Chronic Non-specific Neck PainNCT07813871
Effect of Cervical Force Control Training on Force Sense and Steadiness in Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain
A study testing Conventional Exercise Training in people with Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain and Neck Pain, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) is a very common issue among young adults, often linked to poor posture, prolonged screen time, and sedentary habits. This persistent pain can change how the neck muscles work and control movement. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 24 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain, Neck Pain
- What is being tested?
- Conventional Exercise Training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- Sep 2026to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 24 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients diagnosed with Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain (CNSNP) lasting >= 3 months.
- Body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 29.9 kg/m² (non-obese).
- Pain intensity >= 30 mm on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
- Neck disability ranging from mild to moderate (10% to 48%) on the Neck Disability Index (NDI).
- Able to perform isometric contractions with visual feedback.
Who cannot join
- Shoulder/upper limb fractures or replacement (<12 months), or moderate-severe shoulder osteoarthritis (OA).
- Cervical radiculopathy/myelopathy, peripheral neuropathy, vestibular disorders, or history of stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA).
- Upper limb pathology (tendinopathy, capsulitis), thoracic outlet syndrome, or fibromyalgia.
- Received neck-specific physiotherapy within the last 3 months.
- Severe osteoporosis, uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c >9%), or active infection/inflammation.
- Cervical injections or surgery within the last 6 months.
- Inability to follow 2-step instructions.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Refaey contact
Egypt1 site
Faculty of Physical Therapy
Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafr el-Sheikh Governorate
Mohamed M Refaey, M.Sc., 00201030290667, mohamed_salama@pt.kfs.edu.eg
Mohamed M Refaey, M.Sc.
About this study
Chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) is a very common issue among young adults, often linked to poor posture, prolonged screen time, and sedentary habits. This persistent pain can change how the neck muscles work and control movement. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether a specific type of rehabilitation-called "cervical force control training"-can help improve how well people can feel and control their neck muscle strength, and whether this reduces their pain and improves their daily function.
Researchers will invite young adults (18 to 24 years old) who have had neck pain for at least 3 months to participate. Participants will be randomly divided into two groups:
Read more
Force Control Training Group: Will receive a new training program that uses a handheld dynamometer with a screen to help them practice holding steady, precise neck muscle contractions with visual feedback.
Conventional Exercise Group: Will receive a standard physical therapy program consisting of neck muscle stretches and shoulder-blade strengthening exercises.
Both groups will perform their exercises 3 times a week for 8 weeks. Researchers will measure participants' neck muscle steadiness, pain levels, and neck disability before the program starts, right after the 8-week program ends, and again at a 3-month follow-up to evaluate the long-lasting effects.
Read the detailed description
Chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) involves persistent cervical pain without an identifiable structural pathology. Recent evidence suggests that CNSNP is closely associated with sensorimotor control deficits, including impaired proprioception and diminished force steadiness (the neuromuscular ability to produce and sustain precise submaximal force levels with minimal fluctuations). While conventional exercises improve strength and reduce pain, they often neglect the fine-motor precision and sensorimotor integration necessary for optimal neck function.
This randomized controlled trial (RCT) is designed to investigate the effect of cervical force control training compared to conventional neck exercises on force sense, force steadiness, pain intensity, and functional disability in young adults (18-24 years) with CNSNP.
Following baseline assessments for maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), force sense, and force steadiness (quantified by the coefficient of variation) using a Handheld Dynamometer (HHD), as well as clinical measures (VAS for pain, NDI for disability), eligible participants will be randomized into two groups:
Experimental Group (Force Control Training):
Participants will undergo an 8-week targeted training program (3 sessions/week, 30-40 mins each). The protocol utilizes submaximal isometric contractions with visual feedback via an HHD device paired with an application. The program progresses systematically through three phases: Phase 1 (Calibration \& Reference at MVIC), Phase 2 (Acquisition using descending submaximal intensities 25% to 10% MVIC with continuous visual tracking), and Phase 3 (Retention \& Transfer involving faded/no feedback and complex dual-tasking, such as auditory monitoring or arithmetic).
Control Group (Conventional Exercise Training):
Participants will undergo an 8-week program (3 sessions/week, 30 mins each) consisting of standard cervical stretching (upper trapezius and levator scapulae) and scapular strengthening/stabilization exercises (e.g., side-lying external rotation, side-lying forward flexion, prone extension, and push-up plus). Resistance will be tailored based on gender and body weight.
