Sick Sinus SyndromeBRAVENCT07360067
Prospective Cohort Study of Bachmann Bundle Versus Right Atrial Appendage Pacing: Impact on Atrial Cardiomyopathy Evaluated by Echocardiographic Parameters and Clinical Outcome
An observational study of Sick Sinus Syndrome, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the impact of different atrial pacing sites-Bachmann's bundle pacing versus right atrial appendage pacing-on the development and progression of atrial cardiomyopathy in patients diagnosed with sick sinus syndrome who are undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sick Sinus Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Right Atrial Appendage Pacing and Bachmann Bundle Pacing
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 9 Dec 2025to 31 Dec 2028
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Year
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients who presented to Samsung Medical Center, were diagnosed with Sick Sinus Syndrome, and underwent de novo permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation based on clinical indications.
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 19 years or older
- Patients diagnosed with sick sinus syndrome who are scheduled for de novo implantation of a permanent pacemaker or permanent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
- Patients or their legal representatives who voluntarily consent to the access of medical records and study data throughout the entire research period
Who cannot join
- Patients with persistent or permanent AF
- Patients with a life expectancy of less than one year due to other comorbidities
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Patients who refuse active treatment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
South Korea1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, Seoul, 06351
Juwon Kim, MD, 82+ 2-3410-3419, abcd186a@naver.com
About this study
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the impact of different atrial pacing sites-Bachmann's bundle pacing versus right atrial appendage pacing-on the development and progression of atrial cardiomyopathy in patients diagnosed with sick sinus syndrome who are undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation.
Read the detailed description
Previous studies have reported that conventional Right Atrial Appendage pacing is associated with delayed atrial activation time. A higher burden of atrial pacing at this site has been linked to an increased incidence of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia. Furthermore, structural and functional deterioration of the atria-specifically Left Atrial dilation and reduced left atrial strain-has been observed in patients with a high percentage of Right Atrial Appendage pacing. These changes are known to accelerate the progression of atrial cardiomyopathy, potentially leading to adverse long-term clinical outcomes.
To address these limitations, Bachmann Bundle Pacing has emerged as a promising alternative pacing site. The Bachmann bundle is a major atrial myoarchitecture connecting the right and left atria. Pacing at this site is expected to facilitate interatrial conduction, thereby restoring interatrial synchrony and mitigating interatrial block. Prior research indicates that pacing at the Bachmann bundle is associated with a reduced incidence of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia, suggesting distinct benefits regarding atrial electrophysiological outcomes. However, existing studies have primarily focused on electrophysiological parameters, such as arrhythmia incidence. Consequently, the impact of Bachmann Bundle Pacing on atrial structural and functional remodeling remains to be clearly elucidated.
Therefore, this study is designed as a single-center cohort study enrolling a total of 200 subjects (100 prospective and 100 retrospective). The investigators will analyze echocardiographic parameters over a 12-month period following pacemaker implantation. By comprehensively analyzing imaging parameters (left atrial/right atrial strain and volume changes assessed via echocardiography) and clinical outcomes (atrial arrhythmias, heart failure hospitalization, and mortality), this study aims to investigate the differential effects of Bachmann Bundle Pacing versus Right Atrial Appendage pacing on the development and progression of atrial cardiomyopathy.
