Opioid Free AnesthesiaPhase 4NCT07389096
Opioid-Free Anesthesia Versus Opioid Based Anesthesia For Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
A Phase 4 study testing Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl (IV) in people with Opioid Free Anesthesia, run by Nashwa Ahmed at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is a multimodal analgesic approach designed to eliminate the intraoperative use of systemic, neuraxial, or intracavitary opioids. This technique employs a combination of antinociceptive agents targeting various pathways within the central and peripheral nervous systems to achieve effective… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Opioid Free Anesthesia
- What is being tested?
- Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl (IV)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 30 Jan 2026to 31 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Inclusion Criteria:Patients younger than 18 years of age, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I or II, and will be scheduled for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
-
Exclusion Criteria:• Refusal to participate in the study or to allow use of personal data
- Non-idiopathic scoliosis
- Contraindications to commonly used perioperative medications
- ASA Physical Status ≥ III
- Presence of neuromuscular disorders or severe cardiac dysfunction
- Requirement for postoperative mechanical ventilation
- Regular use of analgesics or opioids
- History of allergy to opioids or dexmedetomidine
- Diagnosed mental disorders
- Severe hepatic or renal dysfunction
- Coagulopathy or significant pulmonary disease
- Preoperative or postoperative neurological deficits
- Occurrence of serious arrhythmia, hypotension, or bradycardia necessitating discontinuation of dexmedetomidine infusion
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Port said university
Port Said, 42111
nashwa gomaa ahmed, MD, 00201005289328, dr_nashwa_2008@yahoo.com
About this study
Official title: Opioid-Free Anesthesia Versus Opioid Based Anesthesia For Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial
Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is a multimodal analgesic approach designed to eliminate the intraoperative use of systemic, neuraxial, or intracavitary opioids. This technique employs a combination of antinociceptive agents targeting various pathways within the central and peripheral nervous systems to achieve effective analgesia.
Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a highly selective α2-adrenoreceptor agonist, is a centrally acting non-opioid agent increasingly utilized in clinical practice for its antinociceptive and anxiolytic properties. Only a few prospective randomized controlled trials have specifically examined the postoperative analgesic efficacy of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion in patients undergoing spinal surgery, with limited data focusing on this as a primary endpoint. Importantly, no clinical studies have investigated its analgesic impact in patients undergoing spinal surgery under general anesthesia.
Read the detailed description
Reducing perioperative opioid exposure presents a critical opportunity for anesthesiologists, surgeons, and institutions to minimize patient harm and improve recovery outcomes. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) has emerged as a promising approach to address this need. Opioid-free anesthesia is defined as an anesthetic technique that excludes intraoperative opioid administration through all routes including systemic, neuraxial, and local tissue infiltration relying instead on multimodal non-opioid strategies to achieve effective analgesia. (5) Aim This study explores the intraoperative and postoperative application of dexmedetomidine (DEX) as an opioid-free anesthetic strategy to improve perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing scoliosis surgery under general anesthesia.
Hypothesis:
Continuous infusion of Dexmedetomidine at 0.5 μg/kg/h, following an initial loading dose of 1 μg/kg, yields more effective than standard approaches.
Outcomes This prospective randomized controlled study investigates the intraoperative and postoperative efficacy of dexmedetomidine (DEX) infusion in patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. The primary outcome is intraoperative analgesic effectiveness, while secondary outcomes include the incidence of perioperative complications, the requirement for rescue fentanyl, and surgeon satisfaction.
Thirty patients will be prospectively enrolled and randomly allocated into two parallel groups:
- Group OFA (Opioid-Free Anesthesia): patients will Receive dexmedetomidine with a loading dose of 1 μg/kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h.
- Group OBA (Opioid-Based Anesthesia): patients will Receive fentanyl with a loading dose of 1 μg/kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h.
Methods Ethics committee approval will be obtained, and written informed consent will be secured from the parents of each pediatric participant.
