Self-EfficacyNCT07318246
Team Work and Creative Self-Efficacy
A study testing robot training in people with Self-Efficacy, run by Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of teamwork-based task learning on college students' cognition, attitudes, skills, and creative self-efficacy, and to explore its impact within innovative technology learning contexts. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Self-Efficacy
- What is being tested?
- robot training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 24 Feb 2026to 30 Nov 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age: College students aged 18 years or older
Who cannot join
- Students who are 65 years or older, not enrolled in nursing programs, or currently on leave of absence.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology
Taichung, 406
Shu-Ching Chiu, phd, 886-4-22391647 ext. 7360, scchiu@ctust.edu.tw
About this study
Official title: The Influence of Task-Oriented Learning on College Students' Creative Self-Efficacy
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of teamwork-based task learning on college students' cognition, attitudes, skills, and creative self-efficacy, and to explore its impact within innovative technology learning contexts.
- Conditions
- Self-Efficacy
- Being tested
- robot training, control group
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
robot trainingBehavioural
robot backend design and control training
control groupOther
Traditional class (not-robot )
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| experimental group | Experimental | robot backend design and control training Receives: Behavioral: robot training |
| control group | Other | Traditional class (not-robot ) Receives: Other: control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Creative Self-Efficacy scale
Higher scores indicate more positive outcomes
Measured: A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks
team work scale
Higher scores indicate more positive outcomes
Measured: A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks
perception of robots
Higher scores indicate more positive outcomes
Measured: A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks
functional safety scale
Higher scores indicate more positive outcomes
Measured: A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Reflective Journal
Based on your personal experience, please describe the current functions of robots or other smart technologies, your expectations for their future use in work settings, and your learning experiences with other smart technologies.
Measured: post-test/immediately after the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jan 2026
- Study start24 Feb 2026
- Primary completion30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Self-EfficacyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chiu Shu-Ching, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology
- Investigators
- Shu Ching Chiu, Principal investigator, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07318246
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2510300001
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 2 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Influence of Task-Oriented Learning on College Students' Creative Self-Efficacy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07318246
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2510300001
- Conditions
- Self-Efficacy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Central Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of teamwork-based task learning on college students' cognition, attitudes, skills, and creative self-efficacy, and to explore its impact within innovative technology learning contexts.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| experimental group | Experimental | Behavioral: robot trainingrobot backend design and control training |
| control group | Other | Other: control groupTraditional class (not-robot ) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Age: College students aged 18 years or older
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Students who are 65 years or older, not enrolled in nursing programs, or currently on leave of absence.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| robot trainingrobot backend design and control training | Behavioural | experimental group |
| control groupTraditional class (not-robot ) | Other | control group |
Primary outcome
Creative Self-Efficacy scale
Time frame: A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks
Higher scores indicate more positive outcomes
team work scale
Time frame: A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks
Higher scores indicate more positive outcomes
perception of robots
Time frame: A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks
Higher scores indicate more positive outcomes
functional safety scale
Time frame: A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks
Higher scores indicate more positive outcomes
1 secondary outcome
Reflective Journal
Time frame: post-test/immediately after the intervention
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Self-Efficacy
Recruiting
Effect of Solution-Focused Approach Education on Breastfeeding Avoidance and Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy in Primiparous Mothers
Breastfeeding Avoidance and Breastfeeding Self-efficacy
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Selatogrel Outcome Study in Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction
Acute Myocardial Infarction
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of a Novel Quantum-Inspired Intervention (QII) for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Global Confirmatory Study
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD
Not yet recruiting
AI Smart Glasses Feedback for Intubation Training in Medical Students
Intubation, Intratracheal, Medical Education
Active, not recruiting
The Effect of Planned Group Interaction on Ostomy Adaptation, Quality of Life, and Stoma Care Self-Efficacy Levels in Individuals With an Ostomy
Ostomy - Ileostomy or Colostomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Shu Ching Chiu principal investigator
Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing robot training in people with Self-Efficacy, run by Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Shu Ching Chiu (886+4+22391647, scchiu@ctust.edu.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Creative Self-Efficacy scale (time frame: A pre- and post-test/ up to 10 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2026.