Quality of LifeCARENCT07698964
A Randomized Control Trial of Conversations Advancing Resilience and Empowerment (CARE) Intervention
A study testing Conversations Advancing Resilience and Empowerment (CARE) in people with Quality of Life and Health Promotion, run by University of Texas Rio Grande Valley at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators propose to implement and evaluate the effectiveness of the peer-led CARE Intervention designed to mitigate health differences among rural and low-income communities in Texas. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 49 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Quality of Life, Health Promotion, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Self
- What is being tested?
- Conversations Advancing Resilience and Empowerment (CARE)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Jun 2026to 31 Mar 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 49 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Females between the ages of 18-49
- Self-report at least one risk factor cardiovascular disease (e.g. high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, overweight, and family history of heart disease).
- Reside in one of the priority communities will be eligible to participate in the study.
- Meet minimum digital literacy criteria, defined as having a working and readily accessible email address and using a smart device daily for texting, calling, and checking email.
- Priority communities for the South Texas site include Harris, Hidalgo, Cameron, Willacy, Starr, and Nueces counties plus surrounding coastal communities served by South Coastal AHEC.
Who cannot join
- Those not meeting the inclusion criteria will not be eligible to participate
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
The University of Texas at Rio Grande Valley
Edinburg, Texas, 78539
Lindsey Simon, Assistant Director Regulatory Clinical Research, 9562968723, lindsey.simon@utrgv.edu
Moises Cisneros, 9562712725, Moises.cisneros01@utrgv.edu
- Recruiting
CAN DO Houston
Houston, Texas, 77025
Jasmine J Opusunju, DrPH, MSEd, 832-405-5451, jasmine.opusunju@candohouston.org
Jasmine J Opusunju, DrPH, MSEd
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Control Trial of Conversations Advancing Resilience and Empowerment (CARE): A Peer-Led Intervention to Improve Health Among Communities in Texas
The investigators propose to implement and evaluate the effectiveness of the peer-led CARE Intervention designed to mitigate health differences among rural and low-income communities in Texas. This intervention leverages the expertise of Community Health Workers (CHWs) to empower rural and low-income communities, improving health outcomes through outreach, education, counseling, and social support.
Read the detailed description
The investigators will employ a randomized controlled trial through which individual participants will be randomized to either the intervention or control group. Randomization will be achieved by employing a computer program containing a random number generator (e.g., R). Given the study will be conducted at two sites (Rio Grande Valley and Harris County), randomization and subsequent clinical trials will be conducted independently at each site for feasibility and practicability. Participants in the control group will receive no intervention, but will be invited to receive health education sessions after the follow-up period has ended at 6-months post intervention.
Trained interventionists (e.g., CHWs) will deliver the intervention across four in-person visits and provide verbal reinforcement using implementation scripts, evidence-based skills (e.g., motivational interviewing, protocol-based counseling, health education) to leverage opportunities during conversations with participants to address flawed information and provide accurate information about quality of life-wellness-mental health (Session #1), blood pressure (Session #2), nutrition (Session #3), and physical activity (Session #4). Interventionists will utilize their CARE facilitators guide with embedded scripts to address inaccurate information on quality of life-wellness-mental health, blood pressure, nutrition, and physical activity and gently challenge/provide accurate information and sources.
Throughout the study period, the participants will complete the CARE + CS4 survey online via a Qualtrics or REDcap link for both study arms at 4 (four) timepoints: baseline, post-intervention, 3 months after intervention, and 6 months after intervention. The CARE + CS4 survey is a153 item questionnaire that will evaluate Health-related Quality of Life; Flawed information, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs; Health Behavior (Measuring and monitoring blood pressure), physical activity, nutrition, sleep); Physical and Mental Wellbeing; Social Needs, and Healthcare Utilization among participants.