We will conduct a prospective, randomized study involving 30 pediatric patients aged 8 to 18 years, diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis and will be scheduled for surgical correction. Patients will be randomly assigned into two equal groups.
Anesthetic technique Preoperative Routine Preoperative Investigations
The standard preoperative workup included:
- Complete Blood Count (CBC)
- Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Echocardiography
- Coagulation Profile
- Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Serum Electrolytes
- Blood Crossmatch Additional Investigations
- Plain Chest Radiography
- Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) Analysis
- Pulmonary Function Tests (PFTs), routinely performed to detect restrictive lung defects During the evening preceding surgery, patients will be educated on the use of a five-point visual analog pain scale, illustrated by a series of facial expressions. This scale is designed to facilitate self-assessment, with 1 denoting no pain and 5 indicating the worst imaginable pain. (2) Intraoperative Upon arrival to the operating room, standard monitoring is initiated in accordance with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) guidelines. This includes continuous five-lead electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, capnography, core temperature monitoring, and urine output measurement.
Patients will receive intravenous hydration with 0.9% normal saline at 5-6 mL/kg to maintain adequate systolic blood pressure. No premedication is administered. Hypothermia prevention will be achieved using forced warm air devices.
Antibiotic prophylaxis is administered appropriately within 30 minutes prior to skin incision.
Induction of anesthesia will be achieved with an intravenous bolus of propofol at 2 mg/kg, followed by atracurium at 0.5 mg/kg to facilitate orotracheal intubation. No additional neuromuscular blocking agents are administered during the procedure.
Mechanical ventilation will be maintained using a 1:1 oxygen-to-air mixture (FiO₂ 0.5), with a tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg and a respiratory rate is adjusted between 8 and 14 breaths per minute to maintain end-tidal CO₂ levels within the range of 30-35 mmHg
Following induction, all patients will receive the following intravenous infusions:
- Propofol is administered at 50-150 μg/kg/min, will be titrated to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) within ±20% of baseline values.
- Continuous propofol infusion is similarly adjusted across both study groups to ensure adequate anesthetic depth. Inadequate anesthesia is defined as a heart rate exceeding pre-induction values by more than 15% and/or systolic arterial pressure exceeding baseline by more than 20%, persisting for at least one minute in the absence of hypovolemia or low hematocrit.
- A total of 4 g of intravenous magnesium sulfate will be administered intraoperatively.
- Tranexamic acid will be administered as a loading dose of 15 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion at 5 mg/kg/hr, continued until completion of surgical hemostasis.
In Group D (Dexmedetomidine) Patients will be administered a loading dose of dexmedetomidine at 1 μg/kg over 10 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion at 0.5 μg/kg/hr.
For consistency in preparation, 200 μg of dexmedetomidine [Precedex®, Pfizer] is diluted with normal saline in a 50 mL syringe, resulting in a final concentration of 4 μg/mL.
In Group F (Fentanyl):
Patients will receive opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) consisting of a fentanyl loading dose of 1 μg/kg, followed by a maintenance infusion at 0.5 μg/kg/hr.
An additional large-bore 16-gauge intravenous cannula will be placed in the contralateral hand to serve as a transfusion access line.
Ringer's lactate is administered via an intravenous fluid warmer at a rate of 10 mL/kg/hr, with blood products will be supplemented as clinically indicated.
A Foley catheter is inserted in all patients and will be connected to a urine collection bag for continuous monitoring of urinary output.
Following catheterization, patients are carefully positioned prone, with meticulous attention to the eyes, airway, and pressure points, all of which are assessed, supported, and protected to prevent positioning related complications.
Following placement of the spinal rod instrumentation, the orthopedic surgeon requests a wake-up test, a procedure is considered the gold standard for intraoperative neurological assessment during scoliosis correction surgery. (6) At this point, dexmedetomidine and fentanyl infusions will be discontinued.
After the patient has reached an appropriate level of consciousness for testing. The patient is instructed to grip his hands to assess responsiveness, followed by a command to move his feet. Both tasks are successfully performed without any adverse events, such as excessive movement, accidental extubation, or risk of falling.
