AzTrials
AzTrials

Critical IllnessLift 3NCT07634419

Self-directed Mobile Mindfulness to Address ICU Survivors' Psychological Distress

A study testing Lift mobile mindfulness and Enlighten Recovery education program in people with Critical Illness and Heart Failure, run by Duke University at 3 sites in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Serious acute heart and lung illnesses like heart failure, severe COVID, and sepsis often leave survivors struggling not only physically, but also with lasting depression, anxiety, and stress. These problems that are hard to treat because access to mental health care is often limited. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Critical Illness, Heart Failure, Sepsis
What is being tested?
Lift mobile mindfulness and Enlighten Recovery education program
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
450 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Jan 2027to 31 May 2031
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult (age ≥18)
  • Managed in an ICU for ≥24 hours during the time inclusion criterion #3 is met
  • Serious acute cardiorespiratory condition, defined as ≥1 of the following:
  • mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube for ≥4 hours
  • non-invasive ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP) for ≥4 hours in a 24-hour period provided for acute respiratory failure
  • new use of supplemental oxygen ≥6 liters per minute (or increase in baseline continuous oxygen)
Show all 20Show fewer
  • use of vasopressors for shock of any etiology
  • use of inotropes for shock of any etiology
  • use of pulmonary vasodilators
  • use of aortic balloon pump or cardiac assist device for cardiogenic shock
  • use of diuretic intravenous drip
  • evidence of acute coronary ischemia (i.e., elevated troponin level, supporting EKG changes, unstable angina symptoms documented)
  • urgent cardiac catheterization
  • Cognitive status intact
  • o No history of pre-existing significant cognitive impairment (e.g., dementia) as per medical chart
  • Absence of severe and/or persistent mental illness
  • o Treatment for severe and/or persistent mental illness (e.g., psychosis, bipolar affective disorder, schizoaffective disorder, schizoid personality disorder, schizophrenia [as per medical record], hospitalization for any psychiatric disorder) within the 6 months preceding the current hospital admission
  • Functional fluency in English or Spanish (i.e., sufficient knowledge of English or Spanish to complete study tasks like watch videos, complete surveys)
  • Inclusion criteria present after hospital discharge (i.e., at the time of arrival home after discharge from the hospital):
  • 1. Elevated baseline psychological distress symptoms, defined as a PHQ-9 score ≥5

Who cannot join

  • 1. Discharged to a location other than a home setting (e.g., nursing home, long-term acute care facility, inpatient rehabilitation facility)
  • Exclusion criteria present after hospital discharge (i.e., at T1 Data Collection conducted at the time of arrival home from the hospital):
  • Severe psychological distress as assessed by endorsement of active suicidality (see Protection of Human Subjects document for study team management of this finding)
  • Failure to randomize within 1 month after discharge from the hospital to home
  • Failure to login to study app and access content within 2 weeks after randomization

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Kristy Johnson contact

9196817232

kristy.johnson@duke.edu

Christopher Cox contact

christopher.cox@duke.edu

United States3 sites
  • Medical University of South Carolina

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29403

  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

    Matthew Modes, MD, Matthew.Modes@cshs.org

    Matthew Modes, MD

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Self-directed Mobile Mindfulness to Address ICU Survivors' Psychological Distress: Lift RCT (Lift 3)

Serious acute heart and lung illnesses like heart failure, severe COVID, and sepsis often leave survivors struggling not only physically, but also with lasting depression, anxiety, and stress. These problems that are hard to treat because access to mental health care is often limited. To help address this, the researchers created Lift, a fully automated mindfulness program designed with patient input and delivered through a mobile app. The investigators now plan a large, multi-site study to test whether Lift improves mental health and quality of life over six months compared to a critical illness education program called Enlighten Recovery. Overall the goal is to make an easy-to-use, widely accessible program available to people across the U.S., including those who speak Spanish.

Read the detailed description

Cardiorespiratory conditions such as the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), congestive heart failure, COVID pneumonia, and sepsis are among the most common causes of mortality and morbidity. They are also notable for high rates of persistent psychological distress symptoms including depression, anxiety, and PTSD that worsen quality of life and outcomes of the underlying conditions. Yet there are few effective strategies able to overcome barriers of limited access to mental health care.

To address this gap, the researchers developed Lift, a completely automated and self-directed mindfulness training intervention, from the ground up with patient input. First, Lift reduced depression symptoms and improved quality of life compared to an education program control in a multicenter pilot RCT (R34 AT008819) among those recently hospitalized with serious cardiorespiratory conditions. Next, a 247-person multicenter 2x2x2 factorial optimization trial (U01 AT00974) compared 8 intervention versions differing by program introduction (app vs. therapist), dose (standard vs. high), and approach to in-the-moment symptom management (app vs. therapist). This trial demonstrated that while all versions had a strong effect on depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms, the high dose, app-only version was optimized for effect, adherence, and retention.