- Being tested
- Conversations Advancing Resilience and Empowerment (CARE)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conversations Advancing Resilience and Empowerment (CARE)Behavioural
Health promotion intervention to address chronic disease risk
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CARE Intervention Arm | Experimental | Participants will have up to 60 minute scripted health conversations with a Community Health Worker (CHW) across four visits to leverage opportunities during conversations to address flawed information and provide accurate information about quality of life, wellness, and mental health (Session #1); blood pressure (Session #2); nutrition (Session #3); and physical activity (Session #4). Receives: Behavioral: Conversations Advancing Resilience and Empowerment (CARE) |
| CARE Control Arm | No intervention | Participants in the control group will receive no intervention, but will be invited to participate in the intervention (health education sessions) after the 6-month follow-up period has been completed. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Health-related Quality of Life
The health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is measured by a decrease in the number of total unhealthy days compared to the control group at baseline, end of intervention at 4-weeks, and the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. The assessment used to measure this outcome is the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life-Scale Brief version (WHOQOL-BREF). The items from this assessment are scored using a likert scale of 1-5, 1 being the worst and 5 being the best. The raw score is calculated for each facet and each domain. Both facets and domains are scored through a simple summation of each item in that scale. Each question contributes equally to the facet score and each facet contributes equally to the domain score. Since each facet has four items with response values of 1 through 5, the raw score for any facet must have a minimum value of 4 and a maximum value of 20. Community narratives can be powerful tools that increase health narratives and promote behavior change.
Measured: From Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention.
Secondary outcomes (9)
Flawed information on nutrition, physical activity, blood pressure, and mental health
Flawed information measures the increase in self-efficacy in evaluating health information (flawed information) and to prevent and/or manage chronic conditions, health promotion knowledge, intention to change behavior. Trust in health information sources is measured using 11 investigator-developed items assessing trust in healthcare providers, media, government agencies, community health workers, and community organizations. Responses are rated from 1 (Not at all) to 4 (A great deal), with a Does Not Apply option treated as missing. Item scores are averaged across rated items; higher scores indicate greater trust. Flawed nutrition, physical activity, blood pressure, and mental health information are measured using two likert-scale items rated from 1 (Strongly agree) to 5 (Strongly disagree). Items are reverse coded as needed so higher scores indicate lower endorsement of nutrition flawed information.
Measured: From Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention.
Health knowledge on nutrition, physical activity, blood pressure, and mental health
Nutrition knowledge is measured using investigator-developed multiple-choice items based on the USDA Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Correct responses receive one point; incorrect and "Don't know" responses receive zero points. Scores are summed, with higher scores indicating greater nutrition knowledge. Physical activity knowledge is measured using investigator-developed true/false and multiple-choice items informed by the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Blood pressure knowledge is assessed using investigator-developed true/false and multiple-choice items based on American Heart Association recommendations. Correct responses receive one point; higher summed scores indicate greater knowledge. Knowledge of the relationship between sleep and mental health is measured using five investigator-developed true/false items informed by the CDC and Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. Higher summed scores indicate greater sleep-related knowledge.
Measured: From Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention
Attitudes and beliefs on nutrition, physical activity, blood pressure, and sleep
Nutrition, physical activity, blood pressure, and sleep attitudes and beliefs are measured using six different Theory of Planned Behavior-based (TPB) items rated 1-5 for each measure. Composite scale scores are created after reverse-coding any negatively worded items. Higher scores indicate more favorable attitudes and beliefs for each measure.
Measured: From Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention.
Health Behavior
This survey variable is an adoption of preventative health behaviors. Smoking behavior is measured by current smoking status and average cigarettes smoked per day. Lower smoking frequency indicates healthier behavior. Nutrition behavior is measured by self-reported frequency of fruit, vegetable, sugar-sweetened beverage intake and stage of change. Higher healthy food intake and advanced stage indicate healthier behavior. Physical activity behavior is measured by activity frequency, minutes/week and stage of change. Higher activity and maintenance stage indicate healthier behavior. Blood pressure behavior is measured by stage of change and confidence checking blood pressure at home. Higher scores indicate greater engagement. Sleep behavior is measured by using a stage-of-change item for obtaining 7-9 hours of sleep. Higher stage indicates healthier sleep behavior.
Measured: Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention
Physical and Mental Wellbeing
The outcome will be measured by a decrease in the number of total unhealthy days compared to the control group at baseline, end of intervention at 4-weeks, and the 3- and 6-month follow-ups.