Upon completion of the test, anesthesia will be re-established with an intravenous bolus of propofol (2 mg/kg) and atracurium (0.5 mg/kg). The depth of anesthesia will be maintained at the same level as prior to the wake-up test, and the surgical procedure proceeded without complications.
To initiate emergence from anesthesia, the infusion rate of the maintenance anesthetic agent is reduced to 50% at the onset of surgical closure and is discontinued once the patient is repositioned supine. All patients will receive ondansetron (0.1 mg/kg) for antiemetic prophylaxis and paracetamol (15 mg/kg) for analgesia.
Neuromuscular reversal will be achieved using a standard protocol, neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) is combined with glycopyrrolate (0.01 mg/kg), will be administered upon confirmation of a train-of-four (TOF) count of 4 and a TOF ratio exceeding 80%. Extubation is performed in supine position, contingent upon clinical indicators of full recovery including adequate spontaneous respiration and responsiveness to verbal commands and a TOF ratio >0.9.
Postoperatively Patients will be transferred to either the high dependency unit (HDU) or the neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU). All patients will receive intravenous paracetamol (15 mg/kg every 6 hours) for 48 hours to maintain analgesia.
Measurements Intraoperative Haemodynamics Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) will be continuously monitored using non-invasive techniques at 30-minute intervals throughout the procedure. Specific hemodynamic data points will be recorded at baseline, during skin incision, at 30 minutes post-incision, during skin closure, and at extubation, will be documented in the anesthesia follow-up records.
In all cases, increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP >100 mmHg) or heart rate exceeding 15% above baseline are managed with incremental boluses of propofol, up to 50 mg per dose, is tailored to the patient's response.
Assessment of Intraoperative Blood Loss The visual estimation method remains the most employed technique for assessing intraoperative blood loss in clinical practice. This approach involves evaluating the volume of blood collected in suction canisters, the degree of saturation of surgical gauze, and the visible blood within the operative field.(7) Surgeon Satisfaction Assessment (8)
Surgeon satisfaction will be evaluated in both groups using Likert scale, with scores ranging from 1 to 5, corresponding to the following levels:
1 = Very Bad, 2 = Bad, 3 = Average, 4 = Good, and 5 = Excellent . Satisfaction ratings are recorded postoperatively to assess the perceived quality of surgical conditions and overall intraoperative experience.
Quality of surgical field (9)
The quality of surgical field will be evaluated every 30 min using the surgical field rating (SFR) scale of six points proposed by Fromme et al.:
5- massive uncontrollable bleeding 4- heavy but controllable bleeding that significantly interfered with dissection 3- moderate bleeding that moderately compromised surgical dissection 2-moderate bleeding a nuisance but without interference with accurate dissection
1- bleeding, so mild it is not even a surgical nuisance 0- no bleeding and virtually bloodless field.
Surgical field was graded as good, fair, and poor as:
good - SFR scale 0 or 1 fair - SFR scale 2 or 3 poor - SFR scale 4 or 5 Postoperative Recovery Assessment Post-anesthesia recovery is evaluated using the Post Anesthesia Recovery Score (PARS), alongside measurement of immediate recovery time, defined as the interval from discontinuation of dexmedetomidine or fentanyl infusion to the patient's response to verbal command by opening the eyes. Assessments are conducted at 5-minute intervals starting from the cessation of the anesthetic infusion. (2) Pain Assessment and Analgesic Intervention (3)
Postoperative pain will be assessed at 2, 6, 12, 24 hours using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Pain intensity is classified as follows:
- Mild: NRS 1-3
- Moderate: NRS 4-6
- Severe: NRS 7-10 Intravenous fentanyl (1 µg/kg) is administered as rescue analgesia when the NRS score exceeded 4. The pain free interval is defined as the duration between cessation of the study anesthetic agent and the first administration of rescue analgesia.
