Partial Edentulism of the MaxillaNCT07381283
Immediate Versus Delayed Loading of Dental Implants in the Anterior Maxilla
A study testing Dental Implant in people with Partial Edentulism of the Maxilla and Dental Implant Loading, run by Suez Canal University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This interventional comparative clinical study was conducted to evaluate and compare the clinical stability and radiographic outcomes of immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants placed in the anterior region of the maxilla. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Partial Edentulism of the Maxilla, Dental Implant Loading, Tooth Loss in the Anterior Maxilla
- What is being tested?
- Dental Implant
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 3 Feb 2024to 12 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 55 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged 20-55 years
- Both genders
- Healthy individuals (ASA I) without systemic diseases
- Patients with one or more missing teeth in the anterior maxilla
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or lactating women, or females with osteoporosis
- Patients with harmful oral habits such as bruxism or smoking
- Poor oral hygiene
- Gingival or periodontal diseases with severe vertical or horizontal bone loss
- Teeth with periapical or lateral infections or lesions
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Immediate Versus Delayed Loading of Dental Implants at the Anterior Maxilla
This interventional comparative clinical study was conducted to evaluate and compare the clinical stability and radiographic outcomes of immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants placed in the anterior region of the maxilla. Immediate loading protocols have been shown to improve oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction; however, their influence on implant stability and osseointegration remains an area of ongoing investigation.
A total of sixteen dental implants were placed and the participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups using a computer-generated randomization method (www.Randomizer.org). In Group I (control group), eight implants were placed and restored following a delayed loading protocol, with prosthetic loading performed six months after implant placement. In Group II (study group), eight implants were placed and immediately loaded with provisional polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) restorations. After six months, the provisional restorations were replaced with definitive fixed prostheses.
Preoperative planning of implant placement was performed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Clinical evaluation of implant stability was carried out using the Osstell device, while radiographic assessment of peri-implant bone density and marginal bone changes was performed using standardized indirect digital radiographs. Radiographic evaluations were obtained immediately after implant placement and at six months postoperatively. The clinical and radiographic outcomes of both loading protocols were compared to assess implant stability and osseointegration.
- Conditions
- Partial Edentulism of the Maxilla, Dental Implant Loading, Tooth Loss in the Anterior Maxilla
- Being tested
- Dental Implant
- Keywords
- Dental Implants, Immediate Loading, Delayed Loading, Maxillary Implants, Anterior Maxilla, Partial Edentulism, Implant Stability, Osseointegration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dental ImplantDevice
Endosseous dental implants placed in the anterior maxilla and restored using either immediate or delayed loading protocols.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Delayed Loading Group | Active comparator | Participants in this group received a single dental implant placed in the anterior maxilla. A total of eight implants were placed and restored using a delayed loading protocol, with prosthetic loading performed six months after implant placement. Receives: Device: Dental Implant |
| Immediate Loading Group | Experimental | Participants in this group received a single dental implant placed in the anterior maxilla. A total of eight implants were placed and immediately loaded with provisional restorations. After six months, the provisional restorations were replaced with definitive fixed restorations. Receives: Device: Dental Implant |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Implant Stability (ISQ)
Clinical stability of dental implants was assessed using the Osstell device. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured immediately after implant placement and at 6 months postoperatively. ISQ scores range from 1-100, with scores ≥70 indicating high stability, 60-69 medium stability, and <60 low stability.
Measured: Baseline (immediately after implant placement) and 6 months postoperatively
Peri-implant Bone Density
Bone density around the implants was measured using standardized direct paralleling digital periapical radiographs and analyzed with IDRISI Kilimanjaro software. Two zones were evaluated: the osseointegration zone near the implant border and the surrounding bone interface. Measurements were recorded immediately postoperatively and at 3 and 6 months.
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Postoperative Pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS)
Patients reported the degree of pain using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain. Pain was assessed at 1, 3, and 7 days postoperatively.
Measured: 1, 3, and 7 days postoperatively
Visual Scale of Edema
Facial edema was assessed using a visual grading scale: No edema, Low-grade, Intermediate-grade, and High-grade, based on visual inspection and palpation. Edema was evaluated at 1, 3, and 7 days postoperatively.
