Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, ConcussionPhase 1PIC RehabNCT07402733
Psychologically Informed Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation (PIC Rehab) for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Feasibility Trial
A Phase 1 study testing Psychologically Informed CVPT (PIC) Rehab and Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation (CVPT) in people with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Concussion, run by Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Mild traumatic brain injuries ("mTBIs") affect over 480,000 Canadians each year. While many individuals recover in the initial 4 weeks following mTBI, in up to 30% of individuals symptoms and functional impairments often persist leading to significant disability, decreased quality of life and participation in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Concussion
- What is being tested?
- Psychologically Informed CVPT (PIC) Rehab and Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation (CVPT)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2026to 30 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Reporting dizziness, neck pain and/or headaches for at least 14 days following mild traumatic brain injury/concussion who are referred for cervicovestibular physiotherapy with one or more impairments related to the vestibular, oculomotor, sensorimotor, cervical spine, neuromuscular control.
Who cannot join
- Patients who have previously undergone a session of cervicovestibular physiotherapy will be excluded
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Canada1 site
Evidence Sport and Spinal Therapy North
Calgary, Alberta, T3B6B1
Geoff Schneider, PT, PhD, +1-403-210-9969, geoff.schneider@evidencesportandspinal.com
Kathryn Schneider, PT, PhD
About this study
Official title: PIC Rehab: Psychologically Informed Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Feasibility Trial
Mild traumatic brain injuries ("mTBIs") affect over 480,000 Canadians each year. While many individuals recover in the initial 4 weeks following mTBI, in up to 30% of individuals symptoms and functional impairments often persist leading to significant disability, decreased quality of life and participation in education, physical and occupational related activities. An assessment that evaluates multiple systems is recommended for individuals with mTBI, often involving multiple health care professionals to assess different areas of function (e.g. oculomotor, vestibular, balance, mood, cognition, etc). Current evidence supports the use of cervicovestibular rehabilitation (CVPT) (which includes physiotherapy techniques aimed at treating the neck, balance, visual and other sensory systems) and symptom-tolerated exercise. Evidence suggests that collaborative care, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) may be of benefit. However, the added value of CVPT and CBT in combination co-designed by patients and community partners has not yet been evaluated in mTBI. In other pain and dizziness conditions, the addition of CBT to physical/vestibular rehabilitation yielded improved outcomes. Here we take a transdisciplinary team-based approach to evaluate an integrated combination of CVPT and CBT.
This study will recruit a total of 34 people ages 18-70 years old who have ongoing symptoms following an mTBI for more than two weeks. The first 17 patients will receive CVPT along and the second 17 patients will receive psychologically informed CVPT ("PIC" Rehab). This study will help determine if combined therapy has an additive effect on helping patients recovery from mTBI.
Read the detailed description
Problem: Mild traumatic brain injuries and concussions affect over 480,000 or 1.2% of Canadians each year.1-3 While many individuals recover in the initial 4 weeks following mTBI, up to 30% have persisting symptoms and functional impairments, leading to significant disability, decreased quality of life, and reduced participation in education, physical, and occupational related activities.
Dizziness, balance problems, headaches, and neck pain: Headaches and dizziness are consistently the most commonly reported symptoms following mTBI with estimates of up to 95% of individuals reporting headaches and 40-80% reporting dizziness. In a majority of cases, these symptoms are reported concurrently. Standing balance and dynamic balance deficits have consistently been identified following mTBI, some of which resolve early post-injury (within 3-5 days), while some balance problems remain for weeks to months following injury. Dizziness, balance problems, headaches, and neck pain are associated with greater odds of developing persisting symptoms. In addition, persisting dizziness, headaches, neck pain, and balance impairments can lead to decreased participation in recreational, social, occupational, and educational activities as well as lower quality of life. Decreased activity can, in turn, lead to significant morbidity due to secondary health complications. Therefore, treatments aimed at minimizing headaches, dizziness and balance problems following mTBI are urgently needed to minimize the public health burden of this commonly occurring injury.
Treatment of dizziness, balance problems, headaches, and neck pain following mTBI: Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have identified large positive treatment effects following targeted cervical and vestibular rehabilitation (CVPT) for children, adolescents, and adults with dizziness, neck pain, and headaches following mTBI. These treatments are personalized, based on the individual's profile of specific impairments. CVPT includes treatments targeting neuromuscular and sensorimotor control in combination with manual therapy and soft tissue techniques as indicated. Specific rehabilitation exercises are gradually progressed, performed in combination with symptom-tolerated aerobic exercise, and eventually evolve to task, context, and/or sport specific exercises. From a mechanistic standpoint, the goal of this treatment is to facilitate sensorimotor integration (i.e. integration of visual, vestibular, proprioceptive input and resultant motor output) and either reweigh central balancing of stimuli to optimize function of these systems or up-regulate the use of alternate systems in the event that one of the sensory systems is not optimally operating. Recent international consensus recommendations and clinical practice guidelines recommend CVPT as a treatment that has some of the strongest evidence to date to facilitate recovery. However, up to 27% of individuals may not respond to CVPT5, necessitating other treatment options.
