Chronic Plaque PsoriasisEarly Phase 1NCT07337434
To Check Comparison of Apremilast and Methotrexate Efficacy in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Presented to Tertiary Care Hospital
A Early Phase 1 study testing Methotrexate and Apremilast in people with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, run by Syeda Sana Zaman at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
This study aims to compare efficacy of methotrexate vs apremilast in the management of chronic plaque psoriasis.Given the high prevalence of psoriasis in Pakistan and the significant psychological impact on patients, particularly in Peshawer,this study will provide valuable insights into optimal treatment strategies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- Methotrexate and Apremilast
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 106 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 25 Dec 2025to 25 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients having age between 18-60 years of either gender Diagnosed with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PASI ≥10) No prior systemic therapy in past 3 months.
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy or lactation History of liver or renal dysfunction Known hypersensitivity to study drugs
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Pakistan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
MTI-HMC Peshawar
Peshawar, Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, 25000
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Efficacy of Methotrexate vs Apremilast in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
This study aims to compare efficacy of methotrexate vs apremilast in the management of chronic plaque psoriasis.Given the high prevalence of psoriasis in Pakistan and the significant psychological impact on patients, particularly in Peshawer,this study will provide valuable insights into optimal treatment strategies.
Read the detailed description
Introduction Plaque Psoriasis are red, scaly plaques which mostly manifests on the skin's extensor surfaces, are the hallmark of plaque psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin disorder. It significantly impairs patients' quality of life and poses therapeutic challenges due to chronicity and relapse tendency. Approximately 2% to 3% of the global population deals with psoriasis. The most frequent subtype of psoriasis, plaque psoriasis, affects between 0.5% to 1% of Pakistanis, according to research conducted in hospitals.
Patients with moderate to severe disease were traditionally treated with methotrexate-based systemic therapy. However, its long-term safety profile concerning hepatotoxicity and myelosuppression requires periodic monitoring. Apremilast, a newer oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, has demonstrated moderate efficacy with a favorable safety profile but is less commonly used in developing countries due to cost and limited availability.
While multiple studies have evaluated the efficacy of both drugs individually, direct head-to-head comparisons in regional populations are lacking. Recent international trials indicate Apremilast may have a better tolerability profile but lower efficacy compared to Methotrexate.Apremilast was reported to be more effective than methotrexate (47.3% vs 21.8%) in decreasing PASI scores over 12 weeks in a recent research involving 112 individuals with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Both therapies had minor adverse effects, but Apremilast was found to be more effective.
Despite methotrexate's extensive use in treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, concerns regarding its long-term safety and variable effectiveness persist. Apremilast, a newer oral agent, offers a favorable safety profile but is underutilized in resource-limited settings due to cost and limited availability. Few local studies have compared the two treatments using PASI and other standardized outcome measures to determine whether one is more effective. In light of the relative efficacy and safety of Methotrexate and Apremilast, it is imperative that Pakistani physicians have access to the findings of this trial so that they may make treatment decisions grounded in data.
Objective To compare the efficacy of methotrexate vs apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Operational Definitions
Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis:
Moderate to severe disease will be defined as PASI ≥10. Diagnosis will be confirmed by consultant dermatologist using clinical criteria and PASI tool. (Annex-A)
Efficacy:
Efficacy will be assessed based on reduction in PASI score from baseline to 12 weeks. A 75% reduction in PASI score from the baseline will be considered as primary efficacy outcome.
Null Hypothesis (H₀): When it comes to treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, there is statistically insignificant difference between Apremilast and Methotrexate.
Alternate Hypothesis (H₁): In terms of reducing PASI scores, Apremilast is statistically superior to Methotrexate for treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Material and Methods
Study Design:
Randomized Control Trial
Study Setting:
Department of Dermatology, MTI-Hayatabad Medical Complex (HMC), Peshawar
Duration of Study:
Six months after approval.
Sample Size: Using WHO sample size calculator, with anticipated efficacy of Methotrexate as 21.80% and Apremilast as 47.3%⁹, 95% confidence level, 80% power, the calculated sample size is 106 patients (53 in each group).
