T0: Baseline prior to randomization T1: Mid-intervention at 6 weeks T2: Post-intervention at 16 weeks (primary endpoint) T3: Nine-month follow-up after T2
Resting-state fNIRS functional connectivity (HbO) between bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortices
Resting-state fNIRS recorded for 5-8 minutes (eyes-open fixation). Oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO) signals are preprocessed with motion-artifact correction, short-channel regression (if available), and band-pass filtering (e.g., 0.01-0.1 Hz). Functional connectivity is computed as the Pearson correlation between left and right DLPFC regions of interest and converted to Fisher z for analysis.
Measured: T0 (Baseline), T2 (~16 weeks; primary endpoint), T3 (~9 months after T2) Unit of measure: Fisher z-transformed correlation coefficient (higher = stronger connectivity)
EEG alpha power at rest (eyes-closed)
Mean absolute power in the 8-12 Hz band during 3-min resting eyes-closed, averaged across parieto-occipital electrodes; processed with artifact rejection and ICA according to prespecified pipeline.
μV² (higher = better/according to hypothesis)
Measured: Time Frame: T0 (Baseline), T2 (~16 weeks; primary endpoint), T3 (~9 months after T2)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Character Strengths total score (VIA-114GR)
VIA-114GR total (or mean) score; subscales analyzed exploratorily. Unit of measure: total/mean score (higher = greater strengths use)
Measured: T0: Baseline prior to randomization T1: Mid-intervention at 6 weeks T2: Post-intervention at 16 weeks (primary endpoint) T3: Nine-month follow-up after T2
Wellbeing - PERMA-Profiler total score
Total PERMA score; domain scores (P, E, R, M, A) examined secondarily. Unit of measure: score 0-10 (higher = better wellbeing)
Measured: T0: Baseline prior to randomization T1: Mid-intervention at 6 weeks T2: Post-intervention at 16 weeks (primary endpoint) T3: Nine-month follow-up after T2
Mindfulness (MAAS total)
Mean of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale. Unit of measure: mean score 1-6 (higher = greater mindfulness)
Measured: T0: Baseline prior to randomization T1: Mid-intervention at 6 weeks T2: Post-intervention at 16 weeks (primary endpoint) T3: Nine-month follow-up after T2
Positive Affect (PANAS)
PANAS Positive Affect subscale. Negative Affect analyzed exploratorily. Unit of measure: score 10-50 (higher = more positive affect)
Measured: T0 (Baseline), T2 (~16 weeks; primary endpoint), T3 (~9 months after T2)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2025
- Study start17 Dec 2025
- Primary completionJun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel, two-arm randomized clinical trial. Participants with SCD or MCI are randomized within diagnosis to one of two arms: (1) multi-component Positive Psychology program delivered online (weekly small-group sessions for \~16 weeks plus brief home practice), or (2) treatment as usual (continuation of usual care with no additional structured program from the study team). Outcomes are assessed at baseline, mid-program, post-program, and follow-up.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 128 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alzheimer Hellas
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dimitra Vasileiou, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki
- Investigators
- Despoina Moraitou, Professor, PhD, Principal investigator, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Psychology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07289061
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 99/5-6-2024
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Nov 2025
- Last updated
- 7 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Application of Positive Psychology Interventions in Individuals With Early-stage Cognitive Decline Related to Dementia: Their Impact on Cognitive and Brain Functioning
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07289061
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 99/5-6-2024
- Conditions
- Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Alzheimer Dementia (AD)
- Keywords
- positive psychology, non-pharmacological intervention for dementia, character strengths, mindfulness, forgiveness, gratitude, humor, alzheimer's disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 128 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alzheimer Hellas
- Study start
- 17 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized study tests whether a new multicomponent Positive Psychology program can improve cognition and wellbeing in older adults at the earliest stages of dementia-related decline.
About 128 participants with Subjective Cognitive Decline or Mild Cognitive Impairment will be enrolled. Half will be randomized to the Positive Psychology program and half to Treatment As Usual (TAU).