Re-evaluations will be conducted immediately post-intervention (at 8 weeks) and at a 3-month follow-up. The study aims to establish whether integrating specific force-control tasks offers superior benefits in restoring sensorimotor function and alleviating symptoms in patients with CNSNP compared to conventional rehabilitation alone.
- Conditions
- Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain, Neck Pain
- Being tested
- Cervical Force Control Training, Conventional Exercise Training
- Keywords
- Cervical Force Control, Force Steadiness, Force Sense, Sensorimotor Control, Proprioception, Handheld Dynamometer, Physical Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Neck Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cervical Force Control TrainingBehavioural
An 8-week program (3 sessions/week, 30-40 mins each) utilizing submaximal isometric neck contractions with visual feedback via a Handheld Dynamometer. The protocol progresses through three phases: initial calibration, acquisition using descending target intensities (25% to 10% MVIC) with continuous visual tracking, and retention/transfer using faded or no feedback combined with dual-tasking (e.g., auditory monitoring or arithmetic).
Conventional Exercise TrainingBehavioural
An 8-week program (3 sessions/week, 30 mins each) consisting of standard cervical stretching for the upper trapezius and levator scapulae muscles, alongside scapular strengthening and stabilization exercises (e.g., side-lying external rotation, side-lying forward flexion, prone extension, and push-up plus). Resistance is tailored based on patient gender and body weight.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group: Force Control Training | Experimental | Patients in this group will receive an 8-week cervical force control training program (3 sessions/week). The training involves submaximal isometric neck contractions using visual feedback via a Handheld Dynamometer, progressing from simple feedback-assisted holds to complex dual-task exercises. Receives: Behavioral: Cervical Force Control Training |
| Active Comparator: Conventional Exercise Training | Active comparator | Patients in this group will receive an 8-week conventional exercise program (3 sessions/week). The program includes standard cervical stretching (upper trapezius and levator scapulae) and scapular strengthening and stabilization exercises. Receives: Behavioral: Conventional Exercise Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cervical Force Sense
Assessed using a Handheld Dynamometer (HHD) during force reproduction tasks. It is measured by calculating the absolute error between a target submaximal force and the reproduced force without visual feedback. Lower error values indicate better force sense and proprioception.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up
Cervical Force Steadiness
Evaluated by calculating the Coefficient of Variation (CoV) of force during submaximal isometric cervical contractions using a Handheld Dynamometer (HHD). Lower CoV percentages indicate better force steadiness and neuromuscular control.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (2)
Neck Functional Disability (Neck Disability Index - NDI)
A 10-item patient-completed questionnaire assessing how neck pain affects the ability to manage everyday life activities. Total scores range from 0 to 50, which can be expressed as a percentage (0-100%). Higher scores indicate greater patient-rated functional disability.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up
Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS)
Pain intensity is assessed using a 100-mm horizontal line, anchored by "no pain" at 0 mm and "worst imaginable pain" at 100 mm. Lower scores indicate a lower level of pain.
Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Sep 2026
- Study startSep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Non-specific Neck PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups: an experimental group receiving cervical force control training, and a control group receiving conventional neck exercises
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mohamed Mahmoud Refaey, Kafrelsheikh University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07813871
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P.T.REC/012/006579
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Vaillancourt DE, Slifkin AB, Newell KM. Inter-digit individuation and force variability in the precision grip of young, elderly, and Parkinson's disease participants. Motor Control. 2002 Apr;6(2):113-28. doi: 10.1123/mcj.6.2.113.
PubMed 12122222Arvanitidis M, Falla D, Sanderson A, Martinez-Valdes E. Does pain influence control of muscle force? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pain. 2025 Feb;29(2):e4716. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4716. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
PubMed 39176440Vannebo KT, Iversen VM, Fimland MS, Mork PJ. Test-retest reliability of a handheld dynamometer for measurement of isometric cervical muscle strength. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(3):557-565. doi: 10.3233/BMR-170829.
PubMed 29526841Zaidi, S., Khan, S. A., Zaki, S., Sundus, H., Alam, M. F., & Nuhmani, S. (2025). Effectiveness of sensorimotor training on pain, cervical joint position sense, range of motion, balance, and disability in chronic neck pain: A systematic review. Heliyon, 11(10), Article e43409.
