Chronic Non-specific Neck PainTR Neck painNCT07302958
Telerehabilitation, Face-to-Face Exercises, and a Mixed Model in Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain
A study testing Real-Time Video-Guided Neck Exercises (Tele-Rehabilitation), In-Person Supervised Neck Exercises (Face-to-Face) and Hybrid Tele-Rehabilitation and In-Person Exercises (Mixed Model) in people with Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain, run by Cairo University at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of different physical therapy delivery models in treating chronic non-specific neck pain in adults aged 20-40 years with a history of neck pain for three months or longer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 45 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
- What is being tested?
- Real-Time Video-Guided Neck Exercises (Tele-Rehabilitation), In-Person Supervised Neck Exercises (Face-to-Face) and Hybrid Tele-Rehabilitation and In-Person Exercises (Mixed Model)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 68 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 27 Feb 2026to 31 Mar 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 45 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients will be included in the study if they fulfil the following criteria:
- Adults (20-40 years) with chronic non-specific neck pain (≥3 months' duration).
- Participants with stable internet, and experienced in using either computer, laptop, tablet, or smartphone.
Who cannot join
- Patients will be excluded if they had:
- Neck pain due to specific pathologies (e.g., fractures, infections, or malignancies) and severe neurological deficits.
- History of neck surgery.
- Participants with cognitive impairments or language barriers that would prevent them from following the interventions.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
2 sites in 2 countries
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University
Cairo
Amr Ahmad Fallatah, Doctoral Student, 00966505536390, aam_fallatah@hotmail.com
Mona Mohamed Ibrahim, Assistant Professor
Saudi Arabia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Makkah Health Cluster
Mecca
Amr Fallatah Fallatah, Doctoral Student, +966505536390, Amrf@moh.gov.sa
Amr Fallatah, Doctoral Student
About this study
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of different physical therapy delivery models in treating chronic non-specific neck pain in adults aged 20-40 years with a history of neck pain for three months or longer.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Which approach (tele-rehabilitation, face-to-face exercises, or a mixed model) is most effective at reducing neck pain intensity and functional disability?
- Are there significant differences between the three models in improving cervical range of motion, kinesiophobia (fear of movement), patient satisfaction, and adherence to the exercise program?
Researchers will compare three groups to see if the delivery model affects outcomes:
- A tele-rehabilitation group receiving real-time, video-guided exercise sessions.
- A face-to-face group receiving traditional, in-person supervised exercise sessions.
- A mixed-model group receiving a combination of both tele-rehabilitation and face-to-face sessions.
Participants will:
- Be randomly assigned to one of the three groups.
- Engage in a structured exercise program for 45-60 minutes per session, three times a week for six weeks.
- Follow a phased exercise protocol that begins with mobility and pain reduction, progresses to strengthening, and finishes with endurance and functional training.
- Complete assessments for pain, disability, range of motion, and other outcomes at the beginning and end of the 6-week intervention, with a final follow-up at 3 months.
- Conditions
- Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
- Being tested
- Real-Time Video-Guided Neck Exercises (Tele-Rehabilitation), In-Person Supervised Neck Exercises (Face-to-Face), Hybrid Tele-Rehabilitation and In-Person Exercises (Mixed Model)
- Keywords
- Telerehabilitation, Chronic Non specific Neck pain, Face to face physiotherapy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Real-Time Video-Guided Neck Exercises (Tele-Rehabilitation)Other
Intervention 1: Real-Time Video-Guided Neck Exercises (Tele-Rehabilitation)
How the Intervention is Administered:
Delivery Method: Real-time video conferencing App
Frequency: 3 sessions per week
Duration: 6 weeks (18 total sessions)
Session Length: 45-60 minutes per session
Supervision: Live physiotherapist supervision with real-time feedback and exercise modification
Setting: Participant's home or preferred location with stable internet connection
Materials Provided:
Illustrated exercise guide (provided digitally and in print)
Access to video conferences for sessions
Optional: Resistance bands for home use
In-Person Supervised Neck Exercises (Face-to-Face)Other