- Conditions
- Sick Sinus Syndrome
- Being tested
- Right Atrial Appendage Pacing, Bachmann Bundle Pacing
- Keywords
- bachmann bundle pacing
- Medical subject headings
- Sick Sinus Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Right Atrial Appendage PacingProcedure or surgery
Atrial lead positioned in the right atrial appendage
Bachmann Bundle PacingProcedure or surgery
Atrial lead positioned in the bachmann bundle branch
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Right Atrial Appendage Pacing | Right Atrial Appendage Pacing Receives: Procedure: Right Atrial Appendage Pacing | |
| Bachmann Bundle Pacing | Bachmann Bundle Pacing Receives: Procedure: Bachmann Bundle Pacing |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Structural echocardiographic parameters of the left atrium
LA Volume Index measured as mL/m^2
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Functional echocardiographic parameters of the left atrium
Reservoir Strain (%), Conduit Strain (%), Contraction Strain (%)
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Secondary outcomes (21)
Structural echocardiographic parameters of the left ventricle
LV End-Diastolic Diameter(mm), LV End-Systolic Diameter(mm)
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Functional echocardiographic parameters of the left ventricle
LV Ejection Fraction (%), Global Longitudinal Strain (%)
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Mitral and tricuspid regurgitation volume
as mL per beat
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Structural echocardiographic parameters of the right atrium
RA Volume Index (mL/m^2)
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Functional echocardiographic parameters of the right atrium
RA Reservoir Strain (%), RA Conduit Strain (%), RA Contraction Strain (%)
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
ECG parameters
PR interval (ms), QRS duration (ms), P wave duration (ms), QTC (ms)
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Average heart rate
bpm
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Heart rate distribution
percentage (%)
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Pacing burden
percentage (%)
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Atrial fibrillation burden
percentage (%)
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
atrial fibrillation occurrence
count
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
NTproBNP
pg/ml
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Procedure-related complications
count
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Pacemaker/Implantable cardioverter defibrillator parameters
Threshold (V)
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Pacemaker/Implantable cardioverter defibrillator parameters
longevity (year)
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Cardiac mortality
count
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
All-cause mortality
count
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Patient's functional status
NYHA class I~IV
Measured: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
hospitalization due to heart failure
count
Measured: 6 and 12 months post-procedure
re-admission due to any cause
count
Measured: 6 and 12 months post-procedure
Cerebrovascular event
count
Measured: 6 and 12 months post-procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jan 2026
- Study start9 Dec 2025
- Primary completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sick Sinus SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Samsung Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 1 Year
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Samsung Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Juwon Kim, Samsung Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07360067
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SMC2025-10-106
- Other IDs
- KCT0011382
- Acronym
- BRAVE
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bailin SJ, Adler S, Giudici M. Prevention of chronic atrial fibrillation by pacing in the region of Bachmann's bundle: results of a multicenter randomized trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Aug;12(8):912-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00912.x.
PubMed 11513442Infeld M, Nicoli CD, Meagher S, Tompkins BJ, Wayne S, Irvine B, Betageri O, Habel N, Till S, Lobel J, Meyer M, Lustgarten DL. Clinical impact of Bachmann's bundle pacing defined by electrocardiographic criteria on atrial arrhythmia outcomes. Europace. 2022 Oct 13;24(9):1460-1468. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac029.
PubMed 35304608Lustgarten DL, Habel N, Sanchez-Quintana D, Winget J, Correa de Sa D, Lobel R, Thompson N, Infeld M, Meyer M. Bachmann bundle pacing. Heart Rhythm. 2024 Sep;21(9):1711-1717. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.1786. Epub 2024 Mar 27. No abstract available.
PubMed 38552731Martens P, Deferm S, Bertrand PB, Verbrugge FH, Ramaekers J, Verhaert D, Dupont M, Vandervoort PM, Mullens W. The Detrimental Effect of RA Pacing on LA Function and Clinical Outcome in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Apr;13(4):895-906. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
PubMed 31326478Roithinger FX, Abou-Harb M, Pachinger O, Hintringer F. The effect of the atrial pacing site on the total atrial activation time. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Mar;24(3):316-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00316.x.
PubMed 11310300De Sisti A, Leclercq JF, Stiubei M, Fiorello P, Halimi F, Attuel P. P wave duration and morphology predict atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with sinus node dysfunction and atrial-based pacemaker. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Nov;25(11):1546-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01546.x.
PubMed 12494610Elkayam LU, Koehler JL, Sheldon TJ, Glotzer TV, Rosenthal LS, Lamas GA. The influence of atrial and ventricular pacing on the incidence of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Dec;34(12):1593-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03192.x. Epub 2011 Aug 7.
PubMed 21819434Bradshaw PJ, Stobie P, Knuiman MW, Briffa TG, Hobbs MS. Trends in the incidence and prevalence of cardiac pacemaker insertions in an ageing population. Open Heart. 2014 Dec 10;1(1):e000177. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000177. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25512875Honarbakhsh S, Hunter L, Chow A, Hunter RJ. Bradyarrhythmias and pacemakers. BMJ. 2018 Mar 15;360:k642. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k642. No abstract available.