The program consists of weekly, small-group online sessions for ~24 weeks plus brief home practices. All participants (both arms) will complete questionnaires and cognitive tests at baseline, during treatment, post-treatment, and 9-month follow-up.
Primary question: Do participants receiving the Positive Psychology program show better cognitive and brain-function outcomes than TAU at post-treatment and at 9 months? Secondary question: Are effects larger for SCD than MCI? No medicines are used and risks are minimal. If effective, this scalable, low-cost, non-pharmacological approach could complement usual care for people in very early cognitive decline.
Detailed description
Background Dementia affects tens of millions of people and no curative therapy exists. Non-pharmacological interventions that are safe, scalable, and acceptable are therefore essential to delay decline and preserve functioning. Positive Psychology Interventions (PPIs) have shown promising effects on wellbeing and, more recently, on cognitive performance and neural markers in older adults with early cognitive decline. Positive Neuropsychology proposes that cultivating positive traits and eudaimonic wellbeing may support brain plasticity and cognitive control through multiple pathways, including increased engagement, motivation, and adoption of protective lifestyles. Building on this framework, the present trial tests an online, multi-component PPI tailored for adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). The program is designed to be feasible, scalable, and low-risk, and to generate clinically relevant outcomes on cognition and brain functioning.
Objectives and Hypotheses Primary objective: determine whether the PPI produces greater improvements than Treatment As Usual (TAU) in (a) cognitive performance and (b) neurophysiological indices of brain functioning at post-intervention and at 9-month follow-up. Secondary objectives: evaluate effects on wellbeing and related psychosocial constructs (character strengths, mindfulness), and assess feasibility, adherence, and safety of online delivery. We hypothesize larger gains with PPI at 16 weeks and sustained benefits at follow-up, with potentially stronger effects in SCD than MCI.
Study Design and Setting Randomized, parallel-group, superiority behavioral trial with two diagnostic groups (SCD, MCI) recruited via Alzheimer Hellas. Within each cohort, participants are randomized 1:1 to PPI or TAU, yielding four arms (SCD-PPI, SCD-TAU, MCI-PPI, MCI-TAU). Randomization is concealed and performed by site personnel who are not involved in outcome assessment. The trial is minimal risk, uses no FDA-regulated products, and is approved by the Bioethics Committee of Alzheimer Hellas (Approval No. 99/5-6-2024). Outcome assessors are trained and, where feasible, blinded to assignment.
Participants Community-dwelling older adults with a documented diagnosis of SCD or MCI from Alzheimer Hellas according to site procedures are eligibl. Key capabilities include informed consent, sufficient sensory ability for testing, and access/ability to join online groups. Major neurological/psychiatric conditions that would confound outcomes, severe sensory impairment preventing testing, and concurrent participation in similar psychological programs during the trial are excluded. After consent, participants receive unique study IDs; identifiers are stored separately, with controlled access, and destroyed after data lock.
Intervention: Multicomponent Positive Psychology Program Delivery: weekly small-group videoconference sessions (~60 minutes) for 16 weeks led by trained psychologists.
Assessment schedule and procedures
Assessments occur at four time points:
T0 baseline (pre-randomization); T1 mid-intervention (~6 weeks); T2 post-intervention (~16 weeks; primary endpoint); T3 follow-up (~9 months post-T2). Attendance and home-practice adherence are tracked. Adverse events (AEs) are monitored each visit and during sessions per institutional policy.
Outcomes and Data Acquisition
Primary outcomes (analyzed from T0 to T3):
Cognitive performance: a composite derived from the REMEDES4Alzheimer computerized battery capturing episodic memory, working memory, attention subdomains, and executive functions, with minimized demographic bias.
Brain functioning: EEG and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) markers obtained during standardized cognitive tasks using harmonized acquisition and artifact-handling protocols.
Secondary outcomes: validated indices of wellbeing (PERMA-Profiler; PANAS) measured at all time points to model trajectories. Exploratory psychosocial measures include character strengths (VIA-114GR) and mindfulness (MAAS). Feasibility metrics include recruitment and retention, session attendance, and self-reported practice.