How the Intervention is Administered:
Delivery Method: In-person supervised sessions at clinical facility
Frequency: 3 sessions per week
Duration: 6 weeks (18 total sessions)
Session Length: 45-60 minutes per session
Supervision: Direct physiotherapist supervision with hands-on guidance and real-time feedback
Setting: Clinical rehabilitation facility
Hybrid Tele-Rehabilitation and In-Person Exercises (Mixed Model)Other
How the Intervention is Administered:
Delivery Method: Alternating weekly blocks of tele-rehabilitation (video conferencing and face-to-face sessions
Frequency: 3 sessions per week (alternating delivery)
Duration: 6 weeks (18 total sessions: 9 tele-rehabilitation + 9 face-to-face)
Session Length: 45-60 minutes per session
Supervision: Live physiotherapist supervision for both modalities
Setting: Mixed (participant's home for tele-rehabilitation weeks; clinical facility for face-to-face weeks)
Weekly Schedule:
- Weeks 1, 3, 5: Three face-to-face sessions per week at clinical facility
- Weeks 2, 4, 6: Three tele-rehabilitation sessions per week via Microsoft Teams
Materials Provided:
- Illustrated exercise guide (provided in both digital and print formats)
- Access to video conferencing App for tele-rehabilitation sessions
- Access to clinical facility equipment during face-to-face weeks
- Optional: Resistance bands for home use during tele-rehabilitation week
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time Video-Guided Neck Exercises (Tele-rehabilitation) | Experimental | Participants in this arm receive real-time, synchronous tele-rehabilitation sessions delivered via Microsoft Teams video conferencing platform. A licensed physiotherapist provides live supervision, real-time feedback, and technique correction throughout each session. This arm tests the effectiveness of remote delivery of structured neck exercises with synchronous clinician guidance. Receives: Other: Real-Time Video-Guided Neck Exercises (Tele-Rehabilitation) |
| In-Person Supervised Neck Exercises (Face-to-Face) | Experimental | Participants in this arm receive traditional, in-person supervised exercise sessions at a clinical facility. A licensed physiotherapist provides hands-on guidance, manual corrections, and real-time feedback during each session. This arm serves as the standard care comparison and tests the effectiveness of conventional face-to-face delivery. Receives: Other: In-Person Supervised Neck Exercises (Face-to-Face) |
| Hybrid Tele-rehabilitation and In-Person Exercises (Mixed Model) | Experimental | Participants in this arm receive a novel 50/50 hybrid intervention combining equal proportions of tele-rehabilitation and face-to-face sessions delivered in alternating weekly blocks. Weeks with odd numbers (1, 3, 5) consist of three in-person face-to-face sessions, while weeks with even numbers (2, 4, 6) consist of three tele-rehabilitation sessions. This arm tests whether a hybrid approach optimizes accessibility, adherence, and clinical outcomes by combining the convenience of remote delivery with the benefits of in-person supervision. Receives: Other: Hybrid Tele-Rehabilitation and In-Person Exercises (Mixed Model) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Functional Disability
The Neck Disability Index is the most widely used and validated instrument for assessing the impact of neck pain on patients' functional activities and disability. The NDI-AR consists of 10 items covering functional domains: pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation. Each item is scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 (complete disability), with a maximum total score of 50.
Measured: • Baseline (Week 0, before intervention begins) • Within 1 week post-treatment (Week 6, immediately after final intervention session) • 3 months post-treatment (Month 3, 12 weeks after completion of intervention)
Neck Pain Intensity
The Visual Analogue scale is a self-reported, unidimensional measure of pain intensity. Participants mark their current pain level on a 10-centimeter line, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst pain imaginable.
Measured: • Baseline (Week 0, before intervention begins) • Within 1 week post-treatment (Week 6, immediately after final intervention session) • 3 months post-treatment (Month 3, 12 weeks after completion of intervention
Range of motion
The CROM device is a non-invasive, objective measurement tool designed specifically for assessing cervical spine mobility. The device measures cervical motion in six planes: flexion, extension, right lateral flexion, left lateral flexion, right rotation, and left rotation. Measurements are recorded in degrees.
Measured: • Baseline (Week 0, before intervention begins) • Within 1 week post-treatment (Week 6, immediately after final intervention session) • 3 months post-treatment (Month 3, 12 weeks after completion of intervention.