PubMed 29545242Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Goldschlager NF, Hamilton RM, Joglar JA, Kim RJ, Lee R, Marine JE, McLeod CJ, Oken KR, Patton KK, Pellegrini CN, Selzman KA, Thompson A, Varosy PD. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2019 Aug 20;140(8):e382-e482. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628. Epub 2018 Nov 6. No abstract available.
PubMed 30586772
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Cohort Study of Bachmann Bundle Versus Right Atrial Appendage Pacing: Impact on Atrial Cardiomyopathy Evaluated by Echocardiographic Parameters and Clinical Outcome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07360067
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BRAVE / SMC2025-10-106
- Conditions
- Sick Sinus Syndrome
- Keywords
- bachmann bundle pacing
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Samsung Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the impact of different atrial pacing sites-Bachmann's bundle pacing versus right atrial appendage pacing-on the development and progression of atrial cardiomyopathy in patients diagnosed with sick sinus syndrome who are undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation.
Detailed description
Previous studies have reported that conventional Right Atrial Appendage pacing is associated with delayed atrial activation time. A higher burden of atrial pacing at this site has been linked to an increased incidence of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia. Furthermore, structural and functional deterioration of the atria-specifically Left Atrial dilation and reduced left atrial strain-has been observed in patients with a high percentage of Right Atrial Appendage pacing. These changes are known to accelerate the progression of atrial cardiomyopathy, potentially leading to adverse long-term clinical outcomes.
To address these limitations, Bachmann Bundle Pacing has emerged as a promising alternative pacing site. The Bachmann bundle is a major atrial myoarchitecture connecting the right and left atria. Pacing at this site is expected to facilitate interatrial conduction, thereby restoring interatrial synchrony and mitigating interatrial block. Prior research indicates that pacing at the Bachmann bundle is associated with a reduced incidence of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia, suggesting distinct benefits regarding atrial electrophysiological outcomes. However, existing studies have primarily focused on electrophysiological parameters, such as arrhythmia incidence. Consequently, the impact of Bachmann Bundle Pacing on atrial structural and functional remodeling remains to be clearly elucidated.
Therefore, this study is designed as a single-center cohort study enrolling a total of 200 subjects (100 prospective and 100 retrospective). The investigators will analyze echocardiographic parameters over a 12-month period following pacemaker implantation. By comprehensively analyzing imaging parameters (left atrial/right atrial strain and volume changes assessed via echocardiography) and clinical outcomes (atrial arrhythmias, heart failure hospitalization, and mortality), this study aims to investigate the differential effects of Bachmann Bundle Pacing versus Right Atrial Appendage pacing on the development and progression of atrial cardiomyopathy.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Year
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Right Atrial Appendage Pacing | – | Procedure: Right Atrial Appendage PacingRight Atrial Appendage Pacing |
| Bachmann Bundle Pacing | – | Procedure: Bachmann Bundle PacingBachmann Bundle Pacing |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients who presented to Samsung Medical Center, were diagnosed with Sick Sinus Syndrome, and underwent de novo permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation based on clinical indications.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients aged 19 years or older
- Patients diagnosed with sick sinus syndrome who are scheduled for de novo implantation of a permanent pacemaker or permanent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
- Patients or their legal representatives who voluntarily consent to the access of medical records and study data throughout the entire research period
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with persistent or permanent AF
- Patients with a life expectancy of less than one year due to other comorbidities
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Patients who refuse active treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Right Atrial Appendage PacingAtrial lead positioned in the right atrial appendage | Procedure or surgery | Right Atrial Appendage Pacing |
| Bachmann Bundle PacingAtrial lead positioned in the bachmann bundle branch | Procedure or surgery | Bachmann Bundle Pacing |
Primary outcome
Structural echocardiographic parameters of the left atrium
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
LA Volume Index measured as mL/m^2
Functional echocardiographic parameters of the left atrium
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Reservoir Strain (%), Conduit Strain (%), Contraction Strain (%)
21 secondary outcomes
Structural echocardiographic parameters of the left ventricle
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Functional echocardiographic parameters of the left ventricle
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Mitral and tricuspid regurgitation volume
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Structural echocardiographic parameters of the right atrium
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Functional echocardiographic parameters of the right atrium
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
ECG parameters
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Average heart rate
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Heart rate distribution
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Pacing burden
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Atrial fibrillation burden
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
atrial fibrillation occurrence
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
NTproBNP
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Procedure-related complications
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Pacemaker/Implantable cardioverter defibrillator parameters
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Pacemaker/Implantable cardioverter defibrillator parameters
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Cardiac mortality
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
All-cause mortality
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
Patient's functional status
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation
hospitalization due to heart failure
Time frame: 6 and 12 months post-procedure
re-admission due to any cause
Time frame: 6 and 12 months post-procedure
Cerebrovascular event
Time frame: 6 and 12 months post-procedure
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 11513442Bailin SJ, Adler S, Giudici M. Prevention of chronic atrial fibrillation by pacing in the region of Bachmann's bundle: results of a multicenter randomized trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Aug;12(8):912-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00912.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 35304608Infeld M, Nicoli CD, Meagher S, Tompkins BJ, Wayne S, Irvine B, Betageri O, Habel N, Till S, Lobel J, Meyer M, Lustgarten DL. Clinical impact of Bachmann's bundle pacing defined by electrocardiographic criteria on atrial arrhythmia outcomes. Europace. 2022 Oct 13;24(9):1460-1468. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac029.