Measured: Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention
Social Needs
Social needs are measured by the number of essential social needs for food insecurity, increase in social support, increase in awareness of resources; using the USDA 2-item Food Insecurity Screener. Responses range from 'Often true' to 'Never true'. Higher affirmative responses indicate greater food insecurity.
Measured: Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention
Health Status (Blood pressure)
Blood pressure outcomes are assessed by changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, based on the average of two measurements obtained from the left arm using an electronic blood pressure monitor, with readings collected at least 60 seconds apart. Blood pressure is measured four times per week by the Community Health Worker (CHW) during the intervention period and is self-reported monthly for six months following the intervention.
Measured: Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention
Healthcare Utilization
Measured by our health assessment (CARE + CS4) using investigator-developed items assessing healthcare access, insurance, transportation, neighborhood environment, housing, employment and related factors. Variables are analyzed individually or grouped by domain as appropriate. All assessments are completed at baseline, end of intervention at 4-weeks, and the 3- and 6-month follow-up.
Measured: Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention
Community Health Workers (CHW) Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, Skill Development, Beliefs
Measures changes in Community Health Worker (CHW) knowledge, self-efficacy, skills, and beliefs related to implementation and delivery of the CARE intervention.
Measured: Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jul 2026
- Study start2 Jun 2026
- Primary completion31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Quality of LifeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), CAN DO Houston
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Candace Robledo, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
- Investigators
- Candace A Robledo, PhD, MPH, Principal investigator, The University of Texas at Rio Grande ValleyJasmine J Opusunju, DrPH, MSEd, Principal investigator, CAN DO Houston
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07698964
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB 26-0075
- Acronym
- CARE
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 13 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data (IPD) collected throughout the study and used in the primary and secondary analyses will be shared in de-identified form to protect participant confidentiality. The shared dataset will include variables necessary to reproduce the analyses and validate the study findings. The supporting documentation that will be provided includes, our Study Protocol, the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR), and analytic code used to generate the results. Data will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request and review, in accordance with institutional policies, data use agreements, and applicable privacy and regulatory requirements.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Control Trial of Conversations Advancing Resilience and Empowerment (CARE): A Peer-Led Intervention to Improve Health Among Communities in Texas
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07698964
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CARE / IRB 26-0075
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), CAN DO Houston
- Study start
- 2 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators propose to implement and evaluate the effectiveness of the peer-led CARE Intervention designed to mitigate health differences among rural and low-income communities in Texas. This intervention leverages the expertise of Community Health Workers (CHWs) to empower rural and low-income communities, improving health outcomes through outreach, education, counseling, and social support.
Detailed description
The investigators will employ a randomized controlled trial through which individual participants will be randomized to either the intervention or control group. Randomization will be achieved by employing a computer program containing a random number generator (e.g., R). Given the study will be conducted at two sites (Rio Grande Valley and Harris County), randomization and subsequent clinical trials will be conducted independently at each site for feasibility and practicability. Participants in the control group will receive no intervention, but will be invited to receive health education sessions after the follow-up period has ended at 6-months post intervention.
Trained interventionists (e.g., CHWs) will deliver the intervention across four in-person visits and provide verbal reinforcement using implementation scripts, evidence-based skills (e.g., motivational interviewing, protocol-based counseling, health education) to leverage opportunities during conversations with participants to address flawed information and provide accurate information about quality of life-wellness-mental health (Session #1), blood pressure (Session #2), nutrition (Session #3), and physical activity (Session #4). Interventionists will utilize their CARE facilitators guide with embedded scripts to address inaccurate information on quality of life-wellness-mental health, blood pressure, nutrition, and physical activity and gently challenge/provide accurate information and sources.