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: For individuals with persisting symptoms following mTBI, evidence supports the use of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). CBT is a form of treatment that uses multiple non-pharmacological strategies including education, behavioural and cognitive strategies. This form of non-pharmacological treatment has demonstrated safety and efficacy for a number of different conditions including insomnia, depression, mental health, and more recently for mTBI. For individuals with chronic pain, improvements in anxiety and depressive symptoms have been demonstrated but no difference in pain intensity or pain catastrophizing has been found to date. Patient centred approaches are necessary to optimize effectiveness. In individuals with dizziness, the addition of CBT to physical and/or vestibular rehabilitation may yielded improved outcomes.
Thus, CVPT and CBT in combination may have additive effects for individuals with mTBI. Here we take a transdisciplinary team-based approach to evaluate an integrated combination of CVPT and CBT.
Objectives:
We will conduct a pilot trial using a stepped approach to evaluate the feasibility and patient perceptions of CVPT alone as compared to CVPT in combination with CBT (hereafter referred to as PIC Rehab, or psychologically-informed CVPT) on 1) symptom severity and 2) time to resolution of mTBI related symptoms in adults with symptoms for greater than 14 days following mTBI.
The specific objectives of this study are as follows:
Objective 1: Determine the feasibility of PIC Rehab; Objective 2: Generate preliminary estimates of effect for PIC Rehab on mTBI related symptom resolution compared to CVPT alone; Objective 3: Describe changes by sex in domain specific outcomes of PIC Rehab compared to CVPT alone.
We hypothesize that PIC Rehab will be feasible and will have a greater impact on resolution of symptoms for participants with concomitant anxiety, depression, patient specific functional disability, than CVPT alone.
Methods:
Thirty-four adults aged 18-70 years with symptoms of dizziness, neck pain and/or headaches for at least 14 days following mTBI who are referred for cervicovestibular physiotherapy with one or more impairments related to the vestibular, oculomotor, sensorimotor, cervical spine, neuromuscular control, will be invited to participate. The participants who are included in this study are those with impairments that have previously been shown to respond to cervicovestibular rehabilitation. Patients who have previously undergone a session of cervicovestibular physiotherapy will be excluded from the study. The first 15 participants will complete typical CVPT and the next "step" of the study will have the following 15 participants complete PIC Rehab. Participants will be recruited consecutively in the order they are referred/approached based on their initial symptom reports of headaches, dizziness and/or neck pain at the time of presentation to the clinic, inclusive of both sexes and all genders, with the aim to have equal numbers of male and female participants.
Participants will be eligible for participation if they are referred to or seek treatment at Evidence Sport and Spinal Therapy for cervicovestibular rehabilitation following mTBI. For the purposes of this pilot feasibility trial we will limit our recruitment to one clinic with multiple therapists to enable future study of a larger trial at multiple clinics and, thus, avoid the chance of contamination between control and intervention groups. Consent to contact will be obtained in clinic for those patients meeting the inclusion criteria as part of the initial intake to the clinic and a member of the research team will follow-up and contact the patient by phone.
Eligibility Screen: Patients who agree to be contacted will undergo an eligibility screen with questionnaires (e.g., PCSS) by telephone with a research assistant. If the patient meets the eligibility for the trial they will then be sent a consent form to review and sign online followed by the initial demographic forms, questionnaires and subsequently scheduled for the initial assessment. After completing the initial assessment, the RA will confirm eligibility. It is possible that participants may have pre-existing relationships with the researchers or clinicians that are part of the research team as participants will be recruited through community sport medicine and/or physiotherapy clinics. Thus, all potential participants will be made aware that their choice to participate in this study will in no way affect the care that they receive and that they are free to decline participation at any time.
Protocol:
Participants will be blinded to the hypothesis of the study and to the opposite treatment group to which they are assigned. Thus, two separate consent forms will be used in the study - one for each type of treatment received. Both treatment groups will be seen once weekly for 8 weeks or until the time of symptom resolution and medical clearance to return to sport/learn/occupation and outcomes will be repeated at the 8 week time point. All of the physiotherapists who are participating in the study will undergo a standard CVPT training course. Following recruitment of the initial 15 patients, all therapists will undergo and online and in person training course for PIC Rehab. To facilitate recruitment in a timely fashion and prevent delays between arms, the first 3 of 6 therapists who complete treatment with their participants will complete the PIC Rehab training and the second 3/6 will complete a later training course for PIC Rehab.