- Results publication: PubMed 38552731Lustgarten DL, Habel N, Sanchez-Quintana D, Winget J, Correa de Sa D, Lobel R, Thompson N, Infeld M, Meyer M. Bachmann bundle pacing. Heart Rhythm. 2024 Sep;21(9):1711-1717. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.1786. Epub 2024 Mar 27. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 31326478Martens P, Deferm S, Bertrand PB, Verbrugge FH, Ramaekers J, Verhaert D, Dupont M, Vandervoort PM, Mullens W. The Detrimental Effect of RA Pacing on LA Function and Clinical Outcome in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Apr;13(4):895-906. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.04.022. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 11310300Roithinger FX, Abou-Harb M, Pachinger O, Hintringer F. The effect of the atrial pacing site on the total atrial activation time. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Mar;24(3):316-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00316.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 12494610De Sisti A, Leclercq JF, Stiubei M, Fiorello P, Halimi F, Attuel P. P wave duration and morphology predict atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with sinus node dysfunction and atrial-based pacemaker. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Nov;25(11):1546-54. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01546.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 21819434Elkayam LU, Koehler JL, Sheldon TJ, Glotzer TV, Rosenthal LS, Lamas GA. The influence of atrial and ventricular pacing on the incidence of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Dec;34(12):1593-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03192.x. Epub 2011 Aug 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 25512875Bradshaw PJ, Stobie P, Knuiman MW, Briffa TG, Hobbs MS. Trends in the incidence and prevalence of cardiac pacemaker insertions in an ageing population. Open Heart. 2014 Dec 10;1(1):e000177. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000177. eCollection 2014.
- Results publication: PubMed 29545242Honarbakhsh S, Hunter L, Chow A, Hunter RJ. Bradyarrhythmias and pacemakers. BMJ. 2018 Mar 15;360:k642. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k642. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 30586772Kusumoto FM, Schoenfeld MH, Barrett C, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Goldschlager NF, Hamilton RM, Joglar JA, Kim RJ, Lee R, Marine JE, McLeod CJ, Oken KR, Patton KK, Pellegrini CN, Selzman KA, Thompson A, Varosy PD. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2019 Aug 20;140(8):e382-e482. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000628. Epub 2018 Nov 6. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sick Sinus Syndrome
Recruiting
Multimodality Location Prediction Accuracy of Leadless Pacemaker Positioning
Sinus Pause, Sinus Sick Syndrome
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Safety, Performance, and Clinical Benefit of Pacing the Left Bundle Branch Area - Post-Market Clinical Follow-up
Bradycardia, Atrioventricular Block
Not yet recruiting
Belgo-Luxembourg Leadless PM Registry
Bradyarrhythmias, AV Block Complete
Recruiting
LEAP 2 Chronic EFS
Cardiac Pacemaker, Cardiac Rhythm Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Biospecimen Repository for Cardiac Arrhythmias at the Cleveland Clinic
Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Sick Sinus Syndrome, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Juwon Kim, MD (82+ 10-2079-8154, abcd186a@naver.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Structural echocardiographic parameters of the left atrium (time frame: 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07360067, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2026.