Postoperative Complications
Patients are monitored for the following adverse events:
- Nausea and vomiting
- Shivering
- Pruritus
- Respiratory desaturation, defined as peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) < 92%
- Conditions
- Opioid Free Anesthesia
- Being tested
- Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl (IV)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DexmedetomidineDrug
patients will Receive dexmedetomidine with a loading dose of 1 μg/kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h.
Fentanyl (IV)Drug
patients will Receive fentanyl with a loading dose of 1 μg/kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group OFA (Opioid-Free Anesthesia): | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Dexmedetomidine |
| Group OBA (Opioid-Based Anesthesia) | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Fentanyl (IV) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
intraoperative analgesic effectiveness, Measured by Heart Rate
Changes in heart rate recorded at predefined intraoperative intervals to assess physiological response to analgesia.
Measured: 2 hours
intraoperative analgesic effectiveness, Measured by blood pressure
Changes in blood pressure recorded at predefined intraoperative intervals.
Measured: 2 hours
Secondary outcomes (5)
the requirement for rescue fentanyl
Postoperative pain was assessed at 2, 6, 12, 24 hours using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).
Measured: 24 hour
surgeon satisfaction
using Likert scale, with scores ranging from 1 to 5,
Measured: 2 hours
Assessment of Intraoperative Blood Loss
evaluating the volume of blood collected in suction canisters, the degree of saturation of surgical gauze, and the visible blood within the operative field
Measured: 2 hours
hemodynamics
Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were continuously monitored using non-invasive techniques at 30-minute intervals throughout the procedure.
Measured: 2 hours
Quality of surgical field
the surgical field rating (SFR) scale of six points proposed by Fromme et al.
Measured: 2 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2026
- Study start30 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Opioid Free AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nashwa Ahmed
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Nashwa Ahmed, Port Said University hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07389096
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00012098- Serial0307600
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Aujla KS, Kaur M, Gupta R, Singh S, Bhanupreet, Tavleen. A Study to Compare the Quality of Surgical Field Using Total Intravenous Anesthesia (with Propofol) versus Inhalational Anesthesia (with Isoflurane) for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries. Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):606-610. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.206858.
PubMed 28928556Ghorbani J, Arastou S, Safavi Naeini A, Raad N, Karimi Galougahi M, Jahangirifard A, Akbari Dilmaghani N. Comparing the Effect of Oral Clonidine and Tranexamic Acid on Bleeding and Surgical Field Quality during Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Sep;30(100):255-260.
PubMed 30245979Lin YM, Yu C, Xian GZ. Calculation methods for intraoperative blood loss: a literature review. BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02699-3.
PubMed 39707278Pipat Saeyup, Chanon Thanaboriboon. Anesthetic Management and Role of Dexmedetomidine During Intraoperative Wake Up Test in Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis Correction Surgery: A Case Report. International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine. 2019; 7(1): 27-30 Doi: 10.11648/j.ijacm.20190701.15
Soffin EM, Wetmore DS, Beckman JD, Sheha ED, Vaishnav AS, Albert TJ, Gang CH, Qureshi SA. Opioid-free anesthesia within an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: a retrospective matched cohort study. Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Apr 1;46(4):E8. doi: 10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18645.
PubMed 30933925Catalca S, Ozmete O, Berk N, Civi S, Durdag E, Incekas C, Ozyilkan NB. Does dexmedetomidine infusion reduce the postoperative analgesic need in lumbar disc surgery? Turk J Med Sci. 2025 Mar 24;55(2):470-481. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5991. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 40342316Rani US, Panda NB, Chauhan R, Mahajan S, Kaloria N, Tripathi M. Comparison of the effects of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) and opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) on postoperative analgesia and intraoperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing spine surgery: A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial. Saudi J Anaesth. 2024 Apr-Jun;18(2):173-180. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_341_23. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
PubMed 38654849Moustafa AM, Negmi HH, Rabie ME. The combined effect of ketamine and remifentanil infusions as total intravenous anesthesia for scoliosis surgery in children. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Jun;19(5):1151-68.