CVPT alone: The control intervention will be the typical standard of care of CVPT (Schneider et al 2014, 2018) including individualized cervical and vestibular rehabilitation based on the patient's presentation, including symptom-tolerated exercise.
PIC Rehab: The Psychological Informed-CVPT (PIC Rehab) intervention (modified from Herdman et al) will include education, goal setting, distraction techniques, reattribution of symptoms, relaxation, in vivo exposure, cognitive therapy and problem solving. Collaborative training for physiotherapist providing the PIC Rehab will occur with the study team (KS, NS, KOY, CP).
The stepped process of the treatments will minimize contamination by therapist knowing the principles of the PIC Rehab. Adherence to the intervention will be assessed using scheduled audio recordings of the treatment sessions (to measure therapist adherence to the protocol) and patient reports of completion of home exercises (patient adherence). As this is a pilot feasibility study, a sample of 30 participants (15 in each group) allowing for two drop outs per group based on previous studies done at our centre was deemed to be pragmatic with in a 6 month time frame.
Initial Assessment: The initial assessment will take approximately 90 minutes and participants will complete a series of in person outcomes with the study physiotherapist as listed below that are specific to domains that may be affected by concussion. Where relevant, additional questions and health history information and clinically relevant outcomes will be gathered in keeping with the current standard of care.
Follow-up appointments: All participants will complete a brief set of questionnaires on REDCap at the time of each follow-up appointment to capture current symptoms, completion of home program exercises and any additional treatment that has been undertaken since the time of the previous appointment. In the event that new symptoms are present, the relevant self report and in person clinical outcomes related to the specific symptoms will be repeated. Treating physiotherapists will complete an adherence questionnaire after each session and record all subcomponents of treatment individualized to the patient.
Outcome assessments: Outcome assessments, both self report and in person clinical outcomes, will be repeated 8 weeks after the initial baseline assessment. Following participation in the trial, participants and therapists will be invited to take part in semi-structured interviews to share their experiences as part of the trial, including barriers and facilitators to the rehabilitation protocols.
Outcomes:
Primary feasibility outcomes will include recruitment, retention rate, adverse events, clinical implementation barriers and facilitators faced, and adherence to protocol (therapist).
Secondary outcomes of recovery including time to resolution of symptoms (days) to inform a phase 2 clinical trial. In keeping with international recommendations, and exploratory outcomes that assess impairment specific factors that may change with treatment (i.e. cervical spine, vestibulo-ocular, dynamic balance, etc) will be included.
Secondary outcomes will include change in symptom severity scores on the PCSS (/132), time to resolution of symptoms (days), time to medical clearance to return to sport, learn and work (days) (as relevant) to inform a phase 2 clinical trial. These outcomes will be defined as per the latest international consensus recommendations (page 702). Return to work (RTW) will be defined in the same was as return-to-learn and will be defined as: return to pre-injury occupational activities with no new support, including occupational accommodations or modifications.
Exploratory outcomes are outcomes that are part of typical clinical care and will include impairment based/domain specific outcomes that are the current best available outcomes and aligned with previous trials in the area. All outcomes will also be described by sex. Exploratory outcomes will include the following:
- Fear Avoidance Behaviour after Traumatic Brain Injury Questionnaire (FAB-TBI)
- World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 12 item self-report version
- Anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, GAD-7)
- Depression (Personal Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9)
- Sleep Screen
- Post Concussion Symptom Scale from the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 6 (SCAT6)
- Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM)
- Dizziness Handicap Inventory
- Modified Dizziness Questionnaire
- Neck Disability Index
- Neck Pain Questionnaire
- Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
- Post Traumatic Headache Questionnaire
- Subjective Units of Discomfort Scale (SUDS)
- Neurological screen including cranial nerve, cerebellar and long track signs
- Cervical Spine: Cervical Spine range of motion, cervical flexor endurance, cervical flexion rotation test, craniocervical flexion test, manual spinal examination, palpation for segmental tenderness, extension rotation test, palpation of tender trigger points, palpation of greater and lesser occipital nerves
- Tests done with fixation removed including spontaneous nystagmus, gaze evoked, fixation, hyperventilation, intracranial pressure, head shaking, positional testing (including Dix-Hallpike and Roll tests right and left).