Throughout the study period, the participants will complete the CARE + CS4 survey online via a Qualtrics or REDcap link for both study arms at 4 (four) timepoints: baseline, post-intervention, 3 months after intervention, and 6 months after intervention. The CARE + CS4 survey is a153 item questionnaire that will evaluate Health-related Quality of Life; Flawed information, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs; Health Behavior (Measuring and monitoring blood pressure), physical activity, nutrition, sleep); Physical and Mental Wellbeing; Social Needs, and Healthcare Utilization among participants.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CARE Intervention Arm | Experimental | Behavioral: Conversations Advancing Resilience and Empowerment (CARE)Participants will have up to 60 minute scripted health conversations with a Community Health Worker (CHW) across four visits to leverage opportunities during conversations to address flawed information and provide accurate information about quality of life, wellness, and mental health (Session #1); blood pressure (Session #2); nutrition (Session #3); and physical activity (Session #4). |
| CARE Control Arm | No intervention | –Participants in the control group will receive no intervention, but will be invited to participate in the intervention (health education sessions) after the 6-month follow-up period has been completed. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 49 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Females between the ages of 18-49
- Self-report at least one risk factor cardiovascular disease (e.g. high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, overweight, and family history of heart disease).
- Reside in one of the priority communities will be eligible to participate in the study.
- Meet minimum digital literacy criteria, defined as having a working and readily accessible email address and using a smart device daily for texting, calling, and checking email.
- Priority communities for the South Texas site include Harris, Hidalgo, Cameron, Willacy, Starr, and Nueces counties plus surrounding coastal communities served by South Coastal AHEC.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Those not meeting the inclusion criteria will not be eligible to participate
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conversations Advancing Resilience and Empowerment (CARE)Health promotion intervention to address chronic disease risk | Behavioural | CARE Intervention Arm |
Primary outcome
Health-related Quality of Life
Time frame: From Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention.
The health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is measured by a decrease in the number of total unhealthy days compared to the control group at baseline, end of intervention at 4-weeks, and the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. The assessment used to measure this outcome is the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life-Scale Brief version (WHOQOL-BREF). The items from this assessment are scored using a likert scale of 1-5, 1 being the worst and 5 being the best. The raw score is calculated for each facet and each domain. Both facets and domains are scored through a simple summation of each item in that scale. Each question contributes equally to the facet score and each facet contributes equally to the domain score. Since each facet has four items with response values of 1 through 5, the raw score for any facet must have a minimum value of 4 and a maximum value of 20. Community narratives can be powerful tools that increase health narratives and promote behavior change.
9 secondary outcomes
Flawed information on nutrition, physical activity, blood pressure, and mental health
Time frame: From Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention.
Health knowledge on nutrition, physical activity, blood pressure, and mental health
Time frame: From Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention
Attitudes and beliefs on nutrition, physical activity, blood pressure, and sleep
Time frame: From Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention.
Health Behavior
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention
Physical and Mental Wellbeing
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention
Social Needs
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention
Health Status (Blood pressure)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention
Healthcare Utilization
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention
Community Health Workers (CHW) Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, Skill Development, Beliefs
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jul 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data (IPD) collected throughout the study and used in the primary and secondary analyses will be shared in de-identified form to protect participant confidentiality. The shared dataset will include variables necessary to reproduce the analyses and validate the study findings. The supporting documentation that will be provided includes, our Study Protocol, the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR), and analytic code used to generate the results. Data will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request and review, in accordance with institutional policies, data use agreements, and applicable privacy and regulatory requirements.
Related trials for Quality of Life
RecruitingObservational study
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Prospective Trial for Obesity (EGO-Trial)
Obesity
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
Study of a Support Program for Quality of Life in Chinese Cancer Patients and Survivors
Cancer, Survivorship
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Functional Impact of Psychological Symptoms in Patients With Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome (SSCD): a National Cross-sectional Study
Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Alberta Cancer Exercise Dose in Colorectal Cancer
Cancer, Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Candace A Robledo, PhD, MPH principal investigator
The University of Texas at Rio Grande Valley
Jasmine J Opusunju, DrPH, MSEd principal investigator
CAN DO Houston
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Conversations Advancing Resilience and Empowerment (CARE) in people with Quality of Life and Health Promotion, run by University of Texas Rio Grande Valley at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Candace A Dr. Robledo, PhD, MPH (9562961615, Candace.robledo@utrgv.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Health-related Quality of Life (time frame: From Baseline, end of intervention (following completion of Health Education Session #4; the intervention was designed to last 4 weeks but may be extended due to scheduling considerations), 3 months post-intervention, 6 months post-intervention.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2026.