Sampling Technique:
Random Sampling
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients having age between 18-60 years of either gender Diagnosed with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PASI ≥10) No prior systemic therapy in past 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnancy or lactation History of liver or renal dysfunction Known hypersensitivity to study drugs
Data Collection Procedure This study will be conducted at the Department of Dermatology, MTI-Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, following formal approval from the Hospital Ethical Committee and CPSP Karachi. Random sampling will be used to recruit patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria and give written informed consent. When PASI scores (Annex-A) indicate moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, a consulting dermatologist will confirm the diagnosis. After a comprehensive clinical evaluation of each participant using block randomization, eligible patients will be divided into two therapy groups: Group A, which will get 10-25 mg of methotrexate once weekly along with folic acid supplements, and Group B, which will receive 30 mg of Apremilast twice daily following dose titration. Baseline PASI scores and demographic data will be recorded on a structured data collection form. Follow-up evaluations will be scheduled at the 4th, 8th, and 12th week of therapy to assess treatment efficacy, monitor for adverse effects, and ensure compliance. PASI scoring will be repeated at each visit, and any side effects or treatment modifications will be documented accordingly. Using a pre-made proforma, all data will be recorded.
Data Analysis Procedure:
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 26.0, will be used to input and analyze the data. Age and PASI score will be examined using the Shapiro-Wilk test to check normality. Mean+SD/Median (IQR) will be used for numerical variables. Categorical variables, such as gender, treatment group, demographics and efficacy, will be summarized using frequencies and percentages. An independent samples t-test will be conducted to evaluate the treatment efficacy of the Apremilast and Methotrexate groups based on the mean reduction in PASI scores. To compare categorical variables with efficacy, a chi-square test or Fisher's exact test will be utilized, with a p value less than 0.05 being considered statistically .
- Conditions
- Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
- Being tested
- Methotrexate, Apremilast
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MethotrexateDrug
Group A will recieve methotrexate 10-25mg once weekly for 3 months. Along with folic acid once daily except on day of methotrexate.
ApremilastDrug
Group B will recieve tablet apremilast 30mg twice daily for 3 months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Experimental | This group will recieve methotrexate 10-25mg once weekly for 3 months, Receives: Drug: Methotrexate |
| Apremilast | Experimental | This group will recieve apremilast 30mg BD for 3 months. Receives: Drug: Apremilast |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PASI SCORE calculation
Efficacy of drugs are measured by calculation of PASI score for both groups at each visit.A treatment will be deemed effective if it achieves 75% reduction in PASI score from the baseline in 12 weeks.
Score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72( maximums severity)
Interpretation:
0-5 mild 6-10 moderate >10 severe
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jan 2026
- Study start25 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion25 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion25 Jun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Plaque PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Syeda Sana Zaman
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Syeda Sana Zaman, Hayat Abad Medical Complex, Peshawar
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07337434
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HayatabadMC
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 17 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 13 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Efficacy of Methotrexate vs Apremilast in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07337434
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HayatabadMC
- Conditions
- Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Syeda Sana ZamanOther government
- Study start
- 25 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 25 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 25 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to compare efficacy of methotrexate vs apremilast in the management of chronic plaque psoriasis.Given the high prevalence of psoriasis in Pakistan and the significant psychological impact on patients, particularly in Peshawer,this study will provide valuable insights into optimal treatment strategies.
Detailed description
Introduction Plaque Psoriasis are red, scaly plaques which mostly manifests on the skin's extensor surfaces, are the hallmark of plaque psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin disorder. It significantly impairs patients' quality of life and poses therapeutic challenges due to chronicity and relapse tendency. Approximately 2% to 3% of the global population deals with psoriasis. The most frequent subtype of psoriasis, plaque psoriasis, affects between 0.5% to 1% of Pakistanis, according to research conducted in hospitals.
Patients with moderate to severe disease were traditionally treated with methotrexate-based systemic therapy. However, its long-term safety profile concerning hepatotoxicity and myelosuppression requires periodic monitoring. Apremilast, a newer oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, has demonstrated moderate efficacy with a favorable safety profile but is less commonly used in developing countries due to cost and limited availability.
While multiple studies have evaluated the efficacy of both drugs individually, direct head-to-head comparisons in regional populations are lacking. Recent international trials indicate Apremilast may have a better tolerability profile but lower efficacy compared to Methotrexate.Apremilast was reported to be more effective than methotrexate (47.3% vs 21.8%) in decreasing PASI scores over 12 weeks in a recent research involving 112 individuals with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Both therapies had minor adverse effects, but Apremilast was found to be more effective.
Despite methotrexate's extensive use in treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, concerns regarding its long-term safety and variable effectiveness persist. Apremilast, a newer oral agent, offers a favorable safety profile but is underutilized in resource-limited settings due to cost and limited availability. Few local studies have compared the two treatments using PASI and other standardized outcome measures to determine whether one is more effective. In light of the relative efficacy and safety of Methotrexate and Apremilast, it is imperative that Pakistani physicians have access to the findings of this trial so that they may make treatment decisions grounded in data.