- Vestibulo-ocular reflex tests: head thrust test, dynamic visual acuity
- Quantified Vestibular Ocular Motor Screen (qVOMS)
- Motion sensitivity Test
- Dynamic Balance: functional gait assessment (FGA) and advanced FGA
- Balance Error Scoring System (BESS)
- Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT) or Bike Test (BCBT) as appropriate depending on the patient preference
- Orthostatic Vital Signs
Data Analysis:
Primary feasibility outcomes will be summarized using descriptive statistics [means (standard deviations) or medians/modes (ranges or interquartile ranges) or proportions] as appropriate. Secondary outcomes will be summarized descriptively by treatment group. In addition, exploratory Kaplan Meier survival analysis curves will be constructed by group for time to resolution of symptoms, return to sport, learn, occupation will be evaluated using Kaplan Meier survival analysis curves with the outcome of 8 weeks. Exploratory outcomes will be described by treatment group and sex using descriptive statistics as appropriate based on the outcome and the distribution of the data. Thematic analysis will be used to evaluate barriers and facilitators to PIC Rehab for both participants and providers.
- Conditions
- Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Concussion
- Being tested
- Psychologically Informed CVPT (PIC) Rehab, Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation (CVPT)
- Keywords
- rehabilitation, cervical spine, vestibular, cognitive behavioural therapy, treatment
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Concussion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Psychologically Informed CVPT (PIC) RehabBehavioural
Arm Description: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is a form of treatment that uses multiple non-pharmacological strategies including education, behavioural and cognitive strategies to assist with decreasing symptoms. The experimental PIC Rehab arm will include principles of CBT in combination with the CVPT.
Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation (CVPT)Behavioural
Cervical and vestibular rehabilitation including individually targeted impairments based treatment techniques such as neuromuscular control, joint position sense, manual therapy, adaptation, habituation, canalith repositioning maneouvers, standing balance exercises, dynamic balance exercises, sport and work specific exercises.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation (CVPT) | Active comparator | CVPT includes treatments targeting neuromuscular and sensorimotor control in combination with manual therapy and soft tissue techniques as indicated.5 16 Specific rehabilitation exercises are gradually progressed, performed in combination with symptom-tolerated aerobic exercise, and eventually evolve to task, context, and/or sport specific exercises.16 From a mechanistic standpoint, the goal of this treatment is to facilitate sensorimotor integration (i.e. integration of visual, vestibular, proprioceptive input and resultant motor output) and either reweigh central balancing of stimuli to optimize function of these systems or upregulate the use of alternate systems in the event that one of the sensory systems is not optimally operating.5 17 Recent international consensus recommendations and clinical practice guidelines recommend CVPT as a treatment that has some of the strongest evidence to date to facilitate recovery.14 18 Receives: Behavioral: Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation (CVPT) |
| Psychologically Informed CVPT (PIC Rehab) | Experimental | Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is a form of treatment that uses multiple non-pharmacological strategies including education, behavioural and cognitive strategies to assist with decreasing symptoms. The experimental PIC Rehab arm will include principles of CBT in combination with the CVPT. Receives: Behavioral: Psychologically Informed CVPT (PIC) Rehab; Behavioral: Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation (CVPT) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility - Recruitment
Number of participants recruited
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
Feasibility - retention rate
Number of participants completing the trial divided by the total number of participants recruited
Measured: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Feasibility - Adverse events
Total number of adverse events
Measured: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Feasibility - barriers and facilitators
Barriers and facilitators to the protocol as described by the participants and the physiotherapists.
Measured: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
Feasibility - Adherence to protocol by therapist
Adherence will be measured through voice recording review of the therapist treatment prescription in comparison to the specific group treatment protocol. The choice of treatment by the therapist will be matched to the treatment choice on the treatment protocol and rated as "yes" adheres or "no" does not adhere for each component of treatment at each recorded session. The proportion of components adhered to will be summarized.
Measured: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Symptom Severity Score (SSS)
As measured on the Post Concussion Symptom Scale from the Sport Concussion Assessment tool, /132 where 0 represents no symptoms and 132 the most severe symptoms
Measured: Initial and 8 weeks
Date of Medical Clearance to Return to Sport
Defined as per the Amsterdam International Consensus statement (Patricios, Schneider et al 2023, page 702): "Completion of the RTS strategy with no symptoms and no clinical findings associated with the current concussion at rest and with maximal physical exertion."
Measured: From enrolment until treatment completion at 8 weeks
Date of Return to full learn
Defined as per the Amsterdam international consensus on concussion in sport (Patricios, Schneider et al 2023 page 702): Return to pre-injury learning activities with no new academic support, including school accommodations or learning adjustments.