Peng B, Yang L, Li Y, Liu T, Liu Y. Cervical Proprioception Impairment in Neck Pain-Pathophysiology, Clinical Evaluation, and Management: A Narrative Review. Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):143-164. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00230-z. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
PubMed 33464539Muceli S, Farina D, Kirkesola G, Katch F, Falla D. Reduced force steadiness in women with neck pain and the effect of short term vibration. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011 Apr;21(2):283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.11.011. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
PubMed 21195628
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Cervical Force Control Training on Force Sense and Steadiness in Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07813871
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P.T.REC/012/006579
- Conditions
- Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain, Neck Pain
- Keywords
- Cervical Force Control, Force Steadiness, Force Sense, Sensorimotor Control, Proprioception, Handheld Dynamometer, Physical Therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) is a very common issue among young adults, often linked to poor posture, prolonged screen time, and sedentary habits. This persistent pain can change how the neck muscles work and control movement. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether a specific type of rehabilitation-called "cervical force control training"-can help improve how well people can feel and control their neck muscle strength, and whether this reduces their pain and improves their daily function.
Researchers will invite young adults (18 to 24 years old) who have had neck pain for at least 3 months to participate. Participants will be randomly divided into two groups:
Force Control Training Group: Will receive a new training program that uses a handheld dynamometer with a screen to help them practice holding steady, precise neck muscle contractions with visual feedback.
Conventional Exercise Group: Will receive a standard physical therapy program consisting of neck muscle stretches and shoulder-blade strengthening exercises.
Both groups will perform their exercises 3 times a week for 8 weeks. Researchers will measure participants' neck muscle steadiness, pain levels, and neck disability before the program starts, right after the 8-week program ends, and again at a 3-month follow-up to evaluate the long-lasting effects.
Detailed description
Chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) involves persistent cervical pain without an identifiable structural pathology. Recent evidence suggests that CNSNP is closely associated with sensorimotor control deficits, including impaired proprioception and diminished force steadiness (the neuromuscular ability to produce and sustain precise submaximal force levels with minimal fluctuations). While conventional exercises improve strength and reduce pain, they often neglect the fine-motor precision and sensorimotor integration necessary for optimal neck function.
This randomized controlled trial (RCT) is designed to investigate the effect of cervical force control training compared to conventional neck exercises on force sense, force steadiness, pain intensity, and functional disability in young adults (18-24 years) with CNSNP.
Following baseline assessments for maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), force sense, and force steadiness (quantified by the coefficient of variation) using a Handheld Dynamometer (HHD), as well as clinical measures (VAS for pain, NDI for disability), eligible participants will be randomized into two groups:
Experimental Group (Force Control Training):
Participants will undergo an 8-week targeted training program (3 sessions/week, 30-40 mins each). The protocol utilizes submaximal isometric contractions with visual feedback via an HHD device paired with an application. The program progresses systematically through three phases: Phase 1 (Calibration \& Reference at MVIC), Phase 2 (Acquisition using descending submaximal intensities 25% to 10% MVIC with continuous visual tracking), and Phase 3 (Retention \& Transfer involving faded/no feedback and complex dual-tasking, such as auditory monitoring or arithmetic).
Control Group (Conventional Exercise Training):
Participants will undergo an 8-week program (3 sessions/week, 30 mins each) consisting of standard cervical stretching (upper trapezius and levator scapulae) and scapular strengthening/stabilization exercises (e.g., side-lying external rotation, side-lying forward flexion, prone extension, and push-up plus). Resistance will be tailored based on gender and body weight.
Re-evaluations will be conducted immediately post-intervention (at 8 weeks) and at a 3-month follow-up. The study aims to establish whether integrating specific force-control tasks offers superior benefits in restoring sensorimotor function and alleviating symptoms in patients with CNSNP compared to conventional rehabilitation alone.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups: an experimental group receiving cervical force control training, and a control group receiving conventional neck exercises
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group: Force Control Training | Experimental | Behavioral: Cervical Force Control TrainingPatients in this group will receive an 8-week cervical force control training program (3 sessions/week). The training involves submaximal isometric neck contractions using visual feedback via a Handheld Dynamometer, progressing from simple feedback-assisted holds to complex dual-task exercises. |
| Active Comparator: Conventional Exercise Training | Active comparator | Behavioral: Conventional Exercise TrainingPatients in this group will receive an 8-week conventional exercise program (3 sessions/week). The program includes standard cervical stretching (upper trapezius and levator scapulae) and scapular strengthening and stabilization exercises. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 24 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients diagnosed with Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain (CNSNP) lasting >= 3 months.