PubMed 186376151- Ferschl M, Shibata G, Wong J. New Surgical Approaches to Scoliosis Repair in Pediatric Patients Implications for Anesthetic Management. Current Anesthesiology Reports 2024; 14:475-83. doi.org/10.1007/s40140-024-00641-0
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Opioid-Free Anesthesia Versus Opioid Based Anesthesia For Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07389096
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00012098- Serial0307600
- Conditions
- Opioid Free Anesthesia
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Nashwa AhmedUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is a multimodal analgesic approach designed to eliminate the intraoperative use of systemic, neuraxial, or intracavitary opioids. This technique employs a combination of antinociceptive agents targeting various pathways within the central and peripheral nervous systems to achieve effective analgesia.
Dexmedetomidine (DEX), a highly selective α2-adrenoreceptor agonist, is a centrally acting non-opioid agent increasingly utilized in clinical practice for its antinociceptive and anxiolytic properties. Only a few prospective randomized controlled trials have specifically examined the postoperative analgesic efficacy of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion in patients undergoing spinal surgery, with limited data focusing on this as a primary endpoint. Importantly, no clinical studies have investigated its analgesic impact in patients undergoing spinal surgery under general anesthesia.
Detailed description
Reducing perioperative opioid exposure presents a critical opportunity for anesthesiologists, surgeons, and institutions to minimize patient harm and improve recovery outcomes. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) has emerged as a promising approach to address this need. Opioid-free anesthesia is defined as an anesthetic technique that excludes intraoperative opioid administration through all routes including systemic, neuraxial, and local tissue infiltration relying instead on multimodal non-opioid strategies to achieve effective analgesia. (5) Aim This study explores the intraoperative and postoperative application of dexmedetomidine (DEX) as an opioid-free anesthetic strategy to improve perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing scoliosis surgery under general anesthesia.
Hypothesis:
Continuous infusion of Dexmedetomidine at 0.5 μg/kg/h, following an initial loading dose of 1 μg/kg, yields more effective than standard approaches.
Outcomes This prospective randomized controlled study investigates the intraoperative and postoperative efficacy of dexmedetomidine (DEX) infusion in patients undergoing scoliosis surgery. The primary outcome is intraoperative analgesic effectiveness, while secondary outcomes include the incidence of perioperative complications, the requirement for rescue fentanyl, and surgeon satisfaction.
Thirty patients will be prospectively enrolled and randomly allocated into two parallel groups:
- Group OFA (Opioid-Free Anesthesia): patients will Receive dexmedetomidine with a loading dose of 1 μg/kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h.
- Group OBA (Opioid-Based Anesthesia): patients will Receive fentanyl with a loading dose of 1 μg/kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h.
Methods Ethics committee approval will be obtained, and written informed consent will be secured from the parents of each pediatric participant.
We will conduct a prospective, randomized study involving 30 pediatric patients aged 8 to 18 years, diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis and will be scheduled for surgical correction. Patients will be randomly assigned into two equal groups.
Anesthetic technique Preoperative Routine Preoperative Investigations
The standard preoperative workup included:
- Complete Blood Count (CBC)
- Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Echocardiography
- Coagulation Profile
- Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Serum Electrolytes
- Blood Crossmatch Additional Investigations
- Plain Chest Radiography
- Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) Analysis
- Pulmonary Function Tests (PFTs), routinely performed to detect restrictive lung defects During the evening preceding surgery, patients will be educated on the use of a five-point visual analog pain scale, illustrated by a series of facial expressions. This scale is designed to facilitate self-assessment, with 1 denoting no pain and 5 indicating the worst imaginable pain. (2) Intraoperative Upon arrival to the operating room, standard monitoring is initiated in accordance with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) guidelines. This includes continuous five-lead electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, capnography, core temperature monitoring, and urine output measurement.
Patients will receive intravenous hydration with 0.9% normal saline at 5-6 mL/kg to maintain adequate systolic blood pressure. No premedication is administered. Hypothermia prevention will be achieved using forced warm air devices.
