Clinical trials: Filtering Surgery
Covid19, Personal Protective Equipment
Clinical Trial on the Efficacy of Different Masks With and Without a Peripheral Sealing Device, Against Covid-19
A significant number of professionals subjected to high-risk situations have been infected by Covid-19, due to the lack of adequate respiratory protection equipment or poor marginal sealing adjustments.
- Trial name
- NCT05079308
- Testing
- Peripheral sealing device for surgical mask or filtering face piece, IIR Surgical mask with Filtering face piece
- Where
- Spain
- Volunteers
- 210 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- University of the Balearic Islands
Covid19
Clinical Efficiency of Surgical Masks and Filtering Face-piece 2 Masks
Recent results demonstrated an increased risk of COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers (HCW), particularly when access to personal protective equipment (PPE) was inadequate. (ref).
- Trial name
- NCT04823351
- Testing
- Surgical Mask
- Where
- Switzerland
- Volunteers
- 1,200 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- University of Zurich
Surgical Procedure, Unspecified
Reducing the Negative Effects of Surgical Conditions Use of Double Layer Mask Against Electrocautery With Smoke Filter
This study was conducted to determine and compare the effectiveness of the smoke filtering electrocautery device used to reduce the negative effects of surgical smoke and the use of a double layer mask.
- Trial name
- NCT06550492
- Testing
- smoke filtering electrocautery device, double mask
- Where
- Turkey (Türkiye)
- Volunteers
- 108 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- Ataturk University
Glaucoma
Effectiveness of a Procedure for Previously Failed Glaucoma Surgery
Transconjunctival mitomycin-C in needle bleb revision may be an effective procedure to treat cases with a previously failed trabeculectomy. We will investigate approximately 100 consecutive cases with follow up of up to 9 years.
- Trial name
- NCT00347789
- Testing
- Glaucoma surgery- Bleb revision
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 100 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- Glaucoma Research & Education Group
Glaucoma
Baerveldt Versus Paul Study
The Baerveldt Versus Paul (BvP) Study is a Registry-based Randomised Controlled Trial, Comparing the Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant (BGI) and the Paul Glaucoma Implant (PGI).
- Trial name
- BvP (NCT07733453)
- Testing
- Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant, Paul Glaucoma Implant
- Where
- 4 sites in Australia
- Volunteers
- 150 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- University of Sydney