Measured: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
Return to work
Return to pre-injury occupational activities with no new support, including occupational accommodations or modifications
Measured: From enrolment to end of treatment at 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Feb 2026
- Study start1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Oct 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, ConcussionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study is a pilot feasibility study where the initial group will receive standard cervicovestibular rehabilitation. Subsequently, the same therapists will be trained in psychologically informed cervicovestibular rehabilitation and the patients recruited after this training will be in the psychologically informed cervicovestibular rehabilitation group.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Calgary, Brain Injury Canada
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kathryn Schneider, PT PhD, Principal investigator, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07402733
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PIC Rehab
- Acronym
- PIC Rehab
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 1 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PIC Rehab: Psychologically Informed Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Feasibility Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07402733
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PIC Rehab / PIC Rehab
- Conditions
- Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Concussion
- Keywords
- rehabilitation, cervical spine, vestibular, cognitive behavioural therapy, treatment
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sport Injury Prevention Research CentreUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Calgary, Brain Injury Canada
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Mild traumatic brain injuries ("mTBIs") affect over 480,000 Canadians each year. While many individuals recover in the initial 4 weeks following mTBI, in up to 30% of individuals symptoms and functional impairments often persist leading to significant disability, decreased quality of life and participation in education, physical and occupational related activities. An assessment that evaluates multiple systems is recommended for individuals with mTBI, often involving multiple health care professionals to assess different areas of function (e.g. oculomotor, vestibular, balance, mood, cognition, etc). Current evidence supports the use of cervicovestibular rehabilitation (CVPT) (which includes physiotherapy techniques aimed at treating the neck, balance, visual and other sensory systems) and symptom-tolerated exercise. Evidence suggests that collaborative care, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) may be of benefit. However, the added value of CVPT and CBT in combination co-designed by patients and community partners has not yet been evaluated in mTBI. In other pain and dizziness conditions, the addition of CBT to physical/vestibular rehabilitation yielded improved outcomes. Here we take a transdisciplinary team-based approach to evaluate an integrated combination of CVPT and CBT.
This study will recruit a total of 34 people ages 18-70 years old who have ongoing symptoms following an mTBI for more than two weeks. The first 17 patients will receive CVPT along and the second 17 patients will receive psychologically informed CVPT ("PIC" Rehab). This study will help determine if combined therapy has an additive effect on helping patients recovery from mTBI.
Detailed description
Problem: Mild traumatic brain injuries and concussions affect over 480,000 or 1.2% of Canadians each year.1-3 While many individuals recover in the initial 4 weeks following mTBI, up to 30% have persisting symptoms and functional impairments, leading to significant disability, decreased quality of life, and reduced participation in education, physical, and occupational related activities.
Dizziness, balance problems, headaches, and neck pain: Headaches and dizziness are consistently the most commonly reported symptoms following mTBI with estimates of up to 95% of individuals reporting headaches and 40-80% reporting dizziness. In a majority of cases, these symptoms are reported concurrently. Standing balance and dynamic balance deficits have consistently been identified following mTBI, some of which resolve early post-injury (within 3-5 days), while some balance problems remain for weeks to months following injury. Dizziness, balance problems, headaches, and neck pain are associated with greater odds of developing persisting symptoms. In addition, persisting dizziness, headaches, neck pain, and balance impairments can lead to decreased participation in recreational, social, occupational, and educational activities as well as lower quality of life. Decreased activity can, in turn, lead to significant morbidity due to secondary health complications. Therefore, treatments aimed at minimizing headaches, dizziness and balance problems following mTBI are urgently needed to minimize the public health burden of this commonly occurring injury.
Treatment of dizziness, balance problems, headaches, and neck pain following mTBI: Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have identified large positive treatment effects following targeted cervical and vestibular rehabilitation (CVPT) for children, adolescents, and adults with dizziness, neck pain, and headaches following mTBI. These treatments are personalized, based on the individual's profile of specific impairments. CVPT includes treatments targeting neuromuscular and sensorimotor control in combination with manual therapy and soft tissue techniques as indicated. Specific rehabilitation exercises are gradually progressed, performed in combination with symptom-tolerated aerobic exercise, and eventually evolve to task, context, and/or sport specific exercises. From a mechanistic standpoint, the goal of this treatment is to facilitate sensorimotor integration (i.e. integration of visual, vestibular, proprioceptive input and resultant motor output) and either reweigh central balancing of stimuli to optimize function of these systems or up-regulate the use of alternate systems in the event that one of the sensory systems is not optimally operating. Recent international consensus recommendations and clinical practice guidelines recommend CVPT as a treatment that has some of the strongest evidence to date to facilitate recovery. However, up to 27% of individuals may not respond to CVPT5, necessitating other treatment options.