Sample Size and Power Four arms (SCD-PPI, SCD-TAU, MCI-PPI, MCI-TAU). A priori power calculations indicate a minimum of 32 participants per arm; target enrollment N=128.
Data management and quality control Data are captured on secure, password-protected platforms under unique study IDs; personally identifying information is maintained in a separate, access-restricted file. Quality procedures include range and logic checks, double verification of key variables, and standardized preprocessing pipelines for EEG/fNIRS feature extraction. After database lock, the re-identification log is destroyed. De-identified data may be shared as described in the IPD plan.
Statistical analysis Analyses follow the intent-to-treat principle with participants analyzed as randomized. For longitudinal outcomes, linear mixed-effects models estimate change and Arm×Time interactions, with random intercepts for participants and adjustment for diagnosis cohort (SCD/MCI) and prespecified covariates (e.g., age, sex, baseline value). The two primary outcomes will be tested with appropriate multiplicity control. EEG/fNIRS features are derived via prespecified pipelines and analyzed analogously. Exploratory mediation models will assess whether changes in mindfulness or strengths use relate to cognitive and neural changes.
Safety and ethics Risks are minimal (time burden; potential fatigue during EEG and fNIRS). Standardized procedures and scheduled breaks mitigate burden. AEs are recorded, assessed for relatedness and severity, and reported to the ethics committee per policy. The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable data-protection laws.
Implementation and expected impact Remote delivery enhances access for older adults with mobility or caregiving constraints and lowers cost for participants and providers. If efficacious, the program can be scaled across community and clinical settings through brief facilitator training and manualized materials. The trial will provide mechanistic evidence on whether cultivating character strengths and mindfulness improves cognitive functioning and alters neural activity in early decline. Demonstration of sustained benefits at nine months would support PPIs as practical, low-risk adjuncts to usual care for SCD and MCI, with potential to delay progression.
Follow-up and data sharing All participants are invited to T3 follow-up to assess durability. De-identified datasets may be shared on reasonable request after publication, subject to approvals and data-use agreements, consistent with the IPD sharing plan.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel, two-arm randomized clinical trial. Participants with SCD or MCI are randomized within diagnosis to one of two arms: (1) multi-component Positive Psychology program delivered online (weekly small-group sessions for ~16 weeks plus brief home practice), or (2) treatment as usual (continuation of usual care with no additional structured program from the study team). Outcomes are assessed at baseline, mid-program, post-program, and follow-up.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Psychology Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Positive Psychology InterventionMulti-component Positive Psychology Intervention delivered online in small groups. One session per week (~60 minutes) for about 16 weeks plus brief daily home practice (about 10 minutes). Core components include identifying and using character strengths and mindfulness. Facilitated by trained psychologist. No medicines are given. |
| Treatment as Usual | Active comparator | Behavioral: Treatment as usual (TAU)Participants continue the treatment they already receive (e.g. cognitive training) from their usual providers. No additional structured positive psychology program is delivered by the study team. Assessments occur at the same time points as the experimental arm (baseline, mid-program, post-program, and follow-up). |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -Documented diagnosis of Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) according to clinical evaluation and site standard criteria.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of dementia (major neurocognitive disorder) or other major neurocognitive disorder that is moderate or severe.
- Major psychiatric disorder currently unstable or untreated (e.g., major depression with psychotic features, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia).
- Neurological conditions that affect cognition.
- Uncorrected hearing or vision problems that prevent participation in assessments or online sessions.