Objective To compare the efficacy of methotrexate vs apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Operational Definitions
Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis:
Moderate to severe disease will be defined as PASI ≥10. Diagnosis will be confirmed by consultant dermatologist using clinical criteria and PASI tool. (Annex-A)
Efficacy:
Efficacy will be assessed based on reduction in PASI score from baseline to 12 weeks. A 75% reduction in PASI score from the baseline will be considered as primary efficacy outcome.
Null Hypothesis (H₀): When it comes to treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, there is statistically insignificant difference between Apremilast and Methotrexate.
Alternate Hypothesis (H₁): In terms of reducing PASI scores, Apremilast is statistically superior to Methotrexate for treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Material and Methods
Study Design:
Randomized Control Trial
Study Setting:
Department of Dermatology, MTI-Hayatabad Medical Complex (HMC), Peshawar
Duration of Study:
Six months after approval.
Sample Size: Using WHO sample size calculator, with anticipated efficacy of Methotrexate as 21.80% and Apremilast as 47.3%⁹, 95% confidence level, 80% power, the calculated sample size is 106 patients (53 in each group).
Sampling Technique:
Random Sampling
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients having age between 18-60 years of either gender Diagnosed with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PASI ≥10) No prior systemic therapy in past 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnancy or lactation History of liver or renal dysfunction Known hypersensitivity to study drugs
Data Collection Procedure This study will be conducted at the Department of Dermatology, MTI-Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, following formal approval from the Hospital Ethical Committee and CPSP Karachi. Random sampling will be used to recruit patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria and give written informed consent. When PASI scores (Annex-A) indicate moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, a consulting dermatologist will confirm the diagnosis. After a comprehensive clinical evaluation of each participant using block randomization, eligible patients will be divided into two therapy groups: Group A, which will get 10-25 mg of methotrexate once weekly along with folic acid supplements, and Group B, which will receive 30 mg of Apremilast twice daily following dose titration. Baseline PASI scores and demographic data will be recorded on a structured data collection form. Follow-up evaluations will be scheduled at the 4th, 8th, and 12th week of therapy to assess treatment efficacy, monitor for adverse effects, and ensure compliance. PASI scoring will be repeated at each visit, and any side effects or treatment modifications will be documented accordingly. Using a pre-made proforma, all data will be recorded.
Data Analysis Procedure:
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 26.0, will be used to input and analyze the data. Age and PASI score will be examined using the Shapiro-Wilk test to check normality. Mean+SD/Median (IQR) will be used for numerical variables. Categorical variables, such as gender, treatment group, demographics and efficacy, will be summarized using frequencies and percentages. An independent samples t-test will be conducted to evaluate the treatment efficacy of the Apremilast and Methotrexate groups based on the mean reduction in PASI scores. To compare categorical variables with efficacy, a chi-square test or Fisher's exact test will be utilized, with a p value less than 0.05 being considered statistically .
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Experimental | Drug: MethotrexateThis group will recieve methotrexate 10-25mg once weekly for 3 months, |
| Apremilast | Experimental | Drug: ApremilastThis group will recieve apremilast 30mg BD for 3 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients having age between 18-60 years of either gender Diagnosed with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PASI ≥10) No prior systemic therapy in past 3 months.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pregnancy or lactation History of liver or renal dysfunction Known hypersensitivity to study drugs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MethotrexateGroup A will recieve methotrexate 10-25mg once weekly for 3 months. Along with folic acid once daily except on day of methotrexate. | Drug | Methotrexate |
| ApremilastGroup B will recieve tablet apremilast 30mg twice daily for 3 months. | Drug | Apremilast |
Primary outcome
PASI SCORE calculation
Time frame: 3 months
Efficacy of drugs are measured by calculation of PASI score for both groups at each visit.A treatment will be deemed effective if it achieves 75% reduction in PASI score from the baseline in 12 weeks. Score ranges from 0 (no disease) to 72( maximums severity) Interpretation: 0-5 mild 6-10 moderate >10 severe
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jan 2026.
Related trials for Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneously Administered Guselkumab for the Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis in Pediatric Participants
Psoriasis
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of Samples From Subjects With Various Skin Conditions and Healthy Volunteers
Acne, Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 4
An Open Label Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Roflumilast 0.3% Cream for Chronic Plaque and Nail Psoriasis
Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, Nail Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 2
Early Intervention in Plaque Psoriasis: is Bimekizumab Able to Delay Chronic Inflammation?
Psoriasis
RecruitingObservational study
Serum Substance P, Neuropathic Pain, and Central Sensitization Across Treatment Groups in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
Chronic Plaque-type Psoriasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Methotrexate and Apremilast in people with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis, run by Syeda Sana Zaman at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Filza Ajmal, FCPS part 2 (+923008179226 ext. +923008179226, binteajmal1996@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PASI SCORE calculation (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2026.