Secondary outcomes (3)
Kinesiophobia
The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia is a 17-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess the fear of [re]injury associated with physical movement. Respondents rate each item on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 4 ("strongly agree"). The total score ranges from 17 to 68, with higher scores indicating greater fear of movement and [re]injury
Measured: • Baseline (Week 0, before intervention begins) • Within 1 week post-treatment (Week 6, immediately after final intervention session) • 3 months post-treatment (Month 3, 12 weeks after completion of intervention)
Patient Satisfaction
The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18) is a validated short-form instrument originally developed by the RAND Corporation to measure patient satisfaction with medical care. The PSQ-18 is an 18-item version that retains the essential psychometric qualities of the full-length PSQ-III while providing a practical and comprehensive assessment.
Measured: • Baseline (Week 0, before intervention begins) • Within 1 week post-treatment (Week 6, immediately after final intervention session)
Adherence to Treatment
Adherence to treatment is assessed through systematic attendance tracking and session completion records. An attendance sheet is used to register participant attendance at each session with the date and session number. Adherence is calculated as the percentage of completed sessions relative to the total number of prescribed sessions (18 sessions over 6 weeks).
Measured: • Throughout the 6-week intervention period (Weeks 1-6, continuous tracking at each session) • Final adherence rate calculated within 1 week post-treatment (Week 6, at completion of intervention)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Dec 2025
- Study start27 Feb 2026
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Non-specific Neck PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amr Ahmad Fallatah, Cairo University
- Investigators
- Mona Mohamed Ibrahim, Assistant Professor, Principal investigator, Cairo UniversityMoaaz Ragab Riyad, Lecturer of Physical therapy, Principal investigator, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07302958
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TR,Face to Face, mix model NP
- Acronym
- TR Neck pain
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 8 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bennell KL, Nelligan R, Dobson F, Rini C, Keefe F, Kasza J, French S, Bryant C, Dalwood A, Abbott JH, Hinman RS. Effectiveness of an Internet-Delivered Exercise and Pain-Coping Skills Training Intervention for Persons With Chronic Knee Pain: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):453-462. doi: 10.7326/M16-1714. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
PubMed 28241215Barbosa JC, Comachio J, Marques AP, Saragiotto BT, Magalhaes MO. Effect of a telerehabilitation exercise program versus a digital booklet with self-care for patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: a protocol of a randomized controlled trial assessor-blinded, 3 months follow-up. Trials. 2023 Sep 28;24(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07651-z.
PubMed 37770963Audette I, Dumas JP, Cote JN, De Serres SJ. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 May;40(5):318-23. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3180.
PubMed 20436238Antonio, G. L., Almeida, M. Q., Vera, M. A., de Noronha, M. A., & Selistre, L. F. (2024). Efficacy of telerehabilitation exercise in patients with chronic neck pain: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 28, 100748. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.100748
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Telerehabilitation, Face-to-Face Exercises, and a Mixed Model in Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07302958
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TR Neck pain / TR,Face to Face, mix model NP
- Conditions
- Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
- Keywords
- Telerehabilitation, Chronic Non specific Neck pain, Face to face physiotherapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of different physical therapy delivery models in treating chronic non-specific neck pain in adults aged 20-40 years with a history of neck pain for three months or longer.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Which approach (tele-rehabilitation, face-to-face exercises, or a mixed model) is most effective at reducing neck pain intensity and functional disability?
- Are there significant differences between the three models in improving cervical range of motion, kinesiophobia (fear of movement), patient satisfaction, and adherence to the exercise program?
Researchers will compare three groups to see if the delivery model affects outcomes:
- A tele-rehabilitation group receiving real-time, video-guided exercise sessions.
- A face-to-face group receiving traditional, in-person supervised exercise sessions.
- A mixed-model group receiving a combination of both tele-rehabilitation and face-to-face sessions.
Participants will:
- Be randomly assigned to one of the three groups.
- Engage in a structured exercise program for 45-60 minutes per session, three times a week for six weeks.
- Follow a phased exercise protocol that begins with mobility and pain reduction, progresses to strengthening, and finishes with endurance and functional training.