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: For individuals with persisting symptoms following mTBI, evidence supports the use of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). CBT is a form of treatment that uses multiple non-pharmacological strategies including education, behavioural and cognitive strategies. This form of non-pharmacological treatment has demonstrated safety and efficacy for a number of different conditions including insomnia, depression, mental health, and more recently for mTBI. For individuals with chronic pain, improvements in anxiety and depressive symptoms have been demonstrated but no difference in pain intensity or pain catastrophizing has been found to date. Patient centred approaches are necessary to optimize effectiveness. In individuals with dizziness, the addition of CBT to physical and/or vestibular rehabilitation may yielded improved outcomes.
Thus, CVPT and CBT in combination may have additive effects for individuals with mTBI. Here we take a transdisciplinary team-based approach to evaluate an integrated combination of CVPT and CBT.
Objectives:
We will conduct a pilot trial using a stepped approach to evaluate the feasibility and patient perceptions of CVPT alone as compared to CVPT in combination with CBT (hereafter referred to as PIC Rehab, or psychologically-informed CVPT) on 1) symptom severity and 2) time to resolution of mTBI related symptoms in adults with symptoms for greater than 14 days following mTBI.
The specific objectives of this study are as follows:
Objective 1: Determine the feasibility of PIC Rehab; Objective 2: Generate preliminary estimates of effect for PIC Rehab on mTBI related symptom resolution compared to CVPT alone; Objective 3: Describe changes by sex in domain specific outcomes of PIC Rehab compared to CVPT alone.
We hypothesize that PIC Rehab will be feasible and will have a greater impact on resolution of symptoms for participants with concomitant anxiety, depression, patient specific functional disability, than CVPT alone.
Methods:
Thirty-four adults aged 18-70 years with symptoms of dizziness, neck pain and/or headaches for at least 14 days following mTBI who are referred for cervicovestibular physiotherapy with one or more impairments related to the vestibular, oculomotor, sensorimotor, cervical spine, neuromuscular control, will be invited to participate. The participants who are included in this study are those with impairments that have previously been shown to respond to cervicovestibular rehabilitation. Patients who have previously undergone a session of cervicovestibular physiotherapy will be excluded from the study. The first 15 participants will complete typical CVPT and the next "step" of the study will have the following 15 participants complete PIC Rehab. Participants will be recruited consecutively in the order they are referred/approached based on their initial symptom reports of headaches, dizziness and/or neck pain at the time of presentation to the clinic, inclusive of both sexes and all genders, with the aim to have equal numbers of male and female participants.
Participants will be eligible for participation if they are referred to or seek treatment at Evidence Sport and Spinal Therapy for cervicovestibular rehabilitation following mTBI. For the purposes of this pilot feasibility trial we will limit our recruitment to one clinic with multiple therapists to enable future study of a larger trial at multiple clinics and, thus, avoid the chance of contamination between control and intervention groups. Consent to contact will be obtained in clinic for those patients meeting the inclusion criteria as part of the initial intake to the clinic and a member of the research team will follow-up and contact the patient by phone.
Eligibility Screen: Patients who agree to be contacted will undergo an eligibility screen with questionnaires (e.g., PCSS) by telephone with a research assistant. If the patient meets the eligibility for the trial they will then be sent a consent form to review and sign online followed by the initial demographic forms, questionnaires and subsequently scheduled for the initial assessment. After completing the initial assessment, the RA will confirm eligibility. It is possible that participants may have pre-existing relationships with the researchers or clinicians that are part of the research team as participants will be recruited through community sport medicine and/or physiotherapy clinics. Thus, all potential participants will be made aware that their choice to participate in this study will in no way affect the care that they receive and that they are free to decline participation at any time.
Protocol:
Participants will be blinded to the hypothesis of the study and to the opposite treatment group to which they are assigned. Thus, two separate consent forms will be used in the study - one for each type of treatment received. Both treatment groups will be seen once weekly for 8 weeks or until the time of symptom resolution and medical clearance to return to sport/learn/occupation and outcomes will be repeated at the 8 week time point. All of the physiotherapists who are participating in the study will undergo a standard CVPT training course. Following recruitment of the initial 15 patients, all therapists will undergo and online and in person training course for PIC Rehab. To facilitate recruitment in a timely fashion and prevent delays between arms, the first 3 of 6 therapists who complete treatment with their participants will complete the PIC Rehab training and the second 3/6 will complete a later training course for PIC Rehab.
CVPT alone: The control intervention will be the typical standard of care of CVPT (Schneider et al 2014, 2018) including individualized cervical and vestibular rehabilitation based on the patient's presentation, including symptom-tolerated exercise.
PIC Rehab: The Psychological Informed-CVPT (PIC Rehab) intervention (modified from Herdman et al) will include education, goal setting, distraction techniques, reattribution of symptoms, relaxation, in vivo exposure, cognitive therapy and problem solving. Collaborative training for physiotherapist providing the PIC Rehab will occur with the study team (KS, NS, KOY, CP).