- Concurrent participation in another interventional study targeting cognition or wellbeing during the study period.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Psychology InterventionOnline, group-based Positive Psychology intervention delivered by trained psychologist. One 60-minute session per week for ~16 weeks plus brief daily home practice (~10 minutes). Core components: identification and use of character strengths and mindfulness practices. Includes goal setting and habit formation. Materials provided in Greek. The sessions will take place via secure videoconference. No medications are administered. Participants will continue to receive TAU but they will have one extra hour per week for Positive Psychology Intervention. | Behavioural | Positive Psychology Intervention |
| Treatment as usual (TAU)Structured cognitive training program targeting attention, memory, and executive functions. Participants will continue to receive cognitive training at Alzheimer Hellas. Activities include paper-and-pencil and computerized tasks (e.g., working-memory, processing speed, problem solving). No Positive Psychology components are included. | Behavioural | Treatment as Usual |
Primary outcome
Global cognitive composite (z-score) from REMEDES4Alzheimer
Time frame: T0: Baseline prior to randomization T1: Mid-intervention at 6 weeks T2: Post-intervention at 16 weeks (primary endpoint) T3: Nine-month follow-up after T2
Composite derived from REMEDES4Alzheimer subtests covering episodic memory, working memory, attention subdomains, and executive functions. Raw scores are standardized to z using baseline means,SDs and averaged to a global composite (higher scores indicate better cognition). Unit of measure: z-score (higher = better)
Resting-state fNIRS functional connectivity (HbO) between bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortices
Time frame: T0 (Baseline), T2 (~16 weeks; primary endpoint), T3 (~9 months after T2) Unit of measure: Fisher z-transformed correlation coefficient (higher = stronger connectivity)
Resting-state fNIRS recorded for 5-8 minutes (eyes-open fixation). Oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO) signals are preprocessed with motion-artifact correction, short-channel regression (if available), and band-pass filtering (e.g., 0.01-0.1 Hz). Functional connectivity is computed as the Pearson correlation between left and right DLPFC regions of interest and converted to Fisher z for analysis.
EEG alpha power at rest (eyes-closed)
Time frame: Time Frame: T0 (Baseline), T2 (~16 weeks; primary endpoint), T3 (~9 months after T2)
Mean absolute power in the 8-12 Hz band during 3-min resting eyes-closed, averaged across parieto-occipital electrodes; processed with artifact rejection and ICA according to prespecified pipeline. μV² (higher = better/according to hypothesis)
4 secondary outcomes
Character Strengths total score (VIA-114GR)
Time frame: T0: Baseline prior to randomization T1: Mid-intervention at 6 weeks T2: Post-intervention at 16 weeks (primary endpoint) T3: Nine-month follow-up after T2
Wellbeing - PERMA-Profiler total score
Time frame: T0: Baseline prior to randomization T1: Mid-intervention at 6 weeks T2: Post-intervention at 16 weeks (primary endpoint) T3: Nine-month follow-up after T2
Mindfulness (MAAS total)
Time frame: T0: Baseline prior to randomization T1: Mid-intervention at 6 weeks T2: Post-intervention at 16 weeks (primary endpoint) T3: Nine-month follow-up after T2
Positive Affect (PANAS)
Time frame: T0 (Baseline), T2 (~16 weeks; primary endpoint), T3 (~9 months after T2)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jan 2026.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD)
RecruitingObservational study
InRAD Observational Study
Alzheimer's Disease(AD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Recruiting
Treating Insomnia in Mild Cognitive Impairment
Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Insomnia
Recruiting
The Efficacy of an IADL-based Non-immersive Virtual Reality Training Program to Enhance ADL Performance and Cognitive Function for Persons at Risk of Dementia
Cognitive Enhancement, Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD)
RecruitingObservational study
Fuzhou Aging Brain Health Initiative
Dementia, Alzheimer Dementia (AD)
Recruiting
Chinese Classics Recitation Training in Subjective Cognitive Decline
Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD), Subjective Cognitive Decline
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Despoina Moraitou, Professor, PhD principal investigator
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Department of Psychology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Positive Psychology Intervention and Treatment as usual (TAU) in people with Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), run by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dimitra Vasileiou, M.Sc., PhD candidate (+30 6987304327, dvasilea@psy.auth.gr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Global cognitive composite (z-score) from REMEDES4Alzheimer (time frame: T0: Baseline prior to randomization T1: Mid-intervention at 6 weeks T2: Post-intervention at 16 weeks (primary endpoint) T3: Nine-month follow-up after T2). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jan 2026.