- Complete assessments for pain, disability, range of motion, and other outcomes at the beginning and end of the 6-week intervention, with a final follow-up at 3 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time Video-Guided Neck Exercises (Tele-rehabilitation) | Experimental | Other: Real-Time Video-Guided Neck Exercises (Tele-Rehabilitation)Participants in this arm receive real-time, synchronous tele-rehabilitation sessions delivered via Microsoft Teams video conferencing platform. A licensed physiotherapist provides live supervision, real-time feedback, and technique correction throughout each session. This arm tests the effectiveness of remote delivery of structured neck exercises with synchronous clinician guidance. |
| In-Person Supervised Neck Exercises (Face-to-Face) | Experimental | Other: In-Person Supervised Neck Exercises (Face-to-Face)Participants in this arm receive traditional, in-person supervised exercise sessions at a clinical facility. A licensed physiotherapist provides hands-on guidance, manual corrections, and real-time feedback during each session. This arm serves as the standard care comparison and tests the effectiveness of conventional face-to-face delivery. |
| Hybrid Tele-rehabilitation and In-Person Exercises (Mixed Model) | Experimental | Other: Hybrid Tele-Rehabilitation and In-Person Exercises (Mixed Model)Participants in this arm receive a novel 50/50 hybrid intervention combining equal proportions of tele-rehabilitation and face-to-face sessions delivered in alternating weekly blocks. Weeks with odd numbers (1, 3, 5) consist of three in-person face-to-face sessions, while weeks with even numbers (2, 4, 6) consist of three tele-rehabilitation sessions. This arm tests whether a hybrid approach optimizes accessibility, adherence, and clinical outcomes by combining the convenience of remote delivery with the benefits of in-person supervision. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adults (20-40 years) with chronic non-specific neck pain (≥3 months' duration).
- Participants with stable internet, and experienced in using either computer, laptop, tablet, or smartphone.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Neck pain due to specific pathologies (e.g., fractures, infections, or malignancies) and severe neurological deficits.
- History of neck surgery.
- Participants with cognitive impairments or language barriers that would prevent them from following the interventions.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Real-Time Video-Guided Neck Exercises (Tele-Rehabilitation)Intervention 1: Real-Time Video-Guided Neck Exercises (Tele-Rehabilitation) How the Intervention is Administered: Delivery Method: Real-time video conferencing App Frequency: 3 sessions per week Duration: 6 weeks (18 total sessions) Session Length: 45-60 minutes per session Supervision: Live physiotherapist supervision with real-time feedback and exercise modification Setting: Participant's home or preferred location with stable internet connection Materials Provided: Illustrated exercise guide (provided digitally and in print) Access to video conferences for sessions Optional: Resistance bands for home use | Other | Real-time Video-Guided Neck Exercises (Tele-rehabilitation) |
| In-Person Supervised Neck Exercises (Face-to-Face)How the Intervention is Administered: Delivery Method: In-person supervised sessions at clinical facility Frequency: 3 sessions per week Duration: 6 weeks (18 total sessions) Session Length: 45-60 minutes per session Supervision: Direct physiotherapist supervision with hands-on guidance and real-time feedback Setting: Clinical rehabilitation facility | Other | In-Person Supervised Neck Exercises (Face-to-Face) |
| Hybrid Tele-Rehabilitation and In-Person Exercises (Mixed Model)How the Intervention is Administered: Delivery Method: Alternating weekly blocks of tele-rehabilitation (video conferencing and face-to-face sessions Frequency: 3 sessions per week (alternating delivery) Duration: 6 weeks (18 total sessions: 9 tele-rehabilitation + 9 face-to-face) Session Length: 45-60 minutes per session Supervision: Live physiotherapist supervision for both modalities Setting: Mixed (participant's home for tele-rehabilitation weeks; clinical facility for face-to-face weeks) Weekly Schedule: • Weeks 1, 3, 5: Three face-to-face sessions per week at clinical facility • Weeks 2, 4, 6: Three tele-rehabilitation sessions per week via Microsoft Teams Materials Provided: • Illustrated exercise guide (provided in both digital and print formats) • Access to video conferencing App for tele-rehabilitation sessions • Access to clinical facility equipment during face-to-face weeks • Optional: Resistance bands for home use during tele-rehabilitation week | Other | Hybrid Tele-rehabilitation and In-Person Exercises (Mixed Model) |
Primary outcome
Functional Disability
Time frame: • Baseline (Week 0, before intervention begins) • Within 1 week post-treatment (Week 6, immediately after final intervention session) • 3 months post-treatment (Month 3, 12 weeks after completion of intervention)
The Neck Disability Index is the most widely used and validated instrument for assessing the impact of neck pain on patients' functional activities and disability. The NDI-AR consists of 10 items covering functional domains: pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation. Each item is scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 (complete disability), with a maximum total score of 50.