The stepped process of the treatments will minimize contamination by therapist knowing the principles of the PIC Rehab. Adherence to the intervention will be assessed using scheduled audio recordings of the treatment sessions (to measure therapist adherence to the protocol) and patient reports of completion of home exercises (patient adherence). As this is a pilot feasibility study, a sample of 30 participants (15 in each group) allowing for two drop outs per group based on previous studies done at our centre was deemed to be pragmatic with in a 6 month time frame.
Initial Assessment: The initial assessment will take approximately 90 minutes and participants will complete a series of in person outcomes with the study physiotherapist as listed below that are specific to domains that may be affected by concussion. Where relevant, additional questions and health history information and clinically relevant outcomes will be gathered in keeping with the current standard of care.
Follow-up appointments: All participants will complete a brief set of questionnaires on REDCap at the time of each follow-up appointment to capture current symptoms, completion of home program exercises and any additional treatment that has been undertaken since the time of the previous appointment. In the event that new symptoms are present, the relevant self report and in person clinical outcomes related to the specific symptoms will be repeated. Treating physiotherapists will complete an adherence questionnaire after each session and record all subcomponents of treatment individualized to the patient.
Outcome assessments: Outcome assessments, both self report and in person clinical outcomes, will be repeated 8 weeks after the initial baseline assessment. Following participation in the trial, participants and therapists will be invited to take part in semi-structured interviews to share their experiences as part of the trial, including barriers and facilitators to the rehabilitation protocols.
Outcomes:
Primary feasibility outcomes will include recruitment, retention rate, adverse events, clinical implementation barriers and facilitators faced, and adherence to protocol (therapist).
Secondary outcomes of recovery including time to resolution of symptoms (days) to inform a phase 2 clinical trial. In keeping with international recommendations, and exploratory outcomes that assess impairment specific factors that may change with treatment (i.e. cervical spine, vestibulo-ocular, dynamic balance, etc) will be included.
Secondary outcomes will include change in symptom severity scores on the PCSS (/132), time to resolution of symptoms (days), time to medical clearance to return to sport, learn and work (days) (as relevant) to inform a phase 2 clinical trial. These outcomes will be defined as per the latest international consensus recommendations (page 702). Return to work (RTW) will be defined in the same was as return-to-learn and will be defined as: return to pre-injury occupational activities with no new support, including occupational accommodations or modifications.
Exploratory outcomes are outcomes that are part of typical clinical care and will include impairment based/domain specific outcomes that are the current best available outcomes and aligned with previous trials in the area. All outcomes will also be described by sex. Exploratory outcomes will include the following:
- Fear Avoidance Behaviour after Traumatic Brain Injury Questionnaire (FAB-TBI)
- World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 12 item self-report version
- Anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, GAD-7)
- Depression (Personal Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9)
- Sleep Screen
- Post Concussion Symptom Scale from the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 6 (SCAT6)
- Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM)
- Dizziness Handicap Inventory
- Modified Dizziness Questionnaire
- Neck Disability Index
- Neck Pain Questionnaire
- Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)
- Post Traumatic Headache Questionnaire
- Subjective Units of Discomfort Scale (SUDS)
- Neurological screen including cranial nerve, cerebellar and long track signs
- Cervical Spine: Cervical Spine range of motion, cervical flexor endurance, cervical flexion rotation test, craniocervical flexion test, manual spinal examination, palpation for segmental tenderness, extension rotation test, palpation of tender trigger points, palpation of greater and lesser occipital nerves
- Tests done with fixation removed including spontaneous nystagmus, gaze evoked, fixation, hyperventilation, intracranial pressure, head shaking, positional testing (including Dix-Hallpike and Roll tests right and left).
