Nursing EducationNCT07825077
Effects of AI Dialogue-Based Scenario Simulation on Students' Flow and Learning Performance
A study testing Gamified Feedback and Conventional Formative Feedback in people with Nursing Education, run by Chang Gung University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
This study examines the effects of an AI dialogue-based scenario simulation integrated with concept mapping and post-dialogue feedback on nursing students' learning. Nursing students will participate in pediatric care scenarios using standardized AI-supported dialogues. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nursing Education
- What is being tested?
- Gamified Feedback and Conventional Formative Feedback
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 91 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 21 Sep 2026to 5 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the designated nursing course during the study period.
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Willing to participate and providing informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Students who decline or do not provide informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Taiwan1 site
Chang Gung University of Science and Technology
Taoyuan, Taoyuan City, 333324
About this study
Official title: The Effects of Scenario Simulation Via AI Dialogue Integrated With Concept Mapping and Gamified Feedback on Students' Flow and Learning Performance: The Roles of Collaborative Processes and Interaction Mechanisms
This study examines the effects of an AI dialogue-based scenario simulation integrated with concept mapping and post-dialogue feedback on nursing students' learning. Nursing students will participate in pediatric care scenarios using standardized AI-supported dialogues. Two feedback approaches will be compared: gamified feedback and conventional formative feedback without gamification elements. The study will examine students' flow experience and learning performance and explore how collaborative processes and interaction mechanisms may contribute to these outcomes. The findings are expected to provide evidence on how different feedback approaches influence students' engagement and learning during AI-supported scenario simulation.
- Conditions
- Nursing Education
- Being tested
- Gamified Feedback, Conventional Formative Feedback
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Gamified FeedbackBehavioural
Gamified feedback is delivered following the AI dialogue-based scenario simulation and includes game-related elements such as points, levels, progress indicators, and mission-based features.
Conventional Formative FeedbackBehavioural
Conventional formative feedback is delivered following the same AI dialogue-based scenario simulation without gamification elements.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Gamified Feedback Group | Experimental | Participants receive a concept-mapping-integrated AI dialogue-based scenario simulation followed by gamified feedback. The feedback includes gamification elements such as points, levels, progress indicators, and mission-based features. Receives: Behavioral: Gamified Feedback |
| Conventional Formative Feedback Group | Active comparator | Participants receive the same concept-mapping-integrated AI dialogue-based scenario simulation followed by conventional formative feedback without gamification elements. Receives: Behavioral: Conventional Formative Feedback |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Flow Experience
Flow experience will be assessed using the 8-item Flow Experience Questionnaire developed by Pearce et al. (2005). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate a greater level of flow experience. Descriptive statistics will be used to examine the distribution and change in flow scores, missing data, and internal consistency.
Measured: Baseline (before the intervention) and immediately after completion of the intervention (approximately Week 18).
Academic Learning Performance
Academic learning performance will be assessed using students' course midterm and final examination scores. Higher scores indicate better academic performance.
Measured: At approximately Week 9 (midterm examination) and Week 18 (final examination) of the academic semester.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Intrinsic Motivation
Intrinsic motivation will be assessed using a 25-item version of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), based on the IMI framework of McAuley et al. (1989) and the version adapted by Yin et al. (2021). Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The instrument assesses five dimensions: interest/enjoyment, pressure/tension, perceived choice, perceived competence, and perceived value. Reverse-coded items will be recoded before analysis, and each subscale score will be calculated as the mean of its constituent items.
Measured: Baseline (before the intervention) and immediately after completion of the intervention (approximately Week 18).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Sep 2026
- Study start21 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion5 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion5 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Nursing EducationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 91 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung University of Science and Technology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07825077
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB-26-058-B1
- Other IDs
- NSTC 115-2410-H-255-014
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 21 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effects of Scenario Simulation Via AI Dialogue Integrated With Concept Mapping and Gamified Feedback on Students' Flow and Learning Performance: The Roles of Collaborative Processes and Interaction Mechanisms
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07825077
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB-26-058-B1
- Conditions
- Nursing Education
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 91 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung University of Science and TechnologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 5 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 5 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study examines the effects of an AI dialogue-based scenario simulation integrated with concept mapping and post-dialogue feedback on nursing students' learning. Nursing students will participate in pediatric care scenarios using standardized AI-supported dialogues. Two feedback approaches will be compared: gamified feedback and conventional formative feedback without gamification elements. The study will examine students' flow experience and learning performance and explore how collaborative processes and interaction mechanisms may contribute to these outcomes. The findings are expected to provide evidence on how different feedback approaches influence students' engagement and learning during AI-supported scenario simulation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Gamified Feedback Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Gamified FeedbackParticipants receive a concept-mapping-integrated AI dialogue-based scenario simulation followed by gamified feedback. The feedback includes gamification elements such as points, levels, progress indicators, and mission-based features. |
| Conventional Formative Feedback Group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Conventional Formative FeedbackParticipants receive the same concept-mapping-integrated AI dialogue-based scenario simulation followed by conventional formative feedback without gamification elements. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the designated nursing course during the study period.
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Willing to participate and providing informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Students who decline or do not provide informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gamified FeedbackGamified feedback is delivered following the AI dialogue-based scenario simulation and includes game-related elements such as points, levels, progress indicators, and mission-based features. | Behavioural | Gamified Feedback Group |
| Conventional Formative FeedbackConventional formative feedback is delivered following the same AI dialogue-based scenario simulation without gamification elements. | Behavioural | Conventional Formative Feedback Group |
Primary outcome
Flow Experience
Time frame: Baseline (before the intervention) and immediately after completion of the intervention (approximately Week 18).
Flow experience will be assessed using the 8-item Flow Experience Questionnaire developed by Pearce et al. (2005). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores indicate a greater level of flow experience. Descriptive statistics will be used to examine the distribution and change in flow scores, missing data, and internal consistency.
Academic Learning Performance
Time frame: At approximately Week 9 (midterm examination) and Week 18 (final examination) of the academic semester.
Academic learning performance will be assessed using students' course midterm and final examination scores. Higher scores indicate better academic performance.
1 secondary outcome
Intrinsic Motivation
Time frame: Baseline (before the intervention) and immediately after completion of the intervention (approximately Week 18).
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Nursing Education
Recruiting
Environmental Sustainability-Focused Service-Learning for Nursing Students
Sustainable Consumption Behavior, Sustainability Attitudes
Recruiting
The Effect of Web-Based Simulation and Flipped Learning on Blood Pressure Education
Education, Education Nursing
Not yet recruiting
Artificial Intelligence Powered Digital Education Based on the Neuman Systems Model for Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Radiotherap
Breast Cancer, Radiodermatitis
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Health Belief Model-Based HPV Infection and Vaccination Education on University Students' Knowledge and Health Beliefs
Health Belief Model, Nursing Students
Recruiting
Effect of Solution-Focused Approach Education on Breastfeeding Avoidance and Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy in Primiparous Mothers
Breastfeeding Avoidance and Breastfeeding Self-efficacy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Gamified Feedback and Conventional Formative Feedback in people with Nursing Education, run by Chang Gung University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Bao Huan Yang, PhD (+88632118999 ext 3401, bhyang@mail.cgust.edu.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Flow Experience (time frame: Baseline (before the intervention) and immediately after completion of the intervention (approximately Week 18).). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2026.