Neck Pain Intensity
Time frame: • Baseline (Week 0, before intervention begins) • Within 1 week post-treatment (Week 6, immediately after final intervention session) • 3 months post-treatment (Month 3, 12 weeks after completion of intervention
The Visual Analogue scale is a self-reported, unidimensional measure of pain intensity. Participants mark their current pain level on a 10-centimeter line, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst pain imaginable.
Range of motion
Time frame: • Baseline (Week 0, before intervention begins) • Within 1 week post-treatment (Week 6, immediately after final intervention session) • 3 months post-treatment (Month 3, 12 weeks after completion of intervention.
The CROM device is a non-invasive, objective measurement tool designed specifically for assessing cervical spine mobility. The device measures cervical motion in six planes: flexion, extension, right lateral flexion, left lateral flexion, right rotation, and left rotation. Measurements are recorded in degrees.
3 secondary outcomes
Kinesiophobia
Time frame: • Baseline (Week 0, before intervention begins) • Within 1 week post-treatment (Week 6, immediately after final intervention session) • 3 months post-treatment (Month 3, 12 weeks after completion of intervention)
Patient Satisfaction
Time frame: • Baseline (Week 0, before intervention begins) • Within 1 week post-treatment (Week 6, immediately after final intervention session)
Adherence to Treatment
Time frame: • Throughout the 6-week intervention period (Weeks 1-6, continuous tracking at each session) • Final adherence rate calculated within 1 week post-treatment (Week 6, at completion of intervention)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 28241215Bennell KL, Nelligan R, Dobson F, Rini C, Keefe F, Kasza J, French S, Bryant C, Dalwood A, Abbott JH, Hinman RS. Effectiveness of an Internet-Delivered Exercise and Pain-Coping Skills Training Intervention for Persons With Chronic Knee Pain: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):453-462. doi: 10.7326/M16-1714. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
- Background: PubMed 37770963Barbosa JC, Comachio J, Marques AP, Saragiotto BT, Magalhaes MO. Effect of a telerehabilitation exercise program versus a digital booklet with self-care for patients with chronic non-specific neck pain: a protocol of a randomized controlled trial assessor-blinded, 3 months follow-up. Trials. 2023 Sep 28;24(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07651-z.
- Background: PubMed 20436238Audette I, Dumas JP, Cote JN, De Serres SJ. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 May;40(5):318-23. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3180.
- BackgroundAntonio, G. L., Almeida, M. Q., Vera, M. A., de Noronha, M. A., & Selistre, L. F. (2024). Efficacy of telerehabilitation exercise in patients with chronic neck pain: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 28, 100748. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.100748
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Motor Imagery Exercises and Suboccipital Myofascial Release Techniques in Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain
Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain
Active, not recruiting
Cervical Stabilization vs Scapular Clock Exercises for Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain
Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Physiotherapy Approaches on Biopsychosocial Outcomes in Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain
Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Cervical Force Control Training on Force Sense and Steadiness in Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain
Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain, Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Active Release Technique Versus Stecco Facial Manipulation in Patient With Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
Non Specific Chronic Neck Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Mona Mohamed Ibrahim, Assistant Professor principal investigator
Cairo University
Moaaz Ragab Riyad, Lecturer of Physical therapy principal investigator
Cairo University
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Real-Time Video-Guided Neck Exercises (Tele-Rehabilitation), In-Person Supervised Neck Exercises (Face-to-Face) and Hybrid Tele-Rehabilitation and In-Person Exercises (Mixed Model) in people with Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain, run by Cairo University at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Egypt, Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Amr Ahmad Fallatah, Doctoral (00966505536390, aam_fallatah@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Functional Disability (time frame: • Baseline (Week 0, before intervention begins) • Within 1 week post-treatment (Week 6, immediately after final intervention session) • 3 months post-treatment (Month 3, 12 weeks after completion of intervention)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07302958, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2026.