- Vestibulo-ocular reflex tests: head thrust test, dynamic visual acuity
- Quantified Vestibular Ocular Motor Screen (qVOMS)
- Motion sensitivity Test
- Dynamic Balance: functional gait assessment (FGA) and advanced FGA
- Balance Error Scoring System (BESS)
- Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test (BCTT) or Bike Test (BCBT) as appropriate depending on the patient preference
- Orthostatic Vital Signs
Data Analysis:
Primary feasibility outcomes will be summarized using descriptive statistics [means (standard deviations) or medians/modes (ranges or interquartile ranges) or proportions] as appropriate. Secondary outcomes will be summarized descriptively by treatment group. In addition, exploratory Kaplan Meier survival analysis curves will be constructed by group for time to resolution of symptoms, return to sport, learn, occupation will be evaluated using Kaplan Meier survival analysis curves with the outcome of 8 weeks. Exploratory outcomes will be described by treatment group and sex using descriptive statistics as appropriate based on the outcome and the distribution of the data. Thematic analysis will be used to evaluate barriers and facilitators to PIC Rehab for both participants and providers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study is a pilot feasibility study where the initial group will receive standard cervicovestibular rehabilitation. Subsequently, the same therapists will be trained in psychologically informed cervicovestibular rehabilitation and the patients recruited after this training will be in the psychologically informed cervicovestibular rehabilitation group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation (CVPT) | Active comparator | Behavioral: Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation (CVPT)CVPT includes treatments targeting neuromuscular and sensorimotor control in combination with manual therapy and soft tissue techniques as indicated.5 16 Specific rehabilitation exercises are gradually progressed, performed in combination with symptom-tolerated aerobic exercise, and eventually evolve to task, context, and/or sport specific exercises.16 From a mechanistic standpoint, the goal of this treatment is to facilitate sensorimotor integration (i.e. integration of visual, vestibular, proprioceptive input and resultant motor output) and either reweigh central balancing of stimuli to optimize function of these systems or upregulate the use of alternate systems in the event that one of the sensory systems is not optimally operating.5 17 Recent international consensus recommendations and clinical practice guidelines recommend CVPT as a treatment that has some of the strongest evidence to date to facilitate recovery.14 18 |
| Psychologically Informed CVPT (PIC Rehab) | Experimental | Behavioral: Psychologically Informed CVPT (PIC) Rehab, Behavioral: Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation (CVPT)Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is a form of treatment that uses multiple non-pharmacological strategies including education, behavioural and cognitive strategies to assist with decreasing symptoms. The experimental PIC Rehab arm will include principles of CBT in combination with the CVPT. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Reporting dizziness, neck pain and/or headaches for at least 14 days following mild traumatic brain injury/concussion who are referred for cervicovestibular physiotherapy with one or more impairments related to the vestibular, oculomotor, sensorimotor, cervical spine, neuromuscular control.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who have previously undergone a session of cervicovestibular physiotherapy will be excluded
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Psychologically Informed CVPT (PIC) RehabArm Description: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is a form of treatment that uses multiple non-pharmacological strategies including education, behavioural and cognitive strategies to assist with decreasing symptoms. The experimental PIC Rehab arm will include principles of CBT in combination with the CVPT. | Behavioural | Psychologically Informed CVPT (PIC Rehab) |
| Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation (CVPT)Cervical and vestibular rehabilitation including individually targeted impairments based treatment techniques such as neuromuscular control, joint position sense, manual therapy, adaptation, habituation, canalith repositioning maneouvers, standing balance exercises, dynamic balance exercises, sport and work specific exercises. | Behavioural | Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation (CVPT), Psychologically Informed CVPT (PIC Rehab) |
Primary outcome
Feasibility - Recruitment
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
Number of participants recruited
Feasibility - retention rate
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Number of participants completing the trial divided by the total number of participants recruited
Feasibility - Adverse events
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Total number of adverse events
Feasibility - barriers and facilitators
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
Barriers and facilitators to the protocol as described by the participants and the physiotherapists.
Feasibility - Adherence to protocol by therapist
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
Adherence will be measured through voice recording review of the therapist treatment prescription in comparison to the specific group treatment protocol. The choice of treatment by the therapist will be matched to the treatment choice on the treatment protocol and rated as "yes" adheres or "no" does not adhere for each component of treatment at each recorded session. The proportion of components adhered to will be summarized.
4 secondary outcomes
Symptom Severity Score (SSS)
Time frame: Initial and 8 weeks
Date of Medical Clearance to Return to Sport
Time frame: From enrolment until treatment completion at 8 weeks
Date of Return to full learn
Time frame: From enrolment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
Return to work
Time frame: From enrolment to end of treatment at 8 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jun 2026.
Related trials for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Concussion
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Pilot Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of PSC-05 for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Recruiting
Evaluation of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) in Individuals With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)
Sleep Architecture, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Active, not recruiting
Pilot TMS in Mild TBI
Persistent Post Concussive Headache, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Recruiting
Non-invasive Stimulation of the Glymphatic System for Slowing Cognitive Decline
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Post Concussion Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation
Improving In-hospital and Post-discharge Patient Education for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Concussion, Mild, Traumatic Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Kathryn Schneider, PT PhD principal investigator
University of Calgary
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Psychologically Informed CVPT (PIC) Rehab and Cervicovestibular Rehabilitation (CVPT) in people with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, Concussion, run by Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kathryn Schneider, PT, PhD (+1-403-210-8951, kjschnei@ucalgary.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility - Recruitment (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2026.