Measured: 1, 3, and 7 days postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Feb 2026
- Study start3 Feb 2024
- Primary completion21 May 2025
- Study completion12 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Partial Edentulism of the MaxillaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Suez Canal UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Suez Canal University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mohamed Said Hamed, Professor, Study chair, Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry - Suez Canal UniversityAsmaa Yousri Abdallah, Assistant professor, Study director, Assistant professor of Oral Radiology, Faculty of DentistryAhmed Abd elmohsen Younis, Assistant professor, Study director, Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry - Suez Canal University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07381283
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 706/2023
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 2 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kim HS, Cho HA, Kim YY, Shin H. Implant survival and patient satisfaction in completely edentulous patients with immediate placement of implants: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Dec 18;18(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0669-1.
PubMed 30563482Gallucci GO, Hamilton A, Zhou W, Buser D, Chen S. Implant placement and loading protocols in partially edentulous patients: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:106-134. doi: 10.1111/clr.13276.
PubMed 30328194Fischer K, Stenberg T, Hedin M, Sennerby L. Five-year results from a randomized, controlled trial on early and delayed loading of implants supporting full-arch prosthesis in the edentulous maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 May;19(5):433-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01510.x. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
PubMed 18371094Eliasziw M, Young SL, Woodbury MG, Fryday-Field K. Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. Phys Ther. 1994 Aug;74(8):777-88. doi: 10.1093/ptj/74.8.777.
PubMed 8047565Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bergkvist G, Sahlholm S, Nilner K, Lindh C. Implant-supported fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up of treatment with non-submerged ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Jun;15(3):351-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01017.x.
PubMed 15142099Bergkvist G, Nilner K, Sahlholm S, Karlsson U, Lindh C. Immediate loading of implants in the edentulous maxilla: use of an interim fixed prosthesis followed by a permanent fixed prosthesis: a 32-month prospective radiological and clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Mar;11(1):1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00094.x. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
PubMed 18384401Hassanin Atia MG, Hamed MS, Abdallah AY, Younis AA. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants at anterior maxilla: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2026 Oct 2;26(1):1921. doi: 10.1186/s12903-026-09843-w.
PubMed 42834394
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Immediate Versus Delayed Loading of Dental Implants at the Anterior Maxilla
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07381283
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 706/2023
- Conditions
- Partial Edentulism of the Maxilla, Dental Implant Loading, Tooth Loss in the Anterior Maxilla
- Keywords
- Dental Implants, Immediate Loading, Delayed Loading, Maxillary Implants, Anterior Maxilla, Partial Edentulism, Implant Stability, Osseointegration
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Suez Canal UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This interventional comparative clinical study was conducted to evaluate and compare the clinical stability and radiographic outcomes of immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants placed in the anterior region of the maxilla. Immediate loading protocols have been shown to improve oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction; however, their influence on implant stability and osseointegration remains an area of ongoing investigation.
A total of sixteen dental implants were placed and the participants were randomly allocated into two equal groups using a computer-generated randomization method (www.Randomizer.org). In Group I (control group), eight implants were placed and restored following a delayed loading protocol, with prosthetic loading performed six months after implant placement. In Group II (study group), eight implants were placed and immediately loaded with provisional polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) restorations. After six months, the provisional restorations were replaced with definitive fixed prostheses.