- Body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 29.9 kg/m² (non-obese).
- Pain intensity >= 30 mm on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
- Neck disability ranging from mild to moderate (10% to 48%) on the Neck Disability Index (NDI).
- Able to perform isometric contractions with visual feedback.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Shoulder/upper limb fractures or replacement (<12 months), or moderate-severe shoulder osteoarthritis (OA).
- Cervical radiculopathy/myelopathy, peripheral neuropathy, vestibular disorders, or history of stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA).
- Upper limb pathology (tendinopathy, capsulitis), thoracic outlet syndrome, or fibromyalgia.
- Received neck-specific physiotherapy within the last 3 months.
- Severe osteoporosis, uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c >9%), or active infection/inflammation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical Force Control TrainingAn 8-week program (3 sessions/week, 30-40 mins each) utilizing submaximal isometric neck contractions with visual feedback via a Handheld Dynamometer. The protocol progresses through three phases: initial calibration, acquisition using descending target intensities (25% to 10% MVIC) with continuous visual tracking, and retention/transfer using faded or no feedback combined with dual-tasking (e.g., auditory monitoring or arithmetic). | Behavioural | Experimental Group: Force Control Training |
| Conventional Exercise TrainingAn 8-week program (3 sessions/week, 30 mins each) consisting of standard cervical stretching for the upper trapezius and levator scapulae muscles, alongside scapular strengthening and stabilization exercises (e.g., side-lying external rotation, side-lying forward flexion, prone extension, and push-up plus). Resistance is tailored based on patient gender and body weight. | Behavioural | Active Comparator: Conventional Exercise Training |
Primary outcome
Cervical Force Sense
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up
Assessed using a Handheld Dynamometer (HHD) during force reproduction tasks. It is measured by calculating the absolute error between a target submaximal force and the reproduced force without visual feedback. Lower error values indicate better force sense and proprioception.
Cervical Force Steadiness
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated by calculating the Coefficient of Variation (CoV) of force during submaximal isometric cervical contractions using a Handheld Dynamometer (HHD). Lower CoV percentages indicate better force steadiness and neuromuscular control.
2 secondary outcomes
Neck Functional Disability (Neck Disability Index - NDI)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up
Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 12122222Vaillancourt DE, Slifkin AB, Newell KM. Inter-digit individuation and force variability in the precision grip of young, elderly, and Parkinson's disease participants. Motor Control. 2002 Apr;6(2):113-28. doi: 10.1123/mcj.6.2.113.
- Background: PubMed 39176440Arvanitidis M, Falla D, Sanderson A, Martinez-Valdes E. Does pain influence control of muscle force? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pain. 2025 Feb;29(2):e4716. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4716. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
- Background: PubMed 29526841Vannebo KT, Iversen VM, Fimland MS, Mork PJ. Test-retest reliability of a handheld dynamometer for measurement of isometric cervical muscle strength. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(3):557-565. doi: 10.3233/BMR-170829.
- BackgroundZaidi, S., Khan, S. A., Zaki, S., Sundus, H., Alam, M. F., & Nuhmani, S. (2025). Effectiveness of sensorimotor training on pain, cervical joint position sense, range of motion, balance, and disability in chronic neck pain: A systematic review. Heliyon, 11(10), Article e43409.
- Background: PubMed 33464539Peng B, Yang L, Li Y, Liu T, Liu Y. Cervical Proprioception Impairment in Neck Pain-Pathophysiology, Clinical Evaluation, and Management: A Narrative Review. Pain Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):143-164. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00230-z. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
- Background: PubMed 21195628Muceli S, Farina D, Kirkesola G, Katch F, Falla D. Reduced force steadiness in women with neck pain and the effect of short term vibration. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011 Apr;21(2):283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.11.011. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
Active, not recruiting
Cervical Stabilization vs Scapular Clock Exercises for Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain
Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Motor Imagery Exercises and Suboccipital Myofascial Release Techniques in Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain
Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain
Recruiting
Telerehabilitation, Face-to-Face Exercises, and a Mixed Model in Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain
Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Physiotherapy Approaches on Biopsychosocial Outcomes in Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain
Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Active Release Technique Versus Stecco Facial Manipulation in Patient With Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain
Non Specific Chronic Neck Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Refaey contact
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Conventional Exercise Training in people with Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain and Neck Pain, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mohamed M Refaey, M.Sc. (00201030290667, mohamed_salama@pt.kfs.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cervical Force Sense (time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07813871, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.