Given these promising findings, a formal test of the optimized Lift mobile mindfulness intervention's efficacy is needed. Therefore, the investigators propose a 4-site multicenter RCT with 6-month follow up among 450 cardiorespiratory failure survivors with elevated post-discharge symptoms of psychological distress. The specific aims will: (1) Test Lift vs. an education program control delivered by similar platforms on symptoms of depression, anxiety, PTSD, and quality of life; (2a) Determine patient-level characteristics associated with a greater treatment response among a priori-defined subgroups using a heterogeneity of treatment effects analysis; (2b) Explore novel adherence metrics and outcomes; and (3) Ensure off-the-shelf intervention readiness with an exploratory mixed-methods hybrid type 1 implementation framework analysis that integrates quantitative trial implementation data with semi-structured trial participant interviews.

Innovative and unique elements include a fully automated mobile health delivery system that personalizes content in response to changes in symptom trajectories, the inclusion of Spanish language versions of intervention and control programs, and strong community engagement with formalized roles. This project addresses national research priorities and could advance the field with a personalizable yet population-scalable therapy that has the potential to broadly improve mental health access.

Being tested
Lift mobile mindfulness, Enlighten Recovery education program
Medical subject headings
Critical Illness, Heart Failure, Sepsis, Acute Lung Injury, Pneumonia, Accidental Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lift mobile mindfulnessBehavioural

    Mobile app-based mindfulness program for serious illness survivors

  • Enlighten Recovery education programBehavioural

    Mobile app-based critical illness education program for serious illness survivors

Study groups in NCT07634419
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lift mobile mindfulnessExperimentalMobile app-based mindfulness program
Receives: Behavioral: Lift mobile mindfulness
Enlighten Recovery education programActive comparatorMobile app-based critical illness education program
Receives: Behavioral: Enlighten Recovery education program

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale (PHQ-9)

    The PHQ-9 is a primary trial outcome measure and the PHQ-9 score at 1 month is the primary trial outcome (Kroenke K, et al. J Gen Intern Med 606-13, 2001). The PHQ-9 is a well-validated metric with English and Spanish versions used in thousands of RCTs. Scores can range from 0 (no depression symptoms) to 27 (serious depression symptoms). The PHQ-9 MCID is 2-4 units.

    Measured: Baseline to 1 month

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7)

    The GAD-7, like the related PHQ-9, has excellent psychodynamic properties including reliability, test-retest stability, accuracy, responsiveness, and validity as supported by confirmatory factor analysis (Spitzer RL, et al. Arch Intern Med. 166:1092-1097, 2006). GAD-7 scores can range from 0 [no distress] to 21 [high distress]); symptom severity is interpreted as mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), and severe (15-21). The GAD-7 MCID is 2-4 units.

    Measured: Baseline to 3 months

  2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7)

    The GAD-7, like the related PHQ-9, has excellent psychodynamic properties including reliability, test-retest stability, accuracy, responsiveness, and validity as supported by confirmatory factor analysis (Spitzer RL, et al. Arch Intern Med. 166:1092-1097, 2006). GAD-7 scores can range from 0 [no distress] to 21 [high distress]); symptom severity is interpreted as mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), and severe (15-21). The GAD-7 MCID is 2-4 units.

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months

  3. The Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome inventory (PTSS)

    The PTSS rates 10 post-traumatic stress symptoms (range 10 [no symptoms] to 70 [high burden of symptoms]). A score >20 represents clinically important PTSD symptoms, while a score >=34 suggests likely PTSD.(Nickel M, et al. J Int Care Med. 19:285-290, 2004; Stoll C, et al. Int Care Med. 25:697-704, 1999) Compared to DSM-IV criteria, it is 98% specific and 77% sensitive for the diagnosis of PTSD among ICU survivors.(Stoll C, et al. Int Care Med. 25:697-704, 1999) The PTSS has excellent internal consistency, reliability, and responsiveness. (Schelling G, et al. Crit Care Med. 26:651-659, 1998; Twigg E, et al. Acta Anaesth Scand. 52:202-208, 2008) Furthermore, it is short and easily understood. Although formal psychometric testing has not clearly defined the PTSS's minimal clinically important difference, a 5-unit change represents a significant change in score in a single item and will therefore be used as a benchmark for this project.

    Measured: Baseline to 1 month

  4. The Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome inventory (PTSS)

    The PTSS rates 10 post-traumatic stress symptoms (range 10 [no symptoms] to 70 [high burden of symptoms]). A score >20 represents clinically important PTSD symptoms, while a score >=34 suggests likely PTSD.(Nickel M, et al. J Int Care Med. 19:285-290, 2004; Stoll C, et al. Int Care Med. 25:697-704, 1999) Compared to DSM-IV criteria, it is 98% specific and 77% sensitive for the diagnosis of PTSD among ICU survivors.(Stoll C, et al. Int Care Med. 25:697-704, 1999) The PTSS has excellent internal consistency, reliability, and responsiveness. (Schelling G, et al. Crit Care Med. 26:651-659, 1998; Twigg E, et al. Acta Anaesth Scand. 52:202-208, 2008) Furthermore, it is short and easily understood. Although formal psychometric testing has not clearly defined the PTSS's minimal clinically important difference, a 5-unit change represents a significant change in score in a single item and will therefore be used as a benchmark for this project.