Preoperative planning of implant placement was performed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Clinical evaluation of implant stability was carried out using the Osstell device, while radiographic assessment of peri-implant bone density and marginal bone changes was performed using standardized indirect digital radiographs. Radiographic evaluations were obtained immediately after implant placement and at six months postoperatively. The clinical and radiographic outcomes of both loading protocols were compared to assess implant stability and osseointegration.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Delayed Loading Group | Active comparator | Device: Dental ImplantParticipants in this group received a single dental implant placed in the anterior maxilla. A total of eight implants were placed and restored using a delayed loading protocol, with prosthetic loading performed six months after implant placement. |
| Immediate Loading Group | Experimental | Device: Dental ImplantParticipants in this group received a single dental implant placed in the anterior maxilla. A total of eight implants were placed and immediately loaded with provisional restorations. After six months, the provisional restorations were replaced with definitive fixed restorations. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults aged 20-55 years
- Both genders
- Healthy individuals (ASA I) without systemic diseases
- Patients with one or more missing teeth in the anterior maxilla
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnant or lactating women, or females with osteoporosis
- Patients with harmful oral habits such as bruxism or smoking
- Poor oral hygiene
- Gingival or periodontal diseases with severe vertical or horizontal bone loss
- Teeth with periapical or lateral infections or lesions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dental ImplantEndosseous dental implants placed in the anterior maxilla and restored using either immediate or delayed loading protocols. | Device | Delayed Loading Group, Immediate Loading Group |
Primary outcome
Implant Stability (ISQ)
Time frame: Baseline (immediately after implant placement) and 6 months postoperatively
Clinical stability of dental implants was assessed using the Osstell device. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured immediately after implant placement and at 6 months postoperatively. ISQ scores range from 1-100, with scores ≥70 indicating high stability, 60-69 medium stability, and <60 low stability.
Peri-implant Bone Density
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months
Bone density around the implants was measured using standardized direct paralleling digital periapical radiographs and analyzed with IDRISI Kilimanjaro software. Two zones were evaluated: the osseointegration zone near the implant border and the surrounding bone interface. Measurements were recorded immediately postoperatively and at 3 and 6 months.
2 secondary outcomes
Postoperative Pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS)
Time frame: 1, 3, and 7 days postoperatively
Visual Scale of Edema
Time frame: 1, 3, and 7 days postoperatively
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Feb 2026.
- Background: PubMed 30563482Kim HS, Cho HA, Kim YY, Shin H. Implant survival and patient satisfaction in completely edentulous patients with immediate placement of implants: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Dec 18;18(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0669-1.
- Background: PubMed 30328194Gallucci GO, Hamilton A, Zhou W, Buser D, Chen S. Implant placement and loading protocols in partially edentulous patients: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:106-134. doi: 10.1111/clr.13276.
- Background: PubMed 18371094Fischer K, Stenberg T, Hedin M, Sennerby L. Five-year results from a randomized, controlled trial on early and delayed loading of implants supporting full-arch prosthesis in the edentulous maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 May;19(5):433-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01510.x. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
- Background: PubMed 8047565Eliasziw M, Young SL, Woodbury MG, Fryday-Field K. Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. Phys Ther. 1994 Aug;74(8):777-88. doi: 10.1093/ptj/74.8.777.
- BackgroundCohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Background: PubMed 15142099Bergkvist G, Sahlholm S, Nilner K, Lindh C. Implant-supported fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up of treatment with non-submerged ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Jun;15(3):351-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01017.x.
- Background: PubMed 18384401Bergkvist G, Nilner K, Sahlholm S, Karlsson U, Lindh C. Immediate loading of implants in the edentulous maxilla: use of an interim fixed prosthesis followed by a permanent fixed prosthesis: a 32-month prospective radiological and clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Mar;11(1):1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00094.x. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42834394Hassanin Atia MG, Hamed MS, Abdallah AY, Younis AA. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants at anterior maxilla: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2026 Oct 2;26(1):1921. doi: 10.1186/s12903-026-09843-w.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Partial Edentulism of the Maxilla
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Autogenous Bone Graft on Immediate Dental Implant Osseointegration Using Piezosurgery
Tooth Loss, Partial Edentulism in the Maxilla or in the Mandible
Active, not recruiting
Carrot Technique Versus Guided Bone Regeneration for Horizontal Ridge Deficiency in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone
Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Deficiency, Partial Edentulism
Active, not recruiting
A Follow-Up Study of Straight and Tapered Dental Implants in the Front Upper Jaw
Tooth Loss in the Anterior Maxilla, Partial Edentulism of the Maxilla
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mohamed Said Hamed, Professor study chair
Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry - Suez Canal University
Asmaa Yousri Abdallah, Assistant professor study director
Assistant professor of Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry
Ahmed Abd elmohsen Younis, Assistant professor study director
Assistant Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry - Suez Canal University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dental Implant in people with Partial Edentulism of the Maxilla and Dental Implant Loading, run by Suez Canal University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Implant Stability (ISQ) (time frame: Baseline (immediately after implant placement) and 6 months postoperatively). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07381283, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2026.