Antibiotic prophylaxis is administered appropriately within 30 minutes prior to skin incision.
Induction of anesthesia will be achieved with an intravenous bolus of propofol at 2 mg/kg, followed by atracurium at 0.5 mg/kg to facilitate orotracheal intubation. No additional neuromuscular blocking agents are administered during the procedure.
Mechanical ventilation will be maintained using a 1:1 oxygen-to-air mixture (FiO₂ 0.5), with a tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg and a respiratory rate is adjusted between 8 and 14 breaths per minute to maintain end-tidal CO₂ levels within the range of 30-35 mmHg
Following induction, all patients will receive the following intravenous infusions:
- Propofol is administered at 50-150 μg/kg/min, will be titrated to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) within ±20% of baseline values.
- Continuous propofol infusion is similarly adjusted across both study groups to ensure adequate anesthetic depth. Inadequate anesthesia is defined as a heart rate exceeding pre-induction values by more than 15% and/or systolic arterial pressure exceeding baseline by more than 20%, persisting for at least one minute in the absence of hypovolemia or low hematocrit.
- A total of 4 g of intravenous magnesium sulfate will be administered intraoperatively.
- Tranexamic acid will be administered as a loading dose of 15 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion at 5 mg/kg/hr, continued until completion of surgical hemostasis.
In Group D (Dexmedetomidine) Patients will be administered a loading dose of dexmedetomidine at 1 μg/kg over 10 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion at 0.5 μg/kg/hr.
For consistency in preparation, 200 μg of dexmedetomidine [Precedex®, Pfizer] is diluted with normal saline in a 50 mL syringe, resulting in a final concentration of 4 μg/mL.
In Group F (Fentanyl):
Patients will receive opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) consisting of a fentanyl loading dose of 1 μg/kg, followed by a maintenance infusion at 0.5 μg/kg/hr.
An additional large-bore 16-gauge intravenous cannula will be placed in the contralateral hand to serve as a transfusion access line.
Ringer's lactate is administered via an intravenous fluid warmer at a rate of 10 mL/kg/hr, with blood products will be supplemented as clinically indicated.
A Foley catheter is inserted in all patients and will be connected to a urine collection bag for continuous monitoring of urinary output.
Following catheterization, patients are carefully positioned prone, with meticulous attention to the eyes, airway, and pressure points, all of which are assessed, supported, and protected to prevent positioning related complications.
Following placement of the spinal rod instrumentation, the orthopedic surgeon requests a wake-up test, a procedure is considered the gold standard for intraoperative neurological assessment during scoliosis correction surgery. (6) At this point, dexmedetomidine and fentanyl infusions will be discontinued.
After the patient has reached an appropriate level of consciousness for testing. The patient is instructed to grip his hands to assess responsiveness, followed by a command to move his feet. Both tasks are successfully performed without any adverse events, such as excessive movement, accidental extubation, or risk of falling.
Upon completion of the test, anesthesia will be re-established with an intravenous bolus of propofol (2 mg/kg) and atracurium (0.5 mg/kg). The depth of anesthesia will be maintained at the same level as prior to the wake-up test, and the surgical procedure proceeded without complications.
To initiate emergence from anesthesia, the infusion rate of the maintenance anesthetic agent is reduced to 50% at the onset of surgical closure and is discontinued once the patient is repositioned supine. All patients will receive ondansetron (0.1 mg/kg) for antiemetic prophylaxis and paracetamol (15 mg/kg) for analgesia.
Neuromuscular reversal will be achieved using a standard protocol, neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) is combined with glycopyrrolate (0.01 mg/kg), will be administered upon confirmation of a train-of-four (TOF) count of 4 and a TOF ratio exceeding 80%. Extubation is performed in supine position, contingent upon clinical indicators of full recovery including adequate spontaneous respiration and responsiveness to verbal commands and a TOF ratio >0.9.
Postoperatively Patients will be transferred to either the high dependency unit (HDU) or the neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU). All patients will receive intravenous paracetamol (15 mg/kg every 6 hours) for 48 hours to maintain analgesia.