    Measured: Baseline to 3 months

  5. The Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome inventory (PTSS)

    The PTSS rates 10 post-traumatic stress symptoms (range 10 [no symptoms] to 70 [high burden of symptoms]). A score >20 represents clinically important PTSD symptoms, while a score >=34 suggests likely PTSD.(Nickel M, et al. J Int Care Med. 19:285-290, 2004; Stoll C, et al. Int Care Med. 25:697-704, 1999) Compared to DSM-IV criteria, it is 98% specific and 77% sensitive for the diagnosis of PTSD among ICU survivors.(Stoll C, et al. Int Care Med. 25:697-704, 1999) The PTSS has excellent internal consistency, reliability, and responsiveness. (Schelling G, et al. Crit Care Med. 26:651-659, 1998; Twigg E, et al. Acta Anaesth Scand. 52:202-208, 2008) Furthermore, it is short and easily understood. Although formal psychometric testing has not clearly defined the PTSS's minimal clinically important difference, a 5-unit change represents a significant change in score in a single item and will therefore be used as a benchmark for this project.

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months

  6. The EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D)

    The EQ-5D is an easily understood, validated 5-item (plus a 100-point visual analog scale) quality of life measure that has been used successfully in >100 ICU survivor studies.(EuroQOL group. Health Policy. 16:199-208, 1990; Unroe M, et al. Ann Int Med. 153:167-175, 2010) It is considered a Core Measure for ICU outcomes research.

    Measured: Baseline to 1 month

  7. The EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D)

    The EQ-5D is an easily understood, validated 5-item (plus a 100-point visual analog scale) quality of life measure that has been used successfully in >100 ICU survivor studies.(EuroQOL group. Health Policy. 16:199-208, 1990; Unroe M, et al. Ann Int Med. 153:167-175, 2010) It is considered a Core Measure for ICU outcomes research.

    Measured: Baseline to 3 months

  8. The EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D)

    The EQ-5D is an easily understood, validated 5-item (plus a 100-point visual analog scale) quality of life measure that has been used successfully in >100 ICU survivor studies.(EuroQOL group. Health Policy. 16:199-208, 1990; Unroe M, et al. Ann Int Med. 153:167-175, 2010) It is considered a Core Measure for ICU outcomes research.

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months

  9. The Patient Health Questionnaire 10-Item scale (PHQ-10)

    The investigators will use the PHQ-10, which is an adaptation of the PHQ-15 (Kroenke K, et a. Psychosom Med. 64:258-66, 2002), a scale they have used successfully in past work, to assess physical symptoms across 10 domains. The PHQ-15 is reliable, responsive, and easily understood. The study team's PHQ-10 adaptation collapsed several pain items into a single item based on patient feedback. The scale is from 0 to 30.

    Measured: Baseline to 1 month

  10. The Patient Health Questionnaire 10-Item scale (PHQ-10)

    The investigators will use the PHQ-10, which is an adaptation of the PHQ-15 (Kroenke K, et a. Psychosom Med. 64:258-66, 2002), a scale they have used successfully in past work, to assess physical symptoms across 10 domains. The PHQ-15 is reliable, responsive, and easily understood. The study team's PHQ-10 adaptation collapsed several pain items into a single item based on patient feedback. The scale is from 0 to 30.

    Measured: Baseline to 3 months

  11. The Patient Health Questionnaire 10-Item scale (PHQ-10)

    The investigators will use the PHQ-10, which is an adaptation of the PHQ-15 (Kroenke K, et a. Psychosom Med. 64:258-66, 2002), a scale they have used successfully in past work, to assess physical symptoms across 10 domains. The PHQ-15 is reliable, responsive, and easily understood. The study team's PHQ-10 adaptation collapsed several pain items into a single item based on patient feedback. The scale is from 0 to 30, with higher scores meaning more functional issues.

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jun 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2031 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 May 2031 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Lift intervention vs. education program control
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
450 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07634419
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00118118
Other IDs
1UG3AT013109-01
Acronym
Lift 3
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
1 Jun 2026
Last updated
8 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cox CE, Gallis JA, Olsen MK, Porter LS, Gremore T, Greeson JM, Morris C, Moss M, Hough CL. Mobile Mindfulness Intervention for Psychological Distress Among Intensive Care Unit Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Jul 1;184(7):749-759. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0823.

    PubMed 38805199
  • Cox CE, Hough CL, Jones DM, Ungar A, Reagan W, Key MD, Gremore T, Olsen MK, Sanders L, Greeson JM, Porter LS. Effects of mindfulness training programmes delivered by a self-directed mobile app and by telephone compared with an education programme for survivors of critical illness: a pilot randomised clinical trial. Thorax. 2019 Jan;74(1):33-42. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211264. Epub 2018 May 23.

    PubMed 29793970

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lift mobile mindfulness and Enlighten Recovery education program in people with Critical Illness and Heart Failure, run by Duke University at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 20 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Kristy Johnson (9196817232, kristy.johnson@duke.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale (PHQ-9) (time frame: Baseline to 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07634419, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in