Measurements Intraoperative Haemodynamics Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) will be continuously monitored using non-invasive techniques at 30-minute intervals throughout the procedure. Specific hemodynamic data points will be recorded at baseline, during skin incision, at 30 minutes post-incision, during skin closure, and at extubation, will be documented in the anesthesia follow-up records.
In all cases, increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP >100 mmHg) or heart rate exceeding 15% above baseline are managed with incremental boluses of propofol, up to 50 mg per dose, is tailored to the patient's response.
Assessment of Intraoperative Blood Loss The visual estimation method remains the most employed technique for assessing intraoperative blood loss in clinical practice. This approach involves evaluating the volume of blood collected in suction canisters, the degree of saturation of surgical gauze, and the visible blood within the operative field.(7) Surgeon Satisfaction Assessment (8)
Surgeon satisfaction will be evaluated in both groups using Likert scale, with scores ranging from 1 to 5, corresponding to the following levels:
1 = Very Bad, 2 = Bad, 3 = Average, 4 = Good, and 5 = Excellent . Satisfaction ratings are recorded postoperatively to assess the perceived quality of surgical conditions and overall intraoperative experience.
Quality of surgical field (9)
The quality of surgical field will be evaluated every 30 min using the surgical field rating (SFR) scale of six points proposed by Fromme et al.:
5- massive uncontrollable bleeding 4- heavy but controllable bleeding that significantly interfered with dissection 3- moderate bleeding that moderately compromised surgical dissection 2-moderate bleeding a nuisance but without interference with accurate dissection
1- bleeding, so mild it is not even a surgical nuisance 0- no bleeding and virtually bloodless field.
Surgical field was graded as good, fair, and poor as:
good - SFR scale 0 or 1 fair - SFR scale 2 or 3 poor - SFR scale 4 or 5 Postoperative Recovery Assessment Post-anesthesia recovery is evaluated using the Post Anesthesia Recovery Score (PARS), alongside measurement of immediate recovery time, defined as the interval from discontinuation of dexmedetomidine or fentanyl infusion to the patient's response to verbal command by opening the eyes. Assessments are conducted at 5-minute intervals starting from the cessation of the anesthetic infusion. (2) Pain Assessment and Analgesic Intervention (3)
Postoperative pain will be assessed at 2, 6, 12, 24 hours using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Pain intensity is classified as follows:
- Mild: NRS 1-3
- Moderate: NRS 4-6
- Severe: NRS 7-10 Intravenous fentanyl (1 µg/kg) is administered as rescue analgesia when the NRS score exceeded 4. The pain free interval is defined as the duration between cessation of the study anesthetic agent and the first administration of rescue analgesia.
Postoperative Complications
Patients are monitored for the following adverse events:
- Nausea and vomiting
- Shivering
- Pruritus
- Respiratory desaturation, defined as peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) < 92%
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group OFA (Opioid-Free Anesthesia): | Active comparator | Drug: Dexmedetomidine |
| Group OBA (Opioid-Based Anesthesia) | Active comparator | Drug: Fentanyl (IV) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dexmedetomidinepatients will Receive dexmedetomidine with a loading dose of 1 μg/kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h. | Drug | Group OFA (Opioid-Free Anesthesia): |
| Fentanyl (IV)patients will Receive fentanyl with a loading dose of 1 μg/kg followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.5 μg/kg/h. | Drug | Group OBA (Opioid-Based Anesthesia) |
Primary outcome
intraoperative analgesic effectiveness, Measured by Heart Rate
Time frame: 2 hours
Changes in heart rate recorded at predefined intraoperative intervals to assess physiological response to analgesia.
intraoperative analgesic effectiveness, Measured by blood pressure
Time frame: 2 hours
Changes in blood pressure recorded at predefined intraoperative intervals.
5 secondary outcomes
the requirement for rescue fentanyl
Time frame: 24 hour
surgeon satisfaction
Time frame: 2 hours
Assessment of Intraoperative Blood Loss
Time frame: 2 hours
hemodynamics
Time frame: 2 hours
Quality of surgical field
Time frame: 2 hours
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 28928556Aujla KS, Kaur M, Gupta R, Singh S, Bhanupreet, Tavleen. A Study to Compare the Quality of Surgical Field Using Total Intravenous Anesthesia (with Propofol) versus Inhalational Anesthesia (with Isoflurane) for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries. Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):606-610. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.206858.
- Results publication: PubMed 30245979Ghorbani J, Arastou S, Safavi Naeini A, Raad N, Karimi Galougahi M, Jahangirifard A, Akbari Dilmaghani N. Comparing the Effect of Oral Clonidine and Tranexamic Acid on Bleeding and Surgical Field Quality during Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Sep;30(100):255-260.
- Results publication: PubMed 39707278Lin YM, Yu C, Xian GZ. Calculation methods for intraoperative blood loss: a literature review. BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 20;24(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02699-3.
- Results publicationPipat Saeyup, Chanon Thanaboriboon. Anesthetic Management and Role of Dexmedetomidine During Intraoperative Wake Up Test in Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis Correction Surgery: A Case Report. International Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Medicine. 2019; 7(1): 27-30 Doi: 10.11648/j.ijacm.20190701.15
- Results publication: PubMed 30933925Soffin EM, Wetmore DS, Beckman JD, Sheha ED, Vaishnav AS, Albert TJ, Gang CH, Qureshi SA. Opioid-free anesthesia within an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: a retrospective matched cohort study. Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Apr 1;46(4):E8. doi: 10.3171/2019.1.FOCUS18645.
- Results publication: PubMed 40342316Catalca S, Ozmete O, Berk N, Civi S, Durdag E, Incekas C, Ozyilkan NB. Does dexmedetomidine infusion reduce the postoperative analgesic need in lumbar disc surgery? Turk J Med Sci. 2025 Mar 24;55(2):470-481. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5991. eCollection 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 38654849Rani US, Panda NB, Chauhan R, Mahajan S, Kaloria N, Tripathi M. Comparison of the effects of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) and opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) on postoperative analgesia and intraoperative hemodynamics in patients undergoing spine surgery: A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial. Saudi J Anaesth. 2024 Apr-Jun;18(2):173-180. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_341_23. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 18637615Moustafa AM, Negmi HH, Rabie ME. The combined effect of ketamine and remifentanil infusions as total intravenous anesthesia for scoliosis surgery in children. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Jun;19(5):1151-68.
- Results publication1- Ferschl M, Shibata G, Wong J. New Surgical Approaches to Scoliosis Repair in Pediatric Patients Implications for Anesthetic Management. Current Anesthesiology Reports 2024; 14:475-83. doi.org/10.1007/s40140-024-00641-0
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Opioid Free Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Intensive and Conservative NOL®-Guided Analgesia Strategies During Opioid-free Anesthesia
Anesthesia, Bariatric Surgery (Gastric Bypass)
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Opioid-free Anesthesia on Sleep Quality, Cognitive Function and Recovery Quality After General Anesthesia in Elderly Patients
Opioid-Free Anesthesia, POCD
Recruiting
Opioid-Free Versus Opioid-Based Anesthesia in Thyroid Surgery
Thyroidectomy, Oxidative Stress
Not yet recruiting
Intraoperative Infusion of Dexmedetomidine Versus Lidocaine or Magnesium Sulphate for Enhanced Quality of Recovery After Spine Surgery Fixation
Opioid Free Anesthesia, Opioid Based Anesthesia
Recruiting
Suprazygomatic Maxillary Nerve Block in Pediatric Tonsillectomy
Tonsillitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl (IV) in people with Opioid Free Anesthesia, run by Nashwa Ahmed at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Nashwa gomaa Ahmed, MD (00201005289328, dr_nashwa_2008@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
intraoperative analgesic effectiveness, Measured by Heart Rate (time frame: 